Bitcoin Forum
June 06, 2024, 01:32:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Large Bitcoin Collider (Collision Finders Pool)  (Read 193141 times)
rico666 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1037


฿ → ∞


View Profile WWW
October 25, 2017, 02:59:08 PM
 #1041


With the exception of Bitcoins that have been purposefully placed in low entropy addresses, like the puzzle transaction, or Bitcoins that have been inadvertently placed in low entropy addresses, for example from a defective random number generator, this project will never find any Bitcoins that have been properly stored at Bitcoin address generated from an adequate source of entropy.  But again, that is not the purpose of the project.

<snip>

Always interesting to read from other people what the purpose of ones own project is. Ignoring - stubbornly I might say -
 https://lbc.cryptoguru.org/man/theory

Also interesting how statements change over time

"this project will never find any Bitcoins"

"this project will never find any Bitcoins hat have been properly stored at Bitcoin address generated from an adequate source of entropy."

soon then

"this project will never find many Bitcoins hat have been properly stored at Bitcoin address generated from an adequate source of entropy."

;-)

all non self-referential signatures except mine are lame ... oh wait ...   ·  LBC Thread (News)  ·  Past BURST Activities
BurtW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1136

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.


View Profile WWW
October 25, 2017, 03:25:45 PM
 #1042


With the exception of Bitcoins that have been purposefully placed in low entropy addresses, like the puzzle transaction, or Bitcoins that have been inadvertently placed in low entropy addresses, for example from a defective random number generator, this project will never find any Bitcoins that have been properly stored at Bitcoin address generated from an adequate source of entropy.  But again, that is not the purpose of the project.

<snip>

Always interesting to read from other people what the purpose of ones own project is. Ignoring - stubbornly I might say -
 https://lbc.cryptoguru.org/man/theory

Also interesting how statements change over time

"this project will never find any Bitcoins"

"this project will never find any Bitcoins hat have been properly stored at Bitcoin address generated from an adequate source of entropy."

soon then

"this project will never find many Bitcoins hat have been properly stored at Bitcoin address generated from an adequate source of entropy."

;-)
So, are you are claiming that you really expect to find Bitcoins that have been properly stored using a functioning cryptographically secure random number generator with an adequate source of entropy?

Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security.  Read all about it here:  http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/  Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
rico666 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1037


฿ → ∞


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2017, 07:37:59 PM
 #1043

So, are you are claiming that you really expect to find Bitcoins that have been properly stored using a functioning cryptographically secure random number generator with an adequate source of entropy?

Yes, and I even explained why on numerous occasions.

And if you managed to observe what the author of the puzzle transactions has done (removing those with 161-256 bit into the -160 space, for redundancy reasons), you should by now have said farewell to a 256bit private key with "proper/adequate entropy".

And I won't - I repeat: won't - go again into a discussion of simple linear 4th grade arithmetics pointing out how 135bit of search space will take billions of years to compute (which it won't), because I am really sick of peoples linear minds.

all non self-referential signatures except mine are lame ... oh wait ...   ·  LBC Thread (News)  ·  Past BURST Activities
BurtW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1136

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2017, 08:52:52 PM
 #1044

So, are you are claiming that you really expect to find Bitcoins that have been properly stored using a functioning cryptographically secure random number generator with an adequate source of entropy?

Yes, and I even explained why on numerous occasions.

And if you managed to observe what the author of the puzzle transactions has done (removing those with 161-256 bit into the -160 space, for redundancy reasons), you should by now have said farewell to a 256bit private key with "proper/adequate entropy".

And I won't - I repeat: won't - go again into a discussion of simple linear 4th grade arithmetics pointing out how 135bit of search space will take billions of years to compute (which it won't), because I am really sick of peoples linear minds.
OK then, we will see how it goes.

Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security.  Read all about it here:  http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/  Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
BitWise514
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 16, 2017, 07:31:31 PM
 #1045

Guys im new to this plz help can't even get passed "OSBOXES LOGIN" whats the passord what should i write to start scaning ?
rico666 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1037


฿ → ∞


View Profile WWW
November 17, 2017, 07:52:27 AM
 #1046

Guys im new to this plz help can't even get passed "OSBOXES LOGIN" whats the passord what should i write to start scaning ?

