...and people reckon my trust wall/feedback posts are inaccurate  I think you just proved that (yet again). This is pretty off-topic as this is Lauda's thread about their tags, not yours. However, 1. You fucked up your reference link. 2. Its been impossible for me to "cover my tracks" since October 4th, 2016. How can someone just read some of my feedback but skip that one? Thus, what am I "covering up"? 3. My previous feedback is all negative with the exception of an erroneously left positive feedback and a positive I received for buying a NEM shirt in 2014 (from a member who was never DT). 4. As far as there being "no guarantee the account was or was not sold," what guarantee do I have your account wasn't sold? Or anybody's for that matter? There are no guarantees. What there is, however, is a little bit of common fucking sense, which most people have but you (and other of my critics on this issue) seem to be lacking. Seriously, do you like to get hammered before you leave trust feedback, or else what's wrong with you? I'm sick of addressing this issue. Nothing new has come to light. Nothing has changed. I was pretty much just an angry troll up until 2017 and the positive reputation I have is built is all thanks to deeds performed after that. Perhaps Timelord's rating (however erroneous) will quench cryptohunter's thirst for vengeance, but I doubt it. Oh well. Mods please feel free to delete this shit if its off-topic. |
|
|
|
|
Let me get this straight:
1. You won't provide any evidence of why he is a biased moderator, and
2. You refuse to explain yourself any further.
That's not really a strategy for winning over minds.
|
|
|
|
Finally the spammers contest is over and cryptokram winning this by making 3902 posts in around a months time.
That forum is a heaven for the spammers.
That's simply astounding. It averages out to about 10 posts per hour, 12 hours a day, every day for the month. I tried reading through their forum last week and was not shocked to discover its absolute trash. I wonder what their end goal is... somehow converting those users (or readers, if there are any) to yobit users? |
|
|
|
So although your friend nutildah (DT inclusions shared, merits etc) has far more damning evidence of selling his account with the actual sale being offered in black offered in black and white ( after nutildah is claiming that any account sellers are facilitating scams) YOU REFUSE TO FLAG HIM and will OPPOSE any flag raised against him on that basis.
So your opinion is that you should flag people on the basis of they are not your pals or fellow DT supporters?
For the record, before Lauda cleared their trust list, we had mutually excluded each other for quite a while, and been civil about it the entire time. We're not exactly "pals" and we don't necessarily "support" each other, so you're just wrong in your assumptions here. You have the power to open your own flag on me. You're the biggest hypocrite here for demanding others do it when you won't even do it yourself. Stop being such a crybaby and do it. Maybe you'll even get some supporters. Every time you mention me in a thread, I gain a new inclusion on somebody's trust list. So obviously your tactic of repeating the same thing ad nauseum isn't working. Step it up and walk the walk for a change. |
|
|
|
Also as predicted Flying Hellfish would near instantly delete these types of comments if directed toward his left leaning friends, but since it is me they perpetually remain "unhandled".
This is a problem with having a single moderator with extremist views as a moderator of a political sub. This situation is nearly guaranteed to result in moderation that very heavily one viewpoint. Rules will either be very one sided, or will go unenforced for one viewpoint when they are strictly enforced for another. Many polls are run by one left leaning pollster and one right leaning pollster to prevent the result from being skewed to benefit one side. The obvious solution is to either find a moderator with more moderate views, or to find a second moderator with right leaning viewpoints who can help shift the moderation towards the middle/balanced. Well Quickseller, you might have a point, but nobody really has a problem with FH besides you and TS. In case you hadn't noticed, TS is unhappy with all the moderators. So I don't think its a FH problem. I hope Nancy and Chuck are there too. Need to make sure that peach mint thing causes maximum irritation joy for our friend. Maybe they can send him an honorary sub-peanut to make him feel important.
That reminds me: we are having George Soros do an AMA there next week. Don't forget to stop by! |
|
|
|
Yo, I swear I was expecting to see a totally different game for the weekly poll today.
Patriots might have their first real test in Baltimore against the Ravens and their unorthodox run game. I know that Belichick has a perfect record against 1st or 2-year QBs but Lamar is something else. Spread is also pretty close -/+3.
Anyway, voted Steelers just because T.Y. Hilton screwed my fantasy team last week with 54 miserable yards...
