That would require you to prove Craig is a fraud first. Again, that’s how the law works. You cannot rule on opinionated judgements in court poopytildah.
How old are you, like 10? The burden of proof is on Craig to prove hes not a fraud. Wanna make a bet? I bet you craiggy loses in court. If I'm right, you have to stop commenting on this thread. If he wins, I stop commenting in this thread. In Kleiman v Wright? Which exact case are you referring to? Layout the terms of your bet properly mate. I thought it was pretty obvious I was talking about the Wright initiated lawsuit against Peter McCormack. Its pretty simple to understand. Wright loses, you leave. Wright wins, I leave. Except for the fact 98% of civil suits settle before trial. |
|
|
|
That would require you to prove Craig is a fraud first. Again, that’s how the law works. You cannot rule on opinionated judgements in court poopytildah.
How old are you, like 10? The burden of proof is on Craig to prove hes not a fraud. Wanna make a bet? I bet you craiggy loses in court. If I'm right, you have to stop commenting on this thread. If he wins, I stop commenting in this thread. In Kleiman v Wright? Which exact case are you referring to? Layout the terms of your bet properly mate. |
|
|
|
|
Nutildah is the dumbest person I’ve argued with on this form that’s why I always quote him to ensure the evidence is there of exactly what he says. Refuses to debate me on video and defames me daily.
Proof of pussy.
|
|
|
|
There's no way I'm reading all that but on what basis are you proclaiming Craig is Satoshi? I think on the basis that he's delusional...... Nah! wether craig is satoshi or not the question is "does it help contribute to the market? There ain't no way that it can help after all it is the community will decide to invest in a good project or leave it behind and regret in the near future. This project is good and I am closely monitr it on the updates of this project. Its entire value rests on Wright being Satoshi. Outside of that it's simply another altcoin with bitcoin in its name. If u really believe ur written crap, why u posting it here? What is u want to achieve or just being destructive and trolling? No BSV is the only clean chain that has no crap code seen like segshit or dsv / ctor - altcoin genes ... And it scales like hell, that's what u fear, since only ur dumb fear drives u to troll here. Try to spend ur time more constructive or ur live is just usless - ur choice Wright claiming to be Satoshi is one of the most epic trolljobs in all of crypto. You and splashalot are simply perpetuating a fraud by pretending Wright is Satoshi. You are the worst trolls in crypto since Roger Ver and the bcash boys (which you were before sv) That would require you to prove Craig is a fraud first. Again, that’s how the law works. You cannot rule on opinionated judgements in court poopytildah. |
|
|
|
So how many of you bots actually believe Craig is Satoshi? If you know youre right then you have nothing to fear, as Satoshi founded this forum. Surely Satoshi wouldn't let a 'dictatoship' disallow people from acknowledging his identity on his own forum, right? Be proud about your convictions and let the world know for the record.
I believe 2/3 members of the ‘Satoshi Team’’ team are dead, kind of like this form. Are you saying you don’t believe Dave Klieman also didn’t play a role in the ‘Satoshi Team.’ |
|
|
|
There's no way I'm reading all that but on what basis are you proclaiming Craig is Satoshi? I think on the basis that he's delusional...... Nah! wether craig is satoshi or not the question is "does it help contribute to the market? There ain't no way that it can help after all it is the community will decide to invest in a good project or leave it behind and regret in the near future. This project is good and I am closely monitr it on the updates of this project. If Craig has access to the Satoshi wallet, he can singlehandly crash the BTC market after 01/01/2020. It’s naive to believe the total coin marketcap supply will be 21,000,000 given all the lost bitcoin in circulation, I reckon the total suppply is closer to 10 million. Where did you read that it will change on 01/01/2020 ? |
|
|
|
There's no way I'm reading all that but on what basis are you proclaiming Craig is Satoshi? I think on the basis that he's delusional...... Nah! wether craig is satoshi or not the question is "does it help contribute to the market? There ain't no way that it can help after all it is the community will decide to invest in a good project or leave it behind and regret in the near future. This project is good and I am closely monitr it on the updates of this project. If Craig has access to the Satoshi wallet, he can singlehandly crash the BTC market after 01/01/2020. It’s naive to believe the total coin marketcap supply will be 21,000,000 given all the lost bitcoin in circulation, I reckon the total suppply is closer to 10 million. |
|
|
|
Mate, dissenting opinions come from dissenting judgements in court rulings. There was never a judgement in a ruling what constitutes bitcoin so there is no dissenting opinion or judgement.
Edit: name one court in one country that has constituted btc as bitcoin and I’m wrong.
Go on, name one.
If you cannot then we can agree that there is no definition legally as to what constitutes bitcoin, right?
