Tambahan dikit,,

Yang ini, syarat dan ketentuan berlaku.
Jangan sampai buat thread yang hanya dalam hitungan menit sudah dilock sama moderator.
At least, perhatikan beberapa hal berikut :
1. Gunakan fitur "search"
2. Topik punya tujuan yang jelas [No asal topik]
3. Pakai tanda baca yang benar dan gaya bahasa yang mudah dimengerti
4. No plagiarism


Betul, jangan pernah mencoba reply/quote pada sesuatu yang gak kita mengerti. Sebab ujung-ujungnya bisa jadi off topic atau gak nyambung dengan yang dibahas, atau bisa jadi komen mode shit-post [useless post] seperti contoh di atas.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tapi kalo kira-kira memang gak mampu reply di thread itu, cari thread yang lain.
Jangan memaksakan komen di thread yang gak dimengerti atau wawasan kita gak nyampe dengan topik yang di bahas di thread tersebut.
Carilah thread yang kita mampu pahami atau kita punya wawasan/ilmu/pengalaman terkait itu.


Asal jangan kelamaan istirahatnya. Tar malah kelupaan cara posting.  
Intinya kalo kira-kira post kita banyak dihapus gara-gara keseringan posting yang gak punya value [nilai], berusahalah belajar lebih banyak lagi. Baik tambah wawasan ilmu seputar crypto, seputar forum, maupun hal lain yang berkaitan dengan diskusi-diskusi yang ada.

Btctalk name : kawetsriyanto
Rank : Sr. Member
Current post count : 1445
Bustadice Name : kawetsriyanto
Wear appropriate signature : Will wear soon once accepted

Apply for 1 Full member spot.

What do you mean by "came at wrong time"? It is about the time or the marketing strategy or the quality of the project itself?
I think there is no wrong time if it is a good project made by quality team members. They must know what crypto market needs and how to make an ICO be interested. The marketing strategy should be the point, but don't forget finally the quality of the project will determine the success or failure in the end.

So far, it has been known that many ICOs are often failed, scams, or even be dead after the ICO is ended/ Only few ICO projects that are exactly a success, and only some that will survive in the market.

The presence of IEO may help to be one of the problem-solving. However, it is not easy. For many of them also only use the small exchange. Whereas an IEO must be also trusted, if the exchange is good enough or popular at least, it will be okay enough.

Both are the same, there is no guarantee to win or earn money. It should depend on how you do it, I mean about your strategy and experience.
If you are an experienced crypto investor, you must know how to gain profits from ICOs. And for now, I think experienced crypto investors will prefer to choose IEOs. Regarding online gambling, only experienced gamblers know well how to win. Don't think all people can win easily as you said.

Yes. Among hundreds of current projects, there should be always good projects to appear. But it's really rarely seen, I thought many developers are not confident with the current market condition. They may consider about there are too many projects died soon after launching because of the lack of supports from investors.  


It's true, investors may experience trauma after suffering many losses in 2018. So, they are not confident to put their money on new projects anymore or even some of them have come out already.

Actually, the most recommended bounties to join are the bounties paid in BTC or other top coins. You can take a look the bounties paid in BTC here : Services.
Or you can choose bounties that enable the bounty hunters to sell their rewards soon. The bounty like "GOLD Stablecoin" is the example, the coin is already tradable on market and we can trade it directly after getting the rewards as well.

Ini OP nya emang harus dibangunin kali, Om. Miris juga, masa cuman lempar pertanyaan, abis itu hanya mantau atau malah ditinggal pergi.
Saya setuju kalo topiknya asik dan sangat debatable, tapi kalo mau ngarepin kesimpulan ya kudu simpulin sendiri-sendiri ini Om. Harusnya itu OP nya yang menyimpulkan setelah banyak opini yang masuk [resume point2 yang dianggap terbaik dan realistis].


Yang namanya aset, pasti ada resikonya. Intinya pada nilai aset yang bergerak up-down. Terkait dengan Bitcoin, karena pada dasarnya memang sifatnya terdesentralisasi dan purely bergantung supply-demand di market, maka sebenarnya tingkat resiko dari investasi ini sangat tinggi. Tapi memang bisa diminimalisir dengan perhitungan tertentu dan pengalaman yang sudah pernah dialami.
PR? Kalo komunitas crypto sendiri saya kira gak bakal cukup mampu melakukan terobosan yang signifikan. Apalagi masing2 punya pandangan sendiri terkait "stabilitas". Ada yang bilang perlu, ada yang bilang gak perlu. Dari situ aja udh gak satu pemahaman.

Menurut saya, stabilitas hanya bisa dibuat kalo ada pihak ke 3 yang mampu menjaminnya. Tapi apakah ini bisa dilakukan atau tidak, saya kurang tau. 

Maybe some cryptocurrency does have a centralized system. However, not all of them use the same mechanism. In this case, it is back to one of the initial objectives, namely some crypto which was created for a decentralized system, anonymous, and also with its volatility. However, about the KYC process for some crypto projects or exchanges, they are true, but it doesn't mean to generalize that it will be centralized at all.
BUt of course, who knows the future?

