@tinyfox266:  Sure.  Send me your money.

@havelock:  Second thoughts? EDIT: Lol, gone

@horcoff:  A bit, but not as much as with Ed Trcie's Liquid Nitrogen Overclocking

@everyone else:  In keeping with the submersion cooling theme,


ty

Lolno, not wishful thinking.  You're still trying to unload another 20k "units."  That's wishful thinking  

yep.

Not sure I'm understanding you.  You seem to be saying that borrowing at such rates makes no sense, but are trying to borrow at 14% from forum members here:

Gentlemen!  Are you seeing what I'm seeing?

What can possibly go wrong?   We Proud Patriotic Americans are celebrating the Fourth of July.  Like our Father's Day festivities, this takes anywhere from several days to OKTHXBAI!  Just ask the CoinReturn investors!

Moar hard-boiled private dick lore from teh self-moderated thread:


ORLY?

^You're not paying attention:


Edit:  Brevity.

That's what makes it so entertaining.

Quoted for future entertainment.

While making accusations that my posts are financially motivated, it is important not to forget your own motivation--making money by selling shares in your scheme.
(= IMO this is spamming conning with commercial interest).

I called Active Mining (which never traded on Havelock, but nonetheless cost its investors and customers millions) a scam.  In apparent agreement, Missouri Securities Department V& and B& the illustrious Mr. Slaughter.

Some of the other "investment offerings" predicted to cause sobbing and snot:
NeoBee (which has traded on Havelock), MintSpare (ditto), HashFast (which has not) BitFunder (which also has not), UkyoLoan (ditto), CoinReturn (Crypto::Stocks), to name just a few.
So yeah, some may now be wishing that I "interfered" a bit harder.

Again,

@bitcoin.newsfeed:  Thanks, weren't you once accused of being crumbs?

*If you wish to learn more about Havelock "investment offerings," here's a handy TL;DR:  Havelock Securities At A Glance: The SRS BZNZ Edition

FTFY

What he is basically saying is Bitcoin mining is unprofitable for investors.  The "securities issuers" do just fine

Not sure if you have the full context.  OP has made a claim that DataTank prevented "creeping corrosion," a problem that hasn't been publicly reported by a single bitcoin miner to date.  I pointed out that while possibly solving this problem, the Novec cooling solution could be introducing a few of its own, which have yet to come to light.  Electrolytic capacitor impregnation (Novec fluids are commonly used as solvents) and potential difficulties in dealing with both capacitor degradation and catastrophic failure were cited as an example.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=655464.msg7637984#msg7637984

TL;DR:  There's plenty of high-tech VC money looking for ground, there is no need for legitimate corporation to peddle their gear to punters through unlicenced Panamanian exchanges.
Submersion cooling is as old as the hills.  Even the "DataTank" idea is unoriginal--Google "Green Revolution Container."

Is starting a poll about banning someone with multiple alts a smart thing to do?  The villain might rig the votes...

Did you fill those yet?  Some good prices here too, you know...  

The yearly yield is almost as good as PETA too.

As interesting as CoinReturn ...or not so much?

Jimmothy, when I see a child lurching after its ball as it bounces under the wheels of of a careening pickup, I scream "STOP!"  I reflexively do what's needed to prevent the tragedy that's sure to take place if not for my intervention.  Regardless of being asked.

The foolish tyke neither notices the truck, nor does it fully comprehend the consequences of being run over.  It's playing.  It wants its toy.
Why in the world would it ask for my help?

Why would you?

You guys are as predictable as labcoiners.  Any word from your master, good or bad--price spikes ...and deflates over the next day as reality seeps back in

I like that.  Newpio.  Someone should register an .io domain name!