Another post full of jealousy and hate. Maybe that's because nobody trusts you?

http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-30_Sat_04.13h/1021758.html

I contributed a lot to this forum by exposing many scams and scammers https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1094569 and let me ask you what OP of this thread eddie13 or hacker1001101001 did ?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=580327

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1021758

I am out of this thread, because all I can read here, how great others are and how bad I am.

Also I am out of p2pb2b or any other similar cases for a while. Let dudes like eddie13  or hacker1001101001 watch scammers and expose them, because it seems that they are much more educated and experienced forum members. All that does not mean, that I do not respect all that people who are really working very hard to make this forum a better place a keep it clean from scammers. I tip my hat to them.  

Good Luck

Erratic judgement ? Could you please quote some of them and prove that they are Erratic ?

I said "It looks like a plagiarism" I am not an expert in plagiarism. Post edited, but my question stays. What was the purpose of opening this thread ?

So I can use any of your posts as my signature with just quoting it ?

Good luck dude. 

First of all, it is NOT YOUR BUSINESS who included me in their trust list. Also it is NOT YOUR BUSINESS who is on my trust list. The second thing is, what are you trying to say by starting this absolutely meaningless topic, full of hate and jealousy. Are you trying to convince DT members to remove me from their trust lists only because you want them to do so ?

Let the mods decide if someone can use a quote from another user's post as his signature. I am out of this thread till Tuesday. I hope that time will be more than enough for p2pb2b to resolve some issues, start a sig campaign and show us some credibility.

BTW. That is another good reason for a ban.

I suggested that, because p2pb2b is trying to use a red tag as an excuse for the delay of their sig campaign. If that is the real reason than that is the only way out of this situation, if Jolly will not tag the account again. All I am trying to do is to convince that dudes starting a new escrowed sig campaign, but it seems to me that I'M JUST WASTING MY TIME.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5201132.msg53074902#msg53074902

Please stop posting off topic related posts, you can be banned for that. This threat has nothing to do with your relationship with Lauda and with a freedom of speech.

Anyone can buy a copper member account any time. That is completely legal.


p2pb2b bounty campaign manager is very concerned about red trust and mentioning it as a reason for delay. I really do not know what will Jolly do, but you can ask him yourself. I just offered a solution for that situation.

That is a very silly excuse. If only one neg tag from DT member is stopping you from starting of this bloody sig campaign, than buy a new legal copper member account and start the promised campaign. I will wait for couple of days and if nothing happens, I will consider this promised sig campaign as a scam and will stop any communications with them. I tried to do almost everything to help them regarding mentioned campaign, but it seems to me, that I just wasted my time.

I am not sure about Lauda's position regarding this. Did they reached a deal regarding escrow of the funds? If yes, then open a new topic and start your sig campaign. Nobody can stop you, even if your exchange is an obvious scam, because due to forum politics scams are not moderated.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0
 

Regarding all that scam accusations. As I stated here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5205331.msg53232333#msg53232333

"Let potential traders read what is mentioned in scam accusations, study supporting evidence and make up their own minds."

If you ask me, I am still considering it as a scam due to connections with coinsbit scam exchange and other facts posted by Jolly in his thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5192497.0

If we will start to talk about the ethical side of advertising such exchange, that will lead us very far, because there were a lot of campaigns, advertised by some reputable members and at the end they turned out to be scams or at least failed projects.

Let me introduce you to One-Above-All mentally sick troll and paranoid schizophrenic.

Here is his trust page https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2580400

Here are some more interesting details about him. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138419.0

Strongly believes in conspiracy theories, devils and ghosts. Thinks that everyone on this forum are his enemies and especially DT members. I recommended him to visit a doctor many times, but he is refusing of doing so.

Just check the topics started by him.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;threads;u=2580400;sa=showPosts

Loan extension requested and granted. 0.01712 BTC in total will be paid on 20th December.
Thank You Shasan

This exchange had a lot of scam accusations and they tried to start a sig campaign. Because all that accusations, there was a big possibility that sig campaign participants could be scammed. That's why I interfered and demanded to escrow the campaign via reputable member and provided a list of such users. They found Lauda, who is one of the most trusted forum members and now it's up to them, if the agreement will be reached or not. I am not planing to investigate all cases regarding that exchange, but at least I made sure that sig campaign participants will not be scammed. THAT IS DONE ! ans now I am out of this thread and discussion.

Have a nice day
Alex

They were trying to start a Sig campaign without escrowing the funds. I "forced" them to find a reputable escrow for securing funds. Because in the Sig campaign thread there was not a single word about escrowing promised payments funds. After that, they found Lauda, who is one of the most trusted forum users and they are about to reach an agreement. The meaning of all this is that, any bounty campaign of any project even with one scam accusation must be escrowed via any reputable member, who offers such services. Is that project scam or not, must be decided by potential customers themselves after reading all related information. (Scams are not moderated on this forum.)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5203715.msg53174942#msg53174942

They would run that sig campaign WITH or WITHOUT escrow. So now they are forced to escrow funds. WHICH one is better?

I just do not understand, why did you get involved in this conversation with some "smart statements" and ruined your legendary account with a red tag?

MOSPROGNOZ ADVISING SERVICES =

1. I can help you with starting you ANN in a proper way.

2. I can help you with starting you BOUNTY AND SIG CAMPAIGN in proper way.

3. I can ESCROW your bounty campaign funds.

4. I can also act as a topic starter of your campaigns.

5. I reserve the right to reject any project, without any explanations.

P.S. I might help you with IEO and listing on a small, but honest exchange (No fake volumes, no bot trading, no bullshit)

 

I forced them to start an escrowed campaign. (Still waiting)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5203715.msg53170993#msg53170993

That was the only thing I could do, to ensure that participants will be paid. And I guess they found Lauda as an escrow, which means 100% safe campaign. There are a lot of scam accusations and some People think that this exchange is a scam (Including me). Exchange representatives are denying accusations. So, let potential traders read what is mentioned in scam accusations, study supporting evidence and make up their own minds.

Yes. Bitcointalk.news is the best choice i guess. But I need someone who will run it, cuz I do not have time for that.