So far, banking seems to be an enemy of crypto, but recently rumors of a central bank coming in, supporting and even wanting to create their own crypto. Is this the progress of the crypto industry or is it just a new hype?
We will see later how the support of the central bank for fantom, whether it will have a good impact on its growth or even vice versa.
|
|
|
4 yearly events that always happen and are awaited by many people, yeah Bitcoin halving and as far as I know has always had a positive impact on the crypto market, we can see it from the chart history that occurred after Bitcoin halving.
Currently the blockchain-based game is quite popular with many people and of course its development will be more diverse. Recently I know DeFi and DeFi always appear in every discussion, therefore I am very enthusiastic in every project that uses it, interesting to see its development further.
So in 2020 there will be many good and interesting things that will happen in the crypto industry, I hope this year will be better.
|
|
|
Indeed some DEX is available, but so far the centralized exchange remains a favorite of all trader. DEX conditions are quiet from trader, making trading volume low and sometimes buy and sell orders are not available, therefore centralized exchange is preferred.
In the case of hacking exchanges, I think it has happened since the beginning and hacking also occurs in any field, not just crypto. So if you are a trader, then don't keep assets too long in exchange, after trading and making a profit, then pull back assets into a personal wallet.
I hope that in the future DEX will be created in accordance with expectations and become a better choice than a centralized exchange.
|
|
|
Sounds strange in the world of education, but I'm sure if there are universities that open the field of blockchain then this will attract the interest of many prospective students. So far as I know that blockchain courses are rarely found, not even available. I hope there will be action from blockchain experts and other developers to share their knowledge and also be a pioneer to establish educational institutions for blockchain.
|
|
|
I found this game, agareum and it looks like the game you are looking for. Agareum is an online crypto multiplayer gaming platform, this game is simple, tense, but fun. You can also visit their thread here and join their community there, happy playing and earn its tokens.
|
|
|
Crypto does not need banking, but it is banking that requires the technology owned by crypto, blockchain. without banks, the crypto can still be bullish, even a good news can trigger bullish.
Mass adoption has not yet been achieved, but it is not as easy as imagined and takes time to make it happen.
|
|
|
Sad mixed funny, when someone who is often said to be influential in the blockchain and crypto makes a statement like that. "Sorry BTC maximalist", quite furious to hear it, but from there I can assume that he is a shilling, who is paid for every statement in his tweet.
Ethereum 2.0 might have a good effect on just its ecosystem, but it is different from halving Bitcoin which always triggers a bullish market and allows other crypto to reach its ATH, including Ethereum itself.
|
|
|
Ripple always triggers a polemic, between centralized or decentralized. Everyone in this forum knows and agrees that ripple are not decentralized, but this does not mean ripple are a bad investment. Many partners from banks to large institutions are proof that ripple has potential that can be attractive to investors. Indeed the purpose of investment is to make a profit, therefore people choose ripple, they choose profit rather than decentralized
|
|
|
I think central bank coins will be worth the same as fiat currencies, with a ratio of 1:1 (not necessarily usd, maybe it could be euro, yuan or other) based on the country or region that created the coin.
Why is this trend just made when halving bitcoin or the 4-year cycle that always triggers bullish for all cryptos? Why now or not from the previous year they created central bank coins, I think they will take advantage of the hype.
|
|
|
Talking about DeFi, then I found the Jarvis Network project. When reading an announcement about it, it looks very interesting and promising, but unfortunately this project has not been launched and reportedly the alpha version will be launched in Q4 this year. Jarvis Network: delivering decentralized finance to everyone
|
|
|
I don't think there is an overreaction from the TRX holders and they also know that unlocked tokens will not be dumped without any purpose for development or tron needs themselves, but this was recently one of Tron Twitter accounts that made a poll. Look here, Poll regarding 33b #TRX unlock
|
|
|
If I look at the tweets and retweets made by crypto youtubers on their twitter accounts, saying that their videos have returned to the public, but in another article that crypto-related content was not fully restored. Apart from this incident, can a decentralized video platform be the solution in the future?
|
|
|
Hello everyone and Merry Christmas! According to the current situation, cryptocurrencies are about to be brought under government supervision.
When will crypto be brought under government supervision? Where? Sad, because supervision is an opportunity to become their power and clearly will only benefit them. How supervision will control crypto, interventions that will eventually be centralized. Do you think that anonymous coins have a future in this case? How should we choose, thank you for your proposal
Anonymous coins will continue to be available and grow in the future, because not everyone likes transparency and also does not want their transactions to be known to the public. Therefore, anonymous coins were born to maintain the privacy of its users, because I think privacy is part of the security aspect.
|
|
|
It's only natural that he sells his assets as a result of his contribution in ethereum and nothing is illegal. But there is curiosity about the reason for selling because they need money for the game. what game does he mean? While ethereum 2.0 will be launched soon
|
|
|
I think security and protection for its users is their main purpose behind this, it will indeed have an impact on crypto, but this will not affect everyone interest in crypto. We see, if google continues to take action to suspend crypto into their other platforms, then this action will harm themselves.
|
|
|
I don't think there is a special IEO difference in the Imo wallet, it's just that the appearance of their app is more friendly and interesting, users are also easier to use to choose each project in the Imo wallet.
|
|
|
If what already said by grayscale is about the ripple blockchain and yes it's true if that gains the momentum among the financial institutions but if that is about ripple coin and that's very sad to see that but those financial institutions just seeing it as worthless security coin. Just never try to take ripple coin as something that makes the financial institutions feel interesting about that. There have been many articles like this related to ripple, but you are right that ripple are not as interesting as the stories in various articles and it is proven that financial institutions or banks do not see ripple as a solution for them.
|
|
|
Privacy coins have the purpose of personal confidentiality transactions, that means to cover or protect information to the public and I think this is part of the security aspect. The first time I knew privacy coins were monero and to this day I still use them. I honestly appreciate the privacy coins, because they are the freedom of each individual in the transaction can be realized, safe and for personal.
|
|
|
This incident certainly becomes a consideration when someone wants to invest in libra, because of user data is not a trivial thing, it is a valuable privacy asset. Indeed facebook and libra are different platforms, but both are created by the same person and it is possible that these two platforms will be integrated. So, if user data can leak, how can libra protect valuable assets later? Of course, these questions and concerns will continue to arise, because there is no discussion on this issue from the parties concerned.
|
|
|
|