You haven't even given the accounts in question any trust, good, bad or indifferent and yet you want us to check out (and act on) your thread which would be better off here where people can act on it.

What does UUID mean?  I've heard of a UID which is a User IDenetity, but U-U I.D. ??  Just doesn't make any sense.

Dear Nyerok,

Thank you for posting in the Known Alts thread, two things, please don't post screen shots for the kind of post you have made, they can be doctored and therefore won't be taken seriously.

Always post the text of the case you are reviewing, people can search for text here, they can't search an image here.  For example they can search for a wallet address - if you have posted an image, the search engine won't find your post.

I can't add your details to the Google spread sheet for the same reason that I can't copy your text and I can't therefore add you to the level of awesomeness either.

Hi every-one, sorry I've been busy for a few days; check out what I've been up to over yonder:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2799778.msg36582483#msg36582483

Archive: http://archive.is/EL8rW#selection-17209.0-17213.28

[quote author=BitcoinSupremo link=topic=2799778.msg28800345#msg28800345 date=1516776805]
All of them , that is for smho_16 at your quotes.
[/quote]

I only stumbled on this thread on Thursday last week...

This is an all new investigation not relying on previous information gathered either by myself or anyone else.

It doesn't matter if BitcoinSupremo locks the thread as I have a copy of the BBC code and can just port the post to the [color=#0a80b1]Known Alts of any-one[/color] - [color=#f8ae23]A User Generated List[/color] [color=#c81c8f]^{Mk III} thread at a later date.

Accounts Connected:

Robertt, and

Cereberus, smho_16, zend7, BitcoinSupremo, (self admitted) and

smho_16 and lolnabtc, via same wallet and

probably Magnificanto, RacingDoubler, RacingDouble,

as well as the multitude of other UID's listed here ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2799778.msg28690889#msg28690889

[color=#0a80b1]Proof:[/color]

BitcoinSupremo uses the following BitCoin wallets on their profile page:

1DADerDP2D9bpDmaBoJzaniKTVCTRratft Wallet [df715f9a4a] here February 10, 2016, 06:56:15 PM (bal 0.0001)


1P85HZEuM5pv82ZYWvXZJKcfCkop7a7kA Wallet [05a08f68a7]  here (still in play) total balance 0.02783783


Next we look at BitcoinSupremo's threads they have started...

BitcoinSupremo has started 63 threads.

In this locked thread they use the wallet address 141zUmcpP5HEFBNaW28wTTwsBsWvzBwamj here Wallet [3ba084f486] - BitcoinSupremo implies that it is a directbet wallet address, but this is not the case.  The wallet was last used 26 months ago.


The very next post BitcoinSupremo quotes a now deleted post that contains a directbet wallet address - 1FgTowinQk1cefZeRL7RYJrcZTFRqJHA9f but Wallet [4581e73824] does not actually appear to be a directbet wallet address.  This wallet was last used the same day 26 months ago.


BitcoinSupremo's second thread to contain a wallet address of theirs contains a TX / transaction for wallet address 1FFyMhcFutrCbXtqkn3SeoNkV65CLngCfi part of Wallet YoBit.net (last input 2017-07-27 in this transaction where 0.04122148 BTC was shifted from Wallet Bittrex.com once the transaction begins moving again BitcoinSupremo writes: (Archive)

[quote author=BitcoinSupremo link=topic=1414837.msg14338649#msg14338649 date=1459144443]
Thanks for the help, but now after 12 hours it has already 61 confirmations and the money is on one of my many wallets.
[/quote]

BitcoinSupremo's third thread ( 27 June 2016, 02:34:12 ) with a wallet address ( Hashocean-More than 3mln USD made - Archive ) is interesting in that the seventh post is by smho_16 who after at first denying was an alt, BitcoinSupremo then went on to confirm four alts after suchmoon connected two wallet address used by those two. 08 September 2016, 05:43:15


predates


smho_16's very first thread that they started on the 15 January 2016, 13:06:02 (Archive)

[quote author=smho_16 link=topic=1328469.msg13555927#msg13555927 date=1452827162]
Hi there, I am going to share my tips here starting today, just for a record 

15/01/2016
NBA La Lakers @ Golden State La Lakers +17.5 pts @1.92 LOST Quoted in #9
NBL Melbourne vs Cairns Melbourne -7.5 pts @1.84 WON #6
A League Melbourne Victory V Brisbane Draw No Bet - Melbourne Victory @1.53 WON #8[/quote]

is uncanny as it is the same style of betting that BitcoinSupremo goes on to use in their posts starting 23 days later in their second thread: (this example shows smho_16 gambled first)

[quote author=BitcoinSupremo link=topic=1356178.msg13803817#msg13803817 date=1454849646]
 Hi guys

First of all I am a girl who like sports betting. I have been thinking a lot of how to implement the Martingale system in sports betting in real life.
I am going to show you my idea , which is quite simple, but is appealing only to very disciplined and experienced players.

