That's not what's happening at all. The tweet that your entire "news article" is based around is showing numbers that correspond to a different poll, pretending they are the numbers corresponding to the latest poll.

The title of the article you linked is this:

FOX NEWS POLL WAS ACTUALLY DEMOCRAT 48 REPUBLICAN 34 (D+14)

These numbers are part of A DIFFERENT POLL:



https://www.scribd.com/document/426454752/Fox-News-Poll-September-15-17-2019

The numbers from your "news story" are from a mid September poll. The percentage identifying as Democrat actually dropped 1% since the last poll (the mid September one). The % identifying as Republican increased 1%.



https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fox-news-poll-results-october-6-8-2019

Apparently it turns out you can't read.

Look man, correcting your relentless onslaught of bullshit is getting boring. Again, you were wrong, and you'll never admit it due to your psychopathology. Good luck with your crucifixion.

Finally someone opened a flag against theymos, I was wondering how long that was gonna take:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=866

 

He also left a slew of erroneous flag against other users.

Edit: and he's now been banned.

I never said I was above reproach, and I never scammed anyone. game-protect on the other hand, has. If you think this thread is just about naming good guys and bad guys, you're missing its entire point.


I was talking specifically about how it applied to crypto casinos. GP is unique in that case. Despite what you may think, DT isn't a mafia or cartel with nefarious intent. Its quite the opposite. I've investigated, exposed and gone after all kind of scammers and other people trying to make money off the forum in less-than-honest ways, in just about every conceivable business sector related to cryptocurrency. My being in a sportsbook campaign has nothing to do with my contempt for GP -- its been around for far longer than that. If you insist on defending him, be my guest.

But it doesn't seem like you're actually here to do that. It seems like you're just using this thread to continue your never-ending battle against the DT system. Perhaps you should start your own thread about it.

Now you're even starting to sound like him. For starters, you're inferring that we asked him to suck our collective dick, and because he didn't, we "made an example out of him." You're inferring that his problem isn't his but that of the DTs. That's just fucking stupid man. Get a grip.


His racket is unique. He's the only one going around shitting on everything casino-related in hopes of luring new victims to prey on. Its an incredibly shitty business model, and nobody on the default trust list does the same thing. Oh but of course that's not what you said, you said something entirely different, and I'm sure you're going to educate us all on it right now.

So now you've taken to defending a proven scammer and the least trusted member on the forum in order to carry on your ageless vendetta against the DT system... Classy.

Its in the same place as the court ruling awarding you 20,000 € in damages from h4ns.  

Your business here is completely finished at this point. I don't understand what you feel you have to gain by hanging around besides more ridicule and chances to prove that you, game-protect aka Game Protect of game-protect.com, are a scammer.

A lazy Sunday
I saw the Joker movie
Yay incel culture!

Actually its way
Beyond that. Those two words are
Just fun to say. LOL.

You literally said exactly that:

You made it personal from the first page in this thread. That's pretty much all you do when you know you don't have an argument.


You also think that sitting on your ass reading websites like ZeroHedge is the same thing as "going to the gym every day."    You inform yourself with the intellectual equivalent of Cheetos while convincing yourself they are protein bars. But do whatever satiates your incessant craving to feel superior to others, I suppose...


You didn't even bother to fact check this claim for yourself. If you would have, you would know that the information being quoted is from another poll. Looks like you need to switch your workout regimen, because whatever you are doing now isn't paying off.

Well, you were though. You said that impeachment proceedings were the same thing as a criminal investigation. Its not. Ergo, you were wrong. It doesn't matter what kind of contextual padding or re-arranging you want to do, this statement remains incorrect:

You clearly lifted the white paper for your project directly from that of WAVES:


Collecting sensitive personal data while remaining anonymous yourself is a big no-no. It absolutely sounds like you plan on selling passport information to third parties. You are enticing people to give it up for the promise of "free money." Of course they will not get anything, but you will be able to sell their passports to thieves and con artists around the world. This project is absolutely a scam and you should be ashamed for floating it here.

I feel bad about blowing the Pats call about not covering the spread... It certainly seemed like everything was good to go until that last quarter when everything went south in a hurry. Like you guys said, let's see how the line reacts to them playing a good team... which by the looks of it won't be until Week 9 (Ravens) or Week 11 (Eagles).

So far we have 5 votes for Saints and 2 for Jags... the biggest discrepancy we've had in a poll thus far. Line is now at -2.5 Jags, so that will be quite the V for our Collective Wisdom if the Saints can pull it off. I honestly can't say why the line favors the Jags.

That's true. He was posting that comment as I was writing mine. I've since put hv_ on ignore, added to the list of low-level trolls in this thread. I don't ignore jbear (anymore) because at least he is a high level troll.

I've also been guilty of engaging with roach, but that was more like a limited experiment, whereas JJG seems to do it on the regs.


Enjoy!

Who's the more foolish? The fool, or the fool who quotes him?

- Obi Wan Nutildah

Please read the Scam Accusation thread against this project:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190541.0

Definitely read it before putting your money into this project. It details how they plagiarized their white paper. They also have chosen to remain anonymous which makes them highly suspicious. In short, you should reconsider your skills as an investor if you are even considering giving money to a project led by an anonymous team that is this mentally unstable.

First of all, implying that "BTC" is a fork of something is disingenuous. The last "fork" was a soft fork. The Segwit Omnibus Change Set as you like to call it is backwards compatible with antiquated versions of the software. Its not nearly the same thing as creating an entirely new blockchain and using the old coin's logo while commercially billing yourself as "the real bitcoin."


I for one will. I'm 99.9% sure it will never happen, but if it did, then yes, Bitcoin Cash will have won the right to be called "Bitcoin." That's what the whole battle was about in the first place -- a battle to see which coin was the "real" bitcoin. BCH lost a long time ago, just as BSV lost the battle to be the real Bitcoin Cash. Seeing as how Bitcoin Cash has only plummeted in value compared to Bitcoin, its no longer in competition, and if Ver had any humility at all he would rename is coin.

Does this look like the chart of a coin that is on the up-and-up to you?



Its over. The debate is finished.

I just find it humorous that you have a stark inability to ever admit you were wrong about something. Sorry for picking on you.

Good. Glad we're finally on the same page about something.


You claim to be extraordinary in one way or another almost every day, which is why when you venture out of your comfort zone echo chamber here people think you're a riot. You're one of the most egotistical, self-flattering people on the entire forum, and that's saying a lot.

Your zealous overconfidence in your own abilities is truly breathtaking, but at the end of the day I have to remember it is no fault of your own, rather that of the personality disorder that you were predisposed to develop as a result of environmental/genetic conditions beyond your control.

Wow, you just got proven wrong and then you called the person who proved you wrong "Captain Obvious."


Wrong. An impeachment isn't a criminal proceeding. You were wrong, now admit it.

I think what he's saying is its ironic that scambusters have more flags than the scammers.

But of course one active flag is worth a hundred inactive flags.

My motto on the matter is if you don't have at least one trivial flag against you, it means you aren't doing anything really interesting. Its kind of like a badge of honor.