 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4]
|
Thanks - is NeoScrypt just something that will always work better on AMD due to inherent differences in the GPUs, or is it simply because no one has built an optimised miner for NVIDIA cards yet?
It works well on many NVIDIA GPUs. what miner (win x64) is recommended ATM for nVidia (GTX 1060) ? |
|
|
|
What is desired hashrate for GTX 1060 ? Tried sgminer5-grs 5.1.1 and got 518 kH/s (0.518 Mh/s) ? With OC +150 Clock / +800 Mem. ScreenshotWhattomine by default for 1 GTX 1060 suggest 20.5 Mh/s for Groestl ... Am I wrong with my 518 kH/s ? |
|
|
|
It's bad idea because remote manager won't know that new port is used. Just set "-mport 0" if you don't use remote manager. Hm. Look's you are right - changing randomly port will not say anything to remote side (remote manager)... "-mport 0" looks like best option for now.. Will try to check how often error with temperature and then with locked port 3333 will appear. for Nvidia, do we still need to use the old 372.54 drivers or the latest 384.76?
+1 for question - what version of drivers best at the moment (for mining) ? Miner app at start says "Driver 368.81 is recommended for best performance and compatibility". Actual driver version is 384.76 |
|
|
|
I think when application that terminates abruptly like in this case the ports that get opened have nothing to tell them to close and make them available again so when the application starts up again and tries to open the port it's already open but not connected to the currently running process.
Zombies...
It's a problem.... Cause any application can get terminated ... And bat to restart is useless.... It should restart PC at all... Maybe Claymore can add option --selectnextfreeport - if select or default mport is locked - try to use next free port to avoid such problem... |
|
|
|
error: 10048 (port for remote management is busy, use different -mport value) Have you started more than one miner on the same rig?
I use only one instance of Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v9.7 (only one EthDcrMiner64.exe process in TaskList) ... Maybe first (initial instance ) hangs up and another instance try to starts I use bat file @echo off
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
:restart
"d:\Mining\ETH\Claymore's Dual GPU Miner v9.7\EthDcrMiner64.exe" -epool eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008 -ewal 0x.worker -epsw x
Timeout /t 10
goto :restart
pause
Seems like EthDcrMiner64.exe got an error "NVML: cannot get current temperature, error 999 (an internal driver error occurred)" and was terminated but not correctly and stayed in memory or just locked port. And bat file tried to restart it could not bind port (mport) ... |
|
|
|
Hi @all! What does it means ? Miner starts, works OK for over 4 hours and then error witout any recover... ╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.7 ║
╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
ETH: 1 pool is specified
Main Ethereum pool is eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008
DCR: 0 pool is specified
AMD OpenCL platform not found
Driver 368.81 is recommended for best performance and compatibility
Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests
Press "s" for current statistics, "0".."9" to turn on/off cards, "r" to reload pools, "e" or "d" to select current
pool
CUDA initializing...
NVIDIA Cards available: 1
CUDA Driver Version/Runtime Version: 9.0/8.0
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6144 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1
Total cards: 1
ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com' <83.222.114.66> port 8008
ETH: Stratum - Connected (eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008)
ETH: Authorized
No pool specified for Decred! Ethereum-only mining mode is enabled
ETHEREUM-ONLY MINING MODE ENABLED (-mode 1)
ETH: eth-proxy stratum mode
Watchdog enabled
Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 3333
Setting DAG epoch #133...
Setting DAG epoch #133 for GPU0
Create GPU buffer for GPU0
ETH: 07/10/17-08:24:41 - New job from eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008
ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s
GPU0 DAG creation time - 7077 ms
Setting DAG epoch #133 for GPU0 done
ETH: 07/10/17-08:24:53 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ETH: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=61C fan=36%
ETH: 07/10/17-08:25:19 - New job from eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008
ETH - Total Speed: 24.811 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 24.811 Mh/s
GPU0 t=65C fan=38%
...