Its easy, first you pick a team which has been always middle of table in standings or a bit lower, but not too much.
You start betting with 0.01 BTC and double this sum every time until you win. Odds of course must 2 or more to achieve this.
1 Bet-0.01
2 Bet-0.02
3 Bet-0.04
4 Bet-0.08
5 Bet-0.16
6 Bet-0.32
7 Bet-0.64
8-Bet-1.32

About 3 BTC needed for this if you play 8 matches, and 1.4 BTC if you try the seven match martingale system.
In 8 times playing at home ground the middle team should win at list 1 time to make sure you make profit. Profit varies at which number of bet the team wins.

I want to try this with Premier League, or lower English divisions as they have very good odds  8)

This is only a suggestion, I am not responsible if you lose a lot of money, not my fault in anyway, you decide what to do with your Bitcoins.
[/quote]

After a few false starts, this link is BitcoinSupremo's betting thread since the 9th of August 2016 and is still active today.

Although we can conclude smho_16 was under BitcoinSupremo's control as early as the 27 June 2016 it's more likely to my mind that BitcoinSupremo is actually an alt of smho_16 not the other way around given smho_16 starts a gambling thread first.

on: 14 July 2016, 23:18:07 BitcoinSupremo uses the above mentioned wallet address 1DADerDP2D9bpDmaBoJzaniKTVCTRratft in an OP of their thread for their BitcoinSupremo hassle free lending service! not one person comments, the thread is locked the "service" appears to fail.

Eight days earlier ( 6th July 2016) BitcoinSupremo is Looking for SPONSORSHIP!!! but after five "good luck" posts, all BitcoinSupremo can report is they are in negotiation with some very reputable gambling companies...

What concerns me is that not quite nine days after BitcoinSupremo starts this thread (the Reputation is damaged thread that we are reading this in) s/he then creates a new loan service and locks the thread on post four.  Crucially, BitcoinSupremo signs a message verified by brainwalletgtx:


There aren't any other wallet addresses in BitcoinSupremo OP of their threads and without the BCT account estimator website that chronicled all of a users mentions of wallet addresses, we would have to scour all of their individual posts... something for another day perhaps.

Turning our attention back to the long running tipping thread, in the OP there is this link https://satoshibox.com/bxe4msgyh4eaazkakpvo6soz which when we clock on buy yields us this dialogue box:

[img width=400]https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/17/blobcc4e82ecfe1b2df1.jpeg[/img]

which is a dead end as a new wallet address is generated with each new visitor:

[img width=400]https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/17/blob3a6dadec8fba71e4.jpeg[/img]

Staying with this tipping thread for just a bit longer, post number two is from that old chestnut zend7 on the August 09, 2016, 07:00:09 AM asking a question which BitcoinSupremo then answers.  That other old chestnut Wendigo turns up in post twelve.  Wendigo (another problem gambler with multiple alts) turns up fairly quickly in other threads started by BitcoinSupremo .  smho_16 turns up in post seventeen.  (ie two of the three self admitted alts boosting the thread on the 9th of August 2016).

Our two working theories at this point are

• BitcoinSupremo bought the three accounts
• Or, owned them out right from the start. smho_16 predates BitcoinSupremo and was gambling prior to BitcoinSupremo's UID creation.

---

Having exhausted our list of wallet addresses for BitcoinSupremo at over 100, we now turn our attention to smho_16.

On their profile page smho_16 has used wallet addresses 14RPbjjfJz36pEHapBjLd5FtuRYx6Y4P9Y since at least 17 Mar 2017 14:05:19 UTC when their profile page was first archived.  Given that it is unchanged to this day and BitcoinSupremo claims ownership, how is it possible that the wallet address was first used on 2016-04-26 17:17:27 UTC and still active on the 2017-05-11 15:27:45 and is still in use on smho_16 profile page in 2018?

