Hello, I do not understand why I am unable to use yacminer. /
-R 2560 -g 1 --buffer-size 2560 --lookup-gap 8 5*280x 1*7870 8Gb Memory YACoin N=16 today! you overrun your GPU's memory with these settings! (R= far too high) Perhaps these settings work earlier with lower N value but really not with N16. Look N tables what tell how much memory N16 need for one calc then you know what is perhaps ok R with lookupgap 8 and your buffer size (your buffer size is ok for 3Gb GPU's). I think these are not optimal settins because same rig gan hash N14 chacha over 17khash/s. Also this may give some help http://www.ultracoin.net/configgen_raw.html(remember select N16) Btw...how fast hashing you expect with R9 280x with N16? Many thanks, but buffer don't work ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) What is the correct hashrate for 280x ? [/quote]
|
|
|
Hello, I do not understand why I am unable to use yacminer. /
-R 2560 -g 1 --buffer-size 2560 --lookup-gap 8 5*280x 1*7870 8Gb Memory YACoin N=16 today! you overrun your GPU's memory with these settings! (R= far too high) Perhaps these settings work earlier with lower N value but really not with N16. Look N tables what tell how much memory N16 need for one calc then you know what is perhaps ok R with lookupgap 8 and your buffer size (your buffer size is ok for 3Gb GPU's). Also this may give some help http://www.ultracoin.net/configgen_raw.html(remember select N16) Btw...how fast hashing you expect with R9 280x with N16? Many thanks, but buffer don't work ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) What is the correct hashrate for 280x ? [/quote] If you have R9 280x 3Gb memory right buff value is normally (afaik) 2560 (least if system memory is enough! for whole rig) but.. if lookup gap is 8 and -g1, your -R is far too high. Start tuning with low -R. (also you can try -g 2 but then agen other parameters need be related to it) I will recommend (because problems) that first run only with 1 to 4 r9 280x connected to board and look how you can adjust it for work. If I remember right it is far below 500hash/s for one 280x. I use R7 240 4Gb and Nvidia 750Ti's for YAC. (time when I test r9 280x there was too many difficulties and also (perhaps partially due to yacminer when pool diff drops below 1), high power consumption related to hashing speed. R7 240 and Nvidia 750Ti beats it clearly (with N16, if N is lower situation turn very different) Example: N14 chacha, My 4x750Ti rigs give around 12.5khash/s (some loss due to risers what affect with Nvidia but not with AMD radeons) and 4xR9 280x give around 17.5khash/s. But Nvidia use lot of less power related to hashrate. With N16 situation is even more bad for R9 280x. If it is even over 500h/s for one r9 280x then I still use these for YAC and immediately turn my R9 280 rigs to YAC ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) ) And with N16 it is fun but R7 240 4G start show its advantages. 0.35khash/s and perhaps something like ~25W power (if moderate overclocked). (not system total power but card itself) Add: just fast tiny test without any fine adjusting for best result. 250-260 hash/s one r9 280x, clocks e 1100 and m 1500 (changing m to 1600 did not give anything) g 1, l-g 8, buff 2560, R 1260 (crash if try 1280) exept gpu 0 (display) what crash even with this but it can run with R 1220. I did not test with g 2 or other settings. Rig have 4x r9 280x. and mobo is Asrock H81 BTC and 8Gb mem.
