Having everything "set up and working fine" tells me nothing about improving MTBF, commercial viability (err... unless you consider selling unicorn dreams to ignorant bitcoiners "proof of viability"), or usefulness of this Goldbergian contraption (Rube Goldberg's machines did exactly what they were designed to do). That said, I'm guessing nothing (other than a few burnt "investors") would come of this. As far as me wanting to scope out DataTank's secret sauce? What DataTank is doing has been done multiple times before, there's nothing mysterious about the basic process. It hasn't been shelved because of insurmountable technical problems, but simply because cost/benefit makes no sense. As far as complexity? This is a functional phase-change cooling setup. Not rocket surgery. Shell out $350 for a gallon of unicorn tears, and have a blast!    https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg7644407#msg7644407(it is wikid fun) |
|
|
|
Lol, the lower the share price, the higher the "yearly yield." @Aireun: Not a single Havelock offering is trading above the issue price, not even when you add all the dividends paid to date  Choosing wisely=choosing not to invest. Prices updated to 6/30/2014. Chart in the first post left unedited for ref. In the span of five days, prices fell on all but 2 offerings. One delisting(KCIM). One failed IPO (PROV). Two (MS and SMG) remained ~unchanged. If you see any errors, please PM/post. Thanks. ~Happy investing
All the goodness of Why Do You Invest?, now in a convenient table format.
This bespoke quality table was laboriously handcrafted by earnest local artisans, using only the finest traditional forum markup to bring you authentic, naturally aged vintage data (circa 6/25/2014 6/30/2014).
If you spot any errors, please PM. Feel free to post HERE if you crave a intilectual discussing.
* Multiple numbers in this column correspond to multiple IPO trenches--first tranche, second tranche etc., etc.
** "Dividends paid" is the sum total of all dividends paid to date (6/25/2014 6/30/2014).
*** "Profit" is calculated using this formula: ((highest bid)+(Dividends paid)-(Issue price)) / (Issue price) * 100.
This number represents not calculated due to laziness and the inevitable bickering that's sure to ensue about the meaning of "profit."
Suffice it to say none of the securities listed could be called profitable with a straight face. One, thanks for the PM.
[1] In the case of ASICMINER, issue price represents the price at the time of initial listing on Havelock, not the IPO price.
[2] This [three-part offering] is not an investment but a ((zero sum)-fee) game. The issuer is open and honest about this.Edit: corrected ROCKMINER |
|
|
|
^So wait--he was kind enough to tell you *exactly* what was going to happen, you ignored him, it happened, and now, instead of apologizing and admitting to your mistake, you ...put him on ignore?
Are you sure you wish to continue losing money?
I follow this forum to know what is happening, not for someone to laugh at those who have invested in this project. I do not think I will lose money by ignoring his ROFL's. If you knew what is happening, you wouldn't be invested in this bag of dicks. You are, ergo you don't. Perhaps consider listening to those who do? Just a thought. |
|
|
|
|
^So wait--he was kind enough to tell you *exactly* what was going to happen, you ignored him, it happened, and now, instead of apologizing and admitting to your mistake, you ...put him on ignore?
Are you sure you wish to continue losing money?
|
|
|
|
Sorry.
Fuck you dude, you're not even sorry. You just come here to rub salt in the wound. No d00d,  The pain you feel now is good pain--it is the pain that tells you to stop sperging and pull your hand out of the fire. Listen to it. The salt I rub in your wound is the Narcan to the morphia of ignorance. It keeps the pain alive, reminding you to listen to your betters and stop the disgusting cycle of buttrape you call "investing." I don't even expect you to thank me  |
|
|
|
Glad people are still bumping this thread, but wish new members would read the first pages too--both for historical perspective and hearty, guileless luls. Everyone simply must be patient.
Ukyo had promised an announcement early this week, but was unable to get all i's dotted and t's crossed in time. So, Danny has provided the update that Neo will be part of the solution.
The full details will all be announced officially, and to shareholders first, when ready.
Please be careful speculating on any aspects that haven't been announced.
 |
|
|
|
... investment program...
 |
|
|
|
...I've posted my area of expertise already... What is it? I was referring to the very same US Army Research Laboratory study...
