I'd really love to go to Goa, Rome and Paris one more time before I die. I've already been to all those places and I liked them so much that I'd really love to get there once more. Also 'murica just to see if people there are like they describe them on 9GAG etc  |
|
|
|
|
Well if you are going to run a blog you'll need to regularly post new content there. Possibly multiple new articles per day. Also it has to be unique with the layout, have some features that other blogs don't have etc. to get people into reading it. Interesting articles may get you few readers, but most of them are not returning users.
|
|
|
|
I really still think it was somewhat sketchy to sell the BTC. They wouldn't sell the 100$ bills they get from some drug raid for discounted rates, wouldn't they?
No, they wouldn't have to. They'd put those bills directly in the bank because that's real money. But yeah, seized money goes in the bank, they don't incinerate it, if that's what you mean. Yea and why didn't they do something like this with the seized BTC? I bet there are all kinds of stuff they could have bought with them. Or donate them or something. |
|
|
|
|
I really still think it was somewhat sketchy to sell the BTC. They wouldn't sell the 100$ bills they get from some drug raid for discounted rates, wouldn't they?
|
|
|
|
I wanna know if it is possible to make a kind of faucet that u need to view ads and then u get paid btc for it.
It exists: http://btcclicks.com/I don't really understand the concept of this kind of site though, since people who click those ads do not have money to purchase anything which makes the clicks worthless for advertisers, but maybe I'm wrong about that. indeed , but the adsense dosent know that  You cant use adsense on PTC sites. Its against their TOS :-/ |
|
|
|
|
Would you possibly ship this to Finland and any estimates how much it would cost in total?
|
|
|
|
Actually I'm eating neither atm I'm on a diet, but I really crave for a big Pizza |
|
|
|
Thats pretty cool actually. We should make some kind of collectable card set for BTC  |
|
|
|
Im not that worried about the temp, more about the moist/rain. But Everything should be fine with them. Ill make some kind of rack for them once I get back home in few weeks  |
|
|
|
I currently only play CoD AW. Ill need to get some better hardware and upgrade my PC before I can get "serious" with this whole gaming thing |
|
|
|
Hmm it atleast did something, now multipool is showing that I'm hashing over at over 500GH/S speed Yep, thought so. You are now submitting shares more frequently so the pool has enough data to more accurately estimate and report your rate. Allright, thank you very much for your help! |
|
|
|
Hmm it atleast did something, now multipool is showing that I'm hashing over at over 500GH/S speed |
|
|
|
|
I just lowered my diff, we will see what happens. Im using multipool.us so not mining only bitcoin, does that affect how much?
|
|
|
|
My antminer shows in the miner status page that its hashing at 474GH/S, although in Multipool it only shows 381,16GH/s. Any ideas why?
I hope that is the AVG rather than the 5s rate you are stating there and would explain the difference as a result of stale / rejected shares and HW errors .... I'd hazard a guess that the difference is greatly accounted for by stales / rejects though. You most likely have a high latency connection to the pool which results rejected shares .... thus the difference in hash-speed Nope, thats not the 5s avg :-/ E: Now it shows over 400GH/S in multipool site too. Don't know what was wrong earlier Most likely when it was showing a lower rate on the pool you'd hit a patch of rejects (as your stales look normal) Yea might be. Thanks a lot for the help! : ) |
|
|
|
My antminer shows in the miner status page that its hashing at 474GH/S, although in Multipool it only shows 381,16GH/s. Any ideas why?
I hope that is the AVG rather than the 5s rate you are stating there and would explain the difference as a result of stale / rejected shares and HW errors .... I'd hazard a guess that the difference is greatly accounted for by stales / rejects though. You most likely have a high latency connection to the pool which results rejected shares .... thus the difference in hash-speed  Nope, thats not the 5s avg :-/ E: Now it shows over 400GH/S in multipool site too. Don't know what was wrong earlier |
|
|
|
|
My antminer shows in the miner status page that its hashing at 474GH/S, although in Multipool it only shows 381,16GH/s. Any ideas why?
|
|
|
|
|
Ive been running them 24/7 to avoid these kind of quick changes in temperatures. Also I think it could help the moisture thing, as the hardware is all the time pretty warm it should evaporate the moist right?
|
|
|
|
|
You're more likely to crash the car than the house.
|
|
|
|
|
1. bitcoin4eva
2. 252
3. Sr. Member
4. 1GMBE7KadSJ7g7PmKSyVD8WLmsrZH4re17
|
|
|
|
|
Im thinking of making a small case for them in the next few weeks.
First night running the miner outside (need to buy a PSU for the second one) and everything good so far.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