ETH: 07/10/17-11:32:06 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ETH: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ETH: 07/10/17-11:32:17 - New job from eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008
ETH - Total Speed: 24.905 Mh/s, Total Shares: 129, Rejected: 0, Time: 03:07
ETH: GPU0 24.905 Mh/s
ETH: 07/10/17-11:32:19 - New job from eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008
ETH - Total Speed: 24.855 Mh/s, Total Shares: 129, Rejected: 0, Time: 03:07
ETH: GPU0 24.855 Mh/s
GPU0 t=68C fan=44%
GPU0 t=68C fan=44%
ETH: 07/10/17-11:32:56 - New job from eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008
ETH - Total Speed: 24.893 Mh/s, Total Shares: 129, Rejected: 0, Time: 03:08
ETH: GPU0 24.893 Mh/s
GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1
GPU 0 failed
GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k1 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1
GPU 0 failed
ETH: 07/10/17-11:33:11 - New job from eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008
ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 129, Rejected: 0, Time: 03:08
ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s
NVML: cannot get current temperature, error 999 (an internal driver error occurred)
NVML: cannot get current temperature, error 999 (an internal driver error occurred)
ETH: 07/10/17-11:33:19 - New job from eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008
ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 129, Rejected: 0, Time: 03:08
ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s
NVML: cannot get current temperature, error 999 (an internal driver error occurred)
NVML: cannot get current temperature, error 999 (an internal driver error occurred)
ETH: 07/10/17-11:33:26 - New job from eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008
ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 129, Rejected: 0, Time: 03:08
ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s
NVML: cannot get current temperature, error 999 (an internal driver error occurred)
NVML: cannot get current temperature, error 999 (an internal driver error occurred)
GPU0 t=0C fan=0%
WATCHDOG: GPU error, you need to restart miner :(
NVML: cannot get current temperature, error 999 (an internal driver error occurred)
Restarting OK, exit...
ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com' <83.222.114.66> port 8008
Setting DAG epoch #133 for GPU0u2.dwarfpool.com:8008) compatibility
Create GPU buffer for GPU0ed! Ethereum-only mining mode is enabled
ETHEREUM-ONLY MINING MODE ENABLED (-mode 1)to turn on/off cards, "r" to reload pools, "e" or "d" to select current
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.7 ║
╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
ETH: Authorizedailable: 1
ETH: 1 pool is specifiedime Version: 9.0/8.0
Main Ethereum pool is eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008 10 compute units, capability: 6.1
DCR: 0 pool is specified
AMD OpenCL platform not found
Driver 368.81 is recommended for best performance and compatibility
Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests
Press "s" for current statistics, "0".."9" to turn on/off cards, "r" to reload pools, "e" or "d" to select current
pool
CUDA initializing...
NVIDIA Cards available: 1
CUDA Driver Version/Runtime Version: 9.0/8.0
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6144 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1
Total cards: 1
GPU0 DAG creation time - 8448 ms
Setting DAG epoch #133 for GPU0 done
ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com' <83.222.114.66> port 8008
ETH: Stratum - Connected (eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008)
ETH: Authorized
No pool specified for Decred! Ethereum-only mining mode is enabled
ETHEREUM-ONLY MINING MODE ENABLED (-mode 1)
ETH: eth-proxy stratum mode
Watchdog enabled
Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 3333
Setting DAG epoch #133...
server: bind failed with error: 10048 (port for remote management is busy, use different -mport value), next attemp
t in 20sec...
Setting DAG epoch #133 for GPU0
Create GPU buffer for GPU0
GPU0 t=65C fan=39%
GPU0 DAG creation time - 10940 ms
Setting DAG epoch #133 for GPU0 done
server: bind failed with error: 10048 (port for remote management is busy, use different -mport value), next attemp
t in 20sec...
GPU0 t=65C fan=39%
ETH: 07/10/17-11:34:28 - New job from eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008
ETH: 07/10/17-11:34:28 - New job from eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008
ETH - Total Speed: 9.742 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH - Total Speed: 9.750 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 9.742 Mh/s
ETH: GPU0 9.750 Mh/s
...
server: bind failed with error: 10048 (port for remote management is busy, use different -mport value), next attemp
t in 20sec...
