Much more information is required. Everything depends. But normally when the price goes down it's recommended to buy more. Most probably that's what I'd do.

QR Droid [https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=la.droid.qr] is an Android app which recently surpassed 50 million downloads on Google Play. This threshold includes it on a very selective top list.

Because of this today it has announced it's giving away a few prizes including a smartphone and cash prizes:

• Samsung Galaxy S7 or US$600
• US$200
• US$100

What is very interesting is the fact they will deliver the cash prizes via either PayPal or Bitcoin:



Source: https://www.facebook.com/qrdroid/

What do you mean it doesn't work? It's working here.
You can also upload the public key to pgp.mit.edu and others, or just post it here.

Just stop playing fool. Read my post again if you don't understand, buy I'm sure you do.

Yes, low value. 70 domains worth about reg fee each. The proof is the thread I posted where I try to sell them for $7 each without success. The other proof is the post I mention where I offer to remove the negative if you help me get my money back by selling the collateral, without any response from you.

Why? Because I trusted you because of your history and our previous deals. I thought I was sure you would repay but I was wrong.

Happy? Understood? Or will you keep playing fool? Just stop. You scammed, I lost, you won't repay, now at least stop.

But I'm sure you will just repeat the same nonsense without even mentioning the proof. Whatever.

I just noticed I got Legendary with an activity of 826!
I'm not the luckiest but it's not bad at all

That's a lie. You just added one extra domain worth much less than half.

All the domains together were worth less that the loan. The deal was for you to repay the loan, which you never did after a lot of opportunities to extend the time or to help me sell the collateral.
I gave the loan just because we had traded before and I trusted you. What a mistake! And now you play victim, what a shameless person!

Again this is a lie. I lost more than 1 BTC because of your untrustworthiness.

Here I am trying to sell your 'great' domains for $7 a piece without much success. There are other similar threads with even lower prices and not much difference on the result.
If you really thought the domains were worth more than the loan you would have agreed to my offer here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1135458.msg12702301#msg12702301


I strongly advice everyone to stay away from this user. You can't trust him.

By the way I know this is somewhat off-topic (although the warning is required here) so I won't post again about this here, but OP locked the topic where this should be discussed.

---

Edit

I see you will just keep repeating your nonsense  
I won't create a new post for this.

Because I just showed you lie and you can't be trusted at all. People shouldn't make the mistake I made: trusting you.
And even if they're safe with an escrow they should consider just not dealing with an untrustworthy person.
If you still have doubts bout this then read my post a few times again.

Yes, I agreed to take a low-value collateral because I made the mistake of trusting you, because you agreed to repay. It was a loan you know, not a bulk domain sale.
Again, if you don't understand my point just re-read my post until you do, it's not that hard if you try. Although I really don't think you're not understanding, you're just playing fool.


Except one little detail: repaying the loan  

I wanted you to fulfill our agreement and repay the loan, but I lost hopes long ago.
I don't see how expecting you to repay a loan is unfair. It's shameful to ask a loan to be repaid but not to default a loan?
Interesting logic. This just shows the kind of person you are.

Yes I am. At the moment I just feel sorry for you. I just published this because you posted nonsense on the loan thread and locked it.

If you're certain the accounts are cracked then report them. It would also help if you let other (trusted) users know how to identify the cracked accounts for sure.

Not again! Really?!
If it obviously looks untrustworthy then most probably it is. And it's OK to act especially when it's so easy to prove he's not untrustworthy. Please re-read the thread once more. If you still don't get it then read again and again until you get it. Don't quit!
Nobody is police here, so we all need to work together!

---

More completely unrelated nonsense! 

I strongly believe forcing untrustworthy users to stop being untrustworthy is right. And clearly most people agree on that. It's clearly right.
That's why the police forces criminals to stop and go to jail, or even just drivers not to go too fast. (Just an example).

I have no idea what point you consider proved but sure, whatever you say.

---

Anyway regarding anonymous22, he's said he presented the proof to Ognasty. If he confirms everything is legal then of course I'll remove my feedback. If he doesn't then that would prove his cards are not legally obtained.  

Unfortunately this thread is going off topic. I hoped to have a valuable discussion here. Anyway I won't lock it, people may still post really valuable opinions.

I'm anyone who cares. If you see something clearly wrong and it's in your hands to help without causing a bigger harm then do it.

Nothing of that affects me directly but of course I'd like to stop it because it affects others, unfortunately I can't. So what's your point? Because I can't magically fix the world then I should do nothing about anything?

First, I can't do anything about that. Secondly, it would most probably cause more harm (to bitcoin) than good. So no, I do not think we should do that.
But as I said before this has nothing to do with anything. Stay on focus!

Of course it would be a bad idea. Don't post nonsense.

---

I'm stopping replying to you unless you start posting on topic.

1. Read again (or by the first time) OP and the other posts. For example: this (...is selling 14 kinds of cards...) and this (anonymous22 has a shady past...) among others. I really don't like writing the same thing so many times! Just read the thread please.

2. Unfortunately the more people use bitcoin the better for everyone, even if they're "ignorant". They don't need to know how bitcoin works in order to use it. Bitcoin is meant for everyone, not just the ones who fully understand it, not just the more informed or intelligent ones. Bitcoin's reputation affects the news and the mainstream.

---

Read again.

So you think it's better to let people sell obviously illegal cards? I'm only going against those who obviously seem to be selling illegal goods. I'm not assuming everyone is guilty until proven otherwise, only those who clearly show a lot of red flags. Only those cases very unprobable to be legal.
Do you think it's better to let them keep doing their illegal business because it doesn't affect me directly?

