I clicked on some of gts' links, can you really hire someone to implement anon for 0.5BTC? If that would be true, are 0.5BTC really the problem?
The real question you should ask, is 0.5 BTC all it's worth?
What? We might have a language barrier on my side here as I dont quite understand what you are saying.
I'm not a fan of anon.
I think there is an exponentially decrease in the value added as you move from 1st adopter, to second, to third, etc, etc,
'Anon' did wonders for DarkCoin, this is you first adopter
'Anon' did well for secondary adopters, those seeking to replicate the success of DarkCoin (I wanna say XC?, Veri?)
'Anon' didn't do much for tertiary adopters, CloakCoin, SuperCoin
I believe 'anon' will do very little for C2 as it falls between 3rd and 4th stage adopters of the code.
Note this pattern is repeated in ALL ADVANCES IN COINCODE
Scrypt? LiteCoin did well, then it falls off from there
PoS? Did well for PeerCoin (1st), Did well for BC (2nd?) and it falls into the floor from there
X11? Did well for Vert, and falls off from there
CountryCoin? as above....
Decentralised Market? (NXT etc) as above....
X13....
ColouredCoins....
Need I go on....?
There is a pattern emerging and it goe's like this....
The Spoils to the innovator,
The scraps to the imitator.
After that, what is there?
Given where we are in anon coin adoption into code, how well do you think it will do? This is what colours my thinking.
But wait, I missed one........
Integrated FPS/Gaming Tech Coin, innovator is...................?
Secondary adopter is...........?
Fuck me guys, do you get it now? anon is a waste of time, its over, its passe! .5btc on anon is a waste! buy UE4 and make a level or something!
Port your favourite fps level into ue4!