Oh hello, we already know that Gambling existed for a very long time. Just what if, it didn't exist? Do we really expect all of these companies to be working on trading platforms? Mining? Video Hosting? Etc... Do we really intend to be good citizens if this were the fact on our life? Don't get me wrong buddy, this is just another What If... We already know that Gambling already helped countless of people worldwide. And this might be impossible to be gone, so let's just start on this what if
(Continues Discussion...)
I'm gambling just to be entertained I am not really after profit, so maybe to be entertained I will be playing online games just like all the kids I'm seeing in an internet cafes or maybe I just spend my time watching movies but, the fun and excitement is not as good when you're playing games and betting, games are skilled base and predictable and movies have the same theme, not the kind that gambling can give you.
|
|
|
Of course, I play if I have the funds and I think it's my lucky day I'll definitely going to play it depends on the kind of gambler that you are, some can play in a noisy environment and some cannot, in my case I can play because I'm used to it, and there are no casinos that are not really crowded, all popular casinos are crowded and they have a VIP room for those who want a quiet surroundings.
|
|
|
Against a very good counter boxer like Crawford, he has no chance yes he has power but his defense is very doubtful and he is not fighting a classy fighter like what Crawford has fought, the experience will play a major factor here, and Crawford proves to be too much for Kavaliauskas I will not say that it will be a walk in a park, but Crawford will just add Kavaliauskas to his win resume or even knock out.
|
|
|
As far as what I know, there's no war at all, they're just warning everyone to be cautious since a lot of criminals and illegal activities were also engaged in crypto and using it for illegal transactions. Even if they don't like crypto and bitcoin at all, it will be hard for them to stop every citizen of US from using crypto. They already knew how popular bitcoin is... And I don't even see USA would do that.
I read that Bangladesh is to harsh on Bitcoin and so is India, so there is a war against Bitcoin, in some region, but we all know the government is subjective and the government is subject to change, the battle can be won when people pick the right people to govern them. At this point in time, any group, company or government will have a hard time restricting Bitcoin users at this point of time because Bitcoin now has the upper hand.
|
|
|
I don't care about this Brexit thing and I don't know what this has to do with Bitcoin fall, is the seat of Bitcoin power and popularity comes from the United Kingdom, this is one of the dumbest posts I have read so far in this forum, the only downfall of Bitcoin is when we found vulnerabilities in the blockchain, not an act of one nation that has nothing to do with Bitcoin adoption
|
|
|
I haven't been trading my bitcoins and cryptos since this year begins, but I have noticed that the hype train is slowing down since then, compared to last year. I want some honest opinion about the future outlook of BTC or crypto per se. Should investors invest in it ?
We don't need to do hype here only coins that need promotion because it's a new coin that needs hype. but in the case of Bitcoin, it doesn't need hype there are continuous news coming, new videos being uploaded on Youtube, and news articles being written, in fact, Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency still dominate the search engine, you just need to get updated to see the real situation.
|
|
|
We all know the US gov rules, dictate to rest of the world. So if they cornered the btc market, afterwards the btc price could only go up, factor with this a few btc friendly directives, and a massive coup would have been achieved. What is the downside?
That's possible, you can control what you already have, they have the capability to do this maybe they are already doing this and they are not yet exposed, but what if they are exposed, how will the international community react to this, supporting something that they are against with the scenario will be very bad if they are exposed, they rather make it hard for Cryptocurrency than being part or getting a hold of it, they can build a good reputation, because we all know Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency is till has conflict on the system of government
|
|
|
I don't think it has something to do with Libracoin, stable coin and Cryptocurrency is already here when planned on Libra coin hasn't been revealed, it's past circumstances coming from scam coins and the nature of stable coin and cryptocurrency that motivate this council to come out with that statement, it is good for the community that they come out such a strong statement, we are all committed to making the Cryptocurrency a safe environment for investors and users.
|
|
|
Bitcoin is never going to be extinct I believe its consensus will be higher and higher in the future.
We never know what's going to happen in the future because new technology is always been discovered and many coins are coming to that offer good technology we never know what coins that's already here or a new one that can really challenge Bitcoin. But one thing I know is nothing is forever and we are always looking for new technology to make our life easy. We cannot be 100% sure that nothing goes out when many things are coming in.
|
|
|
Life is rather uncertain nowadays as anything can happen at any time and we would be caught off guard. That’s also one way to describe the current economy at this stage. With the world’s economy expanding and expanding there have been more crashes as the years go by and they are becoming more frequent and some say at any moment one could happen.
So you are left with a situation in which the money you currently own, fiat money: the dollar bills & coins, will become worthless and you cannot even buy anything you need to survive on a day to day basis. In this situation, people will have to resort to a system of bartering like in the stone ages. I guess if you have a lot of stuff with value you can trade that would be great, but a majority of people don’t have such a stash. Things can get ugly real fast. Therefore, in such a doomsday situation you have to come up with a situation in which you can trade with people in order to survive. There are two solutions I can come up with, either using precious metals such as Gold & Silver or using Cryptocurrency. Considering that fiat currency is useless, Cryptocurrency might raise in value so that it can be useful as a means of trade as long as the Internet still exists which will most likely be the case.
