Not sure why you made three website, in which all could have been into one since it's very similar. It would been better if you've added something from your perspective as news to each of the article links instead of posting just the article link for readers (that's not how new websites work). Also some introduction for each video would be nice as well. Lastly IIRC I've seen someone in the past with the exact layout and had more contents (not sure if that was you).

Can't measure the exact % but it should be in 5%-10% as BTCitcoin. Since your after a low risk, then you've got your philosophy for investment in a opposite way, mainly due to the high risk road (giving out laons) you've chosen. If I were you, assuming the halving is done and more stability in the market, I'll go ahead and invest in most efficient mining rigs possible (I have a very cheap electricity rate) and look forward in the long term profit (at least this way, I sort of have better control over my own investment).

Although you have a point in the article, everything seems to be cut somehow, for instance the introduction is not that much useful since everything mentioned is something that most users already knew. The main content is just some information's about those companies that offer BTCitcoin payments and lacks users experience. Lastly no conclusion or ending part. To name another type of agency, there are some Bus travel agencies that accepts BTCitcoin as well.

Well I guess your best choice would be either https://openbazaar.org/ or https://bitify.com/. There's another one but has less content: https://biterial.com/
Some other untested ones as well: http://bitcoincommodities.com/

In case your looking for a physical store that sells your mentioned items, AFAIK there's one in Canada but not in your location. Most users that sell here, usually are either in openbazaar or ebay. If you lurk around these websites, you'll see some more items that aren't listed here.

The thing is, you should only hope for the block reward of 12.5 since the halving is just in the corner and block rewards cuts into half as well. I've seen someone got lucky with an Antminer S3 in 2014 (IIRC), but with as little as 1.5 GH/s is surely mission impossible for you. On a side note, it's nice seeing someone positive

People do change therefor the percentage no longer stays the same. I've noticed some in the start were using it just because there wasn't any sort of regulation towards it, but as we went on and the whole pump and dump cases happened, more and more look at it more like an investment that could have more value at some point and ditched their initial intention towards it. Regardless of everything, there are still some that really care for BTCitcoin to succeed for what it is and there will be more addition as well.

Yes indeed had those moments myself. There's a reason BTCitcoin founder was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Economics. The whole thing is massive and covers a lot of things that solves a lot of limitations that other options never gave such solutions. Usually when there's a lot of haters from medias or some known people, it also means that something has been done in the right way (a way that many others wanted to pe a part of it before anyone else). The reason that I could have any type of interaction in the online world (due to where I am), is BTCitcoin itself.

Although the idea is nice, the market for this is quite small and you get yourself bored for waiting to get a single order each time. Unfortunately there are a lot of countries that are affected with slow internet connections and running a node would get large portion of their bandwidth (I'm one of these people due to my location now, it won't be worth running a node for me since all my online activities would be affected), even though it's pretty much nothing for most Europeans, Americans and with exception of few countries in Asia to run a node. Another thing is that not many users care about running one (unfortunately), and all they want to do is use BTCitcoin for payment purposes and nothing more (again unfortunately). Those that run some nodes, already have high speed internet connections therefor they just keep on downloading themselves and save the extra bucks of ordering one of these.

Well both sites seem to have the exact layout and tried both faucet however the reward were not like you said since you said the rewards for the next 72 hrs will be 800 up (I got 250 on darkhash and 100 on the other one), so kindly double check.

Some other things that need corrections:
1. On get started with Bitcoin tab, it shouldn't be proyect but instead "Project".
2. Also about this proyect page is empty, same as Bitcoin mining and News page.
3. Instead of naming the tab "FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS", renaming it to "FAQ" is the better option.
4. On the best Faucets tab, there's only some information's about each faucet but no link to each respective faucet.

EveCoin - Everyone's Coin since no government controls it.
TransCoin - Transparent Coin since transactions made are transparent.
EaseSend - Ease Send since we could easily transfer funds to another person.
PayLess - Pay Less since the transactions fees are quite less than other present methods of payment.
TracePay - Trace Payment since you could trace the chain of transactions being made from one address to other addresses.
GlobePay - Global Payment since anyone in the globe could use it (as long as they have access to internet).
UCash - U Cash (as in You Cash) since your in control of it.

