They just told the world they have 1 trillion dollar deficit, that’s literally 1 trillion dollars. If they get out of bitcoin world as well, that’s just going to be even worse and worse. If they allowed their people to be in crypto fully, like not just allow it, but support it then things would change.

Online world is billions of dollars worth of world, look at alibaba and tiktok which are online companies that grew out of China, they need more stuff like that and they will be able to fix that deficit. You may think it won't, but 10 companies that size would actually cover a good chunk of it. Bitcoin is part of the online world, they can't just lock it down.

I feel like they are secretly doing that already. I say secretly because they do not have picks right now, but they managed to build a team where they will have a ton of space. Right now, they have a huge one at 166 million right? Russell Westbrook is at the end of his contract if I am not wrong, or maybe he will have 1 more year of player option? Lebron is on his last year as well.

You know who has contract after this season ends? AD and Damian Jones and Max Christie, the later two combined for 4 million and AD will be 40 million. Meaning they will have 120 million dollars of contracts gone. This will allow them to take on bad contracts after bad ones for picks. Just this year, they could offer AD to a team, in exchange of getting their pick + all the bad contracts they have. Meaning they will have absolutely nobody from this year, and the pick. That’s the power they are holding currently.

I think there is a bit of difference based on having just 2 games to survive versus having a whole season. If you put all 32 teams in the group stages of UCL, and make them play with each other twice, which would be 64 games, then you will see that PSG may end up at the top.

Because, they could have a few loss but the overall would be good. But when you tell them to either win or go home, they may not be that great. Look at last year, they almost won and then in span if 2 minutes they lost. This is why it is very hard in a tournament structure and not so hard in a league structure. So the difference is not just ligue 1 vs ucl, it’s also cup vs league situation as well.

This is the same team that got scored 4 goals in 35 minutes by Brighton if I am not wrong. He took over the United team that had the lowest points in their history or at least 20-30 years as far as I can remember, and they are 6th right now, they are certainly doing better than expected.

United still missing a lot of players, they really need to get more players, and Varane is missing, and if they bring back Varane, get a good wing back and a striker, this team is a team that could fight for a top spot, at least top 4 to go to UCL, and it's from the worst to best in a single season difference with just a few transfers. I think Ten Hag is doing great, sure there are some mistakes about Ronaldo, he should be playing if you ask me, but aside from that issue, he is great.

I am guessing that it's not directly cash, most of the time when calculating these type of things they do count things that are not directly money, but worths money, such as man hours, which means if 100 people worked on it for 6 months then you calculate all the cost of those employees at the same time, and that could be calculated into it.

I doubt that it would be 15 billion already, that just doesn't make sense, what could they really spend that 15 billion on, think about it item by item, doesn't really sound like a true price. Maybe they are just showing it as a cost to pay less taxes I don't know. But in the end, if they can achieve it one day, it would be all worth it.

Look like Gerrard lost support from his players, so they were fail to give positive results and at the end he lost his job now we have Uni Emery who was at Villarreal and doing good job but now from 1st November he could be joining as new Aston Villa coach no doubt about his ability and quality but in his first stint as coach of Arsenal he has done not good in Premier League even he was good in European games and give good success but in Premier League there were issues, so he lost his job.

Aston Villa is surely a different club, and he can do good here, but he needs time because it's now easy for any coach to give his best in middle of the season hopefully he will improve quality and performance which will help them for having better results and Aston Villa could be back in good shape after this bad time.

I can understand not selling them when they are higher, because you may want to sell it even higher, but not buying when it is low is a big problem. If you buy at 20k right now, and then not sell it when it reaches 100k, then you could sell it when it eventually hits 150k or 200k, that's your own personal preference on when to sell.

However, if you do not buy at 20k at all, then it means you are going to miss out on that chance to make a choice on how much you profit. Not only there are people who don't buy right now, but the shocking thing is there are people who sell right now, and that is beyond understandable for me, how could you sell when it's so cheap and looks potentially so profitable?

It's the best decision from them because right now they not need to spend funds for having any player as their quality is at their best, and they already have players which are doing good job even they were facing some problems in start of this season, but now things are settled, and all players are giving their performance which bring them to second in league table and Champions League results already amazing specially against teams like inter and Barcelona.

There were few rumors they are interested in Harry Kane hopefully this will happen in next summer because suddenly things in Tottenham are not good, and they can face few consequences in future about their coach and players which want to win trophies and right now they are not near this which is surely wired.

Well, there are laws in business as well, so not everything is fair in business . But the idea is true, if you end up with something that profits you just a bit more, you do that. Like for example if you create a product and put it on sale at amazon, then amazon sees that you sell a lot of it, they can create their own product that could compete with yours, similar thing, and then ban you from selling yours, making them the sole seller of such a product. Is this fair? No, but is this legal? It is.

This is how competition gets screwed, small business gets screwed by the big business, and while you were selling it for 9.99, they took over and banished you and now selling it for 19.99 however they want.

They are usually better than the teams they are playing, which means that they can afford to play them on Europa right now, in the league they are playing against very good teams, and it's harder to bring in him, I would say instead of all this trouble, if they kept putting him in at 70th minute or so for like 10 games at the start of the season, that would have given him enough match shape that he would be able to play all game, or you could have put him at start, and bench him at 65,70th minutes so he could rest.

