bardacuda
|
|
July 07, 2017, 08:11:05 PM |
|
I have searched so apologise if this is a noob question, just got a GTX 980 to add to a system with an rx 480 in it. Currently testing it in a separate system that normally runs a 1070 no problem doing the same thing I'm trying to do with the 980 which is boot and use the computer with the iGPU of the CPU and mine on the GPU.
If I boot with the display plugged into the 980 I have no problems but when I'm using the iGPU I get the error "CUDA error: cannot allocate big buffer for DAG"
my bat file, which I run as admin
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999 -ewal *My-Wallet-Address*.*My-Worker-Name*/*My-E-mail* -epsw x -mode 1
I'm On windows 10
382.53 drivers Claymore 9.6
Parameters I have tried changing
-gser 2 -lidag 3 Virtual memory to 16gb No-Overclock
I'm pulling my hair out trying to get this to work ( what little I have left!), I have no problems doing the same thing on the 1070 but the 980 will just not play ball. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
You need to use "-di <GPU #>" So if your IGP is GPU 0, your 480 card is GPU 1, and your 980 is GPU 2; you need to use "-di 2" to use the 980 only, or "-di 12" to use the 480 and the 980
|
The future will rely on AI. SingularityNET lets anyone create, monetize, and use AI at scale. From the creators of Sophia the Robot.
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
nadrojcote
|
|
July 07, 2017, 08:13:22 PM |
|
Guys, has anybody noticed that hashrate of your rigs fell down a bit last time? I had 1005 mh initially, after two months it was 992, now it's 988, yeah it's not much but dont understand why this happened...same frequencies, similar memory error rate
It has been discussed many times. As the DAG gets larger hashrate will decrease. Some cards are affected more than others.
|
|
|
|
QuadraQ
|
|
July 07, 2017, 08:14:57 PM |
|
I didn't see anything in my search to address this, so at the risk of asking a redundant question, is it at all feasible that ZCash could be dual-mined with Ethereum like Decred/Sia/Library?
|
|
|
|
Calatravo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2017, 08:30:02 PM |
|
hi guys im running dual mining eth and sia. but the problem is hes not connecting to the pool i think. what am i doing wrong? setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal "mywallet" -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://sia-eu1.nanopool.org:7777 -dwal "mywallet" /YOUR_WORKER/YOUR_EMAIL -dpsw x -dcoin sia -ftime 10 im getting DCR: Stratum - connecting to 'sia-eu1.nanopool.org' <213.32.29.168> port 7777 DCR: Stratum - Connected (sia-eu1.nanopool.org:7777) DCR: Failed to get nonce1 at handshaking DCR: Authorized
....
DCR: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
...
DCR: Stratum - connecting to 'pasc-eu2.nanopool.org' <92.222.180.118> port 15555 DCR: Stratum - Connected (pasc-eu2.nanopool.org:15555) DCR: Authorized thank you for your help calatravo
|
|
|
|
nadrojcote
|
|
July 07, 2017, 08:52:48 PM |
|
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal "mywallet" -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://sia-eu1.nanopool.org:7777 -dwal "mywallet" /YOUR_WORKER/YOUR_EMAIL -dpsw x -dcoin sia -ftime 10
calatravo
Are you putting in your wallet, worker name and email address....?
