Bitcoin Forum
June 25, 2024, 09:09:55 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 [318] 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 ... 590 »
6341  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcointalk Total Member/Account? on: June 15, 2016, 01:46:37 AM
You probably want the ad stats: https://bitcointalk.org/adrotate.php?adstats which are more helpful than the number of registered accounts.
6342  Other / Off-topic / Re: Need help recovering a .file on: June 14, 2016, 10:56:02 PM
There should be a lot of software to recover deleted files. Just Google around for them.
6343  Economy / Services / Re: IDEA -- Automated sig camp join tool - account renting, no need to lookup sigs on: June 14, 2016, 10:52:04 PM
[Update]

A preview has been released.


To support everyone, and to make it as simple as possible, we decided to use browser extensions instead of Desktop apps.
How exactly does a browser extension with with this? I thought it was supposed to just be a website.

Noooooooo Wink We're not providing junk! This is real. This is powerful.


How it works, is that it keeps you logged-in and updated (on our server) as long as you're logged-in on bitcointalk.

From there, your sigs will be updated automatically, and payments will bitcoin_address on the bitcoin address on your profile (weekly).
On the server side, it checks every hour that each account (member in a sig) is following the rules or else, they will be banned for 24hrs ...
Oh I see. This way it pretty much never risks users accounts even if you are hacked. It would require a malicious browser extension.
6344  Economy / Services / Re: IDEA -- Automated sig camp join tool - account renting, no need to lookup sigs on: June 14, 2016, 10:40:55 PM
[Update]

A preview has been released.


To support everyone, and to make it as simple as possible, we decided to use browser extensions instead of Desktop apps.
How exactly does a browser extension with with this? I thought it was supposed to just be a website.
6345  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Missing blocks when parsing the blockchain on: June 14, 2016, 10:37:24 PM
Bitcoin core doesn't necessarily receive blocks in order and it writes them to the disk in the order it receives them. This is probably the problem you are having.
6346  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Will Bitcoin Core v0.12.1 ever support Ubuntu 15.10 Wily? on: June 14, 2016, 10:07:25 PM
What version are you running? The latest for Wily appears to be 0.12.0 in the PPA.
Oh, I'm running my own compiled version of the master branch. 0.12.1 also works on it.

I don't know why the ppa doesn't have it though.
6347  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Will Bitcoin Core v0.12.1 ever support Ubuntu 15.10 Wily? on: June 14, 2016, 08:54:23 PM
What do you mean it isn't supported? I have bitcoin core working perfectly fine on Ubuntu 15.10.
6348  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Accessing coins in old wallet (0.3.19) on: June 14, 2016, 03:00:32 PM

Bitcoin Core *may* be able to read the wallet file (I think it should since not too much has changed in the wallet file). You probably have to run Bitcoin Core with the -upgradewallet option.

I heard that I cannot just copy my wallet.dat and that I have to specifically make a backup somehow, do you have any idea of the validity of that claim?

Let's say I just take my old wallet.dat without specifically making a backup (whatever that means) and throw it in Bitcoin core 0.12.19 and use the upgrade wallet option, will that risk my coins if the wallet cannot be read?
Possibly. You should make a backup anyways. To backup, just make a copy of the wallet file and put it in a safe location.
6349  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Is it possible for a trezor to be a virus carrier on: June 14, 2016, 02:41:29 PM
Theoretically, yes, however it would require many things to go wrong. First, you would have to allow the infected firmware to be installed. Secondly, you would have to disable the check for a properly signed firmware or the developers of trezor would have to be hacked. Only then could it work.
6350  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: [ANN] Bitcoin Transaction Fee Booster on: June 14, 2016, 01:47:01 PM
Let me see if I got this right, this program is for those who sent a bitcoin but then the fee was too low, so it's not getting added to a block in a reasonable amount of time?

Jane sends 0.01 to Bob but only had a 0.0000001 transaction fee.
Jane uses your program to boost the fee to 0.0002 to get it added to a block faster

Right or do I have it wrong?

Yep. That's exactly what it is for.
6351  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Accessing coins in old wallet (0.3.19) on: June 14, 2016, 01:17:40 AM
Holy crap that is super old and outdated software. It is expected that it shouldn't be able to connect because Bitcoin's method of discovering peers has changed since 0.3.19.

Download and install Bitcoin Core 0.12.1 from https://bitcoin.org/en/download. Bitcoin Core *may* be able to read the wallet file (I think it should since not too much has changed in the wallet file). You probably have to run Bitcoin Core with the -upgradewallet option.
6352  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: How do I fix this? The Maximum number of inputs in a single transaction is 250 on: June 14, 2016, 01:11:17 AM
Bitcoin transactions are made of inputs and outputs. The inputs spend previous outputs. Your transaction spends from a large number of outputs, thus it has a large number of inputs. Validating a transaction with many inputs can be resource expensive.