GPU0 t=68C fan=45%
ETH: 07/10/17-13:26:24 - New job from eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008
ETH: 07/10/17-13:26:24 - New job from eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008
ETH - Total Speed: 6.577 Mh/s, Total Shares: 34, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:52
ETH - Total Speed: 19.688 Mh/s, Total Shares: 27, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:52
Restart miner do not help... Only full PC reboot Wha does it means - server: bind failed with error: 10048 (port for remote management is busy, use different -mport value), next attemp ? I use only one instance of Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v9.7 (only one EthDcrMiner64.exe process in TaskList) ... |
|
|
|
If you have samsung memory ethminer can do 200Mhs... but ppl think Claymore is god for ETH, but he does not care for Nvidia users at all if you are stupid to mine with slower software and pay fee he will not work on optimization!
Why would he, when ppl have no brain to decide for themselfs
What is your recommendation for nVidia ? Switch to ethminer 0.11.0 with latest CUDA: performance improvement or even got to ZCash ? |
|
|
|
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.6 ║
╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
ETH: 1 pool is specified
Main Ethereum pool is eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008
DCR: 0 pool is specified
AMD OpenCL platform not found
Driver 368.81 is recommended for best performance and compatibility
Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.6 recommends nVidia driver 368.81 while I'm using 382.53). Does it means that Claymore's Dual ETH 9.6 just recommends driver that was actual on v9.6 was released ? Should I downgrade 382.53 to 368.81 ? Or maybe update to actual version is 384.76 (2017.6.29) ? |
|
|
|
Made some tests for EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.4b with single ASUS GTX 1060 6G (EX-GTX1060-O6G). Was interested in affecting core and memory clock on hashrate...  | +0 | +100 | +200 | +300 | +400 | +500 | +600 | +700 | +800 | +900 | +950 | | +0 | 290 | 292 | 292 | 294 | 294 | 295 | 294 | 296 | 294 | 295 | 293 | | +50 | 293 | 293 | 294 | 295 | 296 | 297 | 298 | 297 | 298 | 298 | 298 | | +100 | 299 | 299 | 300 | 303 | 303 | 304 | 305 | 305 | 306 | 306 | 306 | | +150 | 302 | 303 | 306 | 306 | 307 | 309 | 309 | 309 | 310 | 310 | 309 | | +200 | 307 | 309 | 311 | 313 | 314 | 315 | 317 | 317 | 317 | 317 | 317 | | +205 | err. | err. | err. | err. | err. | err. | err. | err. | err. | err. | err. |
PWR Limit 80% * err means error on start ("thread ended" or video driver crash after closing miner app - core +200 mem +950) |
|
|
|
Mining ZEC with EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner using flypool Please explain me why in EWBF log I see "Accepted share" over one thousand times and INFO 23:06:41: GPU0 Accepted share 62ms [A:1775, R:0]
INFO 23:06:42: GPU0 Accepted share 63ms [A:1776, R:0]
INFO 23:06:50: GPU0 Accepted share 62ms [A:1777, R:0]
INFO 23:07:13: GPU0 Accepted share 63ms [A:1778, R:0] But in flypool stat I see only 17 valid shares Shares: 17 (100%) Valid / 0 (0%) Invalid What does it mean [A:1778] and why only 17 in flypool stat ? |
|
|
|
А мне понравился канал одного товарища - точнее плейлист его на Youtube - Майнинг от и доКак по мне, для новичка самое оно... Все просто, ясно и в "эволюционном" порядке от NiceHash, кошельков, бирж и т.д. и до пулмайнинга и т.д. Попутно показано как собирал ферму на 4 GTX 1050 Ti, немного о разгоне и т.д. В общем все, что нужно новичку... 7 видео общей длиной 64 минуты... Ну и конечно очень желательно перед всем этим посмотреть ролик о том как собственно работает Биткойн и т.д. - Как работает Bitcoin? Все технические детали за 20 минут и как по мне новичку большего и не нужно  )) Плюс очень интересно товарищ в своем втором по счету видео в плейлисте (вывод денег) рассказал о рекомендованной комиссии, таблице приоритетов включения транзакции в блок и т.д. |
|
|
|
Если бы я имел сомнения, что пост спам, офтоп или имеет низкое значение, то даже не заикался бы.
Тут как раз проблема, что пост по теме и значимый, но был удален, похоже, что случайно.
И это никакое не разведение срача, а обычное исправление.
Если бы вам зарплату на неделю урезали на заводе, хотя вы отлично трудились? Понравилось бы?
