CURRENT BITCOIN BLOCK: 601845
BITCOIN BLOCK FOR CLIENT SEED: 601857

Any clue why 601846 to 601856 were not chosen but 601857? I may answer: they were used but winner is not the house owned ID until 601857. Someone if you know how is the calculation, please check if 601846 to 601856 yield any winner please.

The most questionable things that look suspicious is the ticket list & block id used for the draw were published at the same time with winner ID announcement. At least they could post the list first and announce the block ID which is 1 or 2 days ahead before the drawing taking place. It's fair if this block number was published before the announcement of drawing and then the winner, but in this case it's not and it's big question lol. Any way, you should do that way next draw.

Their Twitter said "LAMBO ROUND 1" which mean it's repeat...too much profit for them lol.

What I can say and suggest for you is start over all again, with assumption that bankroll did not go anywhere and did not get rekted from trades or gambling as accused you have much more than enough to start everything new, the bank roll is big enough together with knowledge and asset (website codes, operating model) you can easily come up a whole new thing/ new webite and brand (with different identity of course) together with buch of attractive contests it's a sure and far better chance of success rather than keeping betking.io since it's dead already and let it be. So many dice sites are popping up and that's the chance as well as advantage for you since they will and certainly do not have that much bankroll compared to you (again, assume the coins are still there).

It might be not good for me to say so, since it is a kind of giving hand to cheater in people view, but that's the fact. Kill the dead brand and go for a whole new thing is better lol.

Trying to sell a script is not a very good option, the most realistic is to bind the script into referer & referrals model where players are free to play and you get benefit from referrals income, but sadly there is no way to force that thing on most of the sites out there, none of them has feature to allow that except freebitco.in (some works required to do that).

You did not get it, the numbers does not yield correct result for sure, it's more or less for marketing purpose. 376,000 includes stakes for both won/lose bets, 194,000 is the amount won back on total of 376,000 spent on stakes of both winning and losing bets, this includes winning amounts are reused for betting again and counted toward that total wagered number, the real amount used for turning around would be much lesser. Simple math, since the site edge is 5% or 1/20 then the mean amount of 18800 bitcoins are used to wager that total 376,000 count of bitcoins and the site's profit is within 18800 bitcoin.

Nah, i am not sure about other strategy, but for my case I would call it is a success case. As for your situation (which lose everything within a minute) I have experienced and work out my way (with references and research of course) to the state that I am currently on which is not losing and not risking of losing but getting out with profit (slowly and steady). I am confident with it because I can see the variances after enough number of bets. On the site I am playing now it's 39 and almost 40 millions bets placed, and the variances already happened and tend to repeat. Yes, "repeat", this is the most important factor since I can see it is repeated thus, I can control it (aka beating a losing streak with enough balance & satisfy the casino constraints).

Good to hear that you are still in success with your revised martingale. I myself having own revised martingale, not double the bet size, not playing for high win chance but "suitable" win chance. The conclusion is "it's success" and also agree with you that with suitable strategy, the moment that the defined balance drained to 0 will be definately long enough that we might not witness in one life time.

Yep, he need to understand both things: effort needed and reward received. Only 0.05% of work needed but it's reward is much much more than that.

For any browser type in the domain only and press Ctrl + Enter, the .com part is automatically filled. On a mobile phone keyboard there is a .com key (to help mobile user type the domain faster, cos they can't press Ctrl + Enter on their phone)...If the .COM is not important, then those software / hardware developvers wouldn't care to have that feature on their products!

That's not correct 100%. Look at my below stat and use your method to predict how lucky I am, and when will I got bursted.

It's fair enough, which a gambler might normally desposit 0.01-0.02 but now they might increase the amount to 0.05, from a statistical view it already help increase wagering amount thus increased income for them.Out of 100% of the users deposited, it may need less than 1% of them to keep the coin there and managed to wager & lost is enough.

Check current stat of wagered vs player won. Currently it's 0.5+/- BTC income on their Dice, this stat got reset somehow but it's there for like 2 weeks since their last database upgrade. 0.5 Btc for two weeks or 1.0 Btc a month, I don't think it can cover all the operation costs. Don't want to make you down but this is the fact, thus act fast since there are numerous of dice sites including many new ones are getting famous extremely fast, you surely don't want that happen which player go for these sites and stay there.

New names doesn't mean new people, that the fact. In term of a business I don't think it perform well enough, it might be OK for a single man company but they have many employees...their total wager volume per week might need to be much more bigger than this.

Act fast, change fast, do it fast and make it Bitdice!

It's not 100% about resolving withdrawal issues, an established casino shall have automatic payment system and for any specific "big" amount which is higher than a specific mark, they should notify users (i.e: an email saying so to let the player know / estimate when will payment happen). For this case: the casino play the game and the player fall into it exactly the way they want (delay and keep silent is the best strategy to beat player mood), and as a player his anger ruined his day.