|
|
|
This coin do not have even working block chain Explorer! If someone think coin can use for real markets as what ever "money" this is first thing what need work without any problems and allways 24/7/365 and with redundancy. If I sell something in business to other people using UTC I need reliable block chain Explorer to watch transactions. If this do not work reliable do not try "sell" this coin to wide markets for more wide use than mining and immediate exchange or just mine and hold. Your marketing work goes like water drop to desert if most important basics do not work reliable. Other amazing thing is oficial web side. It is some kind of big terrible hassle with obsolete information and most links are obsolete / broken. Yes I know it IS hard work but it is only way if want UTC really rise to wide use. UTC is very good technically but it is very pity that all information etc is like Magpie's nest. And days without block chain Explorer without any explanation. How markets can believe this coin if it is still builded over quagmire. There can get more investors and users but after they find this situation they run away very easy. Look coin front page and count how many links are working. Look this thread OP and do same. If business want use bulk wallets (it is normal practice) for transactions do you really think that UTC qt-wallet is installed in every computer and keeped up to date with all Private keys for every addresses without even good possible to watch individual transactions )of course can but... it is also security problem) So where to look. Of course block chain explorer. But it looks UTC block chain Explorer is not working. It need keep in reliable and redundant servers 60/60/24/365 working. Where is information about this situation and predicted time how many minutes this situation is still continuing? http://ultracha.in/Service Temporarily Unavailable The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later. Or is there some reason to hide block chain?
|
|
|
Hello, I do not understand why I am unable to use yacminer. /
-R 2560 -g 1 --buffer-size 2560 --lookup-gap 8 5*280x 1*7870 8Gb Memory [/quote] YACoin N=16 today! you overrun your GPU's memory with these settings! (R= far too high) Perhaps these settings work earlier with lower N value but really not with N16. Look N tables, it tell how much memory N16 need for one calc then you know what is perhaps ok R with lookupgap 8 and your buffer size (your buffer size is ok for 3Gb GPU's). This time N=16. (N14 need 4Mb, N15 need 8Mb and N16 need 16Mb. Next step, N17 need 32Mb etc... (if stay with -g 1) Lookup gap 8 means that this 16Mb (or what ever it is with current N value) is divided to 8 "gaps". So, one is 2Mb. Memory (buffer) 2560Mb can take 1280 2Mb "gaps" at once. So -R max is 1280. then this "hassle" (--temp-cutoff 95 --gpu-fan 0-100 --auto-gpu --temp-target 85 --temp-overheat 95 ) any idea for these paramaters? Why run so hot, and why --auto-gpu? If I set these for my R9 280x rigs (Sapphire Toxic R9 280x) I will set --temp-cutoff 90 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --temp-target 70 --temp-overheat 80 --temp-hysteresis 2 I do not understand what for you use --auto-gpu ?? it is for autoadjust GPU clocks (for temperature), really strange in this situation. (perhaps mistake) And if really need some details. I'm not GPU specialist! So these are only some winks for starting finer adjusting. Also this may give some help http://www.ultracoin.net/configgen_raw.html(remember select N16) Btw...how fast hashing you expect with R9 280x with N16?
|
|
|
Block chain Explorer down? Yesterday I try and today. These kind of things need be reliable. Lot of hype about marketing but basic things need also care. Block chain Explorer is one very basic thing. Service Temporarily Unavailable The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later. How many days is temporary? I want invest to this coin but basic things need work reliable. Marketing peoples do hard and nice work but technical things/services need also be on the same level.
|
|
|
Is it possible to adjust pools(s) so that diff do not drop under 1. Or is it possible find other solution, example so that user can set minimum. It looks like yacminer is somehow in troubles with <1 diff's. Here Thirtybird comment about pool diff and yacminer: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=206577.msg9041513#msg9041513 (it is in YAC thread because there peoples find lot of problems after change to N16 and miners who use yacminer. After then some YAC pool change diff to 1 and it was solution for this problem. This is also some kind of problem with UTC if use yacminer and small workers. I just made tests with one testing machine what have only one test GPU (this time R7 240 4Gb) and soon pool drops diff under 1 and after then yacminer do not take these to accepted shares counting. Edit/Add:This info I did not see before: (I have used ultracoins.info and after then http://ultracoinpool.info ) Pool: http://ultracoiners.info/ Static Diff on port 3333 (Yacminer) <=== Vardiff on port 4444. Also what nice surprice, some kind people have moved my account from ultracoins.info to this ultracoiners.info. Well done. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Now I can make tests with static diff.
|
|
|
Also what hashrate can I expect with the current N-factor? I have two r9 290x (Saphire trixx). at the moment I am getting 18 Kh/s on each, while my CPU (intel xeon) givs ~25 hashes/s / thread.
