If they charge for airdrop then it is a scam airdrop campaign. While there are some airdrop campaigns that actually payout after sending a fee, it's still a risk. They can be trusted if the project is popular and good. It is better to avoid such airdrops.

You are wrong, the airdrop is still there and paying. It's not like it used to be, but the current airdrop is very much and you have to work hard to find the best. Airdrop has not died so far.

We can still see a lot of airdrops on social media, project groups and telegram channels. In fact, many airdrop hunters make their community.

How could that not be a big dump? They held a 4 round bounty campaign with a sizable allocation and distributed them simultaneously. This will not happen if they are already listed on a large exchange with good trading volume.

Is it wrong for bounty hunters to sell their tokens? I do not think so. It's just that they are impatient because they are willing to sell their tokens cheaply. With a casual exchange and now that their price is recovering, it's a good achievement.

It seems that many bounty managers do not have the strength to enforce escrow. There have been several bounties that have been handled by the project itself and some are scams and some are paying. It looks like bounty managers just don't want their job loss. But it did kill the bounty hunter.

There must be a fair system for this work. Projects, bounty managers and bounty hunters must get the same satisfaction. But it is difficult because there are no serious rules in this forum.

Right now there are many DeFi projects that have hidden teams and are not very transparent. They don't even have a whitepaper and website. To me, a project like this is a sign of a scam. But sometimes some are good because they have a large community, so they decide not to scam.

But still prioritize projects that provide transparent project information and clearly have a purpose even though they hide the team. I don't think that's a problem and become a more viable project than projects that don't have anything.

It is true, many bounty hunters were hurt because they had done a good job following the rules and only used 1 account but they did not get paid. I hate those who sign up with someone else's account because sometimes that can get the real account in trouble. KYC is also a serious problem but it looks like it's starting to disappear lately.

Delayed distribution due to high gas costs is actually a matter for the bounty manager and the project team. bounty hunters are already working and must be paid immediately after the campaign ends. But there are some bounty managers who delay that and ask the hunter to pay half the fee in order to get paid.

With the ease of creating new tokens using the ethereum platform and others, it is true that new projects start using the platform because if they create their own platform, it certainly requires a lot of time and money. They take advantage of this to get hype from crypto users and usually they will start migrating to their own platform when the time comes. But indeed there are many projects that only take advantage of the hype and get a lot of money from investors and eventually they become trash tokens. This is so sad.

It is true that bounty campaigns are not what they used to be because many people make projects just to get profit and then leave. The bounty manager cannot guarantee that everything they manage is a good project but the bounty manager should first have to escrow to secure the payment funds for the bounty hunter. Even though the project is a scam, if the bounty manager does an escrow, at least the bounty hunter will still get the right to pay as promised.

For the ClipX bounty managed by the Bounty Detective, it is truly a scam and bounty hunters should have realized it because they asked for KYC after the bounty campaign was over and it was done directly by the project team. Meanwhile, the Bounty Detective seems to have tried to defend the bounty hunter but failed. I see Bounty Detective has launched a new bounty with BNB payments to compensate for the community who joined from the beginning and also experienced a scam project like ClipX.

I also use some of the channels that you share but that is just for information that there is a new project that is hype. I will definitely do some research again because it will make me relieved and no regret to invest in a new project that other people have shared. Make it just a reference unless you really believe it because you get testimonials from yourself. Analyzing itself is good because it will increase our knowledge so that one day we will be able to do it better ourselves.

I think it's natural, when a new project is listed on the exchange there is a possibility that the price will go up or go down immediately. I see DIA projects continue to pick up and get listed on many exchanges and that's great for a new project with the current hype. Of course, it is possible that tokens from the presale or bounty campaign have not been distributed if they hold a bounty campaign.

I don't think it's new, a social media campaign with bitcoin payments. And they are also not a guarantee that they will not trick bounty hunters unless they have escrowed. Fraud should have been avoided if the bounty manager dared to refuse a project that wanted to hold a bounty but they did not escrow funds or tokens before the bounty began. And also I think that fraud will not be easily lost, maybe the bounty campaign will slowly disappear because of the increasing number of fraudulent campaigns and participants who cheat and plagiarism.

That's absolutely true, bounty hunters should be able to read and find complete information before asking. I always find many bounty hunters who always ask in the bounty group about something that has actually been explained and sometimes this information has also been pinned in the group. Every bounty must have something like that, somehow they can be like idiots all the time.

I also heard complaints from my friends about the ClipX bounty being handled by the bounty detective, they asked for KYC when the campaign was over and it was very sneaky. I advised him not to do KYC because it really didn't make sense. Bounty detective was also seen defending bounty hunters but they couldn't do it any further. Everything is left to the project team.

This is true, everyone should use escrow to ensure the safety of funds for bounty hunter payments, many projects and bounty managers do not pay attention to this and bounty hunters are always victims. And there should be a definite agreement for bounties that use KYC or not, this is very torturous for bounty hunters. If KYC is really needed for the bounty campaign, I hope there is a platform to do KYC and it can be used to participate in bounty campaigns that require KYC. Such a system can protect bounty hunter data from misuse of data by the bounty manager or the project. Hopefully someone will voice and hear my writing.

No, I won't. I am already disappointed with such projects even though they are profitable, but in the future they will be rubbish if they just rely on this trend and not continue with serious development. I think a pretty good project you mentioned is DIA, because I see they are listed on a lot of the big exchanges.

For me it will not affect the market too much if the projects listed on the exchange are good projects and also carry a long future, but it is quite sad if the projects just take advantage of the hype defi and they are able to enter the exchange at no cost. Even though their project is nothing special. Many old projects that have been developing suddenly lose out to new projects that use the name defi to become famous.

The number of members doesn't really affect the quality of the project if they are inactive, I prefer projects that have few people in their group but are active and will slowly grow. The most important thing is that the project is always active on their telegram channel or group to provide updates that they are already working on, their social media must also be quite active.

I believe one day this will happen, but not now or the next 5 years. I think TRX is taking a long time to hit $5 at the moment, even though TRX is so popular because it is easy and cheap. Need extraordinary development. It can happen quickly if something unexpected happens as usual, the crypto world is full of surprises.

It's so funny, I'm sorry to have to say investors are such stupid people. They only think of instant benefits for a vacation. From the name of the project they should have understood that it was a complete scam because it took advantage of a similarly successful project name. It should be easy to tell they will be deceived.

Using Binance is the best right now in my opinion because they are not obliged to do KYC and with low fees they are able to trade. And also there are several altcoins available which in my opinion are quite complete