As it is limited, it will have increasing value in the future. Many said that gold is the best investment as its value will not probably decrease because this is not volatile. Limitation of the gold doesn't mean that it will have less value, it is the opposite, they will have a higher value.


Well, I also believe that Bitcoin has great value and it will have increasing value in the future, BTC has many benefits and advantages. But, I still wonder in that case it will surpass the gold? I think that both BTC and gold are something very worthy to invest both.

In case, both gold and BTC have their own upsides. But, they also have their own value based on their own characteristics. For me personally, I love investing in both BTC and gold.

Yeah, if we consider the price, only a few people can own this phone. To support massive adoption, I think it is surely not enough.


It should be helpful even it has not very significant impacts. At least, people know that Samsung company supports crypto business and they begin to provide a feature making crypto users easier to work. But as I have stated above, maybe just a few people can own it. However, we don't underestimate it, it is still a beginning for the more supports planned by Samsung to crypto users.

This commonly happened in the crypto world.
So far, we may see the product of a project offers its real use case. However, in fact, they cannot work well. Delivering a product to be accepted in the market will also depend on some factors to be successful. They are likely the concept of the product, the target of buyers or users, the utility and easiness, and also whether the product can be used around the world. Actually, it also caused by how the community team can spread the benefits and works of the products so that many more people know about it and how to utilize and maximize it.

Kudunya dilock aja threadnya kalo pembahasannya udah mentok dan terkesan cuman mutar2 tentang itu-itu doang.
Monggo Om Indrawan77 atau moderator untuk mempertimbangkan "lock" threadnya.

When the coins come from good projects with potential MVP, we shouldn't worry if the prices go down sometimes. Even if the bounty hunters dump the prices, it mustn't last forever and will have a chance to increase.


Of course, they must be attracted to the lower prices. Many people just wait for dumps to buy IEO or ICO coins nowadays. So, they put aside money for that moment, not buy in IEO or ICO phase.

Menurut saya pribadi :

1. Ngambil dari luar Oke aja asal cantumkan sumbernya.

2. Copas terlalu beresiko untuk kelangsungan website agan, sebaiknya tetap diubah ke gaya bahasa agan sendiri walaupun intinya sama. Ada kemungkinan website lain juga copas model translate kayak agan, Pure hanya pakai google translate untuk jadi konten artikel mereka.

3. Pake tools minimal yang murah meriah kayak smallseotools agar gak kena plagiarism.

4. Mending isi website agan sedikit asal unique dan original daripada ngebut isi banyak2 hanya pakai google translate.


Gak masalah gan, bertahap aja. Yang penting fokus kualitas dulu baru kuantitas. Malah klo digarap sendiri kadang bisa lebih maksimal kualitasnya.


Saya suka respon agan yang ini. Semoga istikomah buat sendiri dengan mempertimbangkan sisi originalitas dan kualitas.
Klo website agan cuman 1 ini, rasanya belum perlu hire orang. Bisa banget dikerjakan sendiri. Kecuali rencananya mau bikin banyak website.

--------------------------------------------

Tambahan dikit, kalo mau dimaksimalkan lagi, itu airdropnya sekalian ditambah juga bounty. Jadi tar : Airdrop & Bounty.

--------------------------------------------

Hanya sekedar saran, monggo kalo ada yang kira-kira bisa menjadi bahan pertimbangan.

Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2003707
Current amount of posts (including this one): 1436
Amount of merit EARNED in the last 120 days: 45 [all earned 306]
Bspin.io username for payouts: kawetsriyanto

Will change the signature soon if I am accepted.  

Strongly agree with this statement, because this is what I use to manage my coins and tokens. So far, having lots of new coins from ICO is indeed reasonable, especially coins which are certainly good potential for long-term investment (although not all of them guarantee). But, if the coin is a real use case, then the belief that the price of the coin will increase over time does indeed exist. And this is what I believe and use so far.

And some coins that have a large number of trading volumes are an option for daily trading, some of them are already in the top 100 Coin Market Cap. Therefore, in this case, dividing coins into daily trading and long-term holding become one of the strategies undertaken to deal with this crypto world.

In this case, ETH and KCS are not stable coins. They still have fluctuations and volatility that depend on the market. The stable coin itself is like USDT and USDC as what the other members said above.

KCS (KuCoin Shares), a coin that is ranked 42 in CMC. I think this coin is included in a coin that promises to be a long-term investment. At present, the price has increased by more than 4%, which is in the figure of $ 1.57 USD.

If we observe, KCS itself already has a quite good trading volume which is around $ 18,378,026 USD with a circulation supply of 88,086,720 KCS. I believe that it has the potential to have increasing price again for a long-term hold.

But if you want to convert KCS to Dash this is also a good choice. Try to see how you progress in the future the price and development of the coin.

It means you have learned it and known it quite well. So, what is your point for asking other people? If you know something interesting on the project, just make a review and tell us in detail.

Update untuk proyek yang terindikasi scam bisa dicek juga di sini : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5180467.0.
Mungkin ada beberapa proyek anyar yang mungkin belum ada di list Om Roy.
Monggo cek di link tersebut untuk info detailnya.