Shares not issued are owned by AMC which is indirectly implying that the founders are owning more than 60% of the shares. I'm also wondering what you mean by R&D. Aren't the miners developed by VMC which, as you have stated before, is a different company.
Of the 100% of shares.
20% are held by AMC for growth/reinvestment (a horrible way to do things but sadly common - shares should represent ownership not be a crude way to determine the percentage of profits dividended),
40% are potentially for sale to the public - with unsold ones the same as the first 20%
The other 40% would be the founder's own shares.
There's thus three ways to look at it:
If you look at divdends then the founder receives 40% of all dividends regardless of how many shares are sold.
If you look at distributed profits (i.e. the dividends that end up NOT going back to AMC) then before any shares were sold he received 100% (obviously) and when all 40% public ones are sold he receives 50%.
If you look at actual ownership then he owns 100% initially falling to 60% if all public shares are sold.
Right now if any profits were made he'd be entitled to the vast majority of that portion of them that was destined to end anywhere other than in AMC itself - as his personal 40% outweigh the portion actually sold.
How well the shares do depend mainly on how profits are calculated - which is where you have to hope he's generous as that largely depends on how VMC decides to define its cost price that it charges to AMC. And of course VMC isn't responsible to investors so doesn't have to make any disclosure in respect of that.
Bottomline is that he DOES own more than 60% - dropping to exactly 60% if/when all 40% of public shares are sold. Reason for that is the ownership the shares owned by AMC. Those are owned by whoever owns AMC. Shareholders do NOT own AMC (that's explicit in the contract) so do not any part of those shares. In practical terms, assuming good faith, the actual effective owned percentage of profits is 50% if all public shares are sold.
There's this sentence in the IPO:
Quote
Only the first 40,000,000 issued shares will receive 100% of the monthly profits after all expenses until the total dividends paid is equal to .0005 BTC per share.
So after all shares are sold there is a time frame where 100% of the profits are paid out to the shareholders and the growth and expansion fund. I agree with the rest of your analysis.Something completely unrelated: Who is the guy buying batches of 50,000 shares at 0.000799999? I appreciate that someone is supporting the current price level but what's in it for him/her?