Hello, I swear you will forgive me.
From now on, I will mention it even if I copy a word from a site.
Please take the negative rating from me. I am ready to improve this site.
I hope you forgive me and I try to publish the best articles.

I think investing in someone else's pocket is a mistake.
I have the stress of losing my property even when I invest with my own money.
How do they give up their money ??

Someone who has spent so much money really could have made a good investment with all of it. Or he could have done other important things.
This is where it is said that money does not make sense.

Okay. You accept my apology.
After all, you are an experienced member and I am a new member and I need your experience.
I hope you are lucky dear friend.

It is true.
We see thousands of types of cash violations every day, however, why does it not spoil its face ??
Perhaps the only thing to consider is that cash has been around for hundreds of years, but bitcoin has only just entered the economy for a few years.
Let me give you an example:
A child who has just entered a school gets into fights with everyone and steals and ...
The manager also warns the child or fires him.
But another child who has been in school for several years and knows how to steal and break without the principal complaining to him.

This was a conceptual example.

Maybe these illustrations and games or even movies have subconsciously affected people.
We also saw in previous years that bitcoin was used for drugs, smuggling, and so on.
I hope the people of the world will prosper.
Hoping that day.

Yes. This can do a lot of damage to the character and face of Bitcoin.
I just hope that these things will be lessened one day so that the people of the world will become more familiar with the true face of Bitcoin.

I have added the source. Sorry you did not read it:

According to coindesk Thirty-six-year-old Kristy Lynn Felkins has been summoned to court on charges of paying 12 bitcoins ($ 5,000 at the time) for trying to hire a killer to kill his ex-wife. The case is said to be related to another case involving the recruitment of a killer. It is worth noting that this killer was not hired in the end.

Also, I did not copy the text and turned it into an article.
And this statement of yours upset me.

A woman has been arrested in the United States for hiring a killer with bitcoin  

A Nevada woman has appeared in federal court on charges of paying $ 5,000 in bitcoin to a killer to kill her ex-husband.

According to coindesk Thirty-six-year-old Kristy Lynn Felkins has been summoned to court on charges of paying 12 bitcoins ($ 5,000 at the time) for trying to hire a killer to kill his ex-wife. The case is said to be related to another case involving the recruitment of a killer. It is worth noting that this killer was not hired in the end.

U.S. law enforcement officials say Homeland Security agents managed to crack down on bitcoins paid to hire a killer. These bitcoins are linked to the Falkins account on the local bitcoin website. Falkins is said to have spoken to the scammer before paying him.

The rumors circulating about this criminal case show that the scammer, over a period of one month, tried hard to persuade Falkins to use a more expensive method of murder. While the murder ultimately does not take place, the scammer cuts off contact with the Falkins without leaving a trace.

Federal agents say an unnamed hacker hacked the killer recruitment site, providing information such as conversations, bitcoin addresses and other data to security officials in January 2019.

The data provided by the hacker to the judiciary has similar implications to another case that federal agents are investigating. This case is also related to a killer recruitment website in Dark Web.



Judicial officials say their source provided a wealth of information about several open cases, but did not name herself or these sites.

Federal officials say the information provided by the hacker is "reliable." The archived documents of the case refer to the hacker as a foreign national convicted of possessing child pornography.

Documents in the Falkins case show that he cooperated with the US government without any financial request or even request for release from prison.

The US Department of Homeland Security has not yet officially commented on the matter.

Many people think that bitcoin transactions are untraceable and that they can be used to finance crimes "completely" anonymously. But the reality is that the bitcoin blockchain sometimes reaches out to security systems to handle cases more efficiently.

coindesk

I also agree with you. In Iran, if something important happens, they will cut off the internet of the whole country. I myself witnessed that after the assassination of one of the good commanders of this country, they cut off the internet of the whole country.

And I remember that my friends in Iran did not know about the Bitcoin chart for weeks, and they were the ones who lost their capital.
However, in my opinion, gold is better in war than bitcoin.

You should not copy the news, you should publish the news in the form of an article, not copy the text of the news and publish it here.

It is true that, as you said, many people do not know much about this area, and this ignorance opens the way for fraud and theft.
We need to think about this.
I have also talked about teaching this information to children in this article. You can see:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5272395.0

As we know, scams and hacks due to Bitcoin have increased a lot in recent years.
And these scams are due to the lack of sufficient knowledge of most people in the world to install bitcoins.
In my opinion, these behaviors should be stopped as soon as possible, otherwise the face of bitcoin in the world will change.

For example, I say: A 40-year-old person who does not know bitcoin and hears the news of hacking, theft, fraud, etc. every day, gets discouraged about installing bitcoin and says (why not buy my money in gold or etc ?).
The mentality of the society must change.

Yes, all of this is just a hypothesis, and Satoshi true identity is revealed when a person or persons with real and convincing evidence prove themselves.
In any case, I think Satoshi identity will remain unknown forever, or he may have died and failed to identify himself to the public before his death.

I did not say anything definite about this, and as you and I both know, these are the only hypotheses that want to challenge Satoshi.
Good luck

In 2014, Leah McGrath Goodman published a report in Newsweek claiming that Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto, a 64-year-old Japanese-American man from Southern California, was the creator of Bit[Suspicious link removed]dman claims that Doreen Nakamoto "implicitly" identified himself as Satoshi Nakamoto in an interview with Goodman; However, Doreen Nakamoto later vehemently denied any involvement in the creation of bitcoin.

McGrath Goodman is a distinguished reporter who has won awards in his career and has published articles in prestigious publications such as the Wall Street Journal, Fortune and the Guardian. In an interview with Anthony Pompliano, he explained that he now has new information about Nakamoto's identity and intends to write more about it. Goodman stated:

As my report was being published, the Department of Homeland Security launched an investigation.
I received many emails; But I received a special email from a group who wanted to divulge real information, and I hope to write more about it and provide more information about my initial report.

There are many more secrets, and they are not all just about Durin, and I think we all knew that.

Just focusing on Dorin was not very satisfying; There are definitely more tips and I really hope to be able to publish them as well.
Also, I want to respect the privacy and feelings of the people who spoke to me.

Goodman quoted Nakamoto as saying:

I no longer participate in this work and I can not talk about it.
This project has been entrusted to other people and they are now in charge of it. I have nothing to do with them anymore.

Police officers at the scene later confirmed that Goodman's quote from Nakamoto was correct.

In an interview with Pompliano, McGrath Goodman said that the issue of his relationship and interaction with Nakamoto before the face-to-face meeting was quite clear. He explained:

We've been exchanging emails for weeks. I even sent him an email with Bitcard given to me by Gavin Andresen. He also received all these emails before the interview, knowing that we were going to talk about bitcoin.

I was disappointed that he later claimed that he did not know what the subject of the conversation was. He certainly knew we wanted to talk about bitcoin. We've been talking about this for weeks on the Internet before I actually went to his house.

Thanks for reading this article. Good luck