a bunch of bullshit
Here are the actual facts about your account: - you woke up (along with 2 other accounts, of which you are probably both) specifically to defend Trade Satoshi against scam accusations - you called the person complaining about being locked out of their Trade Satoshi account a scammer - you posted mainly in the Trade Satoshi thread to question and ridicule people complaining about being scammed - you tried to bribe me to have your negative feedback removed - you were defending allegations made by a known troll whose previous accounts were banned - you then proceeded to open a flag on my account that was backed by a thread created by said troll - now you are claiming Trade Satoshi is a scam in an attempt to distance yourself from it, but really you should just open a new account and start over, even though I know getting that first merit wasn't easy for you. Hehe thats a good one Hey where did u sign up for the tradesatoshi signature campaing? i cannot find anything on bitcointalk, i would like to join, i know my account is new but i will try to be more active @Dihunter seems to be a scammer, i did a little research, his uses his account to diffame tradesatoshi, is still not clear why, or why he did not provide more evidence other the owner is a Chinese citizen living in Venezuela who was born in UK and registered a company in Hong Kong.
This new scam is getting more common in crypto, is called "Reputation Scam"
where a site is targeted by scammeres and they create posts on forums, facebook, twitter, etc, and then they contact the site and ask for money in exchange to remove all those posts from the internet, this scam is very old in amazon accounts where competitors left bad reviews on their competitor products.
Try with a bigger font and maybe the support guys on Tradesatoshi can read you better I HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM WHEN I TRY TO LOGIN TO MY ACCOUNT SINCE 5 DAYS WHY!!!  I HAVN T TFA I CHANGED MY PASSWORD I DID DO ALL THIS AND IN THE END I CAN T LOGIN PLEASE HELP ME THANKS. Just contact the support via their website and hope that you hear back from them. Posting here won't be of any help, your question will just be buried without getting an answer. How much money do you want to stop the scam?
I want my reputation back
But i can change my opinion about that and i will start to boycott tradesatoshi if i can get my trust back, the scammer is not responding,
Please scammer accept my doge, lets negotiate your price, i only have doge, is the only i can afford, please scammer
|
|
|
|
JollyGood mentioned:
+ User account maxtron is probably being controlled as part of the Vitor Services pumping paid
My question is :
+ Where is the prove?
It would appear JollyGood jumped the gun on this one. This user maxtron has no other posts in the Cryptoknowmics thread or other threads being spammed by the same group of spammers. His long post about Satoshi Nakamoto in Bitcoin Discussion is not something that a Vitor Services account would do. I hope JG sees this thread and considers removing his negative trust. |
|
|
|
|
Here's the thing: you're not really arguing with me. You're arguing with Mike Pompeo. You are saying that his claims he received a subpoena are bullshit. You should really take it up with him, not me.
|
|
|
|
Nothing has been debunked, except for your ability to produce these subpoenas you swear exist. Just admit they don't exist. Come on, you know its true buttercup. Just say it.
I never said I could produce the subpoena. Why would I say the subpoena doesn't exist when Pompeo (the man receiving said subpoena) admits it exists? That would be ludicrous. I'm not like you. I value reality. |
|
|
|
|
I supported your flag. Seems like a pretty clear cut case of scamming. It still needs 2 more DT supporters to be active.
|
|
|
|
|
For some reason I thought Timelord was on DT, now I see that's pretty far from the truth, so I am removing my counter-rating on irfan_pak10, as Timelord's rating is meaningless, as it should be. I don't understand his obsession with digging up "dirt" on accounts from several years ago, and feeling the need to act erroneously on it, but whatever.
|
|
|
|
Please show the shareholder contracts?
Who owns the domain earnbet.io?
You should resolve the multiple scam accusations against you before attempting to continue conducting business on this forum. Everyone should be aware that game-protect of game-protect.com is the Bitcointalk forum's least trusted member after having demonstrated untrustworthy behavior time and again over the last few years. It is recommended that you not engage this member's services as you are highly likely to lose money. |
|
|
|
At least you can admit it is just a belief. Mike Pompeo also never said he has 4 testicles. Does that mean Mike Pompeo doesn't have 4 testicles? Why don't you check while you are busy thinking of new distractions from the point. It doesn't matter why Mike Pompeo didn't say he had 4 testicles. It matters you cant prove the subpoena exists.
Why would Pompeo say he received a subpoena if it doesn't exist? |
|
|
|
Pompeo says the subpoena exists. This is good enough evidence for anybody willing to be honest about using deductive reasoning. Its not about semantics. Its about you being unable to admit when you are wrong. Pompeo isn't the magic subpoena machine man. Subpoenas are public court documents. You swear this document exists yet you can not produce it. Admit you have never seen it and you can't prove it ever existed. The burden of proof is yours, and hearsay doesn't count. I admit I haven't seen it. I believe it exists because the man being subpoenaed referenced its existence several times. Mike Pompeo never said "the subpoena doesn't exist"; you did. Why would Pompeo say he received a subpoena if it doesn't exist? |
|
|
|
Maybe Pompeo is in on the deep state conspiracy to get Trump and that's why he lied about receiving a subpoena. Probably paid off by Soros and the Lizard People. Makes perfect sense.  TECSHARE finally came to his senses and stopped arguing that the subpoena doesn't exist. He must just be curious where it is for some reason. The House didn't issue any subpoenas related to the impeachment investigation before October 31st. They don't exist. You argue they do exist. The burden of proof is on you to prove they exist. You can play semantic gymnastics all day none of it changes the fact you can't produce the subpoena. Pompeo says the subpoena exists. This is good enough evidence for anybody willing to be honest about using deductive reasoning. Its not about semantics. Its about you being unable to admit when you are wrong. |
|
|
|
somewhere here, many months ago i posted that tradesatoshi is a scam
seeing is how all you did was cover for TradeSatoshi's lies for several months this seems highly unlikely. prove it. |
|
|
|
Maybe consider taking a break from P&S TECSHARE? You're getting triggered way too easily.