|
|
|
|
brizio71
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 456
Merit: 250
Blockchain Just Entered The Real World
|
|
July 07, 2017, 08:56:24 PM |
|
Hello,
I have a RIG with 7 x 1080 8GB and 1 x 1060 6GB, stratinf from today after few minutes the miner crash with this log output:
22:47:01:067 1b54 GPU 3, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered 22:47:01:084 1b54 GPU 3, GpuMiner kx failed 1 22:47:01:090 424 GPU 2, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered 22:47:01:105 1798 GPU 6, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered 22:47:01:090 1b54 Set global fail flag, failed GPU3 22:47:01:122 a24 GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered 22:47:01:160 1ac4 GPU 5, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered 22:47:01:167 424 GPU 2, GpuMiner kx failed 1 22:47:01:208 de4 GPU 1, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered 22:47:01:234 1b60 GPU 4, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered 22:47:01:278 1798 GPU 6, GpuMiner kx failed 1 22:47:01:287 1b58 GPU 3, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered 22:47:01:296 1b54 GPU 3 failed 22:47:01:303 a24 GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1 22:47:01:337 1ac4 GPU 5, GpuMiner kx failed 1 22:47:01:207 424 Set global fail flag, failed GPU2 22:47:01:354 de4 GPU 1, GpuMiner kx failed 1 22:47:01:358 1b60 GPU 4, GpuMiner kx failed 1 22:47:01:286 1798 Set global fail flag, failed GPU6 22:47:01:371 1b58 GPU 3, GpuMiner kx failed 1 22:47:01:331 a24 Set global fail flag, failed GPU0 22:47:01:400 a24 GPU 0 failed 22:47:01:436 1a90 GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered 22:47:01:442 1a90 GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1 22:47:01:450 16e8 GPU 6, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered 22:47:01:365 1b60 Set global fail flag, failed GPU4 22:47:01:358 de4 Set global fail flag, failed GPU1 22:47:01:482 de4 GPU 1 failed 22:47:01:515 1b48 GPU 1, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered 22:47:01:526 16e8 GPU 6, GpuMiner kx failed 1 22:47:01:448 1a90 Set global fail flag, failed GPU0 22:47:01:534 1798 GPU 6 failed 22:47:01:400 1b58 Set global fail flag, failed GPU3 22:47:01:581 1b58 GPU 3 failed 22:47:01:587 1a90 GPU 0 failed 22:47:01:534 16e8 Set global fail flag, failed GPU6 22:47:01:641 1b48 GPU 1, GpuMiner kx failed 1 22:47:01:644 1b60 GPU 4 failed 22:47:01:687 1b74 GPU 4, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered 22:47:01:694 424 GPU 2 failed 22:47:01:707 1ad8 GPU 2, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered 22:47:01:349 1ac4 Set global fail flag, failed GPU5 22:47:01:719 16e8 GPU 6 failed 22:47:01:644 1b48 Set global fail flag, failed GPU1 22:47:01:773 1b74 GPU 4, GpuMiner kx failed 1 22:47:01:777 1ad8 GPU 2, GpuMiner kx failed 1 22:47:01:812 15c4 GPU 5, GpuMiner cu_k03 failed 77, an illegal memory access was encountered 22:47:01:822 1ac4 GPU 5 failed 22:47:01:864 1b48 GPU 1 failed 22:47:01:777 1b74 Set global fail flag, failed GPU4 22:47:01:811 1ad8 Set global fail flag, failed GPU2 22:47:01:885 15c4 GPU 5, GpuMiner kx failed 1 22:47:01:932 1b74 GPU 4 failed 22:47:01:945 1ad8 GPU 2 failed 22:47:01:932 15c4 Set global fail flag, failed GPU5 22:47:01:963 15c4 GPU 5 failed
Do u know the reason ?
|
|
|
|
Calatravo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2017, 09:34:56 PM |
|
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal "mywallet" -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://sia-eu1.nanopool.org:7777 -dwal "mywallet" /YOUR_WORKER/YOUR_EMAIL -dpsw x -dcoin sia -ftime 10
calatravo
Are you putting in your wallet, worker name and email address....? only putting in my wallet. do i need worker name and email?
|
|
|
|
MetalHelmet
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2017, 10:05:22 PM |
|
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.6 ║ ╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
ETH: 1 pool is specified Main Ethereum pool is eth-ru2.dwarfpool.com:8008 DCR: 0 pool is specified AMD OpenCL platform not found
Driver 368.81 is recommended for best performance and compatibility
Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.6 recommends nVidia driver 368.81 while I'm using 382.53). Does it means that Claymore's Dual ETH 9.6 just recommends driver that was actual on v9.6 was released ? Should I downgrade 382.53 to 368.81 ? Or maybe update to actual version is 384.76 (2017.6.29) ?
|
|
|
|
yany
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2017, 10:26:30 PM |
|
Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.6 recommends nVidia driver 368.81 while I'm using 382.53).
Does it means that Claymore's Dual ETH 9.6 just recommends driver that was actual on v9.6 was released ? Should I downgrade 382.53 to 368.81 ?
Or maybe update to actual version is 384.76 (2017.6.29) ?
