I just find the logic in this flawed - acknowledging on the one hand that women have different interests and then trying to use that difference to achieve equality "in Bitcoin".
Just stop looking at the damn numbers. It doesn't matter how many percent of Bitcoin users are women. Stop bringing up the gender at all and treat everyone who has an interest in Bitcoin equally. Part of the problem is treating women specially and putting them in the spotlight.
Noone gives a crap about the gender distribution among kindergarten workers, why Bitcoin?
|
|
|
It's absolutely hilarious how people can claim to be well-meaning and try to bring women "into Bitcoin" by saying that women only care about shopping or "For most women it needs to be easy with a well-known company behind it." and generally treating them like little shopping addicts who can't help it.
The idiocy is staggering.
|
|
|
he first two I asked declined. They were unsure about installing a wallet app and unclear about what BTC is. I did not think giving away money would be this hard. Actually they seem pretty smart. I wouldn't participate either when someone walks up to me and suggests installing some software I know nothing about, and promising me "money" for it. The whole idea to get people involved in Bitcoin this way seems rather stupid.
|
|
|
Why _should_ we work this disparity? We should work on how women are treated when they actually enter the field on their own, not drag them into a field against their interest.
What would you think if women suddenly started to drag you into being a kindergarten worker when you have absolutely no interest in working with children?
Let the interests find their field on their own and stop looking at some imaginary disparity that ought to be removed.
|
|
|
Naja, man muss aber sagen, dass Bilder mit lesbaren Nummern hochladen auch nicht das Cleverste war, was man machen kann. Das Internet vergisst nicht und das sollte man _vorher_ bedenken und nicht hinterher jammern.
|
|
|
People living true equality don't bring up the gender in the first place. If you care what gender someone has, you're the sexist, not us.
Fucking feminazis.
Edit: Bringing the distribution of men and women to 50:50 everywhere is complete bullshit. What's important is that someone who wants to pursue a certain interest can actually do so. Forcing a 50:50 balance regardless of interests and factual differences of the genders is what's wrong with this false feminism these days.
So someone running a Bitcoin business is female? Good, what does it matter? Bitcoin is an interest pursued mostly by men? Gee, that must mean it's an endeavor that men somehow find more interesting than women do. Doesn't mean women are oppressed from pursuing it.
False feminists keep preaching sexism while the reality is that women can do what they want already. It just so happens that their interests are actually different because the genders are actually different, physically and neurologically. You can't preach that away. Fucking feminazis.
|
|
|
Noch tragischer: es war nicht mal ein Apostroph. Es sind http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravis_%28Typografie%29, die man normalerweise umständlich mit Shift+´+Leertaste eingibt. Wie peinlich das sein muss, bei jedem einzelnen Plural 3 Tasten zu drücken, wo die richtige Schreibweise wäre, gar keine Taste zu drücken. Normalerweise rechtfertigen sich die Baumschüler ja damit, dass es schneller einzugeben ist, aber so? :>
|
|
|
Also ist der Grund für die geringe Auszahlung Abuse ?
Wobei jeder selbst mal scharf nachdenken kann, welchen Sinn es ergibt, bei "Abuse" die Auszahlung für alle zu verringern statt die "Abuser" einfach abzuklemmen.
|
|
|
Ihr wisst, wie man lockt. Gibt es zu FFXIV eigtl. auch direkt Spielzeit zu kaufen? Ich finde nur das Spiel selbst.
|
|
|
Eine Chance, dass FFXIV dazukommt inkl. Gamecards?
|
|
|
1. Troll with some wild bullshit 2. Play the victim by claiming censorship 3. 4. Profit That's feminazis for you.
|
|
|
@TCM laut gtmetrix.com lädt unsere Seite in unter 3 Sekunden, dass sollte eigentlich noch im grünen Bereich sein.
Die Seite lädt deutlich über 3s, manchmal sogar gar nicht zu Ende. Telekom VDSL. Ihr scheint zwar in den USA zu hosten, aber auch zu anderen US-Seiten habe ich nicht diese Ladezeiten. Gibts hier noch mehr Telekom-Kunden, die mal Rückmeldung geben könnten, ob ich der Einzige bin, bei dem es so lahmt? Edit: Jetzt gerade ist es noch erträglich und lädt auch anscheinend jede Seite zu Ende.
|
|
|
Die falsche Einheit stoert zumindest mein Verstaendnis nicht.
LOL.
|
|
|
Er meinte aber kW, nicht kWh.
OMG, welcome to my PLONK-File. Sei weise, plonk leise. Noch nie gehört? Ich bin jedenfalls nicht so tolerant gegenüber Dummheit. Wenn der Klügere ewig nachgibt, regieren die Dummen.
|
|
|
Er meinte aber kW, nicht kWh.
|
|
|
Grottenlangsam, die Seite.
|
|
|
6 verteiler mit 32 A Kurz nachrechnen 30A * 3 * 6 Verteiler * 220v = 118 kW/h
Was soll kW/h sein? In der Schule nicht aufgepasst?
|
|
|
|