Blockchain.info's node has a policy of rejecting any transaction with over 250 inputs probably to reduce resource use on their node. However, if a block includes such a transaction, then they will accept the transaction. This is what happened with your transaction because it had too many inputs.
6353  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Full Node - Too few connections on: June 13, 2016, 09:12:28 PM
Problem is my connection count is always low (10-16).

What could be the reason for this ? Do i forgot to configure something?
10-16 connections is not low. There is nothing wrong with your node. You can only have a maximum of 8 outgoing connections, the rest of the connections can only happen if people want to connect to you, and clearly they are.

Your connection count will increase as your node stays online longer. If you take it on and off every day, then your connection count is going to be lower than if you leave it on.
6354  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Are secp256k1 library questions appropriate here, or doomed to be buried in alts on: June 13, 2016, 08:01:10 PM
It should be fine to ask them here, but given the lack of Bitcoin developers on this forum, you probably won't get any decent answers. Try asking on the bitcoin-dev mailing list or on the #bitcoin-dev irc channel.

no bitcoin devs here?
Not that many, and certainly very few that understand this sort of crypto. Of the Core Devs who are here, we only have gmaxwell occasionally and maybe luke-jr. Since you are asking about the schnorr signatures, I think it would be best to ask on the #bitcoin-dev irc channel where there actually is discussion, or at the very least, paid attention to by developers, unlike this forum.

Edit: for stuff on schnorr sigs, I don't think anything "official" has been done yet, it's all experimental. You may want to take a look through the changes here: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/212 which introduced schnorr sigs to libsecp256k1.
6355  Other / MultiBit / Re: Problem with MultiBit HD on: June 13, 2016, 07:52:27 PM
MultiBit HD is not compatible with Multibit classic. It also can't import keys. Rather, your friend should download MultiBit classic from https://multibit.org/releases.html. Then he should load his wallets and send all of his Bitcoin to addresses in his new MultiBit HD wallet.
6356  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Are secp256k1 library questions appropriate here, or doomed to be buried in alts on: June 13, 2016, 07:27:30 PM
It should be fine to ask them here, but given the lack of Bitcoin developers on this forum, you probably won't get any decent answers. Try asking on the bitcoin-dev mailing list or on the #bitcoin-dev irc channel.
6357  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Passphrase on: June 13, 2016, 06:19:18 PM
I already tried .. its more that i know sort of what i used as password.

but what is the extension name of a paper backup ? is that a .dat ?
Armory wallet files are .wallet

A paper backup is supposed to be printed, not saved somewhere on the computer. The file extension is then whatever you saved that backup as. Also, paper backups aren't encrypted.
6358  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Passphrase on: June 13, 2016, 06:14:04 PM
I think i know what i used for the password tho. how am i able to brute force it?
Then try the password and see if it works.

If you want to brute force it, check out this software: https://github.com/gurnec/btcrecover
6359  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Passphrase on: June 13, 2016, 06:05:26 PM
Hi everyone,

So i have my bitcoins a while now (2013) in combination with armory.
i made a paper back up and putted it on my NAS in a encrypted folder but for some reason i lost this folder on my NAS.
Now i have an encrypted wallet and i can't remember my passphrase.

Is there any way to brute force it ? it says it should take 0.223 secs unlock time
You can brute force it but it is going to take you a very long time. Without any idea of what your password is, you pretty much have no chance of guessing the password. Even though 0.223 seconds seems like its really fast, in computer terms, that is a ridiculously huge amount of time, especially when you want to brute force something in as little time as possible.
6360  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: I have some questions on: June 13, 2016, 06:01:12 PM
When the halving will happen, the miners will earn less for each block (12.5BTC = half of 25BTC). This should (but not 100% it will) make the BTC rise. And the current rise of the price may be related to the halving, which is about to come in some ~4 weeks or so.

Alright.. So in other words, it would be wise to sell after the halving? (Initially I don't plan to sell, since I believe bitcoin will keep growing and growing.. here in Brazil more and more people are interested and planning to buy BTC)
Not necessarily. No one knows what the price will be after the halving. Anyone saying that the price will be something is just speculating. It is impossible to know the future and Bitcoin's price is not guaranteed to go up nor go down after the halving. You can buy and sell whenever you feel comfortable doing so.
Pages: « 1 ... 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 [318] 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 ... 590 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!