Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 01:48:06 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 »
601  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / BITCOIN-GOLD Dev's Have Now Entered "Denial Mode" Deleting BTG Problem on GITHUB on: November 06, 2017, 09:07:02 AM
https://github.com/BTCGPU/BTCGPU/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed

BTG BTCGPU BITCOIN-GOLD

Developers have now entered the final phase of BITCOIN-GOLD demise, DENIAL

Rather than admitting things are getting worse daily or that the TESTNET is a 100% failure that there will never be a operational MAIN-NET, they are now just deleting any and all complaint or reported problems.

The testnet is hard coded to go live mainet 7NOV2016 @ 0700 UTC, yet the TESTNET doesn't even work and 50% of the code is non-operational.

They now have multiple testnets on GITHUB, but the code is clearly getting worse and not better.
602  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Bitcoin Gold Mining on: November 06, 2017, 08:51:46 AM
Can someone explain to me why since the testnet is running since November 1st why this person received 3000 btg on October 15th ?

http://btgblocks.com/testnet/address/mmd6PvfQtcchEpA2SJn3UPZULYay57eyXW

dev's said they will mine to the current block to where they're currently at. It was for them only and they announced it a month prior to it happening

There has never been any real mining to date on BTG, what you see there are just "GENESIS" block transactions that are inserted in the code at birth of the block-chain.

All is created by scratch the BTG is NOT compatible with existing BTC chain as its 2MB and the BTC is 1M.

At this point even when you get a 'payout' on mining pool "pool.gold" where they show a payout the BGOLDD daemon will still show 'zero' when you use 'bgold-cli getbalance' this is because the testnet software doesn't work, and they don't know how to make it work.
603  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Bitcoin Gold Mining on: November 06, 2017, 08:28:37 AM
I'm waiting for new information

Go to github.com/btcgpu

click issues, then click 'resolved' issues, as the dev's try to hide the real shit

updates daily in there by the community hacking the code everyday, and reporting what they find,

essentially the software is becoming more unstable and now the testnet will be extended another week, even the only working pool ( pool.gold ) is not paying out test coins, all of the software is shit, as the dev's don't know c++ and are over their heads,

https://github.com/BTCGPU/BTCGPU/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed

"Closed issues" are the GOLD, these are the issues that the chinese HW miners are trying to hide from public,

Essentially these HW guys at china-asic that forked the BTG bitch, don't have a fucking clue about what they're doing.
604  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Gold (BTG) on: November 06, 2017, 07:52:19 AM
I've been out of the loop for a while, and didn't understand why the price was for BTG futures, rather than BTG, I'm happy that I get it now.

It sounds like a shame that they pre-mined it, the idea of Bitcoin being ASIC resistant probably isn't something that most people would be against, but someone trying to steal a load of money in the process isn't ever going to be so popular.
I expect that BTG will hang around as a top 50 coin, just because people are invested in it, even without ever buying it.  That puts pressure on exchanges to list it and keeps trade volume up.  I guess I'll dump though.



It already exists and it works, its called BITCOIN-Z, it has equihash, zaddress, and 100% software works,

The problem for BTC-Z is that they're not back by rich assholes in CHINA.

BGT (Gold) is backed by CHINA-ASIC a hardware company that hired one of its own ( hw ppl can't write code ), so the entire project is one big FUCK, that said they got a GREATA website and marketing team, and they have the 'bitcoin-core political-people' and exchanges by the balls.

[ chinese asic hw ppl own +51% of BTC so they make the rules, like "suck the BTG cock" ]

Goes to show you  that good working software don't mean shit, that BULLSHIT rules the bitcoin universe.


If I were Jack Liao, I would BUY bitcoin-z, I would take it back to 21 MIL max ( current set to 21 billion ), and I would rebrand it as  bitcoinn-gold, the current BTG is NEVER going to be finished or work because project is being ran & orchestrated by idiots with no experience in C++ or bitcoin core.
605  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Where Will U Be on Nov 8, 0700 When BITCOIN-COIN-GOLD Goes MainNet?? on: November 05, 2017, 02:50:27 PM
https://github.com/BTCGPU/BTCGPU/issues/140

Lot's of disinformation about the real launch, open solo mining of BTG, currently at $250/coin,

GPU mining at '1' difficulty, not since 2011 will idiots become rich just from running software.

Questions begged to be asked,why are they say 1200 Nov 8, when the code is hard-wired for 0700, just one more 'fuck' in the BTG scam, but in this case the foxes can out smart the chinese wolves.