Something is wrong. R9 290x is not over 4 times faster than Sapphire toxic R9 280x. With "conservative" settings for reliability, one R9 280x give around 4.2-4.5 khash/s. With some aggressive settings it can pump some small amount higher depending many things. R9 290x can not be 4x faster. So, my opinion is that something is wrong with your settings if it continuoysly show 18kh/s for one R9 290x. I would also guess that @ 18kh/s he's getting massive HW errors. He needs to post a screenshot of his cmd window and show what settings are being used. You are perfectly right. I restarted the machine and now it shows plenty of HW, don't know why it didn't before. My settings are: yacminer --scrypt-chacha --worksize 128 -g 1 --lookup-gap 3 --buffer-size 3532 -R 10496 -o stratum+tcp://ultracoiners.info:3333 -u <> -p <> --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600 which is exactly what I got from the config website in the OP. Any idea where to start for really conservative settings for R9 290x? I actually never used Yacminer before, and I started first with ultracoinminer with the settings from the config website. This crashed my AMD display driver (which "recovered successfully") but then it only showed 0.0 Kh/s, I tried to tweak the settings but it never helped, so I gave up and switched to Yacminer. Actually thought I had it working, but no joy ..... The settings I had for ultraminer was: ultracoinminer --scrypt-jane --worksize 128 -g 1 --lookup-gap 3 --thread-concurrency 98400 -I 13 -o stratum+tcp://ultracoiners.info:4444 -u <> -p <> --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 Any help highly appreciated! / I used the config generator for a 290x with 4GB of ram and here is what I got for yacminer. Very different from yours. yacminer --scrypt-chacha --worksize 128 -g 1 --lookup-gap 8 --buffer-size 3532 -R 7040 -o stratum+tcp://<pool address>:<port> -u <username> -p <password> --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600 If your card has 6GB of ram then it should be --lookup-gap 7 --buffer-size 5416 -R 9344 How much DRAM does your mobo have? It plays a big part with high N-factors. He have used N12 ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Imho, this -R 10496 is far too high for N14 and specially if also lookup gap is only 3, your buffer is far too small for this massive amount. N14 means 8M mem need for one.... Try R under 1000 and start then increase it for find optimum. (do not look only miner display and gross hashrate, look also how pool "think" about your hashing) If you use higher lookup gap then of course raw intensity (-R) can be higher. I do not know if lookup gap 3 is optimum with your system. But if these are used your -R is really lot of too high. Of course my thinking here may be bullshit because it is long time I have adjusted amd radeon mining. Btw From http://www.ultracoin.net/configgen_raw.html for R9 290x 4Gb mem and N14------------------------- yacminer --scrypt-chacha --worksize 128 -g 1 -- lookup-gap 8 --buffer-size 3532 -R 7040 -o stratum+tcp://<pool address>:<port> -u <username> -p <password> --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600 ------------------------- Then example If yo drop lookup gap half then you need also drop -R I believe you have accidentally used N12 when you get these values!
|
|
|
Also what hashrate can I expect with the current N-factor? I have two r9 290x (Saphire trixx). at the moment I am getting 18 Kh/s on each, while my CPU (intel xeon) givs ~25 hashes/s / thread.
Something is wrong. R9 290x is not over 4 times faster than Sapphire toxic R9 280x. With "conservative" settings for reliability, one R9 280x give around 4.2-4.5 khash/s. With some aggressive settings it can pump some small amount higher depending many things. R9 290x can not be 4x faster. So, my opinion is that something is wrong with your settings if it continuoysly show 18kh/s for one R9 290x.
|
|
|
Great? My earnings drops dramatically. 50% drop or even more. Without any markable change in difficulty what have been around 0.0012. Something is now very odd if compare time before this change. Also now there is lot of more times when my workers drops offline. Previously my 2 rigs (GPU rigs) never show in pool "my workers" that they are off. Now many times. Now my other miners, (i7 cpu's) are mostly "off". Previously system (pool) works just ok. Now it is so terrible that perhaps need try solo. I do not accept over 50% drop without any markable change in Network and my hashrate. Rule no 1. is that do not "repair" and "adjust" well working system.