To my mind this reinforces the assertion that BitcoinSupremo is an alt of smho_16 which has been used by the pair since at least the 26th of April 2016.

14RPbjjfJz36pEHapBjLd5FtuRYx6Y4P9Y is part of Wallet [05a08f68a7] which was last used on the 2018-04-30 18:38:49 UTC

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/05a08f68a7a83b39/addresses as you may recall contains the signed wallet address


In all fairness we need something that overlaps smho_16 to BitcoinSupremo Let's turn our attention to the time line around the following loan...

• In mid January 2016 (14th to 20th January 2016) smho_16 tries to get loans / tips (14/01) here here here here (20/01) here here (21/01) here (22/01) here here here (all links are the archive to save time and space) using the wallet address 16wTgwurnPeS1U1GKEhvPsFMe1qSWujCdv they have signed.
• 15 January 2016, 13:06:02 smho_16 first thread post with gambling in the style BitcoinSupremo would go on to use.
• 22 January 2016, 22:39:51 smho_16 asks for, and receives a loan: Need a quick micro loan (Archive) <--- This is where the loan is taken out.
  
  This is the TX https://blockchain.info/tx/1db93922fa0c6c0d85fa2944e23620b2304f0102560386e8093f725fafd6c55b
  
  16wTgwurnPeS1U1GKEhvPsFMe1qSWujCdv part of Wallet [0d81e46515] receives 0.002 BTC
• 03 February 2016, 23:32:23 Date Registered:    BitcoinSupremo
• 17 Mar 2017 First archived use of wallet address 14RPbjjfJz36pEHapBjLd5FtuRYx6Y4P9Y by smho_16
• 27 June 2016, 02:34:12 smho_16 posts in BitcoinSupremo thread as detailed above
• 29 August 2016, 22:06:1 smho_16 repays the loan using the wallet address     14RPbjjfJz36pEHapBjLd5FtuRYx6Y4P9Y which is part of Wallet [05a08f68a7] <--- This is where the loan is repaid.
  
  in repaying the loan smho_16 says:
  
  
  Quote
  You could have reminded me back in the days regarding this loan. I totally had forgot about it as from the period of January up to April I was not very much active in the forum because of personal reasons. Anyway I don't want to be owning money to anyone so here it is your repayment. I am sorry for bumping this topic but it was a request from the lender after such a long time for such irrevelant amount.
  
  https://blockchain.info/tx/237a643a57000755ffcdb74196ffcc72c9a4902ad0b0efa797b0376de4e94a06
  
  Topic locking.
• 07 September 2016, 20:34:38 I connect Cereberus u=536619 smho_16 u=544789 zend7 u=639442 BitcoinSupremo u=754727 to morocco.man u=525932 from10to1280 u=713392 starting here first Cereberus then BitcoinSupremo take turns denying the connection - as we know eventually BitcoinSupremo admits the connection of the four Cereberus u=536619 smho_16 u=544789 zend7 u=639442 BitcoinSupremo u=754727 claiming they were bought.

26th of April 2016 ?
27the June 2016 ?

After 29 August 2016, when smho_16 repaid the loan using the wallet address 14RPbjjfJz36pEHapBjLd5FtuRYx6Y4P9Y or before?

smho_16 takes a loan with a proven scammer wallet and repays it with the wallet that BitcoinSupremo signs a message with.  Eight days later BitcoinSupremo claims they were bought.  I doubt it.

Why repay a loan that the previous owner of the UID owed? Or at least state that it was a previous owner?  And why say it was your fault for being distracted?

---

BitcoinSupremo is the scammer morocco.man and all the other alts listed here:

[quote author=marlboroza link=topic=2799778.msg28690889#msg28690889 date=1516635899]
[quote author=BitcoinSupremo link=topic=2799778.msg28641379#msg28641379 date=1516571301]
I have nothing to hide too.
[/quote]
I don't think so.

---

[quote author=BitcoinSupremo link=topic=2799778.msg28641379#msg28641379 date=1516571301]
Been here for many years without scamming someone and minding my own business.
[/quote]

Account Cereberus was connected with account pbitcoin here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg16174365#msg16174365 but that is actually irrelevant.