Bitcoin-Gold, no Gold was harmed in its manufacturing in China.

A full week prior to launch 500k sols / sec have been directed towards 'zero reward' [ pool.gold ], one can only imagine when reward > 0, that the hash rate will become  10's of millions of Sols per Second.

***

Feel good don't worry there is only one mining pool that works, its already got 99% of farms working for free two weeks prior to launch.

Take back BTC-Sha256 from the Chinese and give them Equihash too, I say.

"NSA created SHA-256"

"Google is NSA" - PUTIN

***

No other pool than www.pool.gold works, no other pool is working with the dev-team, no other pool has had advanced access to the real code.

What's the point of github? Well the exchanges said they wouldn't list unless source was public, ahh but whose ass did the pull the source?? Did it have to be source that worked?? Ahh no of course not, this is all about the SCAM. But don't worry 1/2 life is weeks, as there are dozens of new ICO's coming in days, Bitcoin-Lead, Bitcoin-Shit, Bitcoin-Silver, Bitcoin-Feces,...
606  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How to Hack Bitcoin - Let's Talk Real How its Done - Being Done on: November 05, 2017, 02:39:20 PM
1.) fake web sites that look real, which harvest private keys ( most common easy way to make $5 Million USD in one afternoon )
This is just scamming.  It happens with fiat currency (and all other currencies) as well.
2.) mt-gox type infiltratin of exchanges where private-keys are held, another easy way for 'hackers' to gain access to millions quickly
This is based on weak and centralised third parties.  It doesn't hack BTC, it just finds weaknesses in one central system.
4.) The theory of experts
And by experts you mean idiotic conspiracy theorists?  The NSA do not have the technology to break 256-bit security, nor do the public.  No one does yet, and if anyone does in the future, there can just be a hard fork to a more quantum-secure BTC.
is that NSA created BTC to wait and see when the PUBLIC would/could break SHA-256, I speculate it will be broken by public within 2-3 years
The cryptography standard ENCRYPT II considers BTC safe until at least 2030.
5.) Large Bitcoin Collider - this project if it gets 1k, or +10, users, all targeting their asic/gpus farms towards any specific address say 'satoshi1', then selective hacking will be gold, and just like mining pools, people will be paid a share of the profit as high value coins are hacked,.. How soon? Again it just depends on how quick he can get ppl aboard.
False.  No current computers are capable of getting anything other than a negligible amount of keys and coins from people with poorly randomised (or not randomised) private keys.

Can U backup a single one of your insipid assertions?

The NSA has never blessed an ALGO they didn't own their entire adult lives.
607  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is BTG worth the trouble? on: November 05, 2017, 02:26:13 PM
As the title says, would you claim your BTG or you would pass? I hear many bad stuff about it and the possibility that you could lose your btc.

200,000 MINED PRE coins @ $500 USD, that be $100 Million USD not bad for one chinese guy paying a couple dumb white fucks penny's.

The Chinese are raking in on these ICO's pure & simple.

Worth your trouble?

Probably the dumbest of all are the little sheep with 0.05 total BTC wealth hoping for their free BTG.

Toss in the fact there are 1,000's of BTC spawn ICO's, and largely the same ppl doing same shit Over&oOver

Say again? Trouble for whom?

Only the bag holder
608  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Gold (BTG) on: November 05, 2017, 02:14:10 PM
i have 0.36 btc in my bittrex account when the btg fork happens. anyone know when bittrex will credit those btg to holders?

Quote from bittrex
If you have a Bitcoin (BTC) balance on Bittrex during the BTG ... Bitcoin Gold intends to perform a wallet balance snapshot at Bitcoin block ...

so more disinformation from n00b scammer accounts.

The Snapshot was taken in oct. 25th IIRC.

DO not listen to these N00B Shill accounts people. You best bet is to dump it before the premine gets dumped if your lucky enough to get it on an exchange you have funds on the wallet is not even open source so it could be a trojan and steal all your coins. N00bs are gonna get raped on this scam, don't be one.

Replay Attack: If you execute a transaction on the BTG chain (when this is possible), someone could execute the same transaction on the BTC chain, since all hashes would be the same. He could simple steal your BTC. The same goes the other way around.
A protection on this attack (as implemented for BCH) would be to add a value (just a flag or modifier) in each transaction in order to create different hashes.
BCH already implemented this - but I do not know the status for BTG.

