|
1 btc is not even much money to invest in the first place. so yes ofc you should invest in 1 btc! its a good long term investment . it might not make you rich but it will make you some money atleast i believe.
|
|
|
|
maybe the number of investors ticker was fake and the real number of acounts was way lower ? i dont know agree that its way to litle ruckus for this big scam
Those stats don't lie though. http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/ore-mine.orgoh ok thanks  then i dont know why its so quiet about this alot of people then lost alot of money , and its been running for 2 years. its very wierd. |
|
|
|
I sold 10.5 or so BTC back then, didn't purchase any though. Would of purchased if I needed though.
Do you think it is good time to purchase now? The price has dropped since the $1200 price reached in 2013. Yes it's especially good if you can buy under $500 It will be easier for you to get profits out of that. yes. thats my strategy anything under 500$ is a buy for me. btc reaching 1000 is not to far fetch , so a double in money is always nice  |
|
|
|
Advantages: If the price reaches $1300, then there is strong momentum and it will probably go much higher.
If the price doesn't reach $1300, then bitcoin failed or something seriously went wrong. You will save yourself a lot of time and money.
Disadvantages: You miss the gains from 350 to 1300
i rather keep my btc dont have that much anyway around 3 , and risk loosing them all and watch the value increase up until 1300, instead of selling now and buy like 1 btc at 1300 for that money lol and not earned anything from the rise to 1300....... |
|
|
|
|
maybe the number of investors ticker was fake and the real number of acounts was way lower ? i dont know agree that its way to litle ruckus for this big scam
|
|
|
|
Fair enough. im not taking sides just so you know im just asking becuse im curious. do you have any article or thread i can read to help me grasp the whole thing about why blocksize increase is a bad thing. right now im not for or against. but it seems to be a subject that stirs up alot of feelings.
Well, I'd have to look for that information myself right now. The first thing that comes to mind is this:
Any examples of the 10 minute script. The best thing that you could do is ask the developers yourself on IRC if you really want to know. ok thanks for the link! i will check it out and will ask around search on the web after! |
|
|
|
The correct statement is 'some blocks are full'. You can't just jump to conclusions based on data recovered in the last few hours. Out of the last few blocks I see a few at around 750kb. It is frustrating how much energy is being wasted. Just scale the blocksize already...
That can be a dangerous act. i have not been into all this bitcoin stuff for so long , but from all i read so far , i cant realy see why so much people are hating on bigger block sizes. Becuse all i can see and hear right now is that bitcoins would benfit from it a great deal.
Because you have no IT background and have not done adequate research. How could you jump to such conclusions? With a block size of 2 MB it is possible to construct a transaction that would take over 10 minutes to validate which would harm the network. Fair enough. im not taking sides just so you know im just asking becuse im curious. do you have any article or thread i can read to help me grasp the whole thing about why blocksize increase is a bad thing. right now im not for or against. but it seems to be a subject that stirs up alot of feelings. |
|
|
|
Right now Bitcoin's price is rallying and block are full. According to blockchain.info backlog of unconfirmed transactions is 11.6 MB right now and as far as I know there is now spam or stress test going on. How worse does it need to get?
i have not been into all this bitcoin stuff for so long , but from all i read so far , i cant realy see why so much people are hating on bigger block sizes. Becuse all i can see and hear right now is that bitcoins would benfit from it a great deal. |
|
|
|
how safe something is is impossible for us to say bitcoins as with all investments have a possibility to lose you money instead of making you money , so just invest money you can afford to lose so you dont ruin your life in the same rate as your investments is falling |
|
|
|
Withdraw work or not ? please answer thanks
not working tryed two days ago just to confirm what everyone already been telling me on this thread , and i still got nothing on my btc wallet. scam scam scam just stay away , and hope new investors sees this thread before investing so this scammer dont get any more money. |
|
|
|
...I wonder what their next NSA-fork will be named like?
I'm calling it now, "Bitcoin Pure", will be a potential name. Since they are "going back to the roots" (absolutely not in facts), they could call it Bitcoin Source, Bitcoin Plus or even Bitcoin Simple ! or they can just call it...... wait for it ........ bitcoin roots ? and in their campaign they can have a slogan "we are going back to the roots" |
|
|
|
lost on 4 ponzis on this forum pretty much given up on them. they are the same as they always been not a mater if they turn scam just when , as of right now i stay away from them. they are not getting any more of my money |
|
|
|
|
yes ofc you can make money investing it, alot of money if your skilled/luck but you can also lose it all so it depends on what risk you want to take. dont know how many times i read that people lost their life savings on stocks , becuse they made alot of money for a time but then their luck started to run out and they lost the sum the gained and more in 1/10 of the time it took for them to gain it in the first place through investments. so it all depends realy what type of person you are. can you take a loss? and how do you take a loss. do you want to win it back risking even more money ?only you know what type of person you are and what suits you.
