Should I be able to generate multiple addresses? Option is grayed out in my wallet - 0.99 GUI.  No with the current version of XDN Client you can generate only one address. The main reason is - you actually need only one address, because of XDN privacy protection. E.G. In case of Bitcoin you should use multiple addresses to save your privacy, DarkNote is designed to save you privacy by default. But later we will introduce 1.multiple addresses generation 2. Multisignatures. |
|
|
|
|
And you always should remember, that you can find first CN GUI one page html wrapper for simplewallet, made on DuckNote/DarkNote developers long time ago. It is Open source and available on github.
|
|
|
|
1. Source code of XDN is open. XDN itself is an open-source project. 2. New cryptography implementation that is used for messages is open and available on github. 3. New updated simplewallet with crypto from 2 is also on github, so you guys can do services around. 4. As for GUI source code - currently it is close sourced for a number of reasons, one is to induce developers to make their own GUI implementations, but for sure some day we will announce it, for sure. I can tell you that we are using original early Bitcoin approach and the first CN GUI you are using is not a QT  |
|
|
|
Now it worked!
I closed darknoted, I opened Windows GUI and got connected.
What was this all about???
There was a problem with some of GUI nodes. Now it is fixed. Dear users, it is really good for XDN if you will launch your own nodes and run XDN in "heavy" mode. It is really simple. 1. Run darknoted daemon: in case of Windows - darknoted.exe .....Now wait until sync with network .... (or you can download blockchain from http://darknote.cc to make it faster) 2. Run DarkNote GUI client. 3. Go to Connections tab -> press Disconnect -> press Connect to local darknoted. that's it. Any way you DarkNote are always safe if you keep your Private keys safe. |
|
|
|
windows gui wallet
How to use local darknote instance?
And how also choose a directory?
something like that
darknotewallet.exe -datadir=E:\darknote\
1. Launch darknoted daemon. Wait until it sync with network (may take a long time) or download blockchain to make it faster. 2. In GUI client, when darknoted daemon is launched change GUI client connection to "local darknoted" |
|
|
|
Hi,dev,has the 'transaction too big' issue been fixed ?  You should use latest versions of simplewallet or GUI. It will help avoid big sized transactions. If your tx is too big, try to make it smaller with lower amount or lower mixin count. |
|
|
|
i found a bag?
Pending balance don't clearning then coins go to Actual balance.
its ok?
windows gui wallet
No, it is not a bug, but a wallet logic as for now. |
|
|
|
|
Every time you can`t connect to DarkNote remote daemon, you should remember, that DarkNote client can be connected to your local darknoted daemon. Any way all issues with remote nodes and GUI client fixed, sorry for inconvenience.
|
|
|
|
|
Some nice trading stats. Starting with Poloniex:
1. Historical XDN trade volume (2014/06/23 - 2015/02/04) 7,100,674,230.72 XDN (Only Poloniex data)
2. Historical BTC trade volume (2014/06/23 - 2015/02/04) 911,1 BTC (Only Poloniex data)
|
|
|
|
Also, does network transactions include that of exchange buys and sells?
Network transactions include all XDN units and/or messages transfers. User to user, User to service, Service to Service, etc - all possible transfers. Actual network transactions include only "real" transactions, but not "Generation transaction". E.G. If block has only 1 generation transaction = +1250XDN (current block reward), means that block was just mined and do not include any other transactions, that block and that transaction WILL NOT be included in Actual transactions list. |
|
|
|
We are working on progressive DarkNote stats, here are some research, before it is public:
Based on blocks 1 to 88000:
1. Average difficulty: 130 423 399
2. Average hashrate: 543 431 H/S
3. Average block size: 7693 byte
4. Average median size: 4004 byte
5. Average tx count: 4
6. Fee sum: 1946 105 XDN
7. Penalty sum: 194008095 XDN - 1293387 minimal (150XDN) blocks. Actually about +10 years of mining with 150 XDN min block reward.