It took them 2 weeks or more to figure out how to merge the code when everyone else did it in a day. Complete amateur scammers.


i don't think exchanges gives them out before mainnet is running with wallets ( hard deadline 8th Nov )

bought some from bitfinex ~$90, rising up nicely  Wink


cheers
Its really a surprise to see that even some people buy this kind of shitcoins which were got freely by just air drop.BTG still does not have any wallet support.I think its only traded in bittrex and yobit as a token.There is no service code publicly released.No miners support since it is said that mining algorithm would be modified so that even GPU systems could be used for mining making decentralization in bitcoin once again.

I would say to better dump it now itself before it gets the value of zero.

QFT

Despite BTC gold is really a scam coin and everybody it understands , I think BTG can make pump x2-x3 when it will list on Bittrex.  Wink

Yeah, after the initial dump there will probably be a pump for another dump and that will be their real replay attack. Lol

Amateeeuuuur scammers they are, but they are backed by the RICHEST ASIC monopoly in CHINA, who OWNS +90% of BTC et-al

So when the 80000 LB gorilla in the room say's "SUCK THE BTG COCK"

Well U suck.
609  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Gold (BTG) on: November 05, 2017, 02:10:33 PM
New blog post, november 5
https://bitcoingold.org/bitcoin-gold-daily-update-testnet-participation-launch/
On the last page of "Bitcoin Gold Testnet Participation Manual":
"... the hard deadline (Nov 8 12:00 UTC) ..."
So the main net launch may not happen until wednesday 8/11.

Actually hardcoded in current source ( see github testnet1 ), the actual main-net launch is Nov 8, 0700,

So I beg to ask, why & who needs the 5 hour lead??
610  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Gold (BTG) on: November 02, 2017, 01:42:48 PM
To all of the wallet questioners: The Wallet will be available (HitBTC, etc) when the Mainnet is live and running. There are no BTG Wallets online. Not even those who got free btg with their btc. The only can hold those BTGs in their wallet nearby their BTC Adress. I know its really really hard to believe but you ppl have to wait until those Deposit Adresses will be created buy Exchanges or Offline. BTG is "new" and a cryptocoin. Its not a Windows plug and play thing. All you have to do is wait and check google Cheesy

U can create a BTG address right now with the bgold-cli client, that's been a given for 2+ weeks, but that's all the software is good for,

the 'mainnet' will NEVER in human history become online, because why should it???

RIght now the YOBIT.NET is is selling an ICO with no blockchain for $200/coin, and gold.pool is getting miners to run their rigs on a pool that promises zero return,

why in HELL would they ever change any of this?

It's all the same people, but this way all along,

Lastly, if you study the github for btcgpu, in the past month they have really haded NO CODE, its just a few changes to the base 'magic cookies' and all, like for instance today they added the NOMP pool, but they added NO CODE, they just import exists git-hubs and slap on their title, but NEVER add value to any code, again its all irrelevant, cuz it doesn't do anything, other than sit there,

In the meantime the price is STRONG, and MORONS keep mining on a pool that promises ZERO ROI
611  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Gold (BTG) on: November 02, 2017, 11:08:16 AM
wouldn't it be funny if the testnet were doing the premine pow.  i'm fairly new but i've never seen a launch anything like this...   there are other "bitcoin forks" like btcz that launched flawlessly, no premine and wallets for multiple platforms.    And they had NONE of the hype this one had.    I hope i'm wrong about this one

It would be funny and possible,

The github.com/btcgpu could be all entire FAKE bullshit,

the pool.gold is running something, but when i build the software it only runs in -testnet mode, and I can't solo mine cuz my proxy gets a "Getblocktemplate" nada, and do it by hand and sure enough you get -9 when you 'gold-cli getblocktemplate'

so what the hell are they running on gold.pool? its the same people, perhaps their running a FAUX test pool for another flavor that works, because sure as hell the shit at githhub.com don't work

***\

Right now POOL.GOLD is running at 250K sol/sec, now where in the HELL is that HASH power going? It ain't going to test BTG, cuz the blockchain don't exist and the testnet doesn't support mining,

IMHO they pool.gold is all part of the ENTIRE scam, not only do they have no intention of ever delivering working software, but now they have people mining into the NULL world for FREE, directing their machine miners towards who knows?

How many days weeks months will this bullshit go on ??