I was expecting Pats at Ravens as well as it is the clear game of the week, but in a way I am glad it is not, of all the games that are left if you were to ask me which one has the highest chances of being lost by the Patriots I would have chosen this game, Lamar reminds me of Michael Vick and we know he was unstoppable on his prime and coach Harbaugh knows he can beat Bill Belichick since he has done it many times in the past. TBH I just pick the game with the spread closest to zero, so each poll can be for a 50-50 ML bet. It doesn't often work out exactly that way, but this week it does. Indeed Pats/Ravens is the more exciting game. I would still go with Pats in a heartbeat. My fantasy team is up against Brady this week, so I hope this game is their first loss, of course. But if I was betting on the moneyline -- Pats all the way. Speaking of Michael Vick being unstoppable... Are any of you guys Madden fans? I remember Michael Vick in Madden 2006 was indeed unstoppable. It was like unfair to play with him. Great at passing or QB runs just to fuck everybody up. Just like RG-III in Madden 2013, pretty much. I was a bit too young to play Super Tecmo Bowl, but I do remember Bo Jackson, and this run that was lampooned in an episode of Family Guy once:  Aw sonavubitch, it won't embed. Oh well, just watch the Family Guy clip, its funnier anyway: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3X-MODwmZGQ |
|
|
|
-snip-
The conclusion from that is: The existence of men is pointless and will soon not be necessary. Our future AI overlords will realize this, and shall start exterminating males as soon as the tables turn. Don't try creating arguments mr. r0ach when your IQ is even challenged by early monkey specimen.  Nothing in this universe is pointless. You just don't understand it. Based on your behavior you don't have a very high conciousness to be able to know that. Iq is not consciousness. What's the point of high IQ if you learn from the wrong books that are censored and their purpose is to brainwash. You must be new in these parts, jupiter9? Point is that it does not even matter if Lauda is correct or not. Only rarely is there any semblance of a reason to actually support dee snot-nosed roachie poachie, except perhaps is he is inadvertently saying something smart, which again tends to be an extremely rare happening. I looked to see who would give him a damn merit, then saw that it was me, then wondered why the hell I would have done that. Oh, he's this guy  : My friend, let me tell you something. I never had a sex and i probably won't have in this life. I'm almost 40 years old. But i never got any compensation for that. All i have is 0.5 btc but i'm still happy with my life.
I'm kind of regretting it now though because part of having a high IQ is being able to figure out which books are brainwashing you. |
|
|
|
What GP is actually looks like:  To me it looks more like this:  |
|
|
|
^^^
None of this suggests you didn't scam your customer. You said you were going to refund him. You lied. You are a scammer. Nothing else is pertinent to this matter. Based on the statements and documents published by h4ns you conclude that I scammed him? That, and your own words. You acknowledged you owe this person money, and rather than repay them you made up a fictitious settlement amount to worm your way out of repayment. cut off communication with them h4ns does not want my further assistance: (September 3rd) I immediately asked him to refund my money. But his only reaction was that he closed the tickets of my pending cases which generated an automatic email notification. It sounds like you decided for them they didn't want further assistance. You said you would refund this person. You didn't. You are a scammer. and then threaten to sue them when they complain about it online. Please quote where I threatened h4ns to sue him if he complain about it online? It is clear that if I have your identity and location you will be held liable for any damage caused by your illegal activity!  You going to use the same lawyer that forced a company that had already vanished with everyone's money to declare bankruptcy? No, I will engage a lawyer in the country were h4ns is resident. Yes, the court will confirm that h4ns has to compensate the estimated damage caused by his defamation campaign that Game Protect is a scammer!  The only uncertain part is how much compensation the court will confirm. ... h4ns should have better listened to my advice: "The biggest mistake online casino victims can do is listen to extremely mentally ill bitcointalk accounts!" Too bad he didn't realize that you were actually talking about yourself. |
|
|
|
Pump it uuuuuup
 Did I do a good meme you guys? I still don't understand the reference, but, you know, someday I will learn what it means passively. Ah. An extra-satany post for my 6666 post count. Perfect.
Somebody deleted a thread with about 6-7 posts of mine... didn't get an auto-message about it. Weird. |
|
|
|
|
^^^
None of this suggests you didn't scam your customer. You said you were going to refund him. You lied. You are a scammer. Nothing else is pertinent to this matter.
I doubt you have any potential customers left at this point, but if you did, they would be wise to avoid you knowing this is what could happen to them should you take their money and they complain about your lack of progress afterward. You are telling them this could happen to them: you promise to refund them, don't, cut off communication with them, and then threaten to sue them when they complain about it online.
|
|
|
|
So I went through the github for Earths. It's a fork of Waves. https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waveshttps://github.com/earthspay/EarthsPretty much all the commits since they forked it, except 1, are just replacing any mention of "Wave" with "Earths". Every variable, filename, directory, documentation etc. There was one commit called "fix" that caught my eye: https://github.com/earthspay/Earths/commit/4aaca912c9da5424b76499e8f957baec4e76c6fd So the only real technical change they made to the project was in this file: src/main/scala/com/earthspay/settings/Constants.scala The original file looked like this: package com.wavesplatform.settings
import com.wavesplatform.Version
import com.wavesplatform.utils.ScorexLogging
/**
* System constants here.
*/
object Constants extends ScorexLogging {
val ApplicationName = "waves"
val AgentName = s"Waves v${Version.VersionString}"
val UnitsInWave = 100000000L
val TotalWaves = 100000000L
} They deleted that file, and replaced it with this one (notice the change in TotalEarths goes way up):
package com.earthspay.settings
import com.earthspay.Version
import com.earthspay.utils.ScorexLogging
/**
* System constants here.
