<...>
You can also monitor your logged IPs on the forum over the last 30 days, to make see how well you are managing to hide your real IP or the geolocation of your whereabouts. The registered information will depend on how you connect (plain, vpn, tor), so what you see there should be consistent with this. This is where you can take a look at the logged information: https://bitcointalk.org/myips.phpBear in mind the overall retention periods and scopes, depicted in the link provided by @o_e_l_e_o. |
|
|
|
Por si alguien no lo ha visto, hay algunas vacantes abiertas en la campaña de CM (ver https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1935179.msg56969135#msg56969135), sin que se especifique el número concreto de vacantes. Ya hay más de 40 personas apuntadas a postularse, pero la cifra llegará fácