nice coin and all, nice bot too and price for it.
but...for all you shouting moon, this will have very little effect on the price skyrocketing, sorry to burst your bubble. sure the buys may spike but support (as usual for many coins) will be very little. market is saturated and also dead as hell...so yeah nobody will be jumping to by/use snrg just because of a bot (and many ppl already got burned from prior ones as we know).
No one really shouts moon here. Everyone knows better than that. The devs keep updating, this coin is fairly mature, and it has never been really pumped except one time to about 30k sat. All that means that the devs and coin are legit, but pumps aren't going to happen. But, I will say that this coin has been consistently strong. Judging from the kinds of coins you like, I'm surprised you aren't into it.
|
|
|
I think SHF is just in a moment of calm, where people dump on low price and leave losing BTC
It makes it easy to accumulate. Anyone dumping now is trying to short it or can't spot a good long term buy. Shorting might be smart, but it's not easy to tell where the bottom is. My strategy is to avoid calling the bottom and to set fairly consistently sized small buys (valued in BTC, not SHF) no matter what the price. But I have been buying with more BTC as these dumps get bigger and the price drops.
|
|
|
Yep. New design looks good...Interesting to see cloud bot
This is good. The volume has been so low that it has taken a lot of effort for me to accumulate any of this coin. Now they have made a bot to do it. I'm going to put it to work on SNRG and SHF with a trial account on Trex asap.
|
|
|
Another Bobscam ? oh thats surprising.
Worse. Bobby got scammed. He didn't get "scammed". There's one of two possibilities. The first is that he was on the inside and set up the ICO, took the money and ran. In this case, he'd need a developer to clone the coin. But then any developer scammy enough to go in with Bob would just do it themselves. The second possibility is that he played this like we all do and put some into the ICO, looking for the devs to give him a reason to throw buy support at it. And the releases never materialized, giving him one in the loss column. That's a calculated risk. My money is on the second. No one gets scammed in crypto. They either took calculated risks or took uncalculated risks. The ones who take uncalculated risks feel like they got scammed. But they didn't get scammed. They were just dumb and lost some money. Unfortunately, these are usually the same people who never learn.
|
|
|
it looks like a good time to setup some buy support for the upcoming dump.
It should be a big one. Hopefully it won't sink the price too much.
|
|
|
When users log onto the site, they will be presented with an amount, in SNRG, that will be required to burn for each day of use. You can fund one hour of use, or you can fund a whole year of use. It's up to you. This will be updated regularly. Each user will also have a unique address where they will send SNRG in order to add time to their account. Once the SNRG is sent to your unique address it will be accounted for and then sent on to the final, verifiable burn address I mentioned above. That address can be found here: SMJ12qn9jNCCXJnTYRz5Yu9ZenERqvYwfgI should mention that the two-step way we burn coins is the only way to ensure that the coins are provably not spendable. The address SMJ12qn9jNCCXJnTYRz5Yu9ZenERqvYwfg is provably not spendable and corresponds to a 20 byte public key where each byte has the value 0. You can use a combination of a python interpreter (available in your browser here) and the Synergy Qt client to see exactly how this works out. First, you can make a bytearray of the Synergy prefix byte (63) and then 20 zeros (">>>" is the python prompt, don't type it): >>> b = bytearray([63, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]) The prefix byte makes all Synergy addresses start with an "S". To that byte array, you need to append a checksum. That checksum is calculated by taking the first four bytes of the SHA256 hash of the SHA256 hash (two nested hashes) of the bytearray, b, above: >>> import hashlib >>> hashlib.sha256(hashlib.sha256(b).digest()).hexdigest()[:8]
The result of this latter command is '7bfa0903', which corresponds to the bytes: You can see this equivalence with the following python command that converts hex to base 10 (the counting system most humans use): >>> [0x7b, 0xfa, 0x09, 0x03] These checksum bytes are appended to the bytearray, b, which can be used with the Synergy RPC command called encodebase58 (available in the next update): encodebase58 '[63, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 123, 250, 9, 3]' The result of this command is the provable burn address SMJ12qn9jNCCXJnTYRz5Yu9ZenERqvYwfg. Try it in your own console after we update. Why is this address provably not spendable? Because there is no mathematically possible private key that can correspond to the 20 byte public key of all zeros. Tell me something I don't know. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Actually, I have no idea what you are talking about, but I'll take your word for it. Keep up the good work!
|
|
|
It's just about time to freshen things up a bit. You guys down?
|
|
|
shocker ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) - dont say i didnt warn yall since like page 5 me too... but no.. we are fudders... ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) and calling everything a scam ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
Which is the minimum recommended to stake some coins?
