Prohibiting the users with red-trust to join in the bounty is a good point and it will make the bounty to be better.
However, some bounty managers may not consider the trust, they only focus on how many people that can participate and help them promote their projects. It is no matter, however, in my opinion, you will be better to be more selective in choosing or making rules for bounty campaigns.

So sorry, but, I think that I don't agree with his statement.
Well, yeah, there may be many cryptocurrencies that will go to zero, because of the shitcoin and many factors.
However, some top coins likely BTC and ETH will have their position and still survive in any condition event in a very dropped market.
Currently, there are also many projects that offer the real use case crypto, so that they can have greater value once their product is ready.

Basically, yes. Red-trust means an untrusted member, including a bounty manager. But they got it from various cases, just look at what the case is. If the case has no correlation with the bounty, it is no problem I think. However, for me, the better option is surely a bounty manager with a good reputation.

---

Note :
I think you don't need to include "@Wapinter" on your thread above. There are still many worse managers. It is not a place to judge him!!
Why don't you just stated a red-trust bounty manager, no need an example. I think it is clear enough.  

Nice regulation from the government, mate. It is quite the same as my country, there is no specific law about crypto taxation. We just need to pay income tax, including the income got from crypto business. However, as the crypto asset has been officially allowed in our country, I guess there will be a deeper assessment related to taxes in the future.

Sepertinya penempatan chart (bagan) lebih pas kalo di taruh di sub judul masing-masing sesuai tahunnya [2012/2016].


Taruh di sini chart halving (2012-11-28)


Taruh di sini chart halving (2016-7-9)

Note : Ada baiknya penjelasan terkait chartnya ditambah. Agar pembaca yang budiman lebih mudah memahami.  

---

Untuk sub judul yang ini : "Apa Arti Pentingnya Bitcoin Block Halving?", saya kira akan lebih tepat jika diganti "Dampak dari Bitcoin Halving".

---

Mau tanya dikit bagian ini :


Pertanyaan saya simple gan, mengapa pembanding nya 150 hari setelah halving?
Mengapa tidak dibandingkan saja harga sebulan sebelum halving dan sebulan setelah halving?
Apakah ada kaitannya dengan hitungan "per block"?

Thanks gan..

Planning is a must, it should be a stupid idea to trade without planning. Actually, it is not only about making a plan, but we must also learn everything related to trading firstly. I cannot imagine that someone tries to trade without having the proper knowledge. Trading without a plan & proper knowledge seems like fishing without a hook.  

This should not be compared with others. Everyone knows about it!

Will fall even more??
Who said that??
You??

Please, give a valid data or theory about this! I doubt you just guess it.  

I suggest you spend a few minutes to know the current condition about Gold and the price prediction in the future. It will help you to understand that Gold is really a bubble or not. For me, based on some articles, Gold is quite safe and shows a promising chart for its price.

Please read these articles about Gold price prediction :
1. https://www.ccn.com/gold-price-rally-2020-global-stocks-slump/
2. https://capital.com/gold-price-forecast-2020-and-beyond-to-buy-or-not-to-buy

Do you see any correlations between "the limitation of the physical cash transactions" and "Bitcoin or crypto adoption"?
I think they don't plan to consider Bitcoin or crypto adoption, they just plan to apply more digital transactions (online) since it can be easier to control by the government. However, this is a good sign that more countries consider using digital payment in the future. It is in line with the existence of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies.

Betul Om, makanya saya katakan "ditambahkan", ini berrati setelah dilakukan tindakan seperti yang Om Husna bilang di atas.


To the point aja ya Om.  
Daripada kita debat dengan asumsi masing-masing, ya lebih baik langsung tanya yang buat aturan.

It is surprising to see the development of BNB Coin. It is certainly related to the reputation of Binance exchange. If the Binance exchange is still leading all crypto exchange in the world, then BNB Coin may continue to improve and more popular. However, this is not enough to be the king of all coins. BNB Coin is an altcoin, it is the same as other altcoins. The highest possible achievement could be the king of altcoins [overtaking ETH], but not the king of all coins. I am sure the king of all coins will be always Bitcoin (BTC).