Also, the use of "forum" is nonsense regarding to this matter, and it's not an excuse that the casino owner is more active on public forum than staying with his casino and monitor it to support customers in a timely manner, rather than let the customer bring the issue to a public forum (so that he need to act to protect his casino reputation).

I am more on "I/they/we don't care, since I/they/we did not urge to play on the site". I personally realized that after few minutes playing around with the site when I was seeking for sites 3 plus months ago, and then go away/ never turning back with simple thought that "it favour the house".

The key thing for them on Dice game is Min Bet vs Max Win range is too low to let a dice bot play for long enough rather than 0.49 vs 0.50 thing.

For this case it includes both: logical calculation & personal experience. His bot initially perform not very effective (hit a rare streak once every two or three weeks) but after sometimes play and together with input from other users it achieve a near perfect result (hit a rare streak once every two or three months). So it can be concluded: research to have logical calculation (betsize, odds, iteration of random events/sets), resolve the "spike" or "skewness" of distribution of numbers (rolled results), test as much as possible to have accurate statistic. Sum of few dollars I would say it is a no, the minimum balance at least should be 0.5BTC (total willing to lose) for around 70% win chance but for better chance to win in the long term you need 1 -> 2BTC (almost you will never lose 24/7 plays with minimal/safest settings).

Otherwise as the site mod said, majority of them lose, that's because of "not enough balance". In any case, play with test mode first to understand how it work, if you managed to have enough patent to run the test 24/7 for few months or even half a year you will understand much of it and have enough confident on playing for real (required balance/ total earning / chance of bursting at specified balance). The reason for test that long is to find out how long it is for the question "you will lose in the long run".

It will help to reduce the next bet size if we lose, and if we win the profit is big enough that can made up enough balance to win another higher rare losing streak. And another reason is due to the total possible outcomes. I.e: 0.0000 - 99.9999 which mean too many chances (1,000,000 possible outcomes) that the result will come outside winning range, aiming for higher odd cause the process to be extended longer (take much more bet count to reach the time where the results keep coming outside winning range).

Higher odd tend to last longer base on my understanding & real playing. I play on 200x and mostly it landed within the range of 1700-1900, once ever it reach 2100, but my balance support upto 2400! so it is pretty safe for a 24/7 play (3 months approximately atm).

The point that bots exist are: 1) if you play with built-in auto dice, there is not enough flexibility (settings) for the player to play, 2) browser based game cause memory leak over time (nature of it) and it can crash your game anytime after few hours of play, 3) not all gamblers know how to program/write code of the bot himself to have metioned feature, that's why public bots exists.

There are two types of bot: standard bot with feature such as multiply by x after each loss (Dicebot or Mydicebot has this type of calculation), custom bot in which multiply x1, x2, x3 or add y1, y2, y3 after each loss, or continously add one satoshi to the next betsize to suite targeted condition (loop of +1 satoshi until it fits). The later one is rare in which human can't do it, or built-in/well known bot can't or will not figure out how to do it. Given the following complex case:

- Given that for a set of 1000 test sessions with specific odd/ win chance over 100,000,000 rolls of each test session (100 billions bets made), the summarized statistic from the tests are "common - 99%", "rare - 0.75%", "extremely rare - 0.25%" losing streak, you want the bot do the following functions: adjust the betsize that "deposited amount" could sustain rare case and the "reserved amount (additional willing to deposit/lose)" could sustain extremely rare case, ajust the bet size that at the specified rare losing streak (let call it r1, r2, etc..) if you win the r1 streak the profit after that win can help you bet 3 more bets, r1+3 = r4, and so on if you win r4 streak the profit can help you bet 3 more bets r4 + 3 = r7. Or the total profit after winning of 100 common losing streaks can help to sustain up to r1+1 streak.

A question for you to test:
- Given a site at 1% edge, Player A total willing to lose budget is 1.0 BTC and he is betting on 0.5% win chance, scale his budget so that it can sustain 1800 bets.
- Given the same scenario, but for Player B he is richer and his willing to lose budget is 6.0 BTC playing on the same 0.5% win chance, scale his budget so that it can sustain 2400 bets.

I don't think this can be done using standard known calculation method, and certainly, rely on your skill alone can't help you acomplish above calculation or human can't do it. Finally to have the above complex case of betting strategy, you need something which come out from statistic (after numerous of time to do specific test), thus human can't collect that kind of statistic other than using a bot which can log the events.

One suggestion for the bonuses especially bet back and loss back, please make it visible and available on the coin user is wagering. Bind it to bitdice point IMO is bad since it is another kind of holding the fund from being taken back by users.

The guy has nothing to do here regarding to the topic we are talking about which is the lottery prize being offset for the Lambo. Btw, i take ideas/comments from both sides, you defend your casino, and he is a player which propose something might be hard to be true to the majorities but i am open to that including verify it because i am a player too. Understand that you need to defense your side but calling him, which is your customer, like that is not good