WHo the fuck knows, what is known is that everything is a SCAM, especially nicehash

***

The price is holding high and nice, and now people are mining for them for free, that's a lot of ZCASH that's being mined for them, and note only zcash seems to have bumped of the EQUIHASH family in past 24 hours of this bullshit pool.gold, so they have the only working -testnet for BGOLDD??? Right

zencash has reported in the past 24 hours a mysterious 250K-sol/sec 'mining pool' just showed up, ... funny wouldn't it be funny if pool.gold was just stealing rigs to mine their own equihash?

Most likely IMHO I would look at nicehash and there desire to scam, its a marriage made in heaven to get morons to MINE on sites where they're promised 'zero return'.
612  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Gold (BTG) on: November 02, 2017, 11:04:03 AM
Where can I create a Bitcoin Gold Address?
I want to use it for mining.
Please beware of the scammers on Twitter that do post sites where you can create a wallet!

download the bgoldd and run it, don't worry there is no blockchain, so its just a "git clone", and then run, then

type "bgold-cli getnewaddress"

This bgoldd doesn't do anything, like it does support "gettemplateblock" so it can't be used for mining, its hard coded to only work in -testnet mode

Then you will have your address, your address, do not accept one from a 'wallet' site.

Oct 25 'fork' came and went, nov-1 came and went, still no software, no block, no wallet and no gui, not much of anything, but promises

but hell the price is high and holding ... ?

shit is the new gold, vaporware is the new treasure

this shit coin doesn't even support zaddresses, its just a piss-poor clone copy of BTC that uses equihash for POW,

but once again nothing works
613  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How to Hack Bitcoin - Let's Talk Real How its Done - Being Done on: October 29, 2017, 04:12:14 AM
I would like to indicate that 1 and 2 are not BTC hacks, but direct hacks on the users and the exchanges, not on the code or the protocol. The rest of the hacks you mentioned are possible but thats only in theory and they will remain that way until someone has demonstrated that it can be done in practice.


I would like to point out to you that 'hacking' is what ever it takes for Party A to "STEAL" BTC from party "B"

We could change the word from hack to steal, almost always all the items 1-N involves "CODING", so thus they're all hacking, 1&2 involve faux websites, but its still hacking ( coding html/js  )

IMHO 1&2 would be ordinary theft and easy to trace, just see who owns the faux website, ... easy for LEO to find.

The other's especially cracking the SHA-256 and discovering Priv-Keys, that can never be traced back to 'U', unless you spend the stolen COIN say on a known address like 'coinbase'.

I think people who do item's 3+ are professional science people who just like puzzles and right now cracking/hacking BTC was one of the biggest challenges on earth.

I would like to rhetorically ask, how many people here who read this shit have actually wrote code to do this?

It seems that 99% of this forum doesn't know how BTC works and just posts dribble from MSM,

Have any of you actually ran brain-flayer? Have any of you written your own LBC?? Have any written a blockchain-parser? Havey any you rolled up your sleeves and tried?

It seems that common sense is that your always told 'its best to mine', but who said that? Is that really true?

IMHO it may be MORE profitable to re-target your GPU-RIGS to cracking high-value addresses

Again it doesn't matter, just trying to see the level of knowledge on this forum, certainly only 1 in 1,000 even code the block-chain here I can see that,

Here's a question, since the level of tech knowledge on this site is so low, anybody know that best site for this subject??

***

Brain-Flayer (#3) has been demonstrated in  public, and people are still using it, as idiots are still using brain-wallet tech to make private-keys ( wallets )

LBC has no desire to brag about what it finds.

***

People have lots 10's of millions to date in BTC, and its ignored,  it seems that the GOV is running BTC, for the same culture exists where when people are robbed the other told to ignore the robbery.

Personally as someone who does write code to hack BTC, I find it valuable to know weaknesses, and to know the most secure way to generate my wallet ( private key address ), had I not done these I would have NEVER known for real what is weak and what is strong, because the rumor and bullshit that is discussed in public is always 100% bullshit. People argued for years that brain-wallets couldn't be hacked, it took a public demonstration to put that practice to an end.