Qxw, you shouldn't cry so much! Because with your nvidia miner you had constantly get two times more yacs since 0.25 difficulty. So you owe all the amd gpu's miners (such as Grim) literally! ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Do you mean that now I should turn on my amd rigs for YAC. And use nvidia's for other things... ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Yes, these nvidia rigs can use also nicely with N14 chacha. 4x750Ti give around 12-13kh/s and 4x R9 "toxic" 280x house heating rigs around 16.5-17.5kh/s (gross) But, if need pay electric and if heat goes to waste, these nvidia beats these amd radeons clearly. With N16 chacha, nvidia 750Ti even more better than R9 280x what start really get hick-up with N16 chacha. Previously I did some exercise with my R7 240 4Gb test card, ands result was poor and then also I did not have time to do more deep testings. Also with R9 280x I give hands up with N16 chacha. Perhaps after this change I can try agen if result is better. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) btw, also I have noted this situation time ago but no one react to this what is really going on. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) What is going on in http://yac.coinmine.pl---------------------------------- ..........Own...............Pool Valid .......4.................58 Invalid......0................ 3,222Efficiency..100.00%...... 1.76%---------------------------------- This ihave been typical situation after change to N16 Perhaps some miners have forget change miners settings. Nearly all (~98%) hashing power go to garbage. Edit|Add: Previously I did some exercise with my R7 240 4Gb test card, ands result was poor and then also I did not have time to do more deep testings. Also with R9 280x I give hands up with N16 chacha. Perhaps after this change I can try agen if result is better. After pool diff set to 1 (previously 0.25) I have tested agen my R7 240 4Gb with yacminer and YAC. Result: without any problems easy to 350h/s 340hash/s (gross) (Engine 1140 1100, Mem 1000). It can more but stability is not perfect and start generate HW'errs or just crash randomly. Now yacminer also show accepteds ok. Edit Add 2: Are there some kind of bug in yacminer or is it only that I do not understand something. If set yacminer for debug display, it display N17 for every works. (but top part of display of course show N16 as it is)
|
|
|
Now it works great.
Great? My earnings drops dramatically. 50% drop or even more. Without any markable change in difficulty what have been around 0.0012. Something is now very odd if compare time before this change. Also now there is lot of more times when my workers drops offline. Previously my 2 rigs (GPU rigs) never show in pool "my workers" that they are off. Now many times. Now my other miners, (i7 cpu's) are mostly "off". Previously system (pool) works just ok. Now it is so terrible that perhaps need try solo. I do not accept over 50% drop without any markable change in Network and my hashrate. Rule no 1. is that do not "repair" and "adjust" well working system. Please change pool hashrate display to display hashes/s instead of khashes/s. khash/s display is too rough for N16. With this peoples can check what miner display and pool thinks about hashrate. If there is too big difference then people need find problem in his own end. I can not yet proof it but now it really looks like that pool do not count every accepted shares. (if I look my miners displays and pool dashboard "valid" count. They do not match and after this change situation looks like more bad. (lest in my case)
|
|
|
My ping time to coinmine.pl is short (ok) to m-s-t.org I have nearly 200ms ping. (too long)
|
|
|
22316340 2014-10-01 10:03:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733320 1.50679363 22316304 2014-10-01 10:01:17 Credit Unconfirmed 733319 1.55030560 22316250 2014-10-01 09:59:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733316 0.43363034 22316212 2014-10-01 09:57:20 Credit Unconfirmed 733313 5.59282703 22316197 2014-10-01 09:57:18 Credit Unconfirmed 733312 0.94767658 22316167 2014-10-01 09:57:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733311 0.79072479 22316087 2014-10-01 09:51:14 Credit Unconfirmed 733309 1.16129224 22316036 2014-10-01 09:49:14 Credit Unconfirmed 733308 1.35420698 22315992 2014-10-01 09:45:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733306 2.30316628 22315956 2014-10-01 09:43:14 Credit Unconfirmed 733305 0.81627933 22315906 2014-10-01 09:39:16 Credit Unconfirmed 733302 0.40344660 22315864 2014-10-01 09:35:21 Credit Unconfirmed 733298 2.54600240 22315790 2014-10-01 09:33:19 