Thanks for sharing. Someone made a good comment. But is this part confirmed?:

Sounds like a huge news, but I don't recall reading about that anywhere.

That's not really an argument. Just a childish mentality: "I broke my toy, but the other kids are playing with theirs... that's not fair!"

You know if he was using the "traditional system", you'd still loose your money, right? Operator losing together with investors 'inspires the confidence'? How?

If you launch your site under the traditional system, how long are you prepared to operate at loss? What happens when you run out of funds?
Even if the site is on profit, what will you do if big investor comes along making your portion of profits insignificant? How will you mitigate that risk?

Thats rather unexpected.


http://www.coindesk.com/spanish-bank-backs-decentralized-bitcoin-exchange-coinffeine/

Charities are not unethical on their own. Go tell the homeless from Sean's Outpost that they should starve to death while waiting for the solidarity/social justice/whatever.

The investors cannot be paid on amounts wagered. That wouldn't make any sense. Operator's fee is paid from investors' funds (if player wins) or from amount wagered by player (if he loses).

If the investors were to be paid % of amount wagered (turnover is not the right word) then they will be effectively paying themselves from their own funds (on player's win) or from their own earnings (if the player loses). So not much logic in that.

This system is way better than 'traditional' one, as it places the operator right in the middle between players and investors, somewhat forcing him to care equally abut both sides.

There's no real benefit of operator being 'on the same boat'.

Imagine the site is making a loss for 2-3 months (lucky whales etc), you've lost some of your investment, but you're OK with that - you know it's a long-term thing. But, knowing there's a real person operating the site - you know he has to eat, he has a costs, bills to pay etc, you have no idea whether (and for how long) he can afford to operate at loss. If he can't he'll likely be tempted/forced by the financial situation to pull some weird stunt (rig the game, 'borrow' investors money, or simply disappear with funds).
With the % of amount wagered system, the above risk is minimised, as op has a steady income.

There are also a massive benefits re affiliate programs, but that's a different story.

Seems a lot. But according to FJ:


I prefer slots, had some luck there. Don't know what the house edge is on them tho.

FortuneJack's campaign is also closed to new participants.
They can start a new one from Wed tho

What do you mean? It didn't redirect me. Still same old site...

That doesn't really matter, the cost of mining can provide some psychological indication to where the BTC price should be, but it doesn't create the value. Example:

If I buy very expensive paint, brushes and canvass, then spend 100 hours on painting and (since I can't paint a shit) my finished painting is butt-ugly and no one wants to buy it at any price - then (despite the costs) it won't have any value.


Yes, you can use gold for other things. But most of its value is the general consensus that the gold is valuable. If all of a sudden all the people stopped recognise gold as a 'store of value' or investment, its price would fall by something around 80-90% (I've seen some analysis the other day).

Helium (the gas used in the balloons) is pretty rare and we may run out of it soon, but it's not considered valuable. Link

http://chemistry.about.com/b/2013/12/02/will-we-run-out-of-helium.htm

Maybe investing in helium isn't a bad idea?  

You can say exact same thing about any other system

And snuffish is aware of that:

In the Reviews section (on your website), for prcdice you said:


Why do you see it as a bad thing? I'd say it's a more sustainable model. It adds some sort of confidence that the dev will have sufficient income to cover operating/promotional expenses even if the site is in loss position for a longer time period.

I see it as a strong point of prcdice.

Could you elaborate?

Pokershibes are OK, I like them too. Shame they don't seem to promote their site. Sometimes it's hard to find people to play with (especially in SNGs)

As the other mentioned - SealsWithClubs

But if you prefer to play with DOGE I recommend pokershibes.com. They've been around for a while, had no issues with them. They've got freerolls every 2 hours.

Czyli jestes na plusie. Super.

Wyplaty robia bardzo szybko, depozyty czasem sie wleka.

Pozdro

OK, I've played my firs freeroll, I was chip leader after 1st round, it was painful to learn that it didn't matter, it all gets reset in the 2nd round 

it was fun tho.

Fakt. Jak ci dobrze idzie, to mozesz target wyrobic w 10-15 min. Ale spore ryzyko ze stracisz wiecej niz wart jest bonus.

Important update:

Ja rozumiem to tak:
- wplacasz np. 0.01
- w przeciagu miesiaca musisz to obrocic 30 razy (wager), nie wazne czy wygrasz czy przegrasz, musisz przez 1 miesiac postawic lacznie 0.3 (dice i anybet sie nie licza)
- wtedy dostajesz 0.01

Czyli troche ciezko.

Troche to skomplikowane i sie w tym gubie.

Logicznie - nie moga ci automatycznie wyplacic bonusu za depozyt, bo wtedy kazdy by wplacal 1BTC i wyplacal 2BTC. Musieli by zwinac biznes w kilka godzin  

Dlatego masz:

Czyli ile musisz postawic zeby dostac 'welcome bonus'. W 'promotions' -> 100% WELCOME BONUS -> learn more, masz cos takiego:


Do tego maja Loyalty program "0.0001 BTC cashback for every 100 point" (za Bronze level).

Za duzo tych promocji na raz zrobili, ciezko ogarnac.

EDIT: Widze ze sie zalapales (jako ostatni):