There are quite a few sites offering investments that you could diversify into. Don't put much in until you can work out they're not a scam though and then they might still be but you know of their likelihood of repaying, just don't put too much into these schemes, like the quin suggests.

Did you get the xprv from copay or electrum?

What derivation path did you use if its electrum. If its copay, it's likely your funds are stored in a change address and I'm not sure how to deal with that in that case.

Did you also import them under the multisig option in electrum?

Can you find the xprv's? You'll have to try and use those if you can.

You can't use the seeds because one it bip39 and electrum doesn't use that by default so the easiest way to do this is to use the xprvs.

---

You're probably better off making a new wallet and transferring the funds to that however.

Es ist ein bitmain deinste.

Ich habt ein auf 0.00095 bitcoin gewinnen vom 30ths fur einem monat. Es ist ein neu HashNest seit es nicht mehr funktioniet auf.

Most likely you have made an electrum wallet that uses bech32 addresses (or as newbies know them, the thing starting with bc1 ).

I think the best method of getting around this is by going to make a new wallet, select standard wallet, create a new seed and click legacy. Then follow the previous instructions and you can send the coins there.

There is nothing to say that if you're holding the coins you can move them eto the segwit wallet while the fees are low and then the exchange should still accept them (hopefully). I'm nearly only using bech32 when I can it's a vast reduction in fees for sending transactions but you can leave the coins in the legacy wallet as you wish.

OP, what country are you at university in. I'm a mod on a few forums and a lot of the time you can find the ip of the person and the data centre of origin. My college had WiFi provided by a local university and my computer science teacher told us how to see that it was them providing the Internet. It may just be in countries where universities were given Internet before locals though.

Do you have 2fa enabled? I'm guessing it's withdrawals you're stuck on. Do you have an auto withdraw address, you have to sign up with one AFAIK?

Yeah so it's quite good 25% APR.

Accurate figures:
30 day miner rental + 30 day maintenance fees: 0.03898437
30 day revenue: 0.03993997

Profit is about 0.00095. Its alright I guess...

I already got the money back its all good. I Dont like the wallet idea.

check the hashnest discussion and support thread...

They didn't seem too interested. I'll just have to switch to btc.com when my next payout comes...

"

---

Live chat said it takes 5-7 working days. Let's hope it's not like hashnests working days...

I'm not sure lottery goes to that. I'm guessing it'll be a few billion if so because that's what the wagering one was. You may as well just badly use the multiply function with 1/30th of the balance wagered to get it up but the system is designed in a way to profit them for obvious reasons.

@pooya I'm not sure I entirely understand you on this one. How ere I was thinking that the private key to public key function will resemble a secure hash function otherwise it would be really easy just to crack.

@aplistir the hash160 doesn't mean there are leads public keys avaliable as you still need to sign your own public key and not your public key hash..

Escrow won't do very much when it comes to PayPal. @op, if you're serious about buying you should state your country and maybe someone will do f2f or bank cash deposits instead?

Looks like a scam anyway. You send the funds while you both hold the one private key.. I'm guessing they've thought thus through and gone with the common watching only scam trend or skmrtjing better they think of.

I do like how one can mess up so much. The title also says 10-20 btc while the thread says 2000 to 3000.

I'm not sure about the idea of banning them outright. It's already possible to hide signatures and block those who look like they're in a signature campaign.

Merit limits could be enforced I guess but I doubt it'll do much. There are lots of users here that are in signature campaigns and a lot of prole go over their maximum weekly limit and just keep posting anyway...

If I were going off donations for helping people in the time I've been here and helped people, I'd have $40 in three years...

Renting signatures to people as a tax and donating the proceeds to charity would be a nice idea. I feel if sigs were removed completely, a lot of users will come for a random trades and then go again there's be no community or reason for the trust and merit system because someone will buy something with money they've earnt in fiat and go again until they next have a nice amount of money to plunge into more goods six months to a year later.

---

My point in this post is that I've come across users who have lived off signature campaigns in the past and it's helped them in between jobs to stop them being completely cut off. There's the issue that quite a few of these are spammy but a few high merit earners in the past I've known personally to do this sort of thing.

From this page there's a table: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Protocol_documentation#Message_types

value	storage length	format
<0xFD	1	uint8_t
<=0xFFFF	3	0xFD followed by the length as uint16_t
<=0xFFFFFFFF	5	0xFE followed by length as uint64_t
-	9	0xFF followed by length as uint64_t

There isn't really any description as to what the first character is supposed to represent? And why the second, third and forth are needed is this just in case the voltage gets misread?

Lite coin is a surprising coin in this regard. Its outperformed a lot of coins just from being a bitcoin that has a block every minute. It's blocksize is tiny in comparison too at 10gb.

---

Ripple is a bit of a phenomenon, the lack of anonymity makes it favourible to companies as they have a company they can legally blame if they're voted against.

The coins are stuck because they are below the minimum threshold.

I need 0.001 extra, I'll have a see if any miners will take it on for a small amount. I might message sidehackand ask if he can do it. I was going to use an exchange like mrr (mining rig rentals) but I can't work out how it works.

I bought it just after the announcements.
I came to the end of a 30 day contract.

They create a pool account specifically, in hindsight, go with btc.com as the pool.

I got an average earning of about 0.0015btc/day in revenue. Having paid 0.038 about for a contract, after the 30 days it came to 0.0399 in revenue. I made a 0.008 loss because antpool only allow withdrawals per 0.01 btc. I'm going to try to use my workaround to getting the rest out but I'll see how it goes.

No.


Just for my clarification are you both alts? The same person?