There's no minimum from what I gather. But if you have less you stake less.
|
|
|
The days of launching a coin based on a bullshit real-world use that doesn't actually justify the existence of the coin are long over.
You need tech. These days, just the bullshittiness of an ANN, like this one, means the devs have nothing in mind and couldn't deliver even if they did.
This one is dead within a month.
Dead within a month? haha if you say so! They say the same thing for shift and exp. Read my back posts. My accuracy is about 100%.
|
|
|
The days of launching a coin based on a bullshit real-world use that doesn't actually justify the existence of the coin are long over.
You need tech. These days, just the bullshittiness of an ANN, like this one, means the devs have nothing in mind and couldn't deliver even if they did.
This one is dead within a month.
|
|
|
what's the inflation rate nowadays, 5000%? to benefit early investors ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Something crazy like that exactly why the price has fallen ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) The price has gone up 50% since the rewards kicked in. Price on Sept 14 when they switched: 10,000 sat. Price today Oct 9: 14,500 sat. Let's all do make believe so we can feel good about the bullshit we come up with.
|
|
|
can someone swap and takeover it like btx?
Why? There are lots of good coins out there. This one never worked right anyway. At least crave was worthy of a takeover. Coins that don't work right never make it.
|
|
|
Now even wallet is also not working
They turned off the delete bot too. You know a coin is dead when they kill the delete bot.
|
|
|
ShiftTeam you fucking think to borrow a coin! You actively support the miners. If nobody will mine the coin will get fucked to your project.
If you are losing money then for your sake you should move on. Wasting time posting here is wasting your own money unless you are getting paid to post. Only idiots would waste their own money like that. I'd hate to think you are an idiot wasting time and money posting here when you should have moved on but there are so many idiots on bitcointalk. They all wonder why they lose money, when you can point out that they do things like post and waste their own time and money. It's generally why I pretty much ignore these idiots. They deserve to lose money.
|
|
|
123sss is just someone building up some posts so they can launch a scam coin and get the pictures shown.
|
|
|
You guys are forgetting how long did take for the Ethereum to be released as it is. What if PoS takes 1 more year or it is impossible to implement in current environment? Who do you think will wait for so long? Decreasing block reward will also decrease inflation and day-by-day dumping, but it will also decrease security, which is totally unacceptable for a project who pretends to be serious.
While SHIFT core devs are working (on whatever....), the coin itself needs marketing. It's that simple.
Pretends to be serious? Sorry sir, we have different view on how things should be handled. You are not the only one who have big experience of cryptos, that i can assure you. Do not pretend to be the only one who knows how to handle SHIFT, try to stay humble, i know the SHIFT team will. By acting superior will get you no where, although i respect your advice and we will of course take it into consideration. Humble Regards I understand where you are coming from, but I just want to throw my opinion in as well, that you should not make decisions until the 2 M target. Miners can just dump to cover mining costs. I'm making steady buys whether the price goes up or down, according to a sound accumulation strategy. A longer mining period will (1) improve distribution, (2) dilute the premine, and (3) give a more reasonable coin count. Bitcoin had it about right with 21 M. 2 M is kind of low, but it's a lot better than 200,000 in terms of transaction granularity. If you cut the money supply then you will be faced with what to do with the premine. Just let the market evolve with the 21 M output for the health of the coin. I know this is going to raise howls from the profit takers, but aim to be a top tier coin, and not just to please the quick dumpers.
|
|
|
CBIT: The coin that makes BOT look legit.
|
|
|
Picked up some cbit under ico today. Thanks sellers.
There's going to be a lot more where that came from.
|
|
|
We all know this coin will be shit in the end... but where is the PUMP? Atleast expecting x2 profits of this one .. edit; don't worry, it will come ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) the "devs" have put to many btc and hours in this there will come no pump... it will dump in the next 1-2 weeks under 100 sat ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) but what else.. see me as fudder i dont care.. i know i dont talk bullshit^^ There will be no way to make money on this one, otherwise I'd be looking for an entry point. 100 sat will be 100 sat wasted.
|
|
|
|