For me, at least they meet the following criteria :

1. It is no problem for me to see 3-4 members as a team but their identities are clear enough with appropriate and capable educational background. It must be visible from their social media and recorded no cases of law.

2. They make future goals rationally and choose clear ways to achieve it according to the roadmap.

3. All the team members are responsive and friendly to the customers both investors or bounty hunters.

4. They make reports regularly to the public according to current progress.

I'm sure it didn't happen according to the facts. IEOs on top exchanges must attract more people than IEOs on shit exchanges. For example : IEOs on Binance and IEOs on Yobit, then surely you must find out the more enthusiastic on Binance than Yobit. Anyway, can you give me examples of IEOs that have flat public responses on top exchanges? I'm quite curious about that..

Of course, every developer has own strategy but I think it is not a good idea by listing their tokens/coins on shit exchanges. It must kill the trust of all investors and it tends to the severe decline constantly.


I agree one of the reason is about the high fees for listing on big exchanges. But I doubt if they want to see the market reaction by listing on small exchanges in the early step. I think it is better to put tokens/coins on medium-top exchanges to trigger more investors or holders.

Actually it is not a new condition when sometimes, people are afraid fo the new projects. There are some reasons such as scams, failed projects, or even not worthy projects for investment. People are here not only because of the technology but also to get the profits. Therefore, they may be afraid and prefer to be more and more careful in choosing the projects in order to avoid some scams, failed projects, or event dead coins.

Normal. It is a crypto world.

If you feel bored, just leave this, simple.

But as you know, crypto is something that we can rule it, it will flow as the condition and activities on the market. So, why are you being so sad and frustrated? personally, I lose much, but I believe that crypto world will find its bullrun again some few times later.

To list certain coin/token/exchange on the Coin market Cap must meet several criteria. It is not only seen from the trading volume.
You can check the completed criteria on this source: https://coinmarketcap.com/faq/ and https://coinmarketcap.com/methodology/#listings-criteria

They explain it clearly with the exact rule and regulation including the terms and conditions why a coin/token/exchange has its place to list on CMC or not.

The answer basically is yes. But, it depends on how we receive and do actions, including how our strategy and carefulness in selecting the project, whether it is legit, scam, or failed one. Waiting for the exact regulation may need more and more times, and we can't wait for longer time to protect ourselves.



What do you mean of the crypto monster? The scammers?
If related to the bounty itself, choosing the bounty with weekly payment, especially with a top coin or traded coin will be worthier to follow.


Well, probably doing research and analysis is classic, but it is really really important to be done.
The analysis is not only to know about what the project offers and how its roadmap, but also analyzing their team whether they are a real person or not, checking the wallet transaction of the project whether it is normal or natural or not. Being active on their telegram channel and other social media will also help up to know more about this project. And of course, it is better to put our participation in the project in which there are the team members that have previous good track records developing the successful projects.

Since Libra is a coin of a big company [Facebook] that has big power in the world, there must be many parties don't want it to support crypto space. I guess it is related to politics to keep Facebook out from participating in producing cryptocurrency. Every ban seems like a drama, why France calls other European countries to ban it? I think it is strange enough.  

Regarding the effect to crypto market, it probably triggers for a temporary decline but I am not really sure it will affect much.

In fact, when we are blaming the scammers, they are laughing at all, laughing that they can scam us and get the money freely from their victims. And they will not regret or think of our blame. This is so sad.

As we know and sure, scammers are very difficult to avoid or prevent. They are always growing and coming with their new ways. And mostly, they will always get the victims although it probably decreased because of the carefulness of the investors. So far, there are only some ways to minimize being scammed and we also thankful to the board on this forum offering scam accusation, so we can avoid joining in the project as soon as possible.

We need to be more careful when going to participate in new projects or offerings, deep and careful analysis is very important.

Almost all new wallets, in the beginning, will only have low users.
But over time, of course, this number will increase with several notes, terms, and condition. That is likely a high level of security, system, effectiveness, features, and also easy access.

