Those who will trade their new "token" CLM might be considered as they were accepted agreement with Cryptopia and their refund offer valuated in NZD.

Be careful about the possible consequences of using(trading) their "token" CLM.

43% loss on LTC amount, and around 40-50% loss at LTC price growth ... did you calculate the total LTC loss? Did you compare your calculation with the 'token" CLM offer value?

I didn't have NZD, and I also want coins and tokens I bought.

Nothing is clear, especially what will the court decide.

Compare the court decisions in MtGox (Japan), and Cryptsy (Belize, USA) as the most characteristic and different cases. At MtGox case the court decided very good, clients will get the most of the found, recovered Bitcoins, and in Cryptsy case the court decided to sell very big majority of the coins (smaller altcoins) to the only 3 persons for few thousands USD only to each of that buyers, as I have read.

Is that risk acceptable to you?

How much percent of your invested money do you plan to get in the case similar to the second one? Did you calculate that?

From Cryptopia twitter,  Feb 14 2019:

"Update: The police have now given us access back to our building, while they continue their investigations. Our staff are working relentlessly to evaluate the funds that were stolen."

They are doing evaluation. For me that is measuring, calculating USD values of stolen coins.

USD value of stolen coins at this 1 year bear market is minimal. No matter how much we paid for our coins, that current value of stolen coin at the 1 year bear market is minimal or close to it.

That could mean, Cryptopia's obligations to us, to their clients, measured in USD in such bear market is very likely quite minimal.

If we can't get our coins or funds (remaining) that could mean: our losses or missed opportunities could very likely become maximized in this bear market, and Cryptopia's obligations to us could very likely become minimized.

In the eventual court proceedings we have to ask for preventing the clearance sale of our funds.

Lynx Team is testing new Lynx HPoW (Lynx Hybrid Proof of Work) mining algorithm which could remove your/our doubts. You can read new reddit topic about that, and discuss about your question:

https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoTechnology/comments/92dafb/lynx_hybrid_proof_of_work_for_consideration/

Tweet from the lead dev from the Lynx Team:  

Check out our Lynx YouTube channel for #LynxCI video tutorials. The videos are for both crypto newbies & nerds.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkoMBxbJQGUByNE3KKh9yxg/videos

There are 10 lynx video tutorials atm.

The topic is older, but at my computer very similar if not the same error appeared at one of the coins.

It helped me to enter winsock reset command ftom the windows command prompt:

        netsh winsock reset

Detailed info: https://www.geeksinphoenix.com/blog/post/2015/06/16/how-to-reset-your-network-adapter-in-windows-10.aspx

Nothing? I see devs are working continuously. Check it on github.

This pool would like to support Lynx coins projects. Add them to the list on the first page:

http://pool.luckyaltcoin.com/

At the official homepage of Lynx Ben, who is the development leader of this rebranded coin, wrote: " It’s also our way of paying homage to the text-only web browser (Lynx) we used back in college in 1994."

It means, Lynx browser is one of the first internet browsers (1992), and is still in development!!!

Btw, zoologists consider lynx as the biggest cat who can meow.

So, this coins will continue where its predecessor stopped.

I don't agree with PoS variants cause I don't know any good imaplementation of PoS which could work fast while syncing after 1-2 millions of blocks, i.e. 1-2 years in the case of Lynx blocktime 30s.

I like idea of PoS very much if PoS is very low, but current implementations of PoS are very bad for longer term coins.

Possible implementation of the merged mining is good idea.

This I already wrote so you can comment:

---

"Lynx coins works very fast when you need syncing or resyncing. All my PoS coins are very slow at that jobs, totally uncomparable with the speed of Lynx. I think only one PoS coin which should consider is Peercoin which does not have problems with syncing speed. Novacoin or Blackcoin clones are very bad when coins is more than 1 or 2 year old, by my experience."


"I will test syncing all of this coins, maybe I will change my view: https://coinsutra.com/proof-of-stake-cryptocurrencies/ "