|
|
|
|
and when you mean calculate fraud into it , you should pretty much expect it to turn fraud in a short time , so if ur not getting your money back in about 1 week from your investment its not worth it even 1 week is longer then 90% of all these "investment games" go. so best is just to avoid all together or just gamble them same odds pretty much , take a big underdog like 40x times your money and you have the same odds as winning on these "investment games" |
|
|
|
is this campaign still open? if it is can i join? |
|
|
|
|
tryed to get alot of people to join but i dont know what it is , even people that think it sounds awsome with btc never buy , i think to process in some cases , like sending money to a bank exchange via bank wire takes for ever and is a hassle for what people are used to. so in short people are so f*cking lazy that u pretty much have to do it for them for them to accept bitcoins.
|
|
|
|
|
intressting i got the same question was laying awake last night in bed and this question popped into my head , i have most of my btc on coinbase maybe i can ask them to set something up? otherwise i just give them all my passwords mail phone and everything and they just setupt their own btcwallet and transfer my money there i guess.
|
|
|
|
It is true that you can buy some things with bitcoin in some stores and all. But mainly Bitcoin has come to be an investment/stock, similar to gold some say. I am quite happy with the possibility of earning it in the internet by simple means (banners, faucets, posting, doing small tasks and works) internationally and without so much government control, and also about speculating with it. I would love it would become a widely used currency and be able to pay everywhere with it... But would not be angry if it remained as it is now (used by some, with the ability to be transferred and earned through internet).
What do you think?
I feel pretty much exactly the same as for now i have not used bitcoins to buy anything i us it mainly as a investment , but i would be happy if i could use my bitcoins in the stores but like it is right now i would not use them in the store anyway becuse in a couple of months the price could have gone up and then i would just be kicking myself for spending them instead of saving them. In the future when the price dont have such swings as it have right now i would gladly use it to pay with. |
|
|
|
New York Times, 15 January 2016:"Mike Hearn, a British computer programmer...." I stopped reading right there. There is no such thing as a "British computer programmer". There are British people who imagine they could program computers. There are British people who write about computer programming as though they could do it in an imaginary world. There are British people who write about actual American computer programmers. And there are probably some British people who peck at keyboards in a futile attempt to write a computer program (and then after writing one page of code they give up and write a novel about their experiences as a "computer programmer"). Well, I AM a programmer, an AMERICAN living in AMERICA where real programming was invented and where Apple, IBM, Microsoft, Google, Oracle, Intel and every other top software and computer hardware company actually exists, not in a novel, but in real life. What this prick reminds me of in no particular order: Edsger W. Dijkstra, a pompous, self-important pendant paid by the Dutch government to write pompous papers about trivial algorithms Americans had already discovered and who probably wrote less than 200 lines of code in his whole life SAP - the software originally written by American programming genius Robert Adams which was subsequently turned into the most unfunctional piece of bloatware in the world over the course of decades by a bunch of pompous German non-programming theorists and now serves, as far as I can see, to primarily allow large companies to pay $500 million a year so that they can use buzzwords like "service oriented architecture" in their annual reports. Piers Morgan Hugh Pickens, the British blogger who tries to inject his obnoxious socialist agenda into every technology subject he can think of, then pollute Slashdot with it David Cameron after a lobotomy the NATS computer system Acorn Computer, the most defective and unusable piece of computer hardware ever invented which sat completely unused in some 100,000 schools in the UK and is now the subject of a bizarre Stalinesque conspiracy by British journalists to write it up as though "a generation of schoolkids grew up learning to program on it" which is a complete lie the British guy I interviewed for a developer job who had a "Masters Degree in Computer Science" from the University of Leeds and scored 0 out of 10 on a written basic skills quiz with questions like "Convert the number 57 to hexadecimal" every single British jerkoff who comes here telling us to how to run our country You would think after the American Revolution these British assholes would get the message: GET YOUR BODY THE HELL OUT OF OUR COUNTRY, YOUR FINGERS OUT OF OUR FORUMS, AND YOUR MOUTHS OUT OF OUR NEWSMEDIA and STOP TRYING TO ACT LIKE YOU KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT OUR TECHNOLOGY This post is epic! Im not a american im swedish , but could not stop laughing this is so funny in so many ways. But i dont know if your serius or not , but as a joke this is brilliant. |
|
|
|
|
Ok if i put it like this , if fbi did realy took down the site , why is the thread on this forum also taken down , have fbi started taking down forum posts now also? ofc its a dumb trick to get away with less heat from the owners of ore-mine.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