However, as many members here have explained, that not all new wallets prepare good planning. So they only create a very standard wallet, not even more interesting and convincing compared to existing wallet types.

At this rate, it is natural that many people lack confidence in new wallets.

I agree that Dogecoin price increases because of following the rising trend on almost all altcoins today. We know that once Bitcoin seems quite stable, then altcoins may improve their prices since people probably prefer to trade altcoins than Bitcoin. Most people want to earn instant profits, so they follow the trends.

Of course, no one can guarantee what will happen in the future. We just predict the future of Bitcoin based on some considerations or main factors. As Bitcoin adoption still continues and there are more big companies join it, I am also confident about the future of Bitcoin. Moreover, Bitcoin has been used for years, I think many people have depended already on it.

You are unlucky, mate. Or you are not selective enough to choose good coins/tokens to buy.  
I advise you to buy new coins that are listed on top exchanges only. If the IEO is provided on small or unpopular exchanges, you must be careful because it is likely the same thing will repeat.

Anyway, can I know what token you mean above? Is it an ICO or IEO project?

Welcome to bounty world.  
Basically bounty is a way to promote a crypto project and you will get rewards by working on it.
In the past, many people who were successful to be bounty hunters. But now, it is not as easy as that time. Too many scammers and failed projects make bounty hunters got only a little income currently. You must know how to analyze potential projects, so I advise you to read some articles that discuss about it firstly [google search].

For me, there are some things that you must remember in the bounty.  
1. Be smart
2. Be selective
3. Be not greedy
4. Don't expect too much

Bukan orang yang tidak dikenal Om, tapi orang yang tidak jelas identitasnya. Orang-orang yang melakukan pembelian ICO berasal dari bermacam-macam negara, jadi ya pasti mereka orang-orang yang tidak kita kenali.

Anyway, makanya biasanya ada aturan investor kudu melakukan KYC. Nah salah satunya untuk menghindari hal semacam ini.


Itu modus lama Om. Saya juga pernah dikirim PM seperti yang jenengan ceritakan. Intinya kalo penawarannya tidak masuk akal, skip aja.
Dipikir aja, masa ada orang yang gak kenal kita tiba2 mintak kita WD saldonya. Apakah gak aneh??  


Gmn maksudnya ini Om Yos?
Apa maksudnya : "Berbagai macam cara bisa dilakukan Penipu. Medianya bisa jadi via Telegram, Twitter, Facebook, atau lainnya".

I am with you. I won't expect too much on Bakkt issue. Bakkt may bring something good but it should be temporary impacts.


In fact, it is not like all investors expect. There is always a delay after delays. And finally, they are bored with Bakkt. Then, the hype has already gone.

Your statement is interesting enough. It seems you have a deep understanding both from gambling and religion point of view.

Actually, it is still debatable about where the payments are taken for the rewards of advertises.
For new gambling sites, I am not sure they pay us from the gambling activities on those sites because they are still new and just launched.
Anyway, for me, we don't advertise gambling but just promote the platform.  

---

Note :
But if you are still not sure about promoting a gambling site, then you are better to leave it. Islam learns us to leave doubtful things.

Maybe it's in it because there are certain interests. The reason is not strong enough.
In this case, actually there are still many other countries that accept and support Facebook coin, Libra. I myself think if some countries want to block the coin, does that mean because Libra has a high potential for success?
If it's like this, we don't need to worry too much. As long as the coins are able to survive and are more valuable, they will also receive them later.

Damn right! What you stated above are the facts, it commonly happened in current new projects. That's why many investors are not really sure to invest in new projects anymore. Nothing can be expected from IEOs on shit exchanges since most of them are careless of the quality from the new projects.

Regarding developers, I agree that they are not stupid but smart enough. They must know that listing on shit exchanges won't bring good impacts to their projects. The big reason why they choose shit exchanges is to scam people with low capitals. 

No need to expect much to ERC20 tokens got from failed ICOs. I doubt if they can have values in the future. I think they are over since the projects failed already. I am sure no investors will take big risks by investing in bad/failed ICOs. So, just forget all the garbage ERC20 tokens.