Don't mind him. I've had him on ignore for quite a while. The last time he was right was in 2012.


Thanks. I was way off in my original guess, by about 1,000 miles, so I erased it.

You were specifically talking about BitMEX API keys, which do not act as bitcoin private keys no matter how far you want to stretch the definition. You are now changing the context of what you were previously talking about in order to avoid having to admit you were wrong.

You can build a platform to use bitcoin private keys in any manner you'd like but its not the same thing as BitMEX API keys.

Damn, this is a good one. I spent about an hour looking at different Mediterranean lighthouses.

It's all about wherever this lighthouse is:



My guess its on an island somewhere between Sardinia and Cyprus. Don't know for sure.

Wow, you win, good job! Going back to delete my incorrect answer now.

https://www.roadsideamerica.com/tip/3120

In no way should anybody be lending you money for this:



How is a lender going to scam you by taking back what is already theirs? You could also withdraw the BTC at any point and leave them hanging with no recourse. This is where the scam element lies.


It can't. You have a misunderstanding of what a private key actually is and you keep failing to acknowledge this.


That's common knowledge and not relevant here.


This forum has its share of people just like you. I suggest you do what they do: customize your trust list so you don't have to see the negative feedback left by others added to your trust score, and get on with your day.


It sure does.

I edited it to reflect that while you may not necessarily be running a Ponzi per se, you should in no way be trusted with other peoples' funds in the manner which you are asking (as it pertains to the link I referenced in your feedback).

I'm glad you crossed out the "Lender as service provider" option in your Lending section post. That is a good step forward. Your foul attitude however brings you two steps back.

That's now how theses work.
That's not how science works.
That's not how logic works.
That's not how anything works.

I agree this is an incorrect use of the flag system. I never supported this flag as Lauda never demonstrated how they were personally harmed. I have removed my negative trust for Memory Dealers as apparently my feedback contained a factual inaccuracy anyway.

At the end of the day, nothing that happens on this forum is going to stop Roger from continuing to damage the credibility of bitcoin for his own financial gain, so why bother trying.

I said you're not just a racist cunt. You're that and so much more.

They have that guy already, his name is Joe Biden. I think Trump is going to mop the floor with him in the debates. If not, at best it will produce another situation similar to the last time around where Trump loses the popular vote but wins the electoral college. Biden is completely uninspiring, but on the other hand, at least he's not Hillary. What he loses due to the debates he will regain by not being Hillary. I dunno. We still have a long way to go.

Heyyyy-O! 

If you need the wordplay of the joke explained so V8s doesn't just seem like a racist cunt, PM me.

Threatening to sue your customers after you've scammed them, for attempting to warn others that you are a scammer. That's a great way to drum up business. Genius, even

What it comes down to is this:

Bitcoin is still a nascent technology and much of the world has little to no understanding of it. They find the idea of cryptocurrency to be confusing, and introducing multiple "Bitcoins" into the marketplace only makes it more so.

Continuing to insist that Bitcoin (BTC) is not Bitcoin and some other coin is is a tactic used by scammers to sell their own coin. Its deception. It does not matter what one's philosophical motivation behind doing so is, the end result is the same: people get duped into buying something other than what they intended to buy, and the "duper" benefits.

Whatever singular metric Roger wants to point to in order to make the case that BCH is more popular than BTC is overshadowed by BTC's staggering advantage in market cap, hash rate and transactions per day. It absolutely dwarfs BCH in terms of real world, every day usage, and all other altcoins along with it.

There is no competition between the two. There is Bitcoin, and then there are a few altcoins piggybacking on its good name.

Of course there might be room for BCH to carve out a niche for itself in the future. It would probably go a lot further in this regard if Roger didn't keep insisting it was the Bitcoin.

Let me know when BCH processes half the average number of transactions that Bitcoin does, and then we'll talk. Right now this number is 15%. Let's talk again when its 50%.

This project is still paying you to do this?

Hey project manager: take a look at where your thread is -- the forum mechanics changed and its not being bumped to the top anymore. You're wasting your money on these professional spammers. You should ask for a refund ASAP and fire them.

Actually there are some notoriously ineffective and overzealous scambusters here as well and they are not on DT1 for what is likely to be that reason. I find people who go around accusing everybody of everything to be tiresome and confusing, as do others.

In addition to Vod's list, which is quite apt, you can also build a positive reputation by helping other members and being a generally positive resource for the forum.

5 unanimous votes for the Rams this week, that's the most agreement we've had on a poll thus far.


Yes, they have been among the worst in recent years past, but I would also nominate Cleveland, Tampa Bay and Buffalo for those positions as well. Even though Buffalo did clinch a division title a few years back.


Me too. I have Robert Woods and I'm leaving him on the bench this week.

Thanks! 

In 2014-2015 I tried fiddling around with setting up a .bit domain using NMC, however the Mozilla browser plugin/extension was just too finnicky and I could never get it to work right. It was a great idea for a coin but at the end of the day it is still subject to a central point of failure, which is the fact that the .bit extension isn't being updated as fast as the web browsers are.

No, he can't. He's pointing out that your "company," Vitor Services, bought hacked accounts in order to engage in mass thread spamming. The worst part is the people who hired you don't even realize the forum mechanics have changed and you're no longer bumping this thread to the top of the section each time you post in it.

I hope they and the rest of your clients are smart enough to fire you immediately, but I doubt that they are.