A.I. ROBOT WANT BATTERIES. 

  LOL.
 I thought so too till i read her/his previous posts.
  How long till this account is sold?
  Welcome to my ignore list Mehek.Or whoever buys your account.

Gambling is tax-free in the UK.
A few years ago the UK government got rid of taxes for betting in real life bookies because they couldn't compete with tax-free online gambling sites based in Gibraltar and Jersey. IIRC.
Also,I just lost £20 on the Grand National on Saturday and i didn't pay tax.

The notes would have been worn away by now i assume.(i'm too lazy to google the lifespan of a typical fiat note)
Maybe the one's made of hemp paper might have survived.

Everything's relative.
 I got paid by cheque 2 week's ago and it took 10 days to clear in my Building Society account.
  and the parasite's still had the nerve to charge me for it too.

   I read an article about cutting down sock-puppet account's and was wondering if this idea would work for this forum CIYAM?
     It seems a good idea to me but i'm a computer illiterate.

 Another non-transactional application of Bitcoin is being developed by Joe Cascio, a semi-retired software engineer living in Connecticut. Cascio calls his innovation "collateralized identity," which he initially developed to address the problem of sockpuppetry on online forums. Because creating new accounts on online services is often free and easy, one individual can conjure up many different identities and use them to harass, spam, or otherwise annoy other users. Suspending sockpuppet accounts does little to address the problem because a malicious user will simply create new ones in their place.

Online forums have tried to defeat sockpuppetry by requiring account holders to use their real identities or by allowing pseudonymous usernames but charging a membership fee to deter one person from creating more than one account. But Cascio has developed a system allowing users to log into websites pseudonymously using Bitcoin addresses. What this means is that a website owner can restrict who can create an account based on the user's current Bitcoin balance, or even her balance history.

For example, a site might require that new users must have at least 30 days of a continuous balance of the Bitcoin equivalent of $100 associated with the address he is using for his ID. That $100 is not a membership fee you have to pay, only an average balance one has to carry for each account. That makes multiple accounts a very expensive proposition for malicious users, while remaining inexpensive for average users. Only because Bitcoin's ledger is public can the site verify that a user does indeed meet its collateral requirements.

"The fact that you can observe the history of a Bitcoin address is important because it means that you can't play Three Card Monte with IDs," says Cascio. Otherwise, a malicious user might simply move money around to different Bitcoin addresses before creating new accounts.

While Cascio only intended to address the sockpuppet issue, he has since discovered that his invention essentially leverages Bitcoin to create pseudonymous identities tied to something akin to publicly verifiable "credit histories"--something that has potential implications far beyond blocking Internet jerks.

This is the link to the article.
  http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Bitcoin%3A+more+than+money%3A+the+digital+protocol+promises+to+change...-a0374098870

  Have a charity boxing match to settle it and put it online
  You both owe me 10 minutes of my time for reading all of your petty bickering.
  I'll never get those minutes back.
 

 Yes indeed. Lot's of trolls that have never read the white paper.
         Welcome to my ignore list 12345mm.
 

 Just had some haggis,neeps and tatties. food of the gods  
 Now i'll gie ye a wee bit of Burns.

   wherever you may be,let your wind blow free
   be in church or be in chapel
   lift yer arse and let it rattle.


    Happy Burns day.
  

                                           
Satoshi was walking in Bitcoinland one day when he spotted 12 Bitcoiners fishing.
As he was watching,1 of the Bitcoiners said "Let's make sure were all here,it would be a terrible shame if 1 of us has drowned!There was 12 of us left to go fishing so i'll count to make sure were all still here."So he points at them and starts counting " 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11? Oh no,1 of us has drowned,OH, NO!".
 Then another of the Bitcoiners starts counting"1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11!  Oh no 1 of us has drowned right enough"
 Soon all the Bitcoiners have counted the same way and ALL come to 11.
                                They were making a terrible noise wailing and whining.
  All the while Satoshi is watching and shaking his head in disgust at the stupidity of the Bitcoiners.Every 1 of them had forgotten to count themselves.
     So Satoshi walks down to them and asks "what's the problem Bitcoiners?Why are you making such a noise with your awful whining?"
    Oh sir they say" 12 of us went fishing,but we all count 11 of us now,1 of us must be drowned. So were wailing and whining as loud as we can,could you help us please?"
    So Satoshi say's "I'll help you.Walk past me 1 at a time."
    As Each Bitcoiner walked by Satoshi he slapped each 1 in the face."1" slap,"2" slap,"3" slap......He slapped and numbered all 12 of them.
    When he slapped the 12th Bitcoiner they all started cheering and thanking Satoshi furiously for saving 1 of them from drowning.
    "will you come to our homes and let us thank you for saving us" said the Bitcoiners.
                                           "No" said Satoshi.
 "i'm leaving Bitcoinland and i won't be back till i find 12 people in the world that are stupider than you"
 
     

  I remember watching "the Bank of Dave".
 If i remember correctly then he had to put up £50 million to even be considered.
 The obstacles and hoops that were put in his path were disgusting.

  I do like the idea of a Bank set up by BTC friendly people though.
 Somewhere for BTC companies/exchanges to open FIAT accounts without fear of the account being shut down for trivial reasons is needed.
 I'm not suggesting a place to store BTC and i don't think the OP was either
 
 
 

  I'm not buying anymore. I'm going to hold what I've got and see what happens.
  If BTC turns to shit then I wont really miss what i'll have gambled.
 
 

Congratulations OP. You're the first arsehole I've put on my ignore list. Be proud. I think you'll be the first of many.

  10 RUN
  20 PRINT"LEARN THIS SHIT"
  30 GOTO 10


   or something like that.

It's all over bar the shouting now. The silly billys were always going to vote NO. They get Union Jack tattoos not Saltire one's and the Other half of the weegies get tri-colors tattoos.Begora.
 

It looks like NO. My vote decided   whodahvthunkit   

I agree. Ban all signatures.

One of Satoshis quotes is
 July 5, 2010: We don’t want to lead with “anonymous (currency)”… (or) “currency outside the reach of any government.” I am definitely not making an such taunt or assertion.

 When did all the talk of "anonymity" start?
 

 How would Fractional Reserve Bitcoin Lending work in practice? How would the Blockchain recognise any of the made up Bitcoins?
 Wouldn't that be like trying to double-spend the same Bitcoin?
 This sounds like it just wouldn't work to me. 

American Politician's funding "pork barrel" project's.