Account smho_16 was connected with accounts horace0812, betohell here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg18221475#msg18221475

Account betohell was connected with accounts diodio5 , ajun96 , NinjaSkills , MTBTT , betohell , blackmachinegun , adjie14 , dwihananto , DeDordtenaar , uname , kostya.ash , Alvin Fahriza ,CryptoSkills , joinal here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg17027865#msg17027865

Account diodio5 was connected to well known scammer dio, hothtszho, Engg.Akrepi, hosumfu, louise123e,  yingbb0301, sun64986161, kenshi222, williamho, diodio1, retes1234, kovaa, summer11, bank2, banklunjo, retes4321, diodio5, godzerosonic, retes43210, retes12345, Engg.Chaks, y02723942001, sun64986, yinghacked, summer111,  summer116, Deacidifyingbbas, sorlunjo,  kenshi2121, kenshin77, kenshin_8513,  d161616, Engg.Chalks.Returns,  chakchaks here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1275297.msg17059136#msg17059136

This https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1925386.0 makes more sense now.

[quote author=The Pharmacist link=topic=2799778.msg28641239#msg28641239 date=1516571123]
~snip~
A cover for a larger dishonesty.  And in this case, I smell something fishy.
~snip~
[/quote]
Well, when you put all connections together...
[/quote]

---

I haven't even started looking at zend7 much less Cereberus to be confident BitcoinSupremo never bought them.

Robertt starts a thread on the 21 January 2016, 19:50:34 - the second and third posts are by lolnabtc and smho_16 respectively.

Robertt confirms their wallet addresses as 16wTgwurnPeS1U1GKEhvPsFMe1qSWujCdv for smho_16 and 1LRFm8Yxd6wosh5WTfVG6t47VBuP6uSY9W for lolnabtc which are both part of the same Wallet [0d81e46515] sending funds from wallet address 13DF7a3F1bHJDQHYobjFcVLmsba8RiS4ou

• In mid January 2016 (14th to 20th January 2016) smho_16 tries to get loans / tips (14/01) here here here here (20/01) here here (21/01) here (22/01) here here here (all links are the archive to save time and space) using the wallet address 16wTgwurnPeS1U1GKEhvPsFMe1qSWujCdv they have signed.
• Starting on the 12th of January 2016 (the day they were spawned) lolnabtc starts asking for loans / tips (12/01) here (13/01) here here (14/01) here (21/01) here (05/02) here here (11/02) here (12/02) here (14/02) here here (18/02) here here here (01/03) here here (02/03) here here
• 28th December 2015, three days after being created, Robertt uses the wallet address 13DF7a3F1bHJDQHYobjFcVLmsba8RiS4ou  here here (signed)  (11/01) here (signed) (12/01) here (signed)  here (signed) here (signed) (13/01) here (staked, but *not* signed) (Gildarts posts one post prior) (16/01) here (signed) (21/01) here (signed) (23/01) here (signed) Here (signed) (25/01) here (signed) (26/01) here here (signed)

This gets me to thinking.  Robertt, lolnabtc and smho_16 might well be alts.  Supposing, just supposing the alts don't just boost each-others posts, but are actually used to funnel funds from one UID to another?  lolnabtc and smho_16 boost Robertt's post and are gifted funds, but in doing so they appear to be legitimately receiving funds.  Robertt goes on to scam and they walk away with "clean" funds seemingly having gained them from Robertt before he went rogue.

Some UID's crop up boosting Robertt's threads:






In Magnificanto's case that UID was last active seven days before BitcoinSupremo's current tipping thread started.

RacingDouble (flagged for running a ponzi) is active in the two weeks the three UID's are seeking funds. (*edit* and while doing some proof for the post I have found a second UID called RacingDoubler that was created just three minutes earlier)

When lolnabtc falls silent, so do the loans and other begging.

Looking at possible connections to Robert, we see that:

• 6th July 2016) BitcoinSupremo is Looking for SPONSORSHIP!!! but after five "good luck" posts, all BitcoinSupremo can report is they are in negotiation with some very reputable gambling companies...
• Robertt is last actual active on: 10 July 2016, 02:11:24 and is last active 21 days later.
• on: 14 July 2016, 23:18:07 BitcoinSupremo uses the above mentioned wallet address 1DADerDP2D9bpDmaBoJzaniKTVCTRratft in an OP of their thread for their BitcoinSupremo hassle free lending service! not one person comments, the thread is locked the "service" appears to fail.

---

I should point out this is just a theory that Robertt is an alt of BitcoinSupremo via lolnabtc and smho_16 and that RacingDoubler/RacingDouble and Magnificanto could also be sock puppets as well.  The very narrow window of use of the three wallet addresses and the seeming urgency to get funds at that time makes me fairly certain Robertt at least is an alt.