8. Total network transactions: 350389
9. Actual Network transactions (Total Network transactions - tx generation): 262389
10. Network time: 249 days
11. Actual 24h transactions volume: 1053
What is Penalty Sum? Also, does network transactions include that of exchange buys and sells? Each CryptoNote coin has a Reward_Penalty specifications. When some kind of "bad" big block is produced the reward will be under penalty. There is a spec, called median size, if some block size is above that median size, reward is under penalty, penalty depends on size of the block. Penalty sum is a sum of all penalties from 1 to 88000 block. That amount of XDN had to be mined, but was not mined due to the described above penalties. But DarkNote Max coin value will always be = 8 589 869 056 XDN - perfect number. So Penalty sum: 194008095 XDN. Minimum block reward is a constant value = 150 XDN. Means it will takes 194008095/150= 1293387 blocks with minimum block reward value(150XDN) to reach that amount that was under penalty from 1 to 88000 block. ((1293387blocks*4min)/60min)/24hours = 3592 days = 9.8 year. But we are working on PoW/PoS Hybrid, so min_block reward may be increased for PoS part of scheme. |
|
|
|
|
We are working on progressive DarkNote stats, here are some research, before it is public:
Based on blocks 1 to 88000:
1. Average difficulty: 130 423 399
2. Average hashrate: 543 431 H/S
3. Average block size: 7693 byte
4. Average median size: 4004 byte
5. Average tx count: 4
6. Fee sum: 1946 105 XDN
7. Penalty sum: 194008095 XDN - 1293387 minimal (150XDN) blocks. Actually about +10 years of mining with 150 XDN min block reward.
8. Total network transactions: 350389
9. Actual Network transactions (Total Network transactions - tx generation): 262389
10. Network time: 249 days
11. Actual 24h transactions volume: 1053
|
|
|
|
1. You can research the XDN difficulty chart, ask forum folks here about mining XDN since 1st block. Ask smooth, seems he liked XDN and mined it since first blocks and he can confirm that.
It is true that I mined XDN from the beginning and there was no premine. However, you will note that tacotime didn't claim a premine, he claimed an instamine. Now on that score I must still respectfully disagree with him and agree with you. An instamine generally refers to the case where difficulty adjustment doesn't happen kick in and an enormous number of coins are mined quickly at very low difficulty (for example, DRK, where 25% were mined on the first day or something). The XDN difficulty adjustment worked well and the number of coins mined at the beginning was more or less in line with the published schedule, so I wouldn't call that an instamine. It is also true that one month for reward having is an extremely fast reward schedule. I'd more properly call that a "fast mine." Finally, it is also true that the ducknote->darknote rebrand, which one might imagine was planned from the start, happened after a few of these reward cuts meaning the bulk of the coins had been mined by the time the somewhat silly meme branding that many dismissed (though I did indeed like) was taken off and the more credible branding added. I understand that you have claimed other reasons for this reward schedule, yet the fact remains that nearly all of the coins were mined before darkNote existed. P.S. Various comments are made and opinions expressed on the forum. Is it really necessary to respond in such a hostile and defensive manner when you disagree with something? P.P.S. Are you affiliated with bytecoin or cryptonote in any way? I agree with this and can also observe smooth's observations. Mining difficulty was quite low in the beginning, and open to everyone (I mined some as I liked the silly theme, just as smooth  ). Also observe that ducknote was announced after optimized miners were available [1]. That means that the bytecoin scammers didn't have an edge anymore, leveling the playing field. But yes, mining 80% of all coins in the first year is fast. dNote, passionate or not, being hostile and unfriendly on the forum isn't an "inconvenience", it's just, well, hostile and unfriendly. Don't take attacks on DarkNote personally, as these attacks will happen more and more if DarkNote succeeds. It's putting a bad image on your coin in any case. [1] http://da-data.blogspot.be/2014/08/minting-money-with-monero-and-cpu.htmlThank you, much appreciate. " But yes, mining 80% of all coins in the first year is fast." - that is the Thing. That is what i am talking about. Idea of fair proof-of-work to run real economy. XDN emission curve was invented long before any of XDN devs new something about CryptoNote technology. Yes, idea of that kind of emission can be discussable, and someone may not like that approach. But DarkNote here is for real users and real markets, that kind of emission exclude the miners influence on network and gives a crypto markets an ability to run a real Libertarian Economy. Just like Milton Friedmans "helicopter drop" in some terms. Why should we wait for several years/decades to run it as we used to, why should we be scared of miners market manipulation in the long term perspective, instead of making a good base in the very first year? Eventually, why should we waste an energy with pure PoW, instead of using energy efficient PoW/PoS scheme, but based on fair PoW initial supply. And you know, after some years keeping low - near Zero fees is laid inside DarkNote, instead of Moneros extreme fees (in fiat terms). DarkNote is very friendly for instant micropayments and almost fee-free for Huge amount transactions, while any Monero transfer is very expensive. Wait, what? Monero transfer is expensive means big fees goes to miners, probably botnets, again and again. Actually right now and even seems from the beginning of Monero diff jump caused by suspicious activity (probably botnets), you can see the situation that we have avoided with DarkNote emission curve. Thanj you. |
|
|
|
|
Happy new month, block reward halving in next 36 hours.
