Depends on the exact model but i think some people are running nodes on a Pi yes.

That's the thing if you're not running your own remote NIS...You're dependent on other people keeping theirs up.

I guess the date might be relevant ?

if you keep teasing it, it best be good

Can you please keep your Lisk morons out of this thread please ?

They are making stupid posts as stupid as they are. But over there I guess they are right.

Btw I saw the post you are refering to. You were spewing complete and utter misinformation. Are people supposed to just let that stand ?
"POI is complicated POS with Exel Spreadsheet BS". "NEM is JavaScript". "NEM is using Peercoin and Namecoin tech". Really ? REALLY?

Not to mention how the fuck is anyone supposed to stop people from posting in other threads ? Maybe if you stop spreading lies about other projects people from those other projects won't post in the threads you're visting.

Don't bother answering to me you're going straight to my ignorelist.

I doubt it will be many people you're gonna attract but I still think this might be a good idea.

The project is Azure.
The moment you submit code they own that particular code. Since the code is almost nothing I'd be fine with that.

There is nothing in the agreement that suggests that they would own NEM or gain any rights other than on the code that we submit. As is clearly stated. We submit jack shit. 0 lines of actual NEM code is being submitted.

I'm not a legal expert but so far I haven't heard anyone clearly explain what sections of the agreement would grant microsofts rights to actual NEM code and why. Don't say you're not a legal expert so you shouldn't make assumptions. If you guys are all lawyers than explain some stuff to us and maybe we won't think you're paranoid anymore.

You guys just keep pointing out sections. Those sections don't sound problematic to most people because they only seem to entail the code we submit. Which again is very little and not at all related to actual code of NIS.

Anyway, we're never all going to agree so we might as well stop discussing it.

I'm sure nembit, rockethead or makoto can answer that in greater detail. From what I can tell it'll be quite a few though.

Nope. You need password + wallet file or private-key. No otherway to access a specific account.

Gotta love it when people tweet about someone or something but not at that person/project.

that's exactly what cryptoapex is gonna be.

What's great about Azure is that people can deploy NIS and test NEM with the click of a button. If companies are gonna test blockchain platforms that's prob where they are gonna be looking for them. It's not about the buzz or whatever, it's about exposure. So it's not THAT big a deal but it is important imho.
It would be better if microsoft put in more effort to vet projects but what are you gonna do...

This is no news....yet. People keep your panties on or you might be dissapointed later on. NEM isn't on azure yet. A pull-request does not yet equal being listed.
If people spent 4 seconds scrolling that page down you'd see that there is actually a technical problem with the template that we're trying to fix (no biggie, just pointing it out to show how little care people take in validating info).
So for once don't give in to the hype and only celebrate when we're officially on it (which I'm confident will happen).

We issued that request like 2 hours ago...how are you guys finding this shit so fast

The word dev in crypto land is pretty much anyone involved in a project. I'm positive some people don't even realize it's short for developer and just use it to describe anyone working in anyway on a project.

I don't have details on the attack but i understand it involved social engineering the support. That can take at least 2 days and only after the support acted would kodtycon have known that the flaw indeed exists. So it's hard to pinpoint how long after he knew that his attack was successfull he contacted the exchange. Within 1 day I'd say qulifies as immediately given that timezones and support response times were involved. That's subjective and debateable but to me that seems like he did tell them in a reasonable amount of time.

I'd like to point out that richie stated that a NEM Dev contacted him. For all I know he could have thought kodtycon is a NEM dev. I have seen 0 proof of the fact that they only made contact after cecvw posted here. You guys keep claiming it but I have seen no proof of it. Truth is only the people that were involved in the conversation can know and since you werent involved, I wasn't involved and cecvw wasn't involved neither of us should be making any claims regarding the timeline because we simply can't know for sure.

Also know that multiple exchanges were contacted when the flaw was discovered. They people involved wanted to get all exchanges to fix the flaw. If you think about it not posting publicly about this makes a lot of sense if you know of a flaw and you have no malicous intent then you want that flaw fixed before it goes public. Makes sense no ?



I and everyone else understands the facts. We simply see them differently and understand that this is a matter that NEM itself wasn't involved. We can't know who knew what and when they knew it so smearing everyone and their uncle is absurd. Why try to smear a project that some people are working very hard on because one person acted in a way that cecvw didn't like ? It makes no sense and since you guys are constantly regering to justice...where's the justice in that ?


I'm supposed to cut all my ties with NEM. My XEM and the contact i have with the people are all ties I have to NEM so clearly that is what is asked.


Yet when people clarify or ask for clarification on your (cecvw and you) part all we get is stuff about scandals and cover ups instead of level headed responses. You guys are the ones that see a conspiracy in everything so we don't get to clarify anything because anything we say is just to cover stuff up which is absurd. We have no reason to cover it up because we only care about NEM and NEM wasn't involved in this mess kodtycon was. And the only wrong thing he did was use someone elses coins to test the attack which cecvw according to the messages seems to have been cool with until he didn't get part of the bounty. 


I guess I answered all of it.

So now you can only repsond in non-sequitors anymore ? You could have pointed out what was incorrect in my post or what I omitted. Instead you chose to start talking about rat ships. Okay. Well then it's time to finally ignore you.

I did read the whole thing. You only have reason to be angry at kodtycoon and noone else.
As I said, jabo stoped replying to you because of your ridiculous behaviour.
I still don't understand what I did either. Also cover things up ?
Can you even tell us what we tried to cover up ? Kodtycoon social engineered exchanges. That's out in the open and noone is denying it. We have no reason to cover any of that up because it has nothing to do with NEM. The exchanges even seem happy about it since one of them payed out a bounty. The only relation to NEM is that kodtycoon once was in the marketing team. So if tomorrow someone else from the team or the community kills someone I suppose the whole team is supposed to get locked up ?

Do you really not see how absurd your demands are and how idiotic your behaviour is ? Honest question...do you really not see that ? Because I'm starting to feel actually sorry for you.

So this sounds like you should be angry at kodtycoon and noone else. That's the only thing that would make sense and the only thing others would agree with you. You have absolutely no reason to smear NEM or anyone other than kodtycoon which is also why you'll never hear an apology from them (or i guess "us").

Noone covered anything up. Jabo didn't answer you anymore because you behave like a psychopath.
Why the fuck would I cut ties with NEM. Do you know what you're asking here ? I'm supposed to sell all my XEM and never talk to anyone related to NEM anymore because you're mentally ill ? That's what you want ? I had nothing todo with this entire mess.

He told them immediately after the hack and got a freaking bounty for it. Do yout not realize this ? The exchanges thanked him for it. Why would he return that bounty ? He was given it by the exchanges for showing them a flaw in the way they handle things.

The only thing you could rightfully be angry about would be kodtycoon using your funds to do the "hacking". But you werent you deranged little kid. You only started going nuts when you realized you wouldn't get a cut of that bounty and now you're trying smear everyone that tried to resolve the issue that wasn't on your side (because noone in their right mind will ever be fully on your side)

/edited for PG-13