"First I tested PIVX coin. Syncing of the whole blockchain  lasted more than 4.5 h. Coin is old about 2 years.  Problem which will became extremely big (just like with the vast majority of PoS coins) is exponential growth of time needed to synchronize the blockchain. It means, first year was synchronized at 1 h,  but second year required almost 4 h to finish sinchronization. I think at the next years this coin will become just like the most of the other PoS coins where you have to wait big time, few hours or evan more time  to synchronize for example 1 last week or 1 last month of the newest blockchain data.
Also, PIVX has block time 60s, and Lynx has block time 30s. In the case of the introducing PoS and the same/similar way of the calculating PoS, Lynx could have big problem with the blockchain syncing after 1 or 2 years after the possible  PoS forking time which will escalate further with the time and the acceptance.
At the current state, Lynx syncing time is very fast. Similar coins which is reviving last months is Argentum which became similar to DigiByte (I think). Argentum's syncing is also very fast, a bit faster than Lynx cause of  block time 45s. In the recent forks, Argentum introduced  4 new algos: Lyra2re2 (GPU)
Myr-Groestl (GPU/ASIC)
Argon2d (CPU)
Yescrypt (CPU/GPU)   as addition to scrypt and sha256d. I think while mining each algo is used to mine one coin block after previous one which is mined by previous algo  from the algo serie.
Maybe this DigiByte/Argentum  multi-algo coin way  is better than introducing PoS. What do you think?"



"PoS implementations is very bad on every coins i tried, except (MAYBE) in Peercoin which has bigger block time than Lynx for example. Such coins are not suitable for regular and longer term use. For those coins with short blocktime like Lynx has, problems with the long time syncing startss even at its 1st year and despite its no wide acceptance. If this coin is short term game, then everything mentioned is not important."


Additional: PIVX is 2 years old coin, and now it has only 1 million blocks, and at this moment its PoS and masternodes implementation seems better than implementation at Novacoin or Blackcoin clones. But exponential growth of the syncing time is easy to notice by measuring synced blocks and passed time. At the current time and state this implementation is quite good.

---

I have more than 10 PoS coins, and all of them are very bad, very slow while resyncing after 1-2 millions of blocks. I think all of them are based on Novacoin or Blackcoin, and all of them have bad implementation while syncing (very slow, it depends on the current number of blocks in the blockchain) including Novacoin and Blackcoin.

Current implementation of Lynx is very fast, Lynx is one of the fastest coins while syncing or resyncing and I like that very much. By known PoS implementation it will be heavy ruined after quite short time, I think and would not like to check it.

Which coin have the best PoS implementation and don't have slow syncing or resyncing which getting worse exponentially by the time? (coin should be old more than 2 years, and coin should have more than 2 millions of  "PoS-ing blocks")

SatoshiLite had good vision.

We have full confidence in all our leaders.

No wonders already not seen.

Cause we like our leaders so so much!

We want to give all our money to them. This is the least thing we could do for our leaders.

We follow all our leaders, we follow and listen every their words, all their thoughts, all their works.

Our minds are perfectly influenced and subordinated.

In few words, we adore our leaders.

Such analysis you could write for every coins including bitcoin and all its forks, clones, modifications.

Such analysis you can write and read on the biggest news and magazines.

Such pump and dump tradings are everywhere on every coin with no exceptions at all. Last one of the biggest cases is the extremely high class quick pump and dump of so-called bitcoin cash last days.


So, the basic questions for you are:

Do you recommend selling at the current price?

Do you plan to rebuy this coin again at this current prices?

We can't fix that cause first attack/injections of 1st billion coins happened 2016-12-16. at the block 1239257.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/meow/block.dws?0d9ffa8f3c57b550028b127b6e2d4efed02e4c666c3994d041f14890226513db.htm

Check blocks:

1239257
1239258
1239259
1239260
1239261

Many people traded from that time.

Only solution now is to prevent future attacks. Now it exists block explorer and we can control every possible attacks and cancel all future attack transactions.

Also, in the source code it should be added new checkpoints regularly.

Think about changing from the scrypt to the x11 with masternodes.

Instead of thinking about Ethereum maybe it is better idea to consider x11 masternodes to make coins more secure.

Problem with Ethereum will be too big blockchain very soon. Some predictions wrote about 1TB Ethereum blockchain size till the end of this year.

Also, it is good idea to insert in source code new checkpoints regularly.

Is that important?

At the very most of the coins many things are smaller or not so big modifications only.

Who should be dev?

To prevent any further attack we all could agree to return to the previous state before potential new attack. Now we have block explorer, we have new number of coins 77,322  M, and that is possible. Before new buying every buyer can check if it happened new attack and he should do it.



I don't know. I asked the same questions for the newer code of bitcoin or litecoin. For dash too. Nobody answered if that is possible.

It seems we can learn how coin pump worked.

Now we can learn how forcing to dump works too.

I agree.

Are the newer versions of bitcoin or litecoin immune to the such kind of attack?

Is dash immune to this kind of attack?

I made 64-bit Windows wallets from the official source code. You can include them in your website. Quote from 2 pages before:


Nobody mentioned qt 5.9.0 ?