This month new community stuff will be presented.
This month new updated client will be available with fixing all minor issues, like mining on core i3 CPU.
This month new DarkNofe web resources will be available.
This month we will keep hard work on DarkNote network improvements and new features/
This month we will help lots of new XDN projects.
This month is a month with 1250 XDN block reward, almost x10 times more than XDN minimum block reward.
Stay tuned.
|
|
|
|
YOU HAVE MYOPIA
no i am not. |
|
|
|
How about all cryptonote devs and backers not act like pre-teens.
WAT?!?!? Why? Maybe their behavior is ahead of time and everybody will act like this soon. dNote: You guys should really, really do these three things. - Explain the motivation and greater strategy/vision, behind your various mostly non-sustainable commercial and community projects, around CN. - Stop creating pretended neutral, objective community websites, projects or organizations around CN. With the intent to abuse them, to promote your projects, securing your information superiority around CN and preventing the creation of a real community around CN (you wont control 100% anymore). Your behavior is harming CryptoNote-technology. It's already visible, many CN users and people interested in CN tech are refusing to work with you and/or don't care about your ideas/next plans for the tech dev, community development or the announcement of yet another coin, out of your CryptoNote-coin-generator. Most serious people I talked with just labeled you guys as crazy and not trust-worthy. Open up and talk and exchange with the CN-users, researcher and devs. If not, nobody will care for any of your projects or work related to CN technology. - Reevaluate your opinion about Monero. There is absolutely no reason for your aggression against the project or your activities to sabotage Moneros development. At least accept Monero and be neutral. No one is talking about cooperations or team members becoming friends and exchanging christmas cards. Just stop the bullshit. And use your resources and time for something positive. Monero is the biggest CN coin, has a fair setup, is very open & democratic and is hurting no one. No valid reasons to hate. Last but not least, if you disavow or not, the whole CN eco-system and your own CN-based projects are benefiting from the software development and infrastructure creation that is done by The Monero Project. This is my 100% unbiased opinion and 0% influenced by my decision to support Monero. Don't reply, just really think about it. If u really care about CN technology sooner or later you will see these three points are without alternatives, if you want to stay part of CN mid-term development & future. ... just unfair. As always. 1. Explain the motivation and greater strategy/vision, behind your various mostly non-sustainable commercial and community projects, around CN. - explained many times, will do it again- our ONLY project is XDN = duckNOTE = DarkNOTE. Motivation = launching new FREE economy >70% of emission in the very first to open it to free markets, to exclude the miners influence and eventually to implement PoS on the top of fair PoS. 2. The only websites we are working on are websites around XDN. And we will make lots of projects around/ Soon you will see the results. 3. All you statement is about XDN devs affiliation with CN devs and other coins devs. Again and again and again, how can you be such a Morono lovers, XDN devs are independent individuals cooperated for a long time, and have a long experience in cryptos, but not here on forums. Actually it took a quite a long time to understand your blaming when it initially occurs, some a parts of our team are still saying : whaaaat? As i can understand, according to your logic, all who are not a Monero devs, are Bytecoin devs. Sorry, we are not. As for me - monero is a biggest bubble, because there is only speculation about it, blockchain is unusable with its size, IMO almost everything about monero seems terrible - unusable blockchain size (On average PC, it just can`t be a network node), block intervals, tx generation size, fee size, no GUI after almost 1 year since start, totally wrong way of development, looks like just no understanding of CN technology. "software development and infrastructure creation that is done by The Monero Project. " lol you are confirming my words - XRM devs can`t develop the coin, because of low technology understanding, they just make some poor services around original source code, like closed source web wallets. There is nothing that monero gives to cryptocurrency world, except the wrong way in understanding the new technology, such a pity. |
|
|
|
1. You can research the XDN difficulty chart, ask forum folks here about mining XDN since 1st block. Ask smooth, seems he liked XDN and mined it since first blocks and he can confirm that.