Confirmed receiving the prize as stated, Thanks to SebastianJu (for holding funds in escrow and paying accordingly) and Hazelnutter (Sebastian) for running this contest and choosing me, I do appreciate it
Thanks to Falconer, Bestwishes745, bitcoinblog, PacePay, roslinpl, aubert, jayce and creativeeditors for the nice words
Congratulations to Falconer and aubert as well

Those who have resolutions lesser than Full HD had problems with initial sizes of Senior and Hero signatures and the sizes has been reduced to fit up to HD screens now. Some haven't updated their signature codes yet, so those that look at them with low resolutions, they do see it differently (same issue with all other long signatures on this forum since unfortunately none are responsive).

Well the team behind it has been trustworthy to date (AFAIK), and even though from time to time, it has it's on complications, the staff get on problems right away and have good support team too (they tend to get to you even if what your asking it isn't considered from the list of problems that support covers). The main problem is that blockchain.info is just another online wallet like some others so there would always be the risk of accounts being compromised but from what I've experienced, it's the best among the online wallets but I wouldn't advise for storing large amounts of BTCitcoin on it (your better off with a hardware wallet for that matter). Their app is actually quite buggy so after my initial experience, I would recommend using your iPhone's browser instead of their app.

Well it seems like a clean looking faucet list however these are my recommendations for improving it's overall experience:

1. It has one of those pale looking effects so introducing some more colors could make the interface look better (another two colors would be nice)
2. Not sure how skilled are you in terms of coding but if you can make an actual countdown timer upon clicking each one of the faucets then that would be the main function that put's your faucet list with other top ones
3. There wasn't any sort of order (order by time, rewards, referral %)
4. Putting the ads on either the top or even at both left and right could have better impressions and possible clicks for you than you putting it at the bottom
5. All of the following pages in the footer (webenlance.com/About us/Blog/Faq's/Contact us/Site Map), does link to your landing page only

Although this is a bad news, specially for banks themselves since their own money was hacked and not customers money but there's a wake up call of a need to change the way everything has been operating, simple due to the fact that this is the second time so clearly someone didn't do their job to the extent they supposed to do and that's whoever was involved with implementation of security levels. Regarding BTCitcoin and blockchain possible role, the author seem to be much on the negative side of BTCitcoin and rather gives the conclusion that blockchain is the better solution so can't agree with him on many points.

It's nice seeing BTCitcoin word getting out there recently (again), has been a while on T.V shows (around 5 months ago, there were much more). There's another one that aired couple of weeks ago, "iZombie S02E18 , at run time 10:40 - 10:45". It's their 3rd time mentioning BTCitcoin on their series (IIRC). It says just sign for brain plan, 25 grand a month, we now take BTCitcoin (with a laugh though).

There are some points that your missing. Each bank actually does hate some currencies (it depends on under the law they operate based on it's respective origin). One thing I've noticed as of late, is the fact that more major trades are taking place with other currencies as opposed to the past, in which was $. Many countries are making joint banks, just so they would ditch the use of foreign currencies, simply due to them not liking the idea of using foreign currencies since they have to comply with certain rules as well. Now BTCitcoin on the other hand, is actually a major treat to the whole banking system, "BTCitcoin will lessen banks operation, the way internet lessened TV and newspaper usage". They can't give loans in BTCitcoin since it's value could change overnight and they might end up on receiving less that they give out. One of BTCitcoins nature is it's decentralized nature and by letting banks regulate it to any extent, it destroys it's purpose on that front.

People mostly do it as a safer option to storing their private data's online since anything present in the online world, has it's vulnerabilities and could lead to breaches that would make information's being leaked to hackers. Regarding the 2FA, there have been even some complications that lead to users being locked out of their own accounts due to this particular option and regardless of it's failures (on occasions), it doesn't eliminate hackers chance of getting their hands on people's account and it rather just adds a layer of security over what it is. Storing in a file could also not be that safe since if left on a computer then it's still not safe (unless completely offline) and lastly on a paper, there's the possibility of losing it or someone stealing it from you so I guess what everyone's doing, is just choosing whats best way to protect what they have.

Confirm receiving this weeks payments. Thanks to Lutpin / DogecoinMachine / Joter85 for another week of payments

Not a good and wise move by the owner in terms of presenting another version in which the last two were shutdown (normally when there's two failure versions, there shouldn't be a third one and only if the previous versions were a success, then that's the times for a better new version). I doubt there will be any difference here and it would be matter of time before history repeat itself. IMO the owner is trying to just earn again and since there will be illegal sales (again), then it wouldn't be suitable for normal and good users.

Here's my entry