Seriously?

https://lbc.cryptoguru.org/man/admin

all non self-referential signatures except mine are lame ... oh wait ...   ·  LBC Thread (News)  ·  Past BURST Activities
ZeusLight
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 17, 2017, 09:10:06 PM
 #1047

Just to confirm that they will find!!!! I  foudn out alredy 1 address used latest 5-october...  this address i found 3 weeks ago and signen message but i dont know if message reached or not !!!! i did it by using electrum and are not so good in this front yet... My stronger part is "Holy mathermatic" = Specail numbers, specail algoritm and combinations!!!!
And believe me or not!!!! By using one singnle algo ... and opened the sites.. I did 2 klick and address were found with 0.0001BTC!!!!
Now i dont know if this address was plant by puzzle groups or not  ? it is in the into the 60field of 90 !!!
So yes im sure 10000000% LBC will find with their power.... btw im using a computer ram 2002 2GB ram and 2.4 ghz!  

Here is the address : 15cUJUVUV89sVZGqon6JENAsVRzGB9vch3

ZeusLight
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 17, 2017, 09:22:15 PM
 #1048

Guys im new to this plz help can't even get passed "OSBOXES LOGIN" whats the passord what should i write to start scaning ?

Seriously?

https://lbc.cryptoguru.org/man/admin


Rico, can you tell about 160 key space??  U mean addresses wich begins with 0a-b - 01-9?  or 00 or 000 ?



 

arulbero
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1915
Merit: 2074


View Profile
November 17, 2017, 09:33:51 PM
 #1049


Rico, can you tell about 160 key space??  U mean addresses wich begins with 0a-b - 01-9?  or 00 or 000 ?


160 space is the space of the first 2^160 private keys (from 1 to 2^160).

What you mean with: "it is into 60 field of 90?"
ZeusLight
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 17, 2017, 10:11:23 PM
 #1050


Rico, can you tell about 160 key space??  U mean addresses wich begins with 0a-b - 01-9?  or 00 or 000 ?


160 space is the space of the first 2^160 private keys (from 1 to 2^160).

What you mean with: "it is into 60 field of 90?"


Ok thanks i see now .

with 60 or 90 field i meant from directory.io site where 90 is = 904625697166532776746648320380374280100293470930272690489102837043110636675  and i foudn a key in 60 field ! 
BurtW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1136

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.


View Profile WWW
November 17, 2017, 10:27:05 PM
Last edit: November 17, 2017, 11:03:53 PM by BurtW
 #1051


Rico, can you tell about 160 key space??  U mean addresses wich begins with 0a-b - 01-9?  or 00 or 000 ?


160 space is the space of the first 2^160 private keys (from 1 to 2^160).

What you mean with: "it is into 60 field of 90?"


Ok thanks i see now .

with 60 or 90 field i meant from directory.io site where 90 is = 904625697166532776746648320380374280100293470930272690489102837043110636675  and i foudn a key in 60 field !  


if 90 = 904625697166532776746648320380374280100293470930272690489102837043110636675

Then what does 60 = ?

What was the exact page number you used?

I do not think you meant page 60 of 904625697166532776746648320380374280100293470930272690489102837043110636675 because 15cUJUVUV89sVZGqon6JENAsVRzGB9vch3 does not appear on page 60 and in fact there are no addresses on page 60 that show as having transactions:

http://directory.io/60

Are you saying you picked a page at random 60xxxxx...xxxx and by chance found an address (15cUJUVUV89sVZGqon6JENAsVRzGB9vch3) which had been used?

If so, what is the exact page number?

Yes, 15cUJUVUV89sVZGqon6JENAsVRzGB9vch3 has been used but it now contains 0 BTC.

https://blockchain.info/address/15cUJUVUV89sVZGqon6JENAsVRzGB9vch3

Note, coming up with a page that contains a used address or an address that currently contains BTC does not prove anything.  I can do that.  All I have to do is get one of my old private keys, calculate the page number and viola I can post that by chance I picked a page with a used address on it.

Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security.  Read all about it here:  http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/  Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
BurtW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1136

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.


View Profile WWW
November 17, 2017, 11:00:42 PM
 #1052

In fact, here you go:

Quote
Guys!  OMG!  I was just messing around and typed in a very long random page number into directory.io and I when I checked I almost died!  I found a page with a used address on it.  This proves the entire Bitcoin system based on large random numbers is totally flawed.  SELL ALL YOUR BITCOINS NOW!  When the news of this gets out everyone will panic and sell.  The price will go to zero!  SELL SELL SELL.

Don't believe me.  Check it out:

http://directory.io/104889172292022069546398109232214554797524545954882670766624383473286585819

See!  I found address 1Nro9WkpaKm9axmcfPVp79dAJU1Gx7VmMZ on page 104889172292022069546398109232214554797524545954882670766624383473286585819 TOTALLY BY CHANCE.