Попробуй посмотреть в профиле свои сообщения Profile - Profile Info - Show Posts Иногда бывает, что пост переносят в другую тему / раздел. Иногда бывает удаляют чьи-то посты ранее и твой пот уезжает на предыдущую страничку и т.д. А что собственно интересовало ? |
|
|
|
Decided to try mining... Tried mining bitcoin long time ago – years ago (in time of 50btc.com and CPU mining only), but could not see profit and gave it up )) ... Now with all hysteria I decided to try once again. Got one GTX 1060 (ASUS EX-GTX1060-O6G). Samsung RAM – thay say it’s good Made with some scrap something able to start GTX 1060 (Intel Core E6600 / Gigabyte GA-73PVM-S2H / 2*2GB DDR2 / SeaSonic S12II 330 Bronze - +12@17A) Tried different settings for GTX 1060, different miners, made some overclock and choose one set for some stable and “not burn” – with MSI Afterburner it is - Power Limit - 80%, Temp Limit - 74C, Core Clock - +100 Mhz, Mem Clock - +800 Mhz. So it’s Core Clock @ 1873 Mhz and Mem @ 4608 Mhz. With such settings (PWR 80%, TMP: 74C, Core +100, Mem +800) I’m getting With ZCash - EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.4b - 303,0 Sol/s - Excavator v1.1.4a GPU Miner for NiceHash. - 297,5 Sol/s With ETH - Genoil's ethminer 0.9.41-genoil-1.1.5-nicehash-1.1.2 - 23,0 Mh/s - Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.5 (чистый ETH) - 22,4-23 Mh/s - Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.5 ETH + DCR - ETH: 21,6 Mh/s DCR: 216,0 Mh/s - Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.5 ETH + SC - ETH: ETH: 21,8 Mh/s SC: 217,9 Mh/s - Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.5 ETH + LBC - ETH: 20,8 Mh/s LBC: 19,4 Mh/s - Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.5 ETH + PASC - ETH: ETH: 20,9 Mh/s PASC: 201,9 Mh/s And now the most interesting - I can not decide in what way and how it is better to mine? Checked with https://whattomine.com hashrates 23 Mh/s for Ethash and 300 Sol/s for Equihash (electricity "free" – 0.00 $/kW) – and it says that most prifitable is to mine - EthereumClassic(ETC) Ethash for 0.00132 BTC/24h - Ethereum(ETH) Ethash for 0.00125 BTC/24h - Hush(HUSH) Equihash for 0.00125 BTC/24h - Zcash(ZEC) Equihash for 0.00119 BTC/24h Also tried Nicehash – it simple and convenient because of simple BTC wallet, oneclick miner install, start benchmark, set wallet number and go. Nicehash by turns mines ETH with Genoil's ethminer 0.9.41-genoil-1.1.5-nicehash-1.1.2 with hashrate ~23Mh/s and ZCash using Excavator v1.1.4a GPU Miner for NiceHash at 297 H/s With this results NiceHash gives profit about 0,00118 BTC/24h but directly in BTC to NiceHash wallet, without any cryptocurrency exchange. Seems like Nicehash more simple and convenient – just started and gets BTC, but there is some difference between https://whattomine.com (0.00132 BTC/24h) и Nicehash (0.00118 BTC/24h) almost 10% not in Nicehash favour. Besides that, withdrawal conditions Nicehash "unpleasant" - the withdrawal fee is currently set to 0.005 BTC or 0.5% of the withdraw amount (whichever is higher). So to withdraw something less 1 BTC from Nicehash in any case should pay 0.005 BTC (with current BTC/USD – it is 13,4 USD)... So I just can’t find which way is better – mining with Nicehash and keep all with BTC, then withdraw with one payment - choose mining pool, follow the courses / new cryptocoins with https://whattomine.com, keep altcoins and then exchange it (with Poloniex).. - If it is better to keep altcoins – which is better to keep? ETH / ZCash / EXP / HUSH - What fees in most popular pools ? What about devfee with “non NiceHash miners”? Will it not turn out that after paying the commission to the pool, the miner devfee, the commissions on the exchanges, and entire profitability from 0.00132 BTC / 24h will fall to the same 0.00118 BTC / 24h in NiceHash? So what is better – mining with NiceHash and keep BTC or mining with pool and keep altcoins ? |