I think that NOBODY who hacks BTC is going to brag or take anything public, at the very least they can sell their service, and make a lot of money, it would be in nobody interest to 'open source' this, just like now the best mining software is all closed source and has fees, nobody gives shit away for free.
614  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is Bitcoin Hackable? on: October 29, 2017, 04:01:42 AM
Bitcoins can't be added to your account like in bank. You would have to modify all the nodes somehow. The only possibility is a majority of hashrate. It is called a 51% attack. It is possible, however it is too expensive to perform so it's not worth it. Bitcoin is safe in general, especially if you have control over your private keys (software or hardware wallet).

indeed to a security problem if we know and understand the technology surely will say that in general the bitcoin is very secure. Because it has a very system bitcoin complex and well enough to avoid the presence of hacking. But one thing can indeed give the worst thing for us is that when we can't control or securing the secret key from the wallet it is certain we will lose all of the funds.

BITCOIN has been hacked 1,000's of times, and people have lots 10's of millions of USD

There is so much ignorance here, I think not 1 in 1,000 on this board understands anything about BTC.

Say the 51% quote above, it has NOTHING to do with hashrate, it has to do with nodes, and that +51% of the nodes must accept the longest chain for a transaction to be confirmed, nothing to do with the subject at hand. Sure if someone controlled +51% of the nodes then they could create their own transactions and that would seriously screw the block-chain, but the problem is that ain't going to happen cuz only one chinese miner controls 51% of the nodes, and he aint' going piss in his own soup bowl.


Ten's of thousands of software people world-over are working to crack the private-keys, and targeted cracking already exists the problem is cracking high-value accounts.

The average BTC account if valid is 0.05 BTC, and its what 2% of the space, Randomly creating Private-keys and looking for money doesn't work, so then one must focus on addresses with money and try to 'guess/calculate' the private-key for that address, that is where the real hacking is going on.


The majority of people on this board, would give their BTC to an exchange for a 'free shit coin' this is how most BTC is lost, not by hacking, but by idiots trying to get free shit-coins (FORKS).
615  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: why do you think satoshi nakamoto kept his identity as a secret? on: October 29, 2017, 03:42:00 AM
Satoshi has almost challenged the entire banking industry which no one could dare to do.Finacial sector has almost been shaken by bitcoin.Bankers and governments too are very much upset about bitcoin.No one has ever expected such a gigantic growth by bitcoin.We could understand that how much they would be in anger over a person who has created such a bitcoin.Satoshi's life itself is in serious threat.That's why,satoshi has taken a wise decision of hiding his identity so that his life would be spared.I think that he would never reveal his identity forever.

Exactly, the rest of his life he would live in a cage.

All governments on earth would indict him and extradite him, just like Julian Assange.

Years ago Phill Zimmerman invented PGP, and for years the GOV wanted to put him in prison, for giving the public an easy way to hide info from GOV.

Now satoshi has given us an easy way to make our own money and hide it from GOV, thus all gov on earth wants satoshi to pay.


Look at silk-road guy gets life in prison as an example, because GOV wants to set an example, also the silk-road guy never spent any BTC, because he knew they were all being tracked, just like satoshi ...

Why go public? If he goes public, then he goes to prison for life, and he can never spend the money.

Let's recall history, its when Gavin(?) I think told Satoshi he had an appointment to meet CIA, that was the last time, and of course Satoshi didn't want BTC used for Wikileaks as he knew that would make BTC an enemy of NSA&CIA.

So Satoshi must remain hidden for life, and can never spend his coin.

End of story.

The real question was satoshi doing this as a solo hobby, or was he a contractor?? Solo, means little, but contractors means some "AGENCY" owns BTC, IMHO  most likely he was "SOLO" because if an agency had paid, they would of by now taken control, the fact that nobody has taken control, is a result of the fact that the first 5 years were just natural growth in the crypto-anarchy community,

Control bullshit didn't start until BTC became noticed by the elite bankers that rule the world

Now of course china see's BTC as currency for the 'gods',

I suspect that across the world BTC will be a rich mans tool, as given USA avg guy don't have $500USD in bank, sure as shit will never have 1 BTC, in China ppl are richer on average, thus many rich will move their wealth around via BTC, again its a toy for the politically elite rich, aka CIA

BTC is just most famous, now there are 1,000's of alt-coins and 100's are very profitable and not on radar,

In some ways its good the assholes ( gov, bankers, lawyers ) just stay focused on BTC and leave the good stuff alone Smiley
616  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / How to Hack Bitcoin - Let's Talk Real How its Done - Being Done on: October 29, 2017, 02:57:31 AM
There are many elements of hacking BTC,

1.) fake web sites that look real, which harvest private keys ( most common easy way to make $5 Million USD in one afternoon )