Credit Unconfirmed 733293 2.63525360 22315704 2014-10-01 09:31:17 Credit Unconfirmed 733289 1.30545441 22315662 2014-10-01 09:31:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733287 1.30149329 22315554 2014-10-01 09:27:18 Credit Unconfirmed 733283 1.18269141 22315520 2014-10-01 09:25:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733281 1.57416931 22315492 2014-10-01 09:23:17 Credit Unconfirmed 733280 3.54202010 22315462 2014-10-01 09:23:14 Credit Unconfirmed 733279 0.54824572 22315414 2014-10-01 09:19:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733276 0.67089192 22315369 2014-10-01 09:17:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733274 1.34660404 22315331 2014-10-01 09:15:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733272 1.75452770 22315260 2014-10-01 09:13:14 Credit Unconfirmed 733268 2.09565559 22315227 2014-10-01 09:11:14 Credit Unconfirmed 733266 0.28170141 22315167 2014-10-01 09:09:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733264 1.69457343 22315133 2014-10-01 09:07:17 Credit Unconfirmed 733263 1.10741843 22315097 2014-10-01 09:07:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733261 1.17533640 22315058 2014-10-01 09:03:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733258 0.48356682 22315004 2014-10-01 08:59:17 Credit Unconfirmed 733255 0.33286607 22314963 2014-10-01 08:59:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733254 1.24300278
efficiency 100% (miner shows 7 rejected shares in 37 hours)
Now it is clear. Something is not ok and you really do not get enough if rig is 4x 0.34kh/s (>1.3kh/s brut. total) and all works optimally. I can not help with R7 240 4Gb settings (and also there is many other things that just card model) because I use Nvidia 750 Ti rigs for YAC. (one 750Ti give around 0.3 - 0.33kh/s with very conservative OC and also with 1x risers. (1x risers also drop small amount of hashrate when use with Nvidia cards but Radeons are different and risers do not mean "anything") If you look pool statistics and there Graphs, what it tell about your hashing speed (if yoy try estimate some kind of average from graph) (With R9 280x rigs I meet so severe difficulties with chacha N16 that I give hands up with these, partially also due to lack of time to do exercises, and I leave these for N14 mining) I have one R7 240 4Gb waiting on my table for some tests later after I get some free time and some HW for start testing with it.
|
|
|
4x 340 hash/s should give true 1200 hash/s (work utility)
so you guys tell me what to expect with 1.2 khash/s in yac per day ...
imo about 1300 to 1500 yac
my confirmed and unconfirmed after exactly 24h was about 650 yac
I'm now into 37 hours and it doesn't look to catch up at all.
PS: in the past such calculations worked out just fine (n14 + n15)
650 YAC is too low for this your miner. (with today total net hashrate) Go to your account and there transactions. Take copypaste about ~20 last credits. Here example Last there is block number and amount of YAC 22316112 2014-10-01 09:53:14 Credit Unconfirmed 733310 4.33114867 22316072 2014-10-01 09:51:14 Credit Unconfirmed 733309(Block) 6.30415787 (YAC) 22316020 2014-10-01 09:49:14 Credit Unconfirmed 733308 6.19066049 22315981 2014-10-01 09:45:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733306 8.06108196 22315940 2014-10-01 09:43:14 Credit Unconfirmed 733305 5.85000185 22315892 2014-10-01 09:39:16 Credit Unconfirmed 733302 4.84135920 22315857 2014-10-01 09:35:21 Credit Unconfirmed 733298 5.09200481 22315840 2014-10-01 09:35:19 Credit Unconfirmed 733297 9.21624784 22315824 2014-10-01 09:35:17 Credit Unconfirmed 733296 6.36020314 22315804 2014-10-01 09:35:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733295 6.64838603 22315780 2014-10-01 09:33:19 Credit Unconfirmed 733293 5.27050720 22315753 2014-10-01 09:33:17 Credit Unconfirmed 733292 4.07729032 22315722 2014-10-01 09:33:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733290 4.23483488 22315692 2014-10-01 09:31:17 Credit Unconfirmed 733289 7.39757501 22315647 2014-10-01 09:31:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733287 6.29055092 22315609 2014-10-01 09:27:27 Credit Unconfirmed 733285 7.74286435 22315577 2014-10-01 09:27:20 Credit Unconfirmed 733284 2.87797119 22315542 2014-10-01 09:27:18 Credit Unconfirmed 733283 4.13941994 22315511 2014-10-01 09:25:15 Credit Unconfirmed 733281 4.72250791 22315479 2014-10-01 09:23:17 Credit Unconfirmed 733280 8.85505025
I know now your hashrate (your miner showed hash rate) and I know my hashrate so I can do some kind of estimate if you have too low reward. What is your accepted and invalids typically (%) bottom of dashboard?