Is this a published study? Title? ISBN? Link? So let me get this straight: IPO Magic never posted anything about "mill engines" (= military engines),
Lol, Google "mill engine" to savor the full extent of your ignorance but NotLambchop did instead. I've checked every single post of IPO Magic in this thread to confirm. I've already thought about that possibility, but now we've got clear evidence: That means that the person behind IPO Magic and NotLambchop is one and the same and is deliberately using multiple handles to create the false illusion of multiple posters bringing up arguments against 2-phase cooling, one of which not denying to get paid for posting. That's just very low and unethical if one needs to resort to such tactics and can still not make any significant progress. At least to me, any kind of credibility of these two posters is pretty much confirmed to be down the drain with this (likely stating the obvious for other more credible posters who had the honor to be insulted by IPO Magic and NotLambchop).
Wait, you're saying NotLambchop is a sock? But if Lambchop is a sock, how could NotLambchop also be a... Ohhhh.... He probably thought he was so cunning with that "Not", but there's no fooling a clever feller like you! No sir!  *I've been accused of being Mircea Popescu (Romanian exchange owner), Eduardo de Castro (HashFast), crumbs (of Active Mining fame), MikeMikeMike and Puppet (PETA), and countless other bogeymen. If it helps you to think me any or all of the above, or that I'm being paid for my posts, I won't ruin it for you. Makes you that much more amusing to deal with. ty |
|
|
|
so enough is enough
+1 Please, you should stop to reply and quote his post, ignore him. I don't care what he think a and what he says, be cause I'm sure what he's doing is for personal interest, not for the community, top much effort for nothing. So that's how you people manage to stay so poor... Are you a prophet? Around here, being able to do a long division gives you all the mystical powers of a prophet. So yeah, to you, I am indeed a prophet. ... |
|
|
|
How's it goin'?  |
|
|
|
Sry bro, I thought you waz being assraped, but now I know I walked in on manly consensual buttsecs. Sry  |
|
|
|
...
@NotLambchop we know everything is scam, and we cannot trust anyone, but without trust, how can we do business? btc/altcoin business is risk itself. We cannot reverse the situation.
... If you know that everything is a scam, you have no business asking people for money to put into said scam. After taking one look at CoinReturn, it was blatantly obvious to me that it would end in many tears and much snot. But, obviously, not to you. Not even after I've taken the time to explain to you intrepid investors *EXACTLY* what will happen. What makes you think you are qualified to be a custodian of other's money? Give back whatever it is you still haven't "lost," before some other lucrative investment opportunity takes it away from you. Do understand that against my better judgement, I'm allowing that the coin was, indeed, taken from you, and not spent on a beat-to-shit eightball and a tuggy from the whore who sold it to you. Wise up. |
|
|
|
...
Your problem is that you still see Bitcoin as if it was a currency. It isn't... it is a commodity, which is easily bartered and can be used as payment for goods, but at its heart, it is a commodity.
...
Lol, OK, a commodity. You give this d00d 10 barrels of oil, and get back one. Profit! But it's becoming obvious that I'm intruding on some creepy SnM/humiliation/degradation fetish played out between consenting adults. Like a battered housewife, you'll defend your abuser with blood still dripping out of your broken nose. Different strokes, I guess I should learn to be more accepting. |
|
|
|
|
@Squeaker: Yes. Yes you have. You just don't quite get it yet.
|
|
|
|
...Profit is still profit... coin value itself could have easily gone down too... If Bitcoin value has gone down, you wouldn't get higher divs. And nothing, not even hoarding, hurts Bitcoin as much as supporting obvious scams. Thanks for making Bitcoiners look like clueless, bumbling rubes who don't even know when they're being duped. |
|
|
|
|
^Because he loses coins like a pro.
|
|
|
|
your creative accounting
You mean the same accounting that is used by every single financial regulatory agency in the world? ... Nah, I mean taking 10 coins from your suckers, returning one, and telling them they made profit |
|
|
|
|
Sure. LeanSixSigma is trying to sell the rubes of this forum shares of a pricey 40-footer full of unicorn tears.
He claims that it will solve the fundamental problem faced by Bitcoin miners: "creeping corrosion." You do not know about this creeping corrosion because the miners are too proud to talk about it, but LeanSixSigma knows it's there, and it's super srs.
|
|
|
|
No need to understand the transfer protocol. I give you 10 coins, I get one back. That's a loss--regardless of whether Bitcoin price has risen or fell. But hey, if your "fans" are happy with your creative accounting, gg. Thanks for the reminding to never underestimate the stupidity of others |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