2.) mt-gox type infiltratin of exchanges where private-keys are held, another easy way for 'hackers' to gain access to millions quickly

3.) the mother of all of course is breaking the sha-256 hash, "Google Brain-Flayer", its been done, but that gig is over, there are many advanced NSA tricks for breaking ECDSA, which is how FBI can any time it wants get the private key for any address ( think silk road BTC auction )

https://github.com/ryancdotorg/brainflayer

[ while BTC people no longer use 'brain wallets' many alt-coins still push this shit, so bloom-filter cracking is still possible across the crypto-currency universe. ]

4.) The theory of experts is that NSA created BTC to wait and see when the PUBLIC would/could break SHA-256, I speculate it will be broken by public within 2-3 years, before that GOV will send out a policy statement and tell all GOV to use SHA-512; banks will be kept on easy to hack stuff forever (DES,AES,RSA), and they'll keep public on SHA-256 as long as they wish. Remember possessing or distruting crypto that GOV can't crack is still possession of a 'lethal weapon' aka bomb in USA criminal-code. In USA its only legal transport crypto that the NSA can crack.

5.) Large Bitcoin Collider - this project if it gets 1k, or +10, users, all targeting their asic/gpus farms towards any specific address say 'satoshi1', then selective hacking will be gold, and just like mining pools, people will be paid a share of the profit as high value coins are hacked,.. How soon? Again it just depends on how quick he can get ppl aboard.

https://lbc.cryptoguru.org

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1573035.msg23690150

Eventually BTC will update itself to SHA-1024, so this is all no big deal, for safety keep your wallet in cold storage and printed, keep your BTC's off of these 99% fraudulent exchanges that just churn your BTC's for "FEES"

Lot's of people working on hacking SHA-256, I know the NSA can do it, and I suspect that folks 'private' in Israel are doing it on as-paid basis, just a matter of time before we get a little better HW, and sometime discovers a new ALGO for SHA-256, in general what the public see's is 15 years behind advanced industry and GOV, FYI in 1968 Tooley published "FFT", but Standard Oil discovered it in 1956 and was sharing with NSA, 17 years it took before Academi caught up with adv-gov-tech

***


In summary its easy to ROB BTC community, its probably easier to mine BTC's with an antminer rather than 'brute force' find a valid private-key with BTC funds.

Smart math people will be the best bet for private software that breaks bitcoin, google stuff like "EDCSA sorting" and rings, ... stuff that drops the search space from 2**128 to 2**32 makes it doable, thats the right way to think about the problem.


Google "blockchain parser", or better yet write your own in python, hell if people want I will post one, generate your own addresses that have high value, know which addresses to attack.

Much work in machine learning is very promising,

Long before I took up GPU mining, I already had a GPU FARM for doing machine-learning CUDA, so it was easy to recommission the hardware over to mining alt-coin for easy money.

One of the things about ML is patterns, and if you study the researchers who wrote brain-flayer, you will see that they study the patterns of addresses and Private-Keys, using Machine-Learn algo's and GPU miner-farms is an ideal way to study the block-chain, and the addresses. Years after 'brainflayer' these researchers are still studying the pattern's of the block-chain, and addresses. Especially 'fashion/vanity keys' are an easy target for researchers.

The SHA256/ECDSA is a TRAPDOOR algo, which means one-way, private-key to public-key; You can never get an PRIV-KEY from an address, so the way to study the problem is have the ML system learn how private-keys generate addresses, that "LEARNING", and its easy directory.io, or write your own ALGO to train the ML.

***

IMHO the future of all this non-sense will be in machine learning, better to have a machine be trained from the block-chain ( for any crytpo ), and then just query the system for high wealth accounts, or priv-keys or anything you wish to know.

James Garwin one of the fathers of the atomic bomb once said "The most dangerous thing was little people know that the atomic bomb worked", once people ( governments ) knew it worked, then any jack-ass would be confident to refine uranium and make a bomb.

Same now with crypto-banks and hacking, once people understand its possible, and not by brute-force, but by building machine's that learn and see patterns that humans don't see, and then the problem is solved.
617  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: any one tell why ico ban in china?? on: October 29, 2017, 02:31:03 AM
All investor are dispointed when ico ban in china.I want to know why ico ban in china.any one explain please.I am really frustrated for this news.Now I am hold my coin.But where are going to crytopia currency??  Angry

It was a very short list, they only banned the most blatant criminals, who quickly moved offshore to Japan, or into Russia.

