Eh, why would you make money for us for free? That is obviously too good to be true and probably a scam. BTW, how hard can it be to trade bitcoin when it only goes upwards anyways?  |
|
|
|
And? Bitcoin is magical and different. It's a growing snowball - not a bubble. It can't burst.
Mmm. Maybe it is time to sell some BTC for fiat after all...  Eh, you obviously are an economist. And we all know that educated, experienced economists don't understand this new currency bitcoins. Because bitcoin is open source, p2p, fancy-smancy and mining - only we geeks can understand the value of it. (Just joking.  ) |
|
|
|
I use real money for purchasing things, and bitcoins as a growing investment. There are barely any places for me (as a Swede) to spend bitcoins anyway. I think that is working quite nicely.
Unfortunately, the result will be disaster if everyone does that. Bitcoin's only utility is as a medium of exchange. If it is not used as such, then it has no utility and no value. If you don't want the value of your bitcoins to come crashing down, then I encourage you to spend bitcoins whenever you can. You don't have to cut into you savings, just buy an extra bitcoin. Spend that and save the rest. Why does it matter if I buy bitcoins for real money, spend them, and then the merchant convert them back to real money instantaneously? Why not pay with real money in the first place then? I guess that would be cheaper considering all exchange rates. And as I said, I don't even know where I would spend bitcoins, I don't need Reddit Gold. Further more. Considering the value growth, like, the value of bitcoin has grown more than 10 % during the last 12 hours. Why would I spend my bitcoins? If I wait they will be worth A LOT MORE. Dunno, I just can't see why my strategy is wrong. |
|
|
|
|
And? Bitcoin is magical and different. It's a growing snowball - not a bubble. It can't burst.
|
|
|
|
|
PayPal since it's easy and secure, and I don't have to give out my VISA number. Bitcoin is an investment I don't want to touch other than for cashing out.
|
|
|
|
Hey OP, I think its not a good time to bu now, price is still to low, just wait a few weeks and buy in then! Thats the smart move.
No, the price is ramming upwards. BUY! |
|
|
|
|
Jag gillar alla referral links på sidan. Och jag gillar också hur absurt konceptet är. Det finns ingen som skulle ge mig pengar gratis - det finns alltid någon hake.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you out of your mind? Bitcoin is a money making machine that hasn't met its climax. It would be stupid to sell in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
Started to pump for 300! It won't take many days with this adoption rate!
|
|
|
|
What do you want to say with that? That is rising and is getting adopted incredibly fast? |
|
|
|
|
I use real money for purchasing things, and bitcoins as a growing investment. There are barely any places for me (as a Swede) to spend bitcoins anyway. I think that is working quite nicely.
|
|
|
|
|
Eh, no stress, right? Don't we expect bitcoin for more than a couple of weeks? All infrastructure won't appear overnight.
|
|
|
|
|
Buy now of course! It will rise to heaven, invest now when you still have time!
|
|
|
|
Everyone is panic buying at any price just to get on the bandwagon.
Would this be the mass acceptance that people debating?
This is hilarious. People are starting to see all those use cases. Just kidding. |
|
|
|
|
This is getting redicioulius. :-P
|
|
|
|
I thinks it adoption not a bubble if its a bubble it has a long way to go before it bursts. Still only 1 billion into it not enough money for it to be unstable or burst i think it can take a lot more money and traffic for it to be considered a bubble.
Didn't it hit 2 billions the other day? And how do you know when bitcoins gets unstable? |
|
|
|
Jag såg den tråden tidigare idag, och jag känner mig mest orolig över punkt 5. Jag misstänker att vissa begränsningar ej går att fixa utan att skriva om protokollet, och därmed eventuellt göra alla tidigare bitcoins värdelösa. Rätta mig gärna om jag har fel. Till exempel känns den växande bitcoin-kedjan oroväckande. Kollar man på http://blockchain.info/charts/blocks-size så kan man se att den redan passerat 6 GB. Och den ser dessvärre ut att växa exponentiellt. Undrar hur man ska hantera det i framtiden, redan idag tar det lång tid att synka referensklienten. Dette kan løses gjennom en hard fork, så det innebærer ikke at alle tidligere bitcoins blir verdiløse. En hard fork innebærer at det blir to block chains, men planen vil da være at den "nye" block chainen (med f. Eks høyere max block size) skal være den gjeldende. Dette betyr at hard forken må koordineres nøye slik at man har de fleste med seg, fordi det vil finnes to samtidige block chains inntil den ene av dem eventuelt dør ut. Men max block size er en stor utfordring for nettverket, der hensynet til skalering og desentralisering står mot hverandre. (jo større block size desto større ressurskrav for å mine eller kjøre en node i nettverket). Jeg er imidlertid optimistisk på at dette vil bli løst på en god måte, det er stor bevissthet rundt dette og jeg tror man vil komme frem til en løsning som hensyntar skalering og desentralisert på en ok måte. Även om man forkar block chain:en måste man väl behålla datan för alla tidigare transaktioner? Annars kommer ju folks bitcoins försvinna. Så jag förstår inte hur en fork skulle lösa problemet med filstorleken. |
|
|
|
Jag såg den tråden tidigare idag, och jag känner mig mest orolig över punkt 5. Jag misstänker att vissa begränsningar ej går att fixa utan att skriva om protokollet, och därmed eventuellt göra alla tidigare bitcoins värdelösa. Rätta mig gärna om jag har fel. Till exempel känns den växande bitcoin-kedjan oroväckande. Kollar man på http://blockchain.info/charts/blocks-size så kan man se att den redan passerat 6 GB. Och den ser dessvärre ut att växa exponentiellt. Undrar hur man ska hantera det i framtiden, redan idag tar det lång tid att synka referensklienten. |
|
|
|
Dunno, it isn't good to be impulsive.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