That is a possible thing and would have worked for them. Instead, they are doing it "bench him on EPL, play him on Europa" style, which is weird.

Decentralized exchanges and decentralized finance is the number one enemy of the governments. You still have to find a way to turn your fiat into crypto and your crypto into fiat, so there will always be exchanges that work in that field and working together with the governments via KYC, but aside from that with the improvements of DEX and DeFi, we are really going to end up seeing things get a lot better in the long run for sure.

This will prevent governments from interfering with our money, they have already taken so much and did so little with it, and I believe that we are going to really see regular people like us prosper thanks to this new technology.

In my country it is illegal, but there are foreign famous people, some even as high as A-List Hollywood people, and that doesn't really matter to me. There are some things that celebrities could influence me with, like I once donated to cancer hospital to be built, the biggest in my nation, and many celebs got together to make both ads on tv, and all shared it on their social media accounts, and we as a nation all donated to it, and that hospital was built, it’s now saving dozens of people per day, it was a great thing.

But when it comes to gambling, I look at the facts, the odds, the house edge, the rewards, the trust rating, those things matter more.

I have to say he may not be the type of player they need right now. They need a goal scorer, someone who only cares about scoring as much as possible, not a complete forward, not some ball artist who can do flair stuff, they need basically a Haaland/Lewa/Mbappe/Ronaldo type of striker who will look for the goal and that's it.

This is not something available with those names, but could find lower level ones, such as Kane. Kane is not available at this moment but I guarantee you if they paid 100 million to Spurs, they could get him and he could play there for at least 5-6 more years, maybe more and that solves a huge problem they are having right now.

That is unfortunately true, and it's their own problem. If they really trust meme projects this much, then they should be investing into it and when they lose money on it, that's their own trouble and has nothing to do with us.

I have personally never invested into doge or any other meme, and I have not made any profits from it neither, but I am fine with not losing any money from it as well. That's the key point, if you are not losing any money at all then you are doing the right thing eventually as well. This doesn't mean that you should never invest into anything just because you could lose, but at least the thing you invest into should have some fundamentally solid reason to go up.

I believe it will get more common in the coming times because of the high transaction costs, which means some casinos will adopt it, and when big names see the other smaller casinos end up getting their customers because of this new addition, they will start adopting it too. That's how it all happens isn't it, all the improvements in big companies happen because some small company does something better, and the big one copies it and sometimes even do it better, meaning there won't be a need left to move away and go to a smaller company.

Certainly the same in the casino world, big names like stake will always cover whatever difference is to keep you here and never have any shortcomings compared to other places for a lengthy period of time.

I do understand the need for people to play without KYC, but I also understand the casinos who ask for it to apply with the regulations as well.

It is not about where the casino is based, you could build a casino in a place where you do not have to ask KYC and that would be fine, however it would also be a trouble for your gamblers to gamble with you in many places of the world, you will have to make sure that you put rules in the ToS stating nearly most of the world can't play with you because you do not ask KYC, which means you are telling people "gamble here at your own risk but no KYC required", which is what casinos do not want to do and want to be accepted in more places.

I feel like there is no team at PSG level, maybe I am wrong but it does look like that, which means that no team could be competing against PSG but some of them will be lucky enough to beat them. Look at the previous years, PSG won almost every year, aside from just one season, and each of these years they lost to some times, each year they had a few loss, and that usually means even though they are better than everyone, they will have games that are unexpectedly a loss from some lower level team.

We never know which team it will be, sometimes it's close enough teams, sometimes lower level teams, we have no idea who it will be, we just assume "eventually" it will happen.

They do not have the money to make more transfers, but the good part is, if you end up at a spot that is beyond what people expected from you that means you are going to get paid more than what you expected as well, which will result with them getting more players next season and they could use those players to finish better and better and keep repeating that constantly.

Unfortunately, football became something of a "rich owners make teams win" type of sport, and that means unless Aston Villa is sold to some rich owner, then we are not going to end up seeing them win anything, but they could at least try to keep overachieving each season they play and Gerrard could help them with it.

I do believe that City and PSG are the two biggest candidates, they are teams designed to win this cup, they are already good at their league already and won it so many times, they don't really care about the league as much anymore, if they can win it that’s great but if they don't then as long as they win UCL that’s fine. Which is why we are going to see both of these clubs do their best to win it all.

Real and Bayern are goo because they have done it before and have the experience, but PSG and City are built for it, and that matters a lot when the time comes. I hope one of them finally wins it and could relax and we can see them play however they want.

I am feeling 100% confident that bitcoin hit the bottom already, even if it goes any lower, it will not hit any lower than the bottom we already hit. I think it was somewhere close to 17.5k if I am not wrong, the past 2 years bottom give or take since the bull run started, and the lowest we reached during the bear market. That was so low, and I doubt we would ever reach that again.

This is why I am feeling like we are not going to really see anything that is going to really change much, and why I am buying as much as I can afford, since I trust it to do a lot better, I am not sure how it will happen, or when, but I am sure it will eventually happen one day.