If I can do it so can you, so can anyone, your Bitcoins are not safe.

Etc. Etc.

Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security.  Read all about it here:  http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/  Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
ZeusLight
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 18, 2017, 02:02:59 AM
 #1053


Rico, can you tell about 160 key space??  U mean addresses wich begins with 0a-b - 01-9?  or 00 or 000 ?


160 space is the space of the first 2^160 private keys (from 1 to 2^160).

What you mean with: "it is into 60 field of 90?"


Ok thanks i see now .

with 60 or 90 field i meant from directory.io site where 90 is = 904625697166532776746648320380374280100293470930272690489102837043110636675  and i foudn a key in 60 field !  


if 90 = 904625697166532776746648320380374280100293470930272690489102837043110636675

Then what does 60 = ?

What was the exact page number you used?

I do not think you meant page 60 of 904625697166532776746648320380374280100293470930272690489102837043110636675 because 15cUJUVUV89sVZGqon6JENAsVRzGB9vch3 does not appear on page 60 and in fact there are no addresses on page 60 that show as having transactions:

http://directory.io/60

Are you saying you picked a page at random 60xxxxx...xxxx and by chance found an address (15cUJUVUV89sVZGqon6JENAsVRzGB9vch3) which had been used?

If so, what is the exact page number?

Yes, 15cUJUVUV89sVZGqon6JENAsVRzGB9vch3 has been used but it now contains 0 BTC.

https://blockchain.info/address/15cUJUVUV89sVZGqon6JENAsVRzGB9vch3

Note, coming up with a page that contains a used address or an address that currently contains BTC does not prove anything.  I can do that.  All I have to do is get one of my old private keys, calculate the page number and viola I can post that by chance I picked a page with a used address on it.





Its of course not 60 page i meant at 60 field! 6XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX!

Due to the respect of that human i cannot post that privatkey if he  use it again, never knows!!!

I personaly think this is planeted by someone who used same mathematic as me.. very special numbers . Becasue i found it in 2 clicks.  and i did not enter random numbers !! I copied the numbers from my 2 different sites ... i used the same algo with other numbers and could find more results. but all of them used and probaly planted for their research!!!
must say it was a nice feeling since i used diff softwares before and never got any result..  but manually with special tech i got it , and i got it FAST!  But im still not worried about my bitcoins... IT is secure and not little.. ITS very much secure!  BUT, nothing is 100% secure in this planet , but one thing that all of us will die one day and its pretty sure and secured death without comeback! Smiley)))))))

Now to one thing: ANYONE who also have controll over thoose 2 addresses : 1DfDSBE9A7osGE18Be5bNtWPyc7VEuouN9 , and 1BLdu9kTpojFYrpEcmDC59EwMUVCN2dayV ...  If u have them tell me how u found them!  Its not by directory in this case.. but in one another way!!! I think someone else also have control over them and got them in the same way as me !
BurtW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1136

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.


View Profile WWW
November 18, 2017, 03:24:07 AM
 #1054

Its of course not 60 page i meant at 60 field! 6XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX!

Due to the respect of that human i cannot post that privatkey if he  use it again, never knows!!!

I personaly think this is planeted by someone who used same mathematic as me.. very special numbers . Becasue i found it in 2 clicks.  and i did not enter random numbers !! I copied the numbers from my 2 different sites ... i used the same algo with other numbers and could find more results. but all of them used and probaly planted for their research!!!
must say it was a nice feeling since i used diff softwares before and never got any result..  but manually with special tech i got it , and i got it FAST!  But im still not worried about my bitcoins... IT is secure and not little.. ITS very much secure!  BUT, nothing is 100% secure in this planet , but one thing that all of us will die one day and its pretty sure and secured death without comeback! Smiley)))))))

Now to one thing: ANYONE who also have controll over thoose 2 addresses : 1DfDSBE9A7osGE18Be5bNtWPyc7VEuouN9 , and 1BLdu9kTpojFYrpEcmDC59EwMUVCN2dayV ...  If u have them tell me how u found them!  Its not by directory in this case.. but in one another way!!! I think someone else also have control over them and got them in the same way as me !

So, you are claiming that you have an "algorithm" that managed to somehow use "special numbers" you found on two web sites and quickly pick pages between page 600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 and page 699999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 that have used addresses on them?

Unless your algorithm is:

1) Find a private key posted on the internet
2) Divide the private key by 128
3) Add one to the result
4) Go to that page

then I do not believe you.

