MON scheudled for getting delisted on Bittrex  Bittrex is a meaningless exchange anyway, let them rot. |
|
|
|
|
Wish I had some spare BTC
|
|
|
|
But.... no proof. So shut up kid. Read this: There was no pre-mine by the dev..
There was a bug in the difficulty calculation that caused the difficulty to get stuck at a very low number, generating a lot of blocks. This is called an insta-mine.
The 500 DRK per block was exactly as it should be, if you look in the source code you can see that the block reward calculation is different for different hash rates. And learn how to leak properly, little newbie of internet. edit: http://cryptolife.net is down for ever, said thank you guys. Yes, the author give the proofs. Read the topic: http://www.reddit.com/r/DRKCoin/comments/26t2ur/darkcoin_premine_proofs/About the bug, can you prove it? The dev can say that was a bug but I don't believe it. And even if this was a bug, the developer would have had to make a airdrop with these pre-mined blocks. Yea, the "bug" is code that was put there purposely by the dev. |
|
|
|
That's awesome news, and from the look of it the stealth addresses are working great so far  |
|
|
|
|
Falling knife, I'm outta here
|
|
|
|
|
red candles, buying time.
|
|
|
|
Multipools are dumping on BitTrex again, get on it and snap them up!
it's cheaper @ poloniex atm I'd rather pay a little extra than use that nightmare of a website, to be honest. What issues have you had with polo? |
|
|
|
Multipools are dumping on BitTrex again, get on it and snap them up!
it's cheaper @ poloniex atm |
|
|
|
|
I would like more info on how stealth address works
|
|
|
|
Brace yourself, mega pump is coming...
Why is a pump coming? |
|
|
|
That's a lot of if, you seriously think that companies will not (want to) consolidate those addresses at one point ?
Well then why don't you buy something from Overstock and come back and tell me how much BTC they own and who their customers are. You can do the same for KNC. I will wait patiently. |
|
|
|
How is the current Bitcoin system going to spell any of this out? You can see transactions in/out. You don't know what's going to supplier or which ones. You don't know what's going back to customers. You don't know anything but money in/money out. It's like looking at a banking balance sheet that has everything blacked out but the amounts. It isn't going to give you any information that isn't already public. Blacking out the numbers as well has no benefit at all.
So your solution is the same at ymer's: Never generate change and never combine dust/change addresses to pay for large debts. Cool. You're right, Bitcoin is totally anonymous. Why would you combine dust? Just make 100000 dust transactions to the address of whoever you are paying to, or make 100000 dust transactions to 100000 addresses of the recipient. Easy as pie. |
|
|
|
I don't think anonymity is a fad. It's a requirement for digital cash.
+1. As businesses get into using cryptocurrency, they will make it an automatic requirement. No company is going to want to open its books to competitors, but that is what will potentially happen every time an accounting employee goes from Company A to Company B (or simply sells out for cash). That was a "light bulb" moment for me regarding anonymity - ALL SERIOUS ALTCOINS MUST HAVE IT going forward. How does the lack of anonymity open the doors for competitors? Because now they can see how much a company is earning? Congrats; that does absolutely nothing. Anonymity only serves to thwart the governments, which is what will lead to stronger regulation. You can't be serious, it's a joke right ? You don't see the issue for a company to let its competitors see its income, when it sells the most/the less, how much it receives per transaction in average etc. You're going to have to spell this out to me. We know how much Microsoft earns. We know how much they spend. We know where they source things from. Same with Apple. Same with Blizzard. Same with Exxon. How is ANY of this going to matter? And if it's so important, why is it all public information anyways? Basically you want to anonymize data that is already publicly displayed. That's asinine. You talk about turnover, I talk about account details, transactions in real time, how the money is used, how much did they pay a supplier etc. sensitive informations. You are either dumb or naive. Please tell me how are you gonna tell how many bitcoins someone owns if he uses a different address for each customer/transaction and doesn't move them to a concentrating address. |
|
|
|
If someone upsets you, please use IGNORE button everyone.  |
|
|
|
I don't think anonymity is a fad. It's a requirement for digital cash.
+1. As businesses get into using cryptocurrency, they will make it an automatic requirement. No company is going to want to open its books to competitors, but that is what will potentially happen every time an accounting employee goes from Company A to Company B (or simply sells out for cash). That was a "light bulb" moment for me regarding anonymity - ALL SERIOUS ALTCOINS MUST HAVE IT going forward. How does the lack of anonymity open the doors for competitors? Because now they can see how much a company is earning? Congrats; that does absolutely nothing. Anonymity only serves to thwart the governments, which is what will lead to stronger regulation. You can't be serious, it's a joke right ? You don't see the issue for a company to let its competitors see its income, when it sells the most/the less, how much it receives per transaction in average etc. You're going to have to spell this out to me. We know how much Microsoft earns. We know how much they spend. We know where they source things from. Same with Apple. Same with Blizzard. Same with Exxon. How is ANY of this going to matter? And if it's so important, why is it all public information anyways? Basically you want to anonymize data that is already publicly displayed. That's asinine. No room for talking sense here, only pumpers are allowed in this thread. |
|
|
|
|
just FYI, your DRK is losing momentum... time to abandon the ship.
|
|
|
|
15-16 in 3 sec  And the announcement doesn't even make sense, it just says that things might be fixed in 3 weeks. LOL Funny, I didn't see anything of the sort written there... Before moving onto RC3, the next version of Darkcoin will now include the masternode payment system (with 20% payouts). The method we’re going to use for masternode payments is not critical and can’t cause a hard fork so it should be rather quick to implement, scheduled for June 14th. It's actually pretty clear. |
|
|
|
|
Show is over for now... this is just gonna be a slow pump to 0.025 levels till second week of june.
See you then.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
