Would you like a cookie?

Very puzzling, the middle quote (the one that now has two links) links to here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5062639.msg47546099#msg47546099 ( http://archive.is/vTvRC ) but all it comes up with is


Agreed Tecshare would've said something about the actual quote he s/he not made it.


Which one? Neither comes off looking too bright.

Archived for future reference: http://archive.is/0jBOl#selection-481.0-485.383


The link in the quote is to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5044535.msg47553937#msg47553937 which I just archived over at http://archive.is/0Rw0R#selection-1885.0-1921.193

The actual (unlocked thread) quote is:


Which means Flying Hellfish has fabricated their proof.

Check the archive and the actual posts, none have been modified (otherwise they would have had a line under the date) and yet no-one else picked up on that deception?

I wouldn't worry about it - if my suspicions were a little more concrete, I probably would have given negative trust as opposed to neutral.

You're showing as at the moment while I'm showing and

Hey thanks for looking - I've just started reading DefaultTrust changes - I'm going to have to draw up a short list of ten people I trust here -


(slightly off topic - I just had a thought we'd see comatose accounts come back to life, but then realised they'd have to keep posting for their trusts to remain at the top of the list, so I doubt we'll see trusts yo-yoing too much as people come and go depending on their own personal circumstances) - give it about 48 hours for most people to log in and see the effects (and add ten people to their trust list)

Actually, just had a thought, has tomatocage been removed from DT?

[quote author=VINSIN link=topic=5095182.msg49142169#msg49142169 date=1547061896]
Have you checked the trust rating of lauda?

The animal is back: Trust: 261: -0 / +27
[/quote]

shorena's Red Paint ^TM makes me see this:

---

I'm curious what mine is now; it was 40: 0 / +4 now it's 0: -1 / +6

---

Speaking of unmentionable...

I can only echo the sentiments of others that I don't trust alts that have been given glowing trust (in any form) by themselves - it's as though they are preening themselves in front of a mirror saying "I trust you"... "oh stop it! I trust you too!"

There are some people who would see it as click the report your own post for merit button and just click everything they ever write...

Yeh we get similar in the Known Alts thread - replace merits with Red Paint ^TM and you get the idea.


I'd say that's why ol' Bozo has fallen silent.

The only posts recently that I'd love to give merits to were in a thread suggesting Vod's IP started 127.... priceless stuff...

Already one of your images you are relying on as proof is not available / not valid. *edit* reloaded page and shows up now...

We've had this discussion previously about how I suggest you need to tag these users yourself and then you say you want someone on the DT to do your work for you, so I won't bother mentioning that.

No doubt someone else will suggest you post this in the Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List ^{Mk III} thread where it has more chance of being seen.

Actually, Cryptopia was the only one that took their eyes off the wheel by choosing to do nothing when SexCoin and more than 100 other cryptos were subjected to 51% attacks on their exchange.

Scroll back through the posts of the last four months before you embarrass yourself any further.

Thanks, I appreciate your vote of confidence.

Can you add an arrow to where their signature is? I can't see a signature in the screen grab you provided (your thread says "same signature") the title of their post would no doubt come from clicking "reply" hence it looks the same and as to their actual post they would have had to fill in this form:

.

So I went to your link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4948249.msg46321552#msg46321552 and found that it was archived: http://archive.vn/VaXQe on the second of Jan. I have also archived it again today. http://archive.vn/ojNsv

so... twenty posts on a page.

12 do not have any signature, eight posts do.

Of the eight posts that do have a signature, five are for Roger Ver. The remaining posts are one each for Desico, Mycro Jobs and lastly bitcoinair.org

Of the five posts for Rodger Ver...

turkmachiavelli posts twice. Firstly their signature details (post 2043 (1of5)), five minutes later secondly to add their Telegram details (post 2045 3of5)) with HiatusGG  (2of5) posting roughly half way during the five minute period.

40 minutes later Puyol (Post 2048 (4of5)) then 32 minutes after that Suzukigsxr250 (post 2049 (5of5)) a total of 1 hour 17 minutes from first of five to fifth of five posts. The fifth post appears to be for a lower level (member) campaigner Suzukigsxr250.

From first post 2014 at 30 September 2018, 04:34:24 to post 2060 at 30 September 2018, 15:59:24 takes eleven and a half hours. In that time *three* not five full members (and one member) with the same signature apply. (five posts; four UID's)

---

Of the next twenty pages, there are barely a dozen posts that have a signature; the rest have none (12/400) (ie 3/100 ie 97%)

---

You asked for an opinion...

... my opinion is I think you found a bounty and scrolled every page until you saw a handful of signatures that were for the same signature campaign and said "Gee, they must be the same because the majority (97%) don't have a signature."

---

When I look at this:





I see nothing to connect any of them other than being registered in a three hour band of the day over a fifty day period.

---

Just one last question:

In two separate posts 23 hours apart you've made the assertion there are five members of this ring:



I count four.

You say elcezireex is a member - based on what evidence? They don't have a signature and never have http://archive.vn/VaXQe#selection-3371.0-3471.55 (2nd Jan) and http://archive.vn/ojNsv#selection-2847.0-2853.55 (4th of Jan)

The three with gibberish in their Other Info *might* be connected on that basis alone, but as The Pharmacist said I've given up on ETH connections - not the least I won't touch ETH to start with, but because these connections are tenuous at best.

---

Why did you add


to the list ??  Walk me through that thought process.

Go back and see if you can connect *just* the three full members with gibberish in their other info... Can you do that? Connect *just* those three?

---

@rhomelmabini screen shots don't prove anything, and once the image provider decides to remove them, your "proof" is lost forever. Use an archive service such as archive.vn to archive your work - and use text to walk people through what they are looking at (your posts don't tell me anything)

---

I'm now away for the week-end but will look back in on this thread early next week.

I don't know why but for some reason when merits first appeared I thought they "recharged" after a given amount of time, so I gave out merits for posts that made me laugh, were topical or hard hitting. I even went back and gave merits for older posts that I still recalled months/years later. Above all when giving out merits I only ever gave out one merit per post; I think it's absurd to give out ten, twenty... fifty merits for a post. (Selfish really) Alas, no recharge and the jar is now empty.  If I come across any I feel are worthy I'll seek-out this thread (this is my way of posting so I can follow the thread)...

...but I think I'm going to be a little selective in which posts I choose to nominate.

Just a reminder for anyone who wants to see a fairly accurate Market Cap for SexCoin should head over to pay a visit to our friends at Coin Gecko: https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/sexcoin

Fixed:


*edit* Actually, why would the two of them cancelling each other out propel Lauda back into the DT?

Second edit:


Never mind...

No, all good there:



Thule's recently (Oct '18) received Red Paint ^TM paints a very similar picture to those given to QS.