BTW exactly how many used addresses have you found using your algorithm?

Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security.  Read all about it here:  http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/  Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
ZeusLight
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 18, 2017, 03:14:23 PM
 #1055

Its of course not 60 page i meant at 60 field! 6XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX!

Due to the respect of that human i cannot post that privatkey if he  use it again, never knows!!!

I personaly think this is planeted by someone who used same mathematic as me.. very special numbers . Becasue i found it in 2 clicks.  and i did not enter random numbers !! I copied the numbers from my 2 different sites ... i used the same algo with other numbers and could find more results. but all of them used and probaly planted for their research!!!
must say it was a nice feeling since i used diff softwares before and never got any result..  but manually with special tech i got it , and i got it FAST!  But im still not worried about my bitcoins... IT is secure and not little.. ITS very much secure!  BUT, nothing is 100% secure in this planet , but one thing that all of us will die one day and its pretty sure and secured death without comeback! Smiley)))))))

Now to one thing: ANYONE who also have controll over thoose 2 addresses : 1DfDSBE9A7osGE18Be5bNtWPyc7VEuouN9 , and 1BLdu9kTpojFYrpEcmDC59EwMUVCN2dayV ...  If u have them tell me how u found them!  Its not by directory in this case.. but in one another way!!! I think someone else also have control over them and got them in the same way as me !

So, you are claiming that you have an "algorithm" that managed to somehow use "special numbers" you found on two web sites and quickly pick pages between page 600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 and page 699999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 that have used addresses on them?

Unless your algorithm is:

1) Find a private key posted on the internet
2) Divide the private key by 128
3) Add one to the result
4) Go to that page

then I do not believe you.

BTW exactly how many used addresses have you found using your algorithm?


Yes ...  thats correct almost.  the pages i speak about are on my computer... Its directory.io runned localy .. what i did is i let one page show only the uncompressed keys, and another one with both ...  then i choose different numbers of how many kyes i want to get showed, here is the special numbers! and i copy the total pages of page one to page two!!  make 1- 2 klicks and result comes... 

so far i found about 15

But as i said im pretty sure somone who make experiments are using thoose keys, i do not believe its from someone not involved at directory / lbc projects.  because it was to easy for me to find.. i did not enforce to find more but if i know they have planted more in same way i could just change the numbers and find them all...
https://i.imgur.com/7saaQ9U.png

You know that u can change directory code so ex, some keys viewd on original dictory.io will not shown in your if u change the bytes!



ZeusLight
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 19, 2017, 02:06:08 PM
 #1056

Btw,

can anyone help me what is the best way to setup directory.io localy and check the balances in the fastest way ? currently im using cors to view balance but its a bit slow and also limited to 128 keys.

1.Was thinking to setup bitcoin-abe , is there any way to make it faster , i alredy have Allbalances.csv file ..
2. Is there any alternative to make directory.io view balances/transactions without limit ?
3. I will upgrade my comptuer and join lbc,  can i change the software settings to let it scan in my way ?  I have different ways of scanning calling it : Wave scan, stock scanning, window scanning, dot scanning and laborynth scanning...
BitWise514
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 23, 2017, 07:38:16 PM
 #1057

Guys please I need help after running the VMWare

osboxes :osboxes
Password: osboxes.org
cd collider; ./LBC -x

I get this error : loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched
I know I have Pearl 5.24 version
And Im on Windows 7

Is there a code or something i should download to make it go through ?

Thank you

BurtW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1136

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.


View Profile WWW
November 24, 2017, 12:21:10 PM
 #1058

What is the issue with applying your code to oclvanitygen instead of vanitygen? From what I understand you're unloading a pre-determined list into RAM and checking to see if any match, right?

Also, i LOVE the name haha Smiley

Vanitygen/Oclvanitygen is trying to generate vanity addresses.  LBC is iterating over private keys and searching for Bitcoin addresses that contain or have contained Bitcoins.  They are working on two very different problems and require very different code.  Since Vanitygen uses random private keys and LBC increments the private key LBC can use a much faster an more efficient algorithm to calculate the public key.

Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security.  Read all about it here:  http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/  Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
jhdscript
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
November 24, 2017, 12:44:30 PM
 #1059

LBC never use base58 encode/decode. I ups its performance too

itod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1076


^ Will code for Bitcoins


View Profile
November 24, 2017, 12:53:40 PM
 #1060

LBC never use base58 encode/decode. I ups its performance too

base58 encode should only use a fraction of resources that hashes use, is it really measurable?
Pages: « 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!