---

zend7 uses the wallet addresses on their profile page:

16 May 2017 10:18:10 UTC 1C3sSw9hKW5JxgEsskwmwSZEiYqP33zybx Wallet [003bd1d96e]

[code]1MwQLj8Hbs59GXTNR9fHALuqyJb36DjUM8   0.            68   464972
1C3sSw9hKW5JxgEsskwmwSZEiYqP33zybx   0.            40   474375
12vyxh1MQ6HegaFjc1E1dJQWRXAc6YWWri   0.            8   453653
17aoUhUcPphyojUrAfYzB8QxA7ZPwE19hE   0.            4   464069
14KqixcBPEXLX1Ynjgph9CT2u61bmG8yo9   0.            3   434168
1B2utzBHTF663ppvnrAKJNYTQewUvDKTPp   0.            3   434168
17nVugAGzZPJi4N6YNJRGFBVyoJW9s3BEP   0.            2   464069
14ADgJF8664FnVU3YzJ6TY8MCcAaJkBnhE   0.            2   453653
1Dsx8hWZBkfK53ZvNcGRgxvoKkyZRPpZad   0.            2   451104
18snLq66BbpDjESCkhK3zeEjRuh8RJ72RQ   0.            2   438438
1FNGieiwoL7p1dBg4TquizpeGdNYmgLrYo   0.            2   434168
19xY5cVmLaS5WQXga7f3CbHnb8pbJwVqPR   0.            1   474375
1J3sfoaZgVhe5xe2cyktyZPgvUiPYC5QMB   0.            1   474375
1F2c3xo4MuvSRvggyAGaVErojNyWmNVsKM   0.            1   464529
12LwbeWxUhGuGRZGo88emeTgAF7AyuJPaK   0.            1   464069
1H8CsdBMSc2zeX61W3uTKNtKScQPhRhPFN   0.            1   463467
12H5c4zPtpz8ebLRtg1jLPSXakgBcnTARn   0.            1   461734
15HuQL8LhgrCAGUQV4zB1yYBr63U75pTGR   0.            1   461734
1GqrobK812YFStn57jEWcMRdWh2PnuAaft   0.            1   459662
1E4qxQbsb1gn8ZfeXxJ8aS8i7hbiybziRQ   0.            1   459661
1MYN4ju4hTDLM9A7t94H37fRMF1LN8h6V3   0.            1   459661
19DxTkwKafcJY2nGWtjLjEYWJ9WbRZFFv5   0.            1   457378
1NBBcTZY5AURUB2d1n7x3vFCHkyCJvmued   0.            1   455854
1zjAbqKGbcqLoDGGBMYUkYdj2qB1GgvAQ   0.            1   453948
15pHUDnLFug2drJdVrV6HMVd3kb3Zp7UPt   0.            1   453653
1F6CWv6z2TyDgv5csyEcN8Hii9PMFBXdvp   0.            1   453653
1MqAx7uKUQtE8mt1XRFv7JbcyuuA6Lixcr   0.            1   453653
133txUanG1hZUxjb6KB1EM6Dz7MFYkWi8H   0.            1   451104
1768kTpSCdBiR5Uq5SkHmdTDtnge77jWEn   0.            1   451104
18zLMYKg3PpohTcfJTMC2263N3XKLcSKy1   0.            1   451104
1B5TpPQ2XYBucJQP4SBCJ6wp8qZWXwTfFE   0.            1   451104
1E4qnj5RvmTrFFebUC9X3ffCjEvXf6yYcX   0.            1   451104
1P4gMGMggvzKjvvUAFA47Vc5vQgcEkXtDm   0.            1   451104
1PFBQYkUFpe5BqKEXp5hBMkEnMLFbo5ami   0.            1   451104
1NfgCjccxG9V2eKJYxxrgGjk9dosF8ZBte   0.            1   446285
18SvuFto4RxmtLTBfegeEuaBq1Y8iXXc7J   0.            1   444310
1yuwXk6go5DsKypxjWrAprv2Mzs43RS5J   0.            1   444310
12twpAXBK45CPYo1qYBf1fZ574zxZr3gqX   0.            1   442538
1Fr74VKLpCs6zAnbdnQwu1iFNeY8rndo1S   0.            1   442538
1GNX7E3W8DvJEYWq16H77akLQVNJHEtwdT   0.            1   44253

Check out the Recommended bitcointalk escrow services list that was created by hedgy73 - If you post your questions there someone will be able to guide you through the necessary processes involved.