One example is the Hongkong crisis but I'm glad that it was resolved if I am from Hongkong and I see crisis going from bad to worse I could convert my assets to Cryptocurrency and fly to other countries that are Crypto friendly, authorities will never know that I will be bringing out all my assets outside, because they have no way of knowing it, you can hold all your private key in a USB or in an encrypted email.
|
|
|
I am little bit confused about this topic, especially in gambling websites that accept Bitcoins or any cryptocurrencies.
So, we can see more activities on gambling that uses Bitcoin when we are in bull market (price increasing)? And decreases the activities or gambling volumes when also the price of Bitcoin keeps dumping (bear season) ?
I don't know if (we) some normal gamblers would have idea about this or maybe some gambling sites would exactly know this based on their website traffic/bet activities.
There's no correct data I suppose, each gambling sites has it's own time when gambler prefers to gamble, but I think gambler, prefer to gambling in the bear market because this is the time when trade their coin to other coins and other prefer to gamble, I'm saying this based on my experienced and all my friends, but still goes on funding and if the gambler wants to gamble.
|
|
|
This news is coming from Bangladesh so people who are into gambling in that region needs to deal with this one, here in our country it's not going to happen, we are liberal and a democratic country, there are many casinos in our country but part of the revenues goes to the health need of our people, $4.1 billion is hard to ignore, our casinos are being run by our government and this is one of the biggest revenue-generating government company.
|
|
|
Bitcoin has been overtaking system companies and projects for the past ten years, I'm not surprised if they beat Paypal as the most preferred payment processor because until now there are a lot of companies prefer Paypal than Bitcoin these companies have in their terms a chargeback option and Paypal so far is the one compatible for now, I used the word for now because change can and will happen.
|
|
|
^ Weird, I don't know why Ruiz will come in the fight much lighter though, did he wanted to show his speed here? I doubt that he can do that against Joshua in this second fight. I mean he was "perfect" in the first fight and I doubt that Joshua will change his strategy. Well, he can run in the first few rounds but I'm sure that Andy even at a heavier weight can catch up with him and will have success.
For me it will spell the difference here and if Ruiz losses this fight, it's probably because of trying to come up lighter against Joshua.
I'm also surprised seeing this picture, it's a big difference, we can easily tell that he will put emphasis on the speed because this is where he beat Joshua with his speed and accuracy, but hopefully, he can maintain the power on those speeds, he will not do something that will let Joshua retake the crown, if Joshua wins by a split decision a trilogy is forthcoming.
|
|
|
It's not really that late but the timing is just right and it's about time, this is the time when people are asking and will ask what and who is Satoshi and Oxford English Dictionary has to realize that, they should update their database, in the near future some of the common words in the community, will be included like HODL, there will be a lot of words coined in Cryptocurrency that will be included in Oxford English Dictionary.
|
|
|
I have seen a lot of documentaries and this one is going to be one of the best documentaries about Bitcoin and Blockchain, I hope it will be seen in the public preferably on Youtube, we need a documentary from time to time, as condition of adoption in Cryptocurrency is changing rapidly and every year there is a new milestone happening, if we have one each year we have a chronicle of what happened in a given year.
|
|
|
A lot of indications is happening right now, we even have a halving coming up it's going to happen next year, but all the indication and are not converting to what should happen right now, we should be enjoying right now because this should be the time that we are moving to another milestone, but unfortunately it's not happening, we will have to wait before the start of the year before all these materialize.
|
|
|
Recently, I was managing a signature campaign and there were few slots open just for the Member ranks, but many higher-level users like Full Member and Hero were requesting me to consider their applications and they would be satisfied with the lower pay according to the Member rank.
Is it acceptable to put higher-level users in competition with lower ones for a spot in the signature campaign? I declined to address such requests, but what if I don't get any applications from good quality posters for the member spot is it then right to choose from higher accounts?
Would really like to hear what you do with your campaigns in such a scenario.
I once applied for a much lower rank just last year but the manager prefers a lower than a hero rank I just realized that when it comes to hiring a participants bounty manager always pick, the one that can follow rules and who can grasp the topic and post wisely and within the topic I was a lousy poster then but that's a good motivation for me, managers will always go for good posters than rank because they want to protect the reputation of the campaign more than anything else.
|
|
|
Bounty hunters please start claiming your worth, do not go around promoting bounty projects that has too low allocation, i was surfing around on this forum today and i saw new bounty projects that have allocation worth of 1000dollars and they even have separate campaigns, why are people promoting such projects? you are the ones responsible for how developers are treating bounty hunters, there is nothing wrong if you decide not to work for penny... Even some airdrops on this forum has 8$ worth of allocation, just imagine that
If I'm going to promote a bounty campaign, I prefer looking on the potential in the market even if they allocate $1000 if it has a potential I will choose it than the other campaign that allocates millions and failed to get in the market or only worth less than a cent, it's good when bounty was at its heyday but not possible anymore you will be respecting yourself more if you stop believing that this coin is the next big thing online according to their developer.
|
|
|
In this kind of bad altcoin market i am still surprised that some new projects are giving out 50% price tag for their tokens, this is a project killer if you ask me, this move is only good if altcoin season is out and surging, 50percent is way too much in this kind of market we are in presently, tell me i'm wrong
All these coins, in reality, do not have value at all, until they get in the market and traders start trading them, it's the supply and demand in the market that sets the price, do not be deceived that if you are going to get 50% off you are going to make a profit right away, unless you see that it's the price that traders are putting on that coin, do not carry this kind of thinking when buying, check the platform whitepaper and full details. then you will have the idea.
|
|
|
|