need send natinal bank transfer UK to my partners. but need your photo with id and card and access online bank. i want proof that it your bank account

If you are paying for a new product several thousand percent above what it cost to make it, you get ripped off, no if's no buts.

Interesting observation. I think we should ask our fellow japanese and korean bitcoiners. Maybe bitcoin isn't trendy over there yet 

...The only downside is that the course is a bit too long for newbies trying to briefly understand bitcoin.

A private hospital in Warsaw, Poland, which is run by the Medicover Group, will soon let patients pay their bills in bitcoin. A bitcoin ATM planned to be launched at the facility in the near future should make that process even easier.

Basically in Bitcoin terms, they're about to create a centralised altcoin that they have 100% pre-mined and it has no difficulty, proof of work or proof of stake whatsoever.

Thank you all for engaging on this important topic. When it comes to XBT and where to set the decimal, I don't think there is a right or wrong answer --- it's a matter of perception and
managing trade-offs and people will sit at different places along that spectrum.

So, here are my detailed reasons for maintaining XBT as a one full bitcoin (1.00000000):

a) We get one shot at setting XBT and minor units within the ISO standards body, so we should not base a plan around what makes "visual" sense at the time (Zimbabwe did not keep going to the ISO for re-pegging as they massively added zeroes. If gold goes to $10,000 per ounce would you recommend adjusting base unit to grams?);

b) The white paper from Satoshi references 21 million as a finite limit for bitcoin issuance. Although he entertains adjusting commas and decimal displays in his post, the public perception and the 21 million limit has taken on a greater importance with the financial world than initially realized. Changing it now would undermine those perception gains. Moving the decimal point to bits would change the finite limit to 21 trillion "bits" or 2.1 quadrillion "satoshis" definitely not inspiring to the economic notion of scarcity (CNBC TV quacks will say the new limit for bitcoin is now 21 trillion!);

c) For better or worse, pricing in currency units implies relative scarcity of that unit. Italy was constantly ridiculed when it required 2,000,000 lira to purchase an everyday household item. They are not the only example. Sure, a newbie can acquire more bits, but it trivializes
the pricing mechanism;

d) XBT is already quoted as 1.00000000 on respected forex sites, such as XE.com, Bloomberg, Reuters Eikon, and CNN. Even Oanda.com quotes it this way although they still use BTC. Moving to a "bits" expression would start to make bitcoin (XBT) a joke currency like Dogecoin;

e) Some will say it's just as a display. But the ISO decimal setting will be more than a display --- it will be the default in the legacy financial world. Instead of changing that default in the reference implementation and instead of changing 1XBT = 1.00000000, I recommend
all other wallets/apps select their preferred display, of which there will be many.

So that Liberal Democratic Party is the government in Japan? Can they actually pass a law/regulation?

What Japan deems fit in Bitcoin’s case is to allow it to be regulated from within, without direct government influence or oversight. Japan seems to have recognized Bitcoin’s unlimited financial and technological potential, and has confidently asked Bitcoin community members to form a self-regulatory authority. It will be called the Japan Authority of Digital Assets (JADA). JADA is supported by Liberal Democratic Party of Japan (LDP)’s IT committee. There is no proposed Japanese government regulation of JADA. Membership includes the Kraken Exchange.

I want to be optimistic, but I don't believe that bitcoin will become more sucesfull from one day to anoter. The general population needs time to understand and accept bitcoin's advantages. Most people see digitalization of payments through credit cards as a positive thing. We don't, I'm pretty sure most people here strongly believe that bitcoin is by far a better alternative to credit cards for money tranfering transactions. But good luck educating others.

My comment is not directed at you, but other comments which seemed to think Denmark will not be using note and coins any longer.

READ THE ARTICLE!

The spokesperson said they will stop printing fiat themselves, but will outsource any printing of new notes. So, they are not completely relying on electronic money.

Of course not, that is just a transaction in Bitcoin.

PoW mining on the other hand, by nature will transfer value out of an eco-system. They use hash rate to process transactions, and obtain transaction fee (and possibly
new coins), then they sell these back to the eco-system. So basically, the eco-system is paying a fee for them to process transactions, and also possibly create new coins.
Then the miners use these fee to buy hardware, pay electricity bill, pay pool fee etc... These are money permanently transferred out of the eco-system.

No mining incentive; no miners; no network security; no bitcoin.

OP doesn't understand how this technology works.

PoW mining currently transfers $500 million USD worth of wealth out of the Bitcoin eco-system, into the pockets of pools/miners/asic hardware vendor/electricity company.