250Million, we're about half way at the moment and the coin has halved a couple of times at set intervals.

10 Accounts Connected:

COINISM0001, nikjain422, preditor422, HartleyDrake, LamontFalkner, RonaldDuncan, MarlonDamon, QuinlanDeclan, KonradAvery, RodneyErskine,

[color=#0a80b1]Proof:[/color]

*Note* I have corrected the UID's in this quote - see below for details of correction...

[quote author=Glomerulus22 link=topic=2544574.msg35942017#msg35942017 date=1525082012]
Accounts Connected:

LamontFalkner, MarlonDamon

[color=#0a80b1]Proof:[/color]

Name:    LamontFalkner u=1835480 http://archive.is/BjMNO
Posts:    179
Activity:    84
Merit:    0
Position:    Jr. Member
Date Registered:    February 14, 2018, 01:24:38 PM
Last Active:    April 29, 2018, 08:08:14 PM

Name:    MarlonDamon u=1835488 http://archive.is/yVJH4
Posts:    181
Activity:    84
Merit:    0
Position:    Jr. Member
Date Registered:    February 14, 2018, 01:26:18 PM
Last Active:    April 29, 2018, 10:24:39 PM

This guy is trying to be smart - he does not post exactly same posts, but his double posts are different, but to similar or same topic, like here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2539541.msg35575910#msg35575910
[/quote]

You can add to that list


and


How I found them was I looked at LamontFalkner and MarlonDamon's trust walls and saw they both gave this person trust:


So we look at this last UID's trust wall and see:



All four of our valentine's day alts gave this last one trust (that wasn't reciprocated) it's a fair bet to say that COINISM0001 u=1231995 owns these alts.

---

previously RodneyErskine also gives trust to LamontFalkner and HartleyDrake on the same day:




Having been created a week after valentine's day and having no activity it's a fair bet to say that this is also an alt.

RodneyErskine u=1855453 gives trust to


HartleyDrake gives trust to both RodneyErskine and KonradAvery on the 30th of April.




KonradAvery like RodneyErskine was created on the 20th of April and has no activity. (Konrad, unlike all the others doesn't have any negative trust thus far)

Having exhausted all our trust links, our accounts connected looks like this:

Accounts Connected:

COINISM0001, HartleyDrake, LamontFalkner, RonaldDuncan, MarlonDamon, QuinlanDeclan, KonradAvery, RodneyErskine,

which Glomerulus22 would have found had /she delved a little further under the surface.

---

And what of our first two UID's found?

Their last active corresponds with all the others listed:



Glomerulus22 also incorrectly labels the two s/he found with incorrect UID numbers.

The 1277719 belongs to


which when you go back to the two last active dates above corresponds, so, was Glomerulus22 onto something? Let's look...

yahoo62278 identifies nikjain422 and preditor422 as being alts... both give each-other merits here and here


archive.is uses the GMT clock (I am GMT +10)

Name:    nikjain422
Last Active:    April 29, 2018, 06:28:59 AM

Name:    LamontFalkner
Last Active:    April 29, 2018, 08:08:14 PM

Name:    MarlonDamon
Last Active:    April 29, 2018, 10:24:39 PM

I'm prepared to say both nikjain422 and preditor422 are alts of the other seven connected by me.

Miscellaneous:

Not sure how Glomerulus22 came to use the UID 1277719 but in any event, it seems to connect with the other alts.

I also haven't delved into these UID's individual posts, I've already spent  over 90 minutes on this one post.

You should put a disclaimer on this post that six minutes prior you posted the *exact* same post on the Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List ^{Mk III} thread here. (Archived)

Nice to have you with us.

Archived for future reference: http://archive.is/0e8eH#selection-6693.0-6721.93

[quote author=digaran link=topic=2544574.msg36164949#msg36164949 date=1525314840]
[quote author=Timelord2067 link=topic=2544574.msg35917380#msg35917380 date=1525048771]Welcome rajurathod18[/quote]

Looks like people I have merited are turning to be helpful for the community. I don't even know, why did I resigned as a source? oh yes because I was offended for having 0 sMerits for days. now that I think about it, I always had 0 sMerits on the last days of every month. lol.

I can't believe these facking cheaters are earning $7000 just by posting garbage. Timelord2067 are you going to remove your red paint on me or should I paint your walls first? second lol.