|
|
|
I just tried mining for a day on yac.coinmine.pl
with 4x R7 240 4 GB.
each card hashes at about 340 h/s.
The problem is all the values of the miner are 0 and most values of the pool are very inaccurate. Probably due to the fact that anything below 1 khash is rounded or not shown.
Do not mind pool statistics numbers as hashing speed or estimated reward. What matter is amount of YAC you get to your account. (Note also 520 confirmation delay, nearly 9 hours) Can you tell amount of coins what you get per hour? Or example what is unconfirmed total amount after 9 hours of mining.
|
|
|
Buddy Thiago..... there are to much problems lately with the pools from you. Please considerer to make the pools more professional and stable because they are very important for UTC and we can not have does instability with the pools http://ultracoins.info has been expanded for this reason we decided to move our server a larger one,all data of our users were moved to the new http://ultracoiners.info All user can login as the Same At Ultracoin.info do not need register. Ultracoin.info go stay open for all users to withdrawall the coins.The new pool twice faster,less orphan hight Performance Thanks for all support .2 DAYS Left Until pool TURN OFF the STRATUM Cannot login to withdraw my coins. Please help me check. Sent PM to you but no answer ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Hey buddy the Vps provider still Down but i ready contact to them as soon as the turn back on i let You know where can withdrawall the coins sorry for the problem causing +1 These loosy works need stop immediately and peoples who have enough authority in dev team need set rules for quality and reliability of services what can hold term "official". If this kind of kids play continue this is soon agen one "shit coin". UTC is too good to destroy with this kind of loosy crap working. All crap works need flush out as soon as possible.
|
|
|
If someone use Bter exchange and you have old YAC deposit address, it is good to check if it have changed! Around bit over 2 weeks ago I have used Bter (because Cryptsy problems this time) Nearly every time I need communicate with Bter (using ticket) that where are my coins. All times they answer quite fast and always then (perhaps manually) they move coins to my Bter balance. After then I ask that they need fix this problem and Bter tell that they are allready working with it and it looks that they have done it. But it was not nice to wait this ticket handling (in my case it was fast))
Yesterday I move some amount of YAC to Bter and, (good luck) before I make transfer I check my deposit address for sure that it is ok. Surprice, without any notice there was new deposit address and I did not ask new.
First I send small amount (need be over 10YAC) for check. It looks like they have repaired something and deposit work now fast without any extra delay. After then I made 3 times agen normal bigger amount deposit and every time it works now ok and fast.
Just, please check if also your deposit address have changed if you have previously used Bter and you may have old deposit address in your wallet address book.
Main reason why I "exercise" with Bter is that Bter have also direct YAC exchnage to fiat money. YAC <-> CNY (RMB) and of course then direct fast transfer/deposit to bank account. (because some times I visit in China)
|
|
|
@primouno, please could you tell me what hashrate I should be getting for a 7950? Ballpark, I never mined UTC before but these seem (to me) like very low numbers.