Actually we can find some social network projects for cryptocurrency. But so far, the most popular projects may be Facebook (Libra) and also Telegram coin. Previously, you may find One Social and some others. However, most of them are not promising and they tend to be failed after the ICO ends. In this case, actually social network project-based is actually promising, however, we must be smart in choosing why they are interesting.

Fake and manipulation will be always there. Everything can be manipulated or faked easily, for example: "softcap" or "hardcap". That's why it is very important to know the track record, reputation, or background of every team member of the project. If they seem can be trust-able, then it is okay to consider joining. But you are better to not join if you get some of these problems: they have bad reputations, their identities are not clearly described, or there is a fake photo of the team members.

Thank you so much Hhampuz, I received the first payment.
Certainly, will keep my best work. 

Saya setuju dengan saran Om Husna di atas. Dan mungkin bisa ditambahkan juga di sini : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5127878.0

I am not really sure if it will be soon but I agree that many countries in Asia seem to consider accepting Bitcoin. My country is one of the countries that still don't accept Bitcoin for a national payment instrument, so Bitcoin is still used for a digital asset only. The laws in our country only validate Rupiah as a national currency [national payment instrument]. So, it is prohibited to use Bitcoin for purchasing goods in my country.

Yes, Real Sociedad may have a chance to be in the first table in the next week but it doesn't mean Real Sociedad will be the winner of La Liga. The game is not over yet, there are still some matches to be faced by Real Sociedad. I am not sure that this team can win all the remaining matches. But, the opportunity to win the La Liga is always there. So, I don't want to rule out this team although the composition of the team's players is not as good as Real Madrid or Barcelona has. Sometimes the miracle can happen in a football competition. However, I think Real Madrid and Barcelona are still the favorite teams to be the winner.       

Both CoinMaretCap and CoinGecko have their own criteria. Some standard criteria are the same and some are different.
For more details about the different criteria, you can check the following link:

Coin Market Cap: based on two important things to be listed, listing criteria (can be seen at the link https://support.coinmarketcap.com/hc/en-us/articles/360034124351-Listings-Criteria) and also Methodology (information about Market Data and Cryptoasset Rank) which can be seen at the link https://support.coinmarketcap.com/hc/en-us/articles/360034116491-Market-Data-Cryptoasset-Rank.

For CoinGecko, you can see it at the link https://www.coingecko.com/id/methodology.

In this case, at this time the CMC might probably have more stringent and higher criteria for listing coins/tokens/ exchanges on their list.
However, both CMC and CoinGecko provide very helpful information for us all.

During this time, I personally more often use CMC to check the feasibility or list of coins/tokens/ or exchange.

The first is to ensure whether the coins are available on the exchange to sell.
Second, the amount is too much and it is very risky. If you need immediate funds or cahs, it is better to divide the amounts into several big exchanges, not only one. It will be useful to avoid losing or minimize risks.
Second, if you don't need the cash immediately, I will suggest you make a step-by-step selling token or coins.

Commonly, every bounty manager has its own telegram group or channel, but some don't.
Actually there are several bounty channels that you can find. They are such as BountyHive, Bounty by Kopisusu, Wapinter Bounty Management, and some others.
However, whatever the channels, it is important to make a deeper and continuous analysis of the bounty that we are going to participate in.
At least here, choose the trusted and also most profitable enough.
Of course, bounties with BTC, ETH, or exact coins listed on exchanges will be more promising to follow.

I am not really sure with your opinion. It should be good but in fact it is still hard to happen.

Bitcoin requires technology and support from the government. At least, it needs the internet to be used and people who own the Bitcoin need to understand how to use it. On the other hand, it won't be able to use if your government bans it. These problems still become obstacles to spread out Bitcoin to all people in the world. So, how everybody will own some Bitcoin?

Look at this global Internet usage around the world : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Internet_usage