Yup! That's it.

Edit: Just 2 ratings at their trust site: mine and ghibly's.

Better times are coming, probably pretty soon 
Every day we get closer to the start of the next big rally.

It is not difficult. Just click on the word "trust" below username TheRealStandard.
On this trust page scroll down, enter the risked amount of BTC, enter your comment and click submit.
That is all.

I gave them a positive rating although I had to wait for 30 hours getting my IPO coins.

He still has red on his name because ghibly79 marked his new username as well.  I can't really think of a reason to start a new thread and a new username other than to get rid of all of that.  

Everyone keeps talking about Mt. Gox, Mt. Gox, Mt. Gox. As though Mt. Gox is solely responsible for the current price drop. Do you guys remember the many other major issues and warning signs that there were with Mt. Gox long before the latest clusterfuck? Other exchanges have lost or stolen funds as well. I really think the whole Mt. Gox card is being overplayed just a bit.

...I don´t understand the hate. This coin is an perfect answer to the Cryptocurrency world at this moment...
Every day a new "shit" coin is starting and everywhere pumper and dumper at the exchanges.
Small fishes can answer in a colletive.
Money making machine like a Perpeto Mobile with ...StandardCoin for everyone.

MT.gox were putting bad influence on cryptocurrencies for many months. Without it future can only be brighter.

Some people might not have trust towards bitcoin but more and mroe big players are starting to get into this business. Recently even some banks considered to adapt bitcoin to abuse transaction system.

speaking of selling coins... any word on bittrex?

from wikipidia:


"Probability is a measure of the likeliness that an event will occur.[1]

Probability is used to quantify an attitude of mind towards some proposition of whose truth we are not certain"

you say it only scams the later investors .. so actualy you realize it's a scam..I personaly am still not certain of that..

but if this is a scam it would also hurt the miners that would mine at his multipool

"probability" or "chance" would still leave a certain amount of uncertainty ,so not definitely without a doubt in my honest opinion.
but let's not split hairs .. the only 100% way to be absolutely sure this is a scam or not is to foresee the future.

but I know that if I would like to set up a scam this would be a good way to do it

Well....there is a 100% chance that it is a scam ,thats the problem..

you will only know for sure that it's a scam when the dev has taken the money/BTC  
What the dev could do to make everything more transparent is for instance use escrow and also tell everyone what his other alias here on bitcointalk is..

right now everybody is just trusting an nameless stranger with there hard earned BTC .. thats the part I don't get personally

He's just been trying to show people that with this system the change of beeing scammed is high.. specially when the "multipool" gets into play aswell
everybody is gonna be minning to fill up the stack of BTC even further?
I'm not saying that the dev is gonna take the BTC and run...but with this system he's got every possibillity to do so.. thats one giant red flag in my book!

Let's hope the naive are right this time (but I doubt it)

I'm not advocating full on salaries at this early stage but small steps would help. Think ebay, craigslist, freelance sites, fiverr, etc. If people got paid even a small amount directly in crypto, they would have an incentive to spend it like currency.

The risk is there, and very high given the particular structure of this ponzi, 75% instant loss when you invest. Even the best Ponzi are not eternal (and this is pretty bad and evident).
But again the problem is not what I or you assume, is he didn't state that, nay he say the opposite, that no loss is possible. I truly believe you are 100% a troll by now xD Must have been the 10th time I repeated that simple concept xD
Was fun but now I have better things to do, really.

"Ponzi" (wikipedia) means a fraudolent investment scheme where you deceive investors to put money in, telling them no loss is possible (or even that profit is guaranteed), when actually the only way they can profit is if new investors come, losing money in their stead. Eventually new investments will stop and bag holders will lose everything. Exactly what this coin is xD

Deception in itself is wrong. You can do it "legit" by declaring you are running a ponzi (here, for example --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=558656.0  gambling section).
Otherwise, you are at least a deceiving scammer, like dev is. So he is lying and holding your money, very very bad combo. More than enough for a big fat -xx feedback and extreme caution tagging.

Again, and lastly: even if he doesn't he still created a Ponzi, deceiving people (for the fun of it?). If he doesn't cash it out it would be retarded (though very likely he'll do, thus the "extreme caution" is still a fair warning) but he still put up a fraudolent post.

A penitent scammer. Would be the first time. Still deserved negative even then

You keep missing the point over and over (pretty sure you are trolling, but let's go ): there is nothing more to prove relatively to the scam we contested him (id est "trying to run a Ponzi scheme"). He already did that in post one. The system is a Ponzi, by it's very structure. Wikipedia (and some brain, though very little) is your friend.

The only thing he can do now is change the first post stating the truth, i.e. this is not a secure investment where you cannot lose but just a Ponzi. That and ofc not running away with the btc on his "exchange" for a very long period of time.
Even if he corrects the post that's not going to cancel his attempted scam (ALREADY done, nothing more to prove about that), I can only mitigate the feedback (something funny like "attempted a ponzi scam but then changed his mind. So maybe now you can trust him....").
Very unlikely he'll do that anyway xD

I believe what is needed is a balanced economy. That means it can't be 99% transactions between miners and investors/speculators with an occasional real purchase transaction thrown in here and there - it should be MAJORITY regular transactions with a small percentage investment/mining. This will take time but it does need to happen. Also, some people need to be getting paid for labor and services directly in Bitcoin. Think about it, why would a regular person go through the trouble of obtaining Bitcoin or any other digital currency, to make purchases, when they could just use a credit card? Well, if they received Bitcoin as payment then they would go ahead and save or spend it just like fiat.

There's a whole article about this concept here: http://www.cryptopros.com/2014/03/working-for-cryptocurrency.html

Also, if businesses could pay employees in crypto they would have an incentive to hold the crypto they receive as payment for their goods/services, to use it to pay employees, rather than immediately exchanging it to fiat.

+1