R9 280x give around 4.4-4.5kh/s (with settings so that it run bullet proof without crashing and of course latest yacminer and 13.12 drivers, win7) and wild quess 7950 give less. You need remember that all is in same boat. With r9 280x give easy 740-760kh/s with normal scrypt. And about half if look normal "scrypt N" (N = 2048)) UTC is not this. It is scrypt chacha and N value is today 14 ! (N=16384) My wild quess is that 9750 can give something around 3kh/s. Today if run 3kh/s it may give something like 25 UTC in 24h. (with today typical difficulty) If get 2mBTC / 24h it is much more than what ever other coin with this same hardware. (but perhaps it give more if do not sell now! - mine and hold. UTC value is really low now) But really I have experience only with r9 280x rigs (sapphire toxic) and Nvidia 750Ti's what also may give around 3kh/s with much much less power that radeon GPU's yacminer is perhaps best today for ati radeon GPU's If go more difficult coin as example YAC where Nvalue is 16 it is much morre difficult and hashrate drops lot of. But do not worry, all other miners with this coin is in same boat with same kind of hashing speed.
|
|
|
There's yac.coinmine.pl, yac.m-s-t.org and I've heard there's a new one called tumblingblock but I haven't tried it.
Solo mining is where I'm at right now - there's no shame or fear there. If you don't know how to do it, google "solo mine dogecoin" or "solo mine litecoin" or "solo mine any coin" - the instructions are all nearly the same.
links are obsolete because people come and go - the coin is nearly 1.5 years old now. If you want to start a P2P mining ring, go for it, but I don't think that idea has ever really lasted long
your comment about an "insiders club" makes me laugh - you realize we _WANT_ people to mine YAC, right? That's kind of the point... Jumping to conclusions and spreading FUD is not warranted.
European pool? - Silly me - I always assumed Poland was in Europe? When did it move?
Yes I know Poland is in europe.also I 'm in europe. But some reason I have been over 90ms ping to yac.coinmine.pl ( I do not know why and did not anymore remember traceroute) I have cheked ping many times and same reult. But now I have checked agen, and what surprice: 0.233 ms, 0.247 ms, 0.253 ms, 0.264 ms Of course there is small possible that I have previously made some mistake and mixed some things... In my situation solo mining with 2 GPU rigs and 2 CPU is not very good idea and I will stay very well working yac.coinmine.pl But I have checked all these pools you listed. Just ago: Tumbling 0 h/s; yac.coinmine.pl around ~20kh/s; yac.m-s-t.org around 15kh/s Network around 115kh/s So out from these pools come something like >70kh/s and this put me thinking that if there is some other pool what is not well known. Of course there may be solo miners but around 70% of hash rate from solo miners souds some amount strange in this case but of course well possible. So I just made question if there is some p2p pool what is not well informed. Sorry, I know well where is Poland ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Perhaps this was some amount loosy "Where are european pools (p2p or others)." I was thinking specially p2p pools but after I edited my text... In history (tens of years ago) I have listened lot of Radio Poland on short waves. (in this time was not any kind of internet and important fast "email" communication method was telex and later telefax also) I believe YAC is part of future. Imho Also ASIC business (or some near future technology things) do not easy destroy this.
|
|
|
@Thirtybird; @devlin
Thanks. Good clarification.
-------- Network hash rate have rised over 130kh/s But, where are pools? I can see 2 pools what have around <40kh/s. I can not find any p2p pools and I can not find pools where are rest miners. Is this page 1. pools list updated?
I wonder if there is so much solo miners?
Example I do not want solo mine (and also not know exactly how to do it) with my poor average 2.8kh/s hash power (only this amount I can use for YAC because my R9 280x rigs really are not at all for N16 (they can but N16 is really not for these radeons)
How can find p2p nodes? In YAC coin information side and here page one many links are obsolete. It is not good for coin in long run if it is some kind of "insiders club". Informatrion need be updated.
Where are european pools (p2p or others). Today I use pool what have shortest ping for me and it is still moderate high ~90ms.
|
|
|
|