So where is the subpoena? Pompeos subpoena is probably in his office or home. I don't know.. Maybe his lawyer has it. Maybe Pompeo is in on the deep state conspiracy to get Trump and that's why he lied about receiving a subpoena. Probably paid off by Soros and the Lizard People. Makes perfect sense. |
|
|
|
OK, back to this. The only reason you are correct here is because he was analyzing the wrong set of blocks, which you didn't know until right now. The fuckup happened in a block previous to 600,000 -- read below. It is glaringly a dispositive. During the previous 10,000 block period there were exactly 6 penalty transactions totaling 0.09746883 BTC. It is less than 1/10th of 1 BTC -- not just "less than 1 BTC." A penalty transaction has distinct characteristics: LN channel = multisig UTXO.
To change channel balance write new tx spending the UTXO. Both sign but dont broadcast.
They all: - are V0_P2WPKH type transactions - are roughly the same size of 237-238 B, 121 vB, 483-484 WU - use SegWit addresses There is a way to filter through transaction data based on this criteria. If his counterparties were on the beneficial side of a stale closing tx, what is their incentive to issue a penalty? They stand to win more through just letting the mistaken stale tx broadcasts lie as is. Seems we need to at least consider that possibility before closing the case. As at least one scenario.
So far none of the 400 nodes connected to him reported receiving any funds. What is more likely is he has the funds, can't access them, and they are far fewer than 4 BTC in total. There are LN experts working pretty hard to help this guy recover his funds. https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/2468It seems like this guy did everything wrong on purpose. Its hard to believe someone would crash through several safeguards so recklessly if he cared at all about his BTC. My bet is when his funds are restored it will surface that the total "lost" was far less than 4 BTC. |
|
|
|
This is great. "You're only a public figure because you cosplay as Satoshi." LOL |
|
|
|
New poll up.
[253] BUFFALO
[254] CLEVELAND Browns have zero votes so far (0-4). I was one of the few who backed the Eagles to win in Buffalo, the only one who went with Steelers last week, but hell i'm not spending a single penny on the Browns. At this point in the season, they're just the complete wreck of a team. So many things have to go to perfect for them to even have a chance against Buffalo and even so, Freddie Kitchens might screw things up with his dumb playcalling and poor/newbie game managing skills. Browns will lose again! However, there might be something that we have overlooked that the sportsbooks know. Why would they open the Browns as the -2.5 favorites? They might begin turning their season around hehehe! Browns was strong in the 1st half, on their home stadium versus the Sea Hawks and the Rams. Bet 1st half -1.5? So far the vote is unanimously for Buffalo... We can't all be wrong, can we? We usually only have 6 votes a poll, but if someone else steps in and votes for Cleveland, make yourself known so you can partake in the glory if you are right. I'm thinking Buffalo is a solid bet, and I'm leaning toward taking the under... Taking Buffalo at +2.5 and an under at 40.5 yields a 4:1 payout (if they both win), pretty good. I'm taking them. edit: you can't parlay 2 concurrent bets. anyway, its still a 2:1 on both roughly if they both win. |
|
|
|
Haha, I think you missed this part When I compared your writing of "suspected as same person":  It means that it is is far more likely than not that it was written by the same person. So: Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / NoFailing to answer the question shows you are morally corrupt and intent to deceive. rekt. Seems to me like he's trying to facilitate the scam of wasting our time. |
|
|
|
Hey where did u sign up for the tradesatoshi signature campaing?
i cannot find anything on bitcointalk, i would like to join, i know my account is new but i will try to be more active
Funny how this guy has now decided that TradeSatoshi is a scam (according to his signature anyway). What a wishy-washy person. Has the backbone of an invertebrate. There is still no doubt in my mind that at one time fratoshi was TradeSatoshi staff. Their words are not to be trusted. |
|
|
|
Pompeo acknowledged receipt of a subpoena in a letter to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. Are you still claiming said subpoena is non-existent? Are you claiming you can prove it ever existed? Produce it. I can't produce it at the moment, however, Pompeo certainly thinks it exists. That should be good enough rationale for any honest, critically-thinking observer of the whole situation. Are you calling Pompeo a liar? Why would he use the word "subpoena" here if it never existed? |
|
|
|
Is Livecoin is next on the list of exchanges asking for KYC just like Tradesatoshi and Cryptobridge did?
Completely off-topic, and the answer is "no." Just because you were promoting a scam exchange it doesn't mean every exchange is a scam. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