|
|
|
Решил попробовать майнинг... Биткойн когда-то пробовал майнить еще на заре (когда был 50btc.com и майнилось только на CPU), но потом закинул - не видел профита )) (о лох)... Щас на фоне истерии решил попробовать. Взял с заначки GTX 1060 (ASUS EX-GTX1060-O6G). Память Samsung, что вроде как гудд. Собрал из "остатков" что-то способное запуститься с GTX 1060. Поигрался разными настройками, майнерами и т.д. Подразогнал карту и пока нашел подразогнанное стабильное и "не жаркое". В итоге нашел, что спокойно и стабильно работает на параметрах (по MSI Afterburner) - Power Limit - 80%, Temp Limit - 74C, Core Clock - +100 Mhz, Mem Clock - +800 Mhz. В итоге в тех ограничениях по мощности частоты входят 1873 Mhz для ядра и 4608 Mhz для памяти. В таких параметрах получаются скорости По ZCash - EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.4b - 303,0 Sol/s - Excavator v1.1.4a GPU Miner for NiceHash. - 297,5 Sol/s По ETH - Genoil's ethminer 0.9.41-genoil-1.1.5-nicehash-1.1.2 - 23,0 Mh/s - Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.5 (чистый ETH) - 22,4-23 Mh/s - Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.5 ETH + DCR - ETH: 21,6 Mh/s DCR: 216,0 Mh/s - Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.5 ETH + SC - ETH: ETH: 21,8 Mh/s SC: 217,9 Mh/s - Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.5 ETH + LBC - ETH: 20,8 Mh/s LBC: 19,4 Mh/s - Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.5 ETH + PASC - ETH: ETH: 20,9 Mh/s PASC: 201,9 Mh/s И вот самое интересно - никак не могу решить что и как лучше майнить ? Загнал в https://whattomine.com значение 23 Mh/s для Ethash и 300 Sol/s для Equihash (электроэнергия "условно бесплатна") - получается, что сейчас оптимально - Expanse(EXP) Ethash за 0.00146 BTC/24h - Hush(HUSH) Equihash за 0.00141 BTC/24h - Zencash(ZEN) Equihash за 0.00140 BTC/24h Попробовал Nicehash - зарегистрировался там, создал BTC кошелек, установил прогу, запустил бенч, закинул на сутки помайнить. Майнит по очереди ETH через Genoil's ethminer 0.9.41-genoil-1.1.5-nicehash-1.1.2 на скорости ~23Mh/s и ZCash через Excavator v1.1.4a GPU Miner for NiceHash на скорости 297 H/s На таких показателях по статистике NiceHash выходит в среднем профитность порядка 0,00128 BTC/24h но сразу в BTC без обменов на биржах и т.д. Вроде как на Nicehash удобно и просто - запустил и само меняет валюты и майнеры... Но разница между "показаниями" https://whattomine.com (0.00146 BTC/24h) и Nicehash (0.00128 BTC/24h) почти 13% не в пользу Nicehash Кроме того, условия вывода из Nicehash "не радуют" - при выводе биткоинов из вашего кошелька nicehash из суммы вывода будет вычтена комиссия за вывод для покрытия комиссии за транзакцию. Комиссия вывода на данный момент составляет 0.005 BTC или 0.5% от суммы вывода (что больше). Получается что бы забрать "что-то" меньше 1 BTC из Nicehash нужно так или иначе заплатить 0.005 BTC (по нынешнему курсу около 13,55 USD)... Вот никак не могу решить что лучше - майнить через Nicehash и копить все биткойнах на кошельке в Nicehash и потому забрать одним выбором... - выбирать пул, смотреть / следить за монетами через https://whattomine.com, хранить разные валюты (ETH / ZCash и т.д. ) на какой-то бирже (типа Poloniex).. - Если хранить - то в какой валюте и что лучше держать ? ETH / ZCash / EXP / HUSH - Какие комиссии у популярных пулов ? Что с devfee у не NiceHash майнеров ? Не получится ли, что после выплаты комиссии пулу, разработчику майнера, комиссий на биржах вся профитность с 0.00146 BTC/24h скатится на тот же 0.00128 BTC/24h озвученной в NiceHash ? Никто не считал как "на круг" сходится профитность на пулах и NiceHash ? |
|
|
|
|