I'm using the latest driver for 6 pieces of GTX 1070 in 7/24 with no problems: 180 MH/s.
|
|
|
|
Finners
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2017, 10:32:39 PM |
|
I have searched so apologise if this is a noob question, just got a GTX 980 to add to a system with an rx 480 in it. Currently testing it in a separate system that normally runs a 1070 no problem doing the same thing I'm trying to do with the 980 which is boot and use the computer with the iGPU of the CPU and mine on the GPU.
If I boot with the display plugged into the 980 I have no problems but when I'm using the iGPU I get the error "CUDA error: cannot allocate big buffer for DAG"
my bat file, which I run as admin
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999 -ewal *My-Wallet-Address*.*My-Worker-Name*/*My-E-mail* -epsw x -mode 1
I'm On windows 10
382.53 drivers Claymore 9.6
Parameters I have tried changing
-gser 2 -lidag 3 Virtual memory to 16gb No-Overclock
I'm pulling my hair out trying to get this to work ( what little I have left!), I have no problems doing the same thing on the 1070 but the 980 will just not play ball. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
You need to use "-di <GPU #>" So if your IGP is GPU 0, your 480 card is GPU 1, and your 980 is GPU 2; you need to use "-di 2" to use the 980 only, or "-di 12" to use the 480 and the 980 Tried that earlier with no success, I forgot to say. Not sure what I've down now but I cant mine at all on the 980. That same error "CUDA error: cannot allocate big buffer for DAG" happens now whether or not I'm plugged into the 980 or not.
|
|
|
|
br2459
|
|
July 07, 2017, 10:40:54 PM |
|
I have searched so apologise if this is a noob question, just got a GTX 980 to add to a system with an rx 480 in it. Currently testing it in a separate system that normally runs a 1070 no problem doing the same thing I'm trying to do with the 980 which is boot and use the computer with the iGPU of the CPU and mine on the GPU.
If I boot with the display plugged into the 980 I have no problems but when I'm using the iGPU I get the error "CUDA error: cannot allocate big buffer for DAG"
my bat file, which I run as admin
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999 -ewal *My-Wallet-Address*.*My-Worker-Name*/*My-E-mail* -epsw x -mode 1
I'm On windows 10
382.53 drivers Claymore 9.6
Parameters I have tried changing
-gser 2 -lidag 3 Virtual memory to 16gb No-Overclock
I'm pulling my hair out trying to get this to work ( what little I have left!), I have no problems doing the same thing on the 1070 but the 980 will just not play ball. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
You need to use "-di <GPU #>" So if your IGP is GPU 0, your 480 card is GPU 1, and your 980 is GPU 2; you need to use "-di 2" to use the 980 only, or "-di 12" to use the 480 and the 980 Tried that earlier with no success, I forgot to say. Not sure what I've down now but I cant mine at all on the 980. That same error "CUDA error: cannot allocate big buffer for DAG" happens now whether or not I'm plugged into the 980 or not. Might sound silly but I had a friend that had the same issue except we put the Virtual mem to 32GB instead of 16GB and it worked for him. Its worth a shot and a reboot.
|
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1898
Merit: 1024
|
|
July 07, 2017, 10:47:52 PM |
|
Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.6 recommends nVidia driver 368.81 while I'm using 382.53).
Does it means that Claymore's Dual ETH 9.6 just recommends driver that was actual on v9.6 was released ? Should I downgrade 382.53 to 368.81 ?
Or maybe update to actual version is 384.76 (2017.6.29) ?
I'm using the latest driver for 6 pieces of GTX 1070 in 7/24 with no problems: 180 MH/s. If you have samsung memory ethminer can do 200Mhs... but ppl think Claymore is god for ETH, but he does not care for Nvidia users at all if you are stupid to mine with slower software and pay fee he will not work on optimization! Why would he, when ppl have no brain to decide for themselfs
|
|
|
|
krnlx
|
|
July 07, 2017, 11:13:12 PM |
|
Mr. Claymore, do you need my log file of crashed ETH mining with AMD Vega for bug fixing in your miners? I tested your ZCash miner too, same issue.
Thanks.