Unfortunately you're wrong. In case you haven't noticed the stereotype "I won't touch bitcoin, it's only good for illegal trading" is very popular.

That doesn't have anything to do with anything. You can't just say "If Mobi's Logic is true" and then say anything ridiculous and unrelated to try and affect my arguments.

You should try to understand the situation better before posting.

---

Probably you're getting sick of this because you're just repeating the same and the same and the same:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1375545.msg14000635#msg14000635

I've just done the same under the condition he stops the selling of any gift card, groupon code or similar unless he previously proves to a trusted member the method is legal.

---

This reply doesn't deserve it's own post so I'm just editing this one.

Sure! That's why I'm asking everyone to help stopping all illegal-GC sellers! Makes sense! 

Some people really can't understand why others would spend time and effort, receive retaliation feedback and even insults to try and stop untrustworthy users without just wanting to benefit themselves. A lot of users don't understand why others care about people getting scammed if they're not directly affected. They do everything just to benefit themselves without thinking on anybody else and they don't understand why others would act differently... It's really sad to be honest.

I will be very happy to remove the negative feedback from your profile after Ognasty confirms you're obtaining all your 14+ kinds of cards legally.
And I'll be willing to join efforts with you to fight scammers in the future.

I've flagged OlDirtyBastard and mriulian now, thanks.
I'll have a look on vitha putri but he's already flagged anyway.

In the very unlikely case you're right then he'll just have to explain it to a trusted user as stated.

Yes, unfortunately nobody is 100% trusted. But whom do you trust more: anonymous22 or the best-rated users on this forum?
It's definitely healthier for the forum that he trusts one of the most trusted users here than we all trust anonymous22, don't you think?

For you "trust abuse" means "trying to stop the selling of illegal items", right?
I really don't think the fact they agree selling illegal goods is wrong is interesting or strange.

---

TBH I didn't know about that, thanks. I agree that's an extra reason to believe it's extremely probable their cards are not legal.

I generally agree with you Quickseller. Of course this is not exact science, but the "benefit of the doubt" has exonerated too many untrustworthy users here.

None of these examples covers having a seemingly unlimited supply of several kind of cards. As I said on OP that's a big red flag. anonymous22 is selling 14 kinds of cards and offers to get a lot of others too. It's very hard to believe they are obtained by legal means.

I've applied my best judgement here and of course I could be wrong. Fortunately removing a feedback is even easier than adding it. I've asked him to prove the origin of their cards to any very trusted user asking him not to disclose the method itself. I added the negative trust only after he refused. However the offer is still opened and I'll remove the feedback as soon as a very trusted member confirms the method is legal.

We disagree on this point but I recognize I can't be 100% sure. But he, you and everyone else must recognize how easy it would be for him to prove he's not doing anything wrong, right?

Again for you "abusing" means "trying to stop the selling of illegal giftcards", right?
My only intention is stopping or at least slowing down the selling of illegal items on the forum. I couldn't care less about becoming a mod. I wouldn't even have the time for that.
And actually I think being "controversial" reduces the chances of becoming a mod, not sure about that.

Then don't! I don't want you to prove anything to me. As I've said several times prove it to another trusted user.

Then do it. Stop saying that and just do it: contact a mod, an escrow or other trusted member and do it.

It's absolutely clear those are fake. Of course you're not serious about this
Just a tip: you should trust only the feedback that appears as "trusted"  

Actually it's got the support of several trusted members. I can't see any trusted user supporting you.

---

Just stop your nonsense arguments and prove your method is legal to a very trusted member. I don't even want to know. Once he confirms everything is legal then I'll remove my feedback.

He would have just said so when asked. That's clearly not the case. Do you honestly think he buys/gets cards and sells them at a loss instead of avoid getting them in the first place? Granted everything at all is possible but extremely unlikely!

In any case as I said before it's not like I'm assuming guilty until proven otherwise nor am I asking others to do so. I'm targeting only those who seem extremely suspicious. And it'd be easy for them to explain how they're getting the codes. They can explain it to an escrow or other very trusted member and be clean.

But of course most users won't be able to explain it clearly.

---

I left feedback on your profile not because you tried to deal with paypal. You being in Brazil has nothing to do with anything. I did it because you tried to buy trust ("Want to buy Bitcoin with PayPal and earn positive trust")  and it was just neutral!
Several times people get negative trust for trust farming.

You should specify you agree with OP, otherwise it would seem you agree with everyone else.

That's exactly what I politely asked you and you refused. You just had to prove it to any trusted member and we could have avoided all this mess.

Or any other trusted member. Personally I'd prefer if you prove it to someone else, not me.

Probably I shouldn't say this myself, but I'm pretty sure most users here disagree with you on this.

I have several untrusted negative trust because I've been fighting scammers and they usually leave fake retaliation trust (like the one you left on my profile after I exposed you).
If you see some of those feedback as trusted then you must have some really messed up trust list!

When you say "abusing" you mean "trying to stop the selling of illegal giftcards", right?
Feel free to contact them.

---

I know you disagree with trying to stop the selling of illegal goods, you've made that clear in the past.
You don't think selling illegal goods is wrong, but I disagree with you.

FYI I'm on DT because dserrano5 added me to his trust list, so I guess you can contact him. Make sure to mention you want him to remove me because I'm fighting the selling of illegal goods here.