There are a lot of borrowers who took a loan and take long extension as I told on my previous post so marco took an extension, it could be normal but it is not normal. Which you can see if you see his posts from the coming back on the forum. So, above all, I think he is untrustworthy. Marco is a person who is not aware of others time and money and s/he has a lot of scam attempts.

You are always welcome. Hopefully, think you will pay a partial amount each week (as you can able) and you will make full repayment on or before the deadline as last time. Thanks again.

Stake address and signature verified from this post. Loan request accepted. BTC sent.
Trx: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/f72e0604ef5d225f16d50a1901717424dcfdb3f05da0245436c2480104c9c9d5
Repayment address: bc1qe49zeuwmg8whqa26jgn5pzm6ul4fzpdccz9s4l

Is there any chance to repay per week (partial amount each week) if not is it possible to make partial repayment by 2 weeks?  Can you please post a fresh loan request without quoting previous posts?

You have replied too on my thread regarding marc's  3rd loan. Where you told there was a mistake you are not marco. But I can't understand base on these all situation how can you advocacy for marco.

Loan request accepted. BTC sent.
TRX: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/95d7d2c98ea2ac0bd3fc492e8d489652b9c5bb33a50bf10dd388899b431fdfc6
Repayment address: 3JaFkXxj5g3MJRTDRH48mMUaKymvvLyMsk

Checking, Have you been accepted on sportsbet.io signature campaign if yes, can you please send me the link and also can you please sign a bitcoin signature.

I have many more borrowers who makes late but usually, I do not disclose that. I have sent a loan and that is 2 months late. But I have not posted that also I have another loan 4 months passed from the repayment date but I have not posted that too. Do you know why?
It is because they are contacting me on time and try to send me partial repayment. But marco could not maintain contact, asked for extension openly on the reputation board but could not repay even could not update anything either s/he needs more time or not. S/he started promoting Ponzi and got negative tag latter by request all tag has been removed though it is not considered by other DT for other people even though that promotion was too old.  For example, see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1432468
There are many more examples for tagged of Ponzi promoter but marco got chance. His/her another scam attempt was s/he tried to take a big loan where s/he tried to take 0.33BTC loan. I believe if s/he could take the loan s/he never repaid. As I have disclosed that and disclosed ponzi promotion s/he might have been able to take the loan base on his feedback though there was no feedback for the transaction.

And for the current loan have you noticed when s/he has been repaid? At the time when Pamoldar told s/he could make the trust positive from neutral. I think that made marco optimistic and marco repaid loan for scamming larger amount.

---

Marco might be honest or not but base on his/her recent activity I can't believe him/his.

Repayment confirmed in full with extension fee without any warning. Thanks a lot for regular update and repayment as on our terms.

Visa (Us payment giant) is searching tech product manager of bockchain as well as crypto talent.

Sentscore and price calculation from August 2018 to March  2019. Below is the image.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bib5wHwuHk

You are absolutely right. But in virtual life, we should consider anyone's behavior. How s/he is acting? After a long time Marco came back and from the time of his coming back his/her activity is very much suspicious, all of his activity is matching with scammers especially loan defaulters.

You may give any type of feedback. But base on the current situation giving positive will help to scam nothing else. Where did you see his/her good reputation? See his/her feedback there is no positive feedback for the transaction. Those positive feedback for running a campaign and I think those feedback sent by the people when they weren't DT. See DT's current feedback they usually do not give positive feedback to the manager. Giving payment to the participant and make good transaction aren't the same. There is a lot of difference. See the trust rating of zapo and many more. Probably zapo got negative trust when s/he asked a loan. Before asking the loan s/he has not received any negative trust and that person was giving payment on time. So, by this example, I think it is clear to you that sending payment to the participants and making good transaction can't be the same.

---

Also, you are aware that marco tried to take another loan of 0.33BTC while there were two active non-collateral loans. Think of yourself what could happen if the loan could be filled.

You are always welcome. You may offer any other terms if you need in the near future, I will try if I can help you. Thanks once again.

how can anyone know either the borrower struggling to repay on time?

---

If you want to mention "marco" then check his last loan request if cant repays this small amount then how s/he could repay 0.33BTC. And on online if you can't repay on time why you will take from here? Why you are not taking from your known person? For a non-collateral loan, you should pay on time at least repay the interest and ask for an extension before getting a warning.

Base on your rank, reputationand, post quality as well as collateral Ic ant accept your loan request. Thanks for visiting my lending thread.

A scammer is always a scammer and a trustworthy man can stay trustworthy. A scammer can be proved by a single minute that s/he is a scammer and to proof, trustworthy may take a long time.
So, when there is a suspicious activity people should give neutral and if highly suspension or proved scammer then must tag negatively.

Last time you told I am responsible for negative trust or I only wanted to destroy your account. This time I have not posted before your being tagged.

You have already taken much time, several DT checked how you were delaying. One question: you are a legendary member and don't you know that creating multiple posts on the same row is policy violation?

You took too many times and latter no update on the forum so, all people can think you have defaulted the loan.

Okay, thanks. Please repay rest of the payment by 20th March.
Thanks for the confirmation and promising repay on or before the deadline.

By giving negative trust to the borrower, cant help anything to the lender and can't make any loss to the borrower. But it can help the future lender or future trader who could be a loser in the near future. So giving negative trust to loan defaulter is a must.