It is true that I mined XDN from the beginning and there was no premine. However, you will note that tacotime didn't claim a premine, he claimed an instamine. Now on that score I must still respectfully disagree with him and agree with you. An instamine generally refers to the case where difficulty adjustment doesn't happen kick in and an enormous number of coins are mined quickly at very low difficulty (for example, DRK, where 25% were mined on the first day or something). The XDN difficulty adjustment worked well and the number of coins mined at the beginning was more or less in line with the published schedule, so I wouldn't call that an instamine. It is also true that one month for reward having is an extremely fast reward schedule. I'd more properly call that a "fast mine." Finally, it is also true that the ducknote->darknote rebrand, which one might imagine was planned from the start, happened after a few of these reward cuts meaning the bulk of the coins had been mined by the time the somewhat silly meme branding that many dismissed (though I did indeed like) was taken off and the more credible branding added. I understand that you have claimed other reasons for this reward schedule, yet the fact remains that nearly all of the coins were mined before darkNote existed. P.S. Various comments are made and opinions expressed on the forum. Is it really necessary to respond in such a hostile and defensive manner when you disagree with something? P.P.S. Are you affiliated with bytecoin or cryptonote in any way? Thank you very much, smooth, you are a very honest person, and explain everything as accurate as i wanted you to do it. P.S. I am passionate person, i tell what i think, sorry for inconvenience. P.P.S. Sure man, as any other CN coin, DarkNote devs use most parts of Bytecoin source code, and as we can see the quality of BCN code, and truly respect the way CryptoNote was implemented in BCN. So we try to keep DarkNote source code updated with Bytecoin original repository, although, since the beginning of XDN we claimed as a group of independent devs, who meet CN technology and BCN itself at the middle of our own cryptocurrency development process. We switched to CN and implemented DarkNote XDN economy with Bytecoin original source code. We added new features to CryptoNote, like original reward structure, because XDN reward structure is totally not about CryptoNote reward structure, because it was invented long before we meet CryptoNote and Bytecoin. |
|
|
|
1. You can research the XDN difficulty chart, ask forum folks here about mining XDN since 1st block. Ask smooth, seems he liked XDN and mined it since first blocks and he can confirm that.
It is true that I mined XDN from the beginning and there was no premine. However, you will note that tacotime didn't claim a premine, he claimed an instamine. Now on that score I must still respectfully disagree with him and agree with you. An instamine generally refers to the case where difficulty adjustment doesn't happen kick in and an enormous number of coins are mined quickly at very low difficulty (for example, DRK, where 25% were mined on the first day or something). The XDN difficulty adjustment worked well and the number of coins mined at the beginning was more or less in line with the published schedule, so I wouldn't call that an instamine. It is also true that one month for reward having is an extremely fast reward schedule. I'd more properly call that a "fast mine." Finally, it is also true that the ducknote->darknote rebrand, which one might imagine was planned from the start, happened after a few of these reward cuts meaning the bulk of the coins had been mined by the time the somewhat silly meme branding that many dismissed (though I did indeed like) was taken off and the more credible branding added. I understand that you have claimed other reasons for this reward schedule, yet the fact remains that nearly all of the coins were mined before darkNote existed. P.S. Various comments are made and opinions expressed on the forum. Is it really necessary to respond in such a hostile and defensive manner when you disagree with something? P.P.S. Are you affiliated with bytecoin or cryptonote in any way? Thank you very much, smooth, you are a very honest person, and explain everything as accurate as i wanted you to do it. P.S. I am passionate person, i tell what i think, sorry for inconvenience. P.P.S. Sure man, as any other CN coin, DarkNote devs use most parts of Bytecoin source code, and as we can see the quality of BCN code, and truly respect the way CryptoNote was implemented in BCN. So we try to keep DarkNote source code updated with Bytecoin original repository, although, since the beginning of XDN we claimed as a group of independent devs, who meet CN technology and BCN itself at the middle of our own cryptocurrency development process. We switched to CN and implemented DarkNote XDN economy with Bytecoin original source code. We added new features to CryptoNote, like original reward structure, because XDN reward structure is totally not about CryptoNote reward structure, because it was invented long before we meet CryptoNote and Bytecoin. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