The BITCOIN-GOLD (BTG) started off as a ICO in August, then got banned and shipped over to Russia, where it became a "FORK".

China GOV didnt' ban BITCOIN, they didn't ban exchanges they didn't ban ICO's, they just banned criminal fraudulent companys from selling "SHIT ICOS" to a gullible public.
618  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Segwit2X:Users care which side wins? Or do they? on: October 29, 2017, 02:25:16 AM
Users should absolutely NOT care about which side wins because it is not about sides. The Bitcoin network is decentralized and votes and agrees on the state of the network every 10 minutes. People vote with their full nodes with has the complete history of the Blockchain.

PTB cares about TWO THINGS

1.) Who controls BTC-CORE, e.g. who writes the CODE, the CODE is what makes the block-chain, already the new BTG ( Bitcoin-Gold  ) doesn't import the classic block-chain, they have their own blockchain, and their own addresses. SEGWIT will also create their own block chain data-structures. The entire "FORK" program BCC,BTG, BSEG are all designed to fragment and create FUD ( read the Chinese plan to take over BTC )

"He that controls the BTC SOURCE control's BTC in the future"

2.) They "PTB" ( Kosher Nostra ) they want the BITCOIN-BRAND, the name, the $200+ Billion USD market-cap and good will.

It's clear here on this forum that the little people only care about "FREE SHIT COINS", but this is only dilution of BTC, and violates Satoshi's original limit of BTC to 21 Million.

The full nodes run SOURCE CODE, which they download from "BITCOIN CORE", or who ever has the MOST POLITICAL muscle to convince +51% of the MINERS to run that source code. The Block-Chain/Merkel Tree don't mean fuck, every time a new source is installed they can easily automate a -reindex and reformat the entire blockchain/database as the wish.



HE WHO CONTROLS the SOURCE CONTROLS BTC

Eventually IMHO the plan of NYA is to go closed source, once they take over BTC with SEGWIT-2, then they will say that the block-chain needs to be encrypted, and that the source needs to be closed to prevent hacking, and the BTC will be just like the "FEDERAL RESERVE BANK", with the exact same ppl running BTC.
619  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is Bitcoin Hackable? on: October 29, 2017, 02:14:19 AM
Some believe that the NSA will eventually hack bitcoin


SHA256 is NSA

NSA never released a crypto that they didn't own the back-door, never nada, never has happened in their history.

BITCOIN is SHA256, ergo BITCOIN is NSA

"Google is NSA" - PUTIN


NSA is just watching and waiting to learn 'when' it becomes "PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE" how to crack SHA-256.

The favorite theory out there is that BTC was created as a financial incentive to crack SHA-256, its been what 8 years, but the financial incentive is there, 100's of BIllion's of USD.


If I was running BTC-ORG I would have bumped BTC to SHA-512, or SHA-1024 a long time ago, and that CRYPTO will not be broken for many years to come.
620  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why you shouldn't support Segwit2x - even if you like the 2MB increase on: October 29, 2017, 02:02:33 AM

But the Segwit2x supporters have made three big mistakes (if their intention was really to become "the Bitcoin"):


1. BCH and SegWit2x have strange relations, since BCH was created by Bitmain which also support SegWit2x. This shows that there's no unity or strong political beliefs in SegWit2x camp - they are simply guided by greed.

2. They did it on purpose to be as contentious and disruptive as possible, it's all about trying to force Core to submit to their demands instead of having their own vision. It's not a secret that eventually Core will start preparing for their own block size increase, but only when they will feel like the network is ready - they don't want to risk security for some short term gain in capacity. So, SegWit2x people want to actually control Core or replace it, simply increasing blocksize is not their main goal.

3. There would be a huge legal shitstorm if a company like Coinbase tried to name SegWit2x coin as "BTC". They are not completely suicidal.


You missed the 4th, NYA should have NEVER been created, letting the KOSHER-NOSTRA run out the orginal BTC ppl in NYC, and then letting NYC MAFIA Kosher-Nostra take over BTC and create NYA, then NYA takes over BTC-CORE, all they want is the "BITCOIN BRAND", The NYC assholes shouldn't WIN this one, it would be better to let the CHINESE win, and let BTC exchanges be ran in JAPAN where its all going anyway's in ASIA.

FUCK NYA, FUCK the Kosher-Nostra, Fuck the Federal Reserve Bank,

All wars are Banker Wars.

Don't let the fucking "BANKS" own BTC.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!