You might be surprised after deleting your red tag on me, maybe you could be included on DT2 by you know who.
I'm going to tag these cheaters and ask for $50 for tag removal on the trust feedback. they should pay $50 in Bitcoin and to the forum.
Maybe it's time for me to be considered as an authority to the useless power abuse of some of the DT2 members to prevent tyranny. some DT2 members are tagging people and then would say that they are not going to remove the tags no matter what. they should use their power to benefit the forum and not their own egoes.

Maybe DT1 members should consider and compare my methods in dealing with these cases with the methods of some DT2 members.
Maybe I could be a good choice, because I don't need any power nor do I need any green trust.[/quote]

Hmm, let's look at your case file:





Ref: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1481383.msg15040552#msg15040552

Nope, can't see any reason to remove any Red Paint ^TM from your case file.


(you might want to check your Trust Wall, I've just pissed up against it again...)

[quote author=bumschaa link=topic=2544574.msg35814775#msg35814775 date=1524938109]
Accounts Connected:

They are in numerical order!

identifyuser -    https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=227450
alexberezov -   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1066970
chixka000 -      https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=821846
visionary -       https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=58779
NetFreak199 -  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=819793
Camus -          https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=319059

[/quote]

What a pity you've just lifted mdayonliner 's work from the 25th of March 2018 and passed it off as your own.



mdayonline's reference was KeithBeeCham work two days prior connecting

chixka000, identifyuser, NetFreak199 and alexberezov

(and all three of you haven't thought to check their trust walls for previous connections to yet more alts that have been made in the past.)

---

Welcome rajurathod18 - I look forward to you editing your post using the submission form at which time I'll add your finds to the Google Spread Sheet.

Glad to hear you are enjoying the faucet - perhaps if you were to spread the love by letting others know then the faucet will erupt more often?

Your post is borderline merit worthy.

Turns out you haven't tagged either UID.  

(and neither did TheUltraElite when they had an opportunity to) - always tag scammers and known alts when you uncover them!

Many thanks for fixing up your post, I appreciate it immensely.  I don't like having to step in too often, but something needed to be said.

Effective immediately, I will not add entries to the Google Spread Sheet if they are presented in the following fashion:


or


or
or


or


or


or


or


or


or


or


or


or

...and WTF is this shit?


and

---

As I've said previously:

---

So posts 401 through 566 won't be processed let alone added to the Google Spread Sheet nore the Level of awesomeness unless / until the reports are tidied up and presented as outlined in the Submission Form.

Feel free to lodge a BUTTHURT ^TM REPORT FORM - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583076.msg13896461#msg13896461 - You are welcome to tell me how much I suck!

You don't suppose s/he was also reagannn as well?

I didn't say he wasn't, I was trying to work out if I need to add them to the google spread sheet this week.  I'll wait for their reply.

Why exactly have you crossed these names out if they are who you are making reports of?

Well, when you write:


It sure does look to me like your wallet was hacked.


This is it, you've said your piece, now it's up to the person/persons who gave you negative trust to decide if they still don't trust you.

In the meantime, you might want to read up on how the Trust System is used here. (eg this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355125.0 )

Multi Sig wallets could be a way of hoDling the coins without the need to install new wallets.

Similarly a part public key generating a vanity wallet ie 1Loyceabc123etc... would be another way to go - even if the person generating the key is a participant, they can't benefit as only Loyce can install the generated key on his machine (for an alt coin under his control) - said key could be sent to a trusted escrow on the current Recommended bitcointalk escrow services list created by hedgy73 who only has to hold it for the 10/11/12/??? months and then forward it to Loyce on an agreed date 10/11/12/??? months hence.

Similarly, if one or more of the participants has one of the alt coins in the latest round they could provide a part public key, have a vanity wallet generated (which is held by the escrow) and at the end of the round the generated key is sent to them to send the alt coin to Loyce's exchange address (eg Cryptopia) for that alt coin who will then sell up and divvy out the funds.  The loss to the group if that person walks away with the altcoins is they have only received their own share back * - if Loyce doesn't receive their alt coins held then they don't get a cut of the rest of the group. QED.
Loyce would be buying the alt coins on an exchange, so he wouldn't be sending any alt coins to an address unless he was satisfied, the protections were in place ( part pub key and escrow holding part secret key etc)

For practicality sake, only one alt coin can be held by one participant per round.

---

Just suggestions, take them or leave them.