-swisstrader
Can you try with -asm 0 option ?
|
|
|
|
Meatball
|
|
July 07, 2017, 11:30:59 PM |
|
If you have samsung memory ethminer can do 200Mhs... but ppl think Claymore is god for ETH, but he does not care for Nvidia users at all if you are stupid to mine with slower software and pay fee he will not work on optimization! Why would he, when ppl have no brain to decide for themselfs
So...not sure how you came to that conclusion. I'm sure Claymore wants to optimize the miner for any / all cards as much as possible. The more efficient the miner, the more shares / MH he's going to get from each person that uses his miner...
|
|
|
|
christiano88
Member
Offline
Activity: 161
Merit: 10
|
|
July 07, 2017, 11:49:23 PM |
|
If you have samsung memory ethminer can do 200Mhs... but ppl think Claymore is god for ETH, but he does not care for Nvidia users at all if you are stupid to mine with slower software and pay fee he will not work on optimization! Why would he, when ppl have no brain to decide for themselfs
So...not sure how you came to that conclusion. I'm sure Claymore wants to optimize the miner for any / all cards as much as possible. The more efficient the miner, the more shares / MH he's going to get from each person that uses his miner... You sir, must not know how difficulty works.
|
|
|
|
Meatball
|
|
July 08, 2017, 12:03:55 AM |
|
If you have samsung memory ethminer can do 200Mhs... but ppl think Claymore is god for ETH, but he does not care for Nvidia users at all if you are stupid to mine with slower software and pay fee he will not work on optimization! Why would he, when ppl have no brain to decide for themselfs
So...not sure how you came to that conclusion. I'm sure Claymore wants to optimize the miner for any / all cards as much as possible. The more efficient the miner, the more shares / MH he's going to get from each person that uses his miner... You sir, must not know how difficulty works. I do understand difficulty, but if he can make his miner more efficient than all other miners, while that would certainly raise the difficulty due to the overall increased hash rate, his miners (and Claymore himself with his dev fee) would have a larger portion of that hash rate in comparison to everyone else, which translates to a larger portion of the overall mined coins at the expense of the people using the other mining applications (until the other mining applications come up with their improved version). Not to mention, improvements to his miner will drive more people to use his miner. So yes, he does have motivation to improve his miner.
|
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1898
Merit: 1024
|
|
July 08, 2017, 12:04:44 AM |
|
If you have samsung memory ethminer can do 200Mhs... but ppl think Claymore is god for ETH, but he does not care for Nvidia users at all if you are stupid to mine with slower software and pay fee he will not work on optimization! Why would he, when ppl have no brain to decide for themselfs
So...not sure how you came to that conclusion. I'm sure Claymore wants to optimize the miner for any / all cards as much as possible. The more efficient the miner, the more shares / MH he's going to get from each person that uses his miner... SUre and guess why he need ~1 year to optimize dual mining with NV, for past 1 year only profit from nvidia dual mining was claymore, stupid ppl/miners just burned more power for no benefit! because they are stupid to do profitability math and see they lose more on lower ethereum speed then on dc/sia/lbc gain!
|
|
|
|
Meatball
|
|
July 08, 2017, 12:13:48 AM |
|
If you have samsung memory ethminer can do 200Mhs... but ppl think Claymore is god for ETH, but he does not care for Nvidia users at all if you are stupid to mine with slower software and pay fee he will not work on optimization! Why would he, when ppl have no brain to decide for themselfs
So...not sure how you came to that conclusion. I'm sure Claymore wants to optimize the miner for any / all cards as much as possible. The more efficient the miner, the more shares / MH he's going to get from each person that uses his miner... SUre and guess why he need ~1 year to optimize dual mining with NV, for past 1 year only profit from nvidia dual mining was claymore, stupid ppl/miners just burned more power for no benefit! because they are stupid to do profitability math and see they lose more on lower ethereum speed then on dc/sia/lbc gain! That I don't disagree with, people really should spend the few minutes it takes to figure out the cost / benefit of dual mining and they may see they'd make more just straight up single mining ETH.
|
|
|
|
manotroll
|
|
July 08, 2017, 12:47:53 AM |
|
Why are you giving this error?
|
|
|
|
BennyAndDeJets
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
July 08, 2017, 02:21:45 AM |
|
Is there a way to identify multiple wallets and pools without using the epools file?
|
|
|
|
|