*snip unprecedented irrelevant opinion inapplicable to any legal system. No court in any legal system in any country has ruled what constitutes Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
No. The markets have decided which chain it is that is currently preferred by the preponderance of participants. It has nothing to do with the question of 'what is bitcoin'.
Remember when the narrative from most "big blockers" was that Bitcoin was the most cumulative hashrate as defined in the whitepaper and that miners ultimately decide/vote on the direction of Bitcoin influenced by market forces? Now that Bcash has failed to convince the majority of users, miners, exchanges, merchants, devs it is pivoting to defining bitcoin as ones individual subjective interpretation and ignoring the whitepaper. The Hypocrisy. “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” Bcash supporters made the wrong bet and despite all the evidence over a sustained time will still remain stubbornly delusional because admitting otherwise is simply too painful. They are hanging on a glimmer of hope that the market will rush over to their altcoin during the next bull market because of fees ignoring this has already been tested in 2017 and making the incorrect assumption that they exist in a vacuum and incorrectly believing they are the only substitute good available. But isn’t that the beauty of it? The capitalist economic model that allows miners to compete on hashrate? So that developers cannot change the rule set and power is eliminated at base protocol level. That’s gone with lightning, they’ve merely tried to eliminate the purpose of mining and give power to a development team (blockstream) who collect the fees instead of the miners. It’s very difficult for me to understand why blockstream should capitalize on the bitcoin network as a whole, how 8 people control the fate of development when a system is available for miners to compete on an equal playing field. |
|
|
|
A dictatorship involves un democratic rule. You telling us that we are wrong because our views on what is bitcoin do not align with yours is a dictatorship because no rule has been established as to what constitutes bitcoin. You have not given any precedent as to why bitcoin is BTC but rather slandering those who do not agree with you. You are a dictator and guys like Lauda who have abused their hierarchy of control and power to assign negative feedback to those whose views do not align with yours towards bitcoin have oppressed the opinions of those against your unprecedented rulings.
The markets are a third party completely irrelevant to what constitutes bitcoin. You’re telling me that Apple is ruled by NASDAQ?
I gave you plenty of reasoning as to why btc is bitcoin and you, like jbreher, just shove your fingers in your ears and say 'no no no no' like 4 year olds. The markets, the exchanges and the consumers have decided via majority opinion that btc is bitcoin. You are free to dissent but nobody gives a shit, and you certainly aren't making an impactful change on reality. Btw if the forum was run by dictators Lauda would have just banned your ass, but you're still here flapping your gums, so what are you crying about? Mate, dissenting opinions come from dissenting judgements in court rulings. There was never a judgement in a ruling what constitutes bitcoin so there is no dissenting opinion or judgement. Edit: name one court in one country that has constituted btc as bitcoin and I’m wrong. Go on, name one. If you cannot then we can agree that there is no definition legally as to what constitutes bitcoin, right? |
|
|
|
One need not idolize CSW in order to have a reasoned preference for the principles that Satoshi instilled in Bitcoin from the outset.
Bitcoin is allowed to evolve without your permission and only a concrete headed shlub would insist that Bitcoin Craig is a truer version of bitcoin than bitcoin. You can keep being wrong all you like, and the markets will continue proving that you are wrong. more alternative facts from nutildah today. There is NO LEGAL definition in ANY COUNTRY as to what constitutes bitcoin, therefore there is no right or wrong. Telling someone they are wrong based on their personal definition of bitcoin is a dictatorship. Oh my god you live in an actual dictatorship and you think someone saying 'you're wrong' constitutes a dictatorship. How detached from reality are you? I know that's a redundant question, the answer is 100%. The markets have decided what is bitcoin and what is not. You're free to believe in whatever discordance with reality you choose, and you will continue to suffer financially as a result. Money talks, bullshit walks. A dictatorship involves un democratic rule. You telling us that we are wrong because our views on what is bitcoin do not align with yours is a dictatorship because no rule has been established as to what constitutes bitcoin. You have not given any precedent as to why bitcoin is BTC but rather slandering those who do not agree with you. You are a dictator and guys like Lauda who have abused their hierarchy of control and power to assign negative feedback to those whose views do not align with yours towards bitcoin have oppressed the opinions of those against your unprecedented rulings. The markets are a third party completely irrelevant to what constitutes bitcoin. You’re telling me that Apple is ruled by NASDAQ? |
|
|
|
Binance the worst exchange, it forced me to open mouth for KYC
There SMS confirmation was not working for multiple days in Venezuela, they ignored me and apologized several days later. I had to then send them videos and other nonsense just to change my email. CZ has no interest in SV because unlike all the other coins he lists, he charges A LARGE listing fee and never recieved anything from anyone on behalf of Bitcoin SV. These recent ICO’s a lot of their raised funding on a Binance listing. The scheme is quite obvious. |
|
|
|
One need not idolize CSW in order to have a reasoned preference for the principles that Satoshi instilled in Bitcoin from the outset.
