Show Posts
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »
|
But then after coin is traded varios users will have access to the sme 'unopened code' Anyone along the way can spend it...
|
|
|
+1 in the end it's people that decide what will be our future as society, democracy or not, we are only under the control of our mental boundaries
|
|
|
it's an adapt or cease evolution. the banking system would be smart to early adapt, but the bottleneck with banking adaption does not have to do with open source software, it's a tipping point when holding on to the system that feeds them right now won't be worth the profit divided by risk of the new system... so essentially the bottleneck is brain power ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
good. banks tied to exchanges just make things traceable.
Want to buy BTC? sell a physical good to someone that has it. Want to sell btc? buy a physical good. Fuck the banks.
good, but not everyone are miners, how can you sell something to a non miner if he can't get bitcoins?
|
|
|
שאלה טובה שהתשובה עליה אינה מוחלטת ולא פשוטה. השאלה היא מה המניע שלך. אם אתה מאמין ברעיון של ביטקוין כרייה היא דרך נהדרת להיות חלק מהקהילה ולהעמיק. גם כן זה מדגיש את הביזוריות של המערכת ומראה שלמרות הקושי אין הכורים עם כרטיסי מסך מוותרים, עם זאת להשקיע בדיוק בנקודה זאת בזמן כסף אך ורק בשביל מכונת כריה? אתה מתכוון להשתמש בציוד לדברים אחרים כאשר הוא לא יפעל כמכונת כריה?
|
|
|
לפי מה שהבנתי אותה הבעיה תהיה קיימת בלייטקוין כיוון שהשימוש שלהם בזכרון מוגבל ומאפשר בניית צ'יפ יעודי למטרת כרייה. מה היתרונות שאתה רואה בלייטקוין?
|
|
|
מאוחר מדי? יחסית לאוכלוסית המשתמשים כיום אולי אתה צודק שיש חברות שנמצאות ביתרון יחסי, אבל כאשר אתה בוחן את השאלה הזאת עם הפוטנציאל של ביטקוין... יש המון מקום לצמיחה. השאלה היחידה שצריכה לעניין הוא יחס צריכת חשמל/כח חישוב, כל השאר הוא שאלה אם אתה מאמין במטבע או לאו.
|
|
|
Well, inflaton at a low rate is probably good, in my opinion should be set as %. But good points were made about the 'pitch', " there will be a set amount of bitcoin", this is probably because fiat curreny is being printed right and left and we are FED of being robbed.
After bitcoin is u derstood and adopted i think there will be a good sense to raise this question. Would it be too late in the game to change the set limit?
|
|
|
Wolud you imagine Satoshi is involved in his next project, too busy to worry about bitcoin?
|
|
|
so people will know where you are at all times. sounds like a lot of personal risk
while the concept of 'trust' is trying to be substituted by math in this project, we can't avoid it completely. trust is needed in ant human contact. what i do want to avoid is trust in big organisations or banks. but in the end, the currency is a form of exchange, and exchange will require trust no matter what.
|
|
|
well, i think localbitcoins is a great service, i use it, but what i prepose is a mobile app, a facilitator for barter and social behaviour. i see similarity, but the new behaviour i prepose is not trade for the sake of trade but barter/trade for the sake of liquidity. the idea is not to invest in bit coins but rather to use them. for instance it could help tourists save the exchange rates of buying more local currency or allow people to slowly adjust to the idea that bitcoins have worth.
the main problem i see with the service right now is that scarcity of users...
btw, i do agree that having geolocating on can offend some persons sense of privacy, but i have it on with various apps and truth is it can be used to track you regardless if it's on or not.
|
|
|
here's an Idea.
In order to enable common use of bitcoin as currency I prepose a new barter concept. Human exchanges. As many people today carry smartphones with them it is possible to transfer bitcoins between two parties without much hassle, It is also possible to geotag one's location. My proposition is an app that enables a person that needs to pay for a service to locate people who are ready to 'exchange' bitcoins in return for paying for that service [plus exchange fee]. The app could scan the location for potential 'exchangers' and their 'fee' and allow the person to contact the potential 'exchanger' in person. From that point one transfers bitcoins and the other pays for the service with cash, creditcard or any other method of payment. Of course if both parties trust each other there is an option for 'distant exchange' which allows a person to pay via phone and credit card and receive bitcoins plus fee from trusted party.
For example. I eat in a restaurant, while eating i ask the app to search for a 'human exchange' willing to pay for my meal in the sum of 50$, the app scans my immediate surroundings for matches, it finds a couple of options of people ready to pay 50$ for x mbitcoins [fee included], i choose the better option and press connect. That person is then sent a message to confirm his ability to come and facilitate the exchange. We meet and say hi, the app allows him to receive the bitcoin as he pays for the meal. We say goodbye and go our way.
|
|
|
How about we use XXX, that would make an impact...
|
|
|
Good idea, plus pushing it to start where bitcion is strong is like using lemos to make lemonade. How do we get this from idea to practice?
|
|
|
|