he lender left him a positive rating
I will be glad if the lender give 0.33
BTC loan to marco.
I would invite The Pharmacist to review his feedback and state that the repayment, while late was paid. Choosing Neutral or Red is of little importance.
Probably you have missed
this postWhy not be more specific and say it was a late repayment.
it could be a late repayment if the borrower (marco) could maintain contact but marco openly took the extension and that time passed but marco has not updated anything that was going on. And a few days later s/he paid and told he made a profit by that money.
Is there anyone right to make money by someone's money without permission?
Is the lender gave him/her extension?
If yes, then why the lender created the post?
Why the lender was so upset by saying "still not responded"?
I have no problem if every DT revises their feedback I have no problem. But I think DT has other business to do; not only to check a person. Who got negative trust a few days ago and DT revised their feedback to give another chance.
But what happened?
Same!!!