Bitcoin is allowed to evolve without your permission and only a concrete headed shlub would insist that Bitcoin Craig is a truer version of bitcoin than bitcoin. You can keep being wrong all you like, and the markets will continue proving that you are wrong. more alternative facts from nutildah today. There is NO LEGAL definition in ANY COUNTRY as to what constitutes bitcoin, therefore there is no right or wrong. Telling someone they are wrong based on their personal definition of bitcoin is a dictatorship. |
|
|
|
In this excellent video, apparently @ChicoCrypto succinctly summarizes the false volume and wash trading reports of Bitwise Asset Management and Blockchain Transparency Institute, while detailing it seems that Binance's use of robots for wash trading: https://youtu.be/xsWSaQqK1dE?t=320At least there is no wash manipulation with BSV. Yeah, it's pretty heavy proof. To request the opening of the investigation from CFTC try this road: https://forms.cftc.gov/Forms/TipsAndComplaints.aspxBinance was one of the handful of exchanges deemed not to be engaging in price manipulation by Bitwise, who are launching their own bitcoin etf based on the findings of their report, so sure, feel free to report a Chinese exchange to an American agency and see how much they care. More alternative facts from Nutildah. Binance has been on the run since day 1. Binance currently has no official headquarters and tries to keep locations secret for security reasons. However, we do know they maintain offices and servers in Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan, and Korea. With legal uncertainty in the Asia Pacific, Binance will move from Hong Kong island to the island of Malta.While an exchange may be registered in one country, it’s made up of millions of users, many of which are likely to be American. If you think team America world police is going to let Binance run their casino and continue to cater to Americans without penalty, you are grossly misinformed. |
|
|
|
I think that now is good moment, the price is very attractive now. Prices continue to decline every month so they will get losses if they invest for the long term, too risky How do you base a long term analysis on a coin that’s been trading on markets for 4 months? |
|
|
|
What will happen with BSV if all exchange follow suite with binance delisting?
Is BSV will be cease to exist? and miners will stop mining and blockchain will halt.
The exchanges have nothing to do with the blockchain And BSV will be going for 2gig blocks for July. |
|
|
|
Just who do you suppose is my 'idol dev'?
Faketoshi, of course. You wish you were best friends, admit it. Is that a hard call? Can I throw it in your face in three years?
It might still have a functioning blockchain in 3 years, but it will be out of the top 20 coins by market cap. Guaranteed. Yes you can find this post and throw it in my face in 3 years if I'm wrong. Lindy says ten years and counting. And up 18% on the day. Not too shabby so far.
Don't know who that is, don't care. And we both know BCH is getting pumped by fork fanbois bailing on SV. Its still quite a ways below the 10% of BTC price mark that lends it the slightest shred of respectability. Much like SV, BCH is based on a lie. The lie being that it is bitcoin. That's why neither coin will succeed.There is no legal definition as to what constitutes bitcoin. Any third party exchange or coinmarketcap can call crypto’s whatever the fuck they want and idiots like yourself will believe the source of news. Find me any court ruling in any country who has declared the btc chain as bitcoin and I will shut up. Until then your post is fake news. |
|
|
|
From Kraken:
"Greetings,
When we first listed Bitcoin SV we warned clients in a blog post that it did not meet our usual listing requirements. Among many red flags, we noted the threatening and openly hostile behavior of Bitcoin SV representatives. We hoped the situation with Bitcoin SV would improve over time but unfortunately it has not.
Over the last few months, the team behind Bitcoin SV have engaged in behaviour completely antithetical to everything we at Kraken and the wider crypto community stands for. So alongside other upstanding members of the community, and in consultation with more than 70,000 members of the community, we have decided to delist Bitcoin SV according to the following schedule:
BSV Deposits will be disabled April 22
Trading will cease on all BSV trading pairs April 29
BSV Withdrawals will continue until May 31
To learn more about the Bitcoin SV delisting, read our blog post.
Thank you for choosing Kraken, the trusted and secure digital assets exchange.
The Kraken Team "
Pretty much sums this cr*p coin up. Bye bye shitclone SV.
And another one bites the dust! When will Wright learn he can't threaten to sue his way into popularity? Craig Wright has you by the balls, he has you writing about HIM every single day. All your attention is on him and nothing else. You’re just too stupid to realize actions speak for themselves mate. |
|
|
|
I dont get it.
Craig is not Satoshi..
Unless he signs a message using a known address owned by Satoshi… He is not him.
There is no proof of Craig being Satoshi.
And the line I saw above "There is no proof Craig isn't Satoshi" is the dummest thing I have ever read.
Try and act like adults and not children.
Mate, that’s how the law works. |
|
|
|
|
All news related to BSV today, still no proof that Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi. Great publicity
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