*/
object Constants extends ScorexLogging {
val ApplicationName = "earths"
val AgentName = s"Earths v${Version.VersionString}"
val UnitsInEarth = 100000000L
val TotalEarths = 9223300000000000000L
} Then they changed only the TotalEarths, deleting a few zeros:
package com.earthspay.settings
import com.earthspay.Version
import com.earthspay.utils.ScorexLogging
/**
* System constants here.
*/
object Constants extends ScorexLogging {
val ApplicationName = "earths"
val AgentName = s"Earths v${Version.VersionString}"
val UnitsInEarth = 100000000L
val TotalEarths = 92233000000L
} So it looks like the only thing they were interested in changing was TotalEarths. My guess is that first they added too many zeroes and got an error, so they reduced it a bit with a new commit. I'm not familiar with the waves platform so I'll let someone else determine if this actually could be part of a scam. OP, could you just let your users know what's up with the totalEarths please? And let me know if I missed anything. Excellent work, good sir. Have my last merit. (They are harder to come by these days for me -- I have to do something "extraordinary" "again," I suppose.) Yes I suppose having more than 9 sextillion EARTHS was just too many, so they scaled it down to a mean 92.233 billion. That way, everybody on the planet can have 12.25 EARTHS. If that's the only change then I would say the software in itself isn't scammy, but the ploy to collect passport data is. I think WAVES is a great platform, as far as they go. Duplicating it is a bit unnecessary. They could have just created a token within WAVES itself. |
|
|
|
|
The fact is the impeachment proceeding is underway, regardless of how any of us feel about it.
Playing armchair constitutional lawyer doesn't change its legitimacy, or the fact that it is happening.
|
|
|
|
I did back up my claims, you just imagine I didn't because it serves you. I am not dancing around anything, rules are selectively enforced. You pretend to be confused all you like, what I said makes perfect sense no matter how much you want to pretend it doesn't. Remind me again, speaking of being upset, why is it all of this bothers you so much if it is so completely baseless and based in nonsense? Oh right, that is just you making a pathetic attempt at marginalizing points you can't argue against as usual.
Its hard to argue against points that are based on delusions. I can provide rational counterarguments all day long but you are so caught up in the paranoid delusion that the entire forum is against you there is no way I could get you to actually consider them. You said this: As usual, rules don't count for you, just for when you can use them as a cudgel against others. What rule isn't counting for me, and how do I use it as a cudgel against others? There is no rule against account sales, so you'll have to pursue a different avenue if you want to prove your point. |
|
|
|
While I am sure you would love it if we could just talk about you for hours, that is off topic. All some one has to do is look at your post history for plenty of examples. Plenty of people totally lose their reputations for doing exactly what you did and condemned others for, but you get the special rules because you fondle all the right balls. Nothing is ever a rule here, that is part of the problem. It is only a rule when people want it to be a rule, and when they don't want it to be a rule there is always some excuse why it doesn't apply to their buddy or some one who agrees with you. Again, this kind of system is what breeds chaos, conflict, and lack of respect for authority.
Okay, so I just as I suspected. You actually have nothing to back up your claims. How can I be the recipient of special rules if, as you just mentioned, the rules don't exist? Stop being cryptic and dancing around the issue. If you had something specific in mind, then say it. If the rules don't exist, what are you making such a big deal out of? You're not really saying anything anymore. Its clear that you're pretty upset over not having non-rules enforced to your liking. Other than that, I have no idea what you're getting at. |
|
|
|
Lying in accusations is not a reason to ban someone. If he is really lying, it should not be difficult to defend yourself with fact based evidence.
I don’t always agree with JollyGoods ways of exposing what he believes to be scams, but I cannot recall a time when I disagreed with his conclusions that something was a scam. This really doesn’t matter though and I would refer you to the first line in this post.
Thanks for restating the obvious for the 5th time, Quickseller. |
|
|
|
More from Bitcoin SV, the gift that keeps giving. Stay fart in your swamp further |
|
|
|
A private, anonymous "team", collecting your passport info in exchange for worthless tokens... What could go wrong? You are a scammer and everything went wrong with you. You want to get the money, but you don’t want us to know who you are. And then get some accounts and get UBI. It will not work. Its going to be hard for you to give anybody UBI when your token has a total buy support of 0.000006 BTC (and 0.000252 ETH, and 0.0226 LTC)... The last time anybody traded it was in May. https://www.probitex.com/trade/index/market/earths_btchttps://www.probitex.com/trade/index/market/earths_ethhttps://www.probitex.com/trade/index/market/earths_ltcDidn't it occur to you at some point that you need buyers for your scheme to work? Or did you just never care because the whole point is to trick people into giving you their passport information? |
|
|
|
You got banned for plagiarism. You're not supposed to be posting outside of your ban appeal thread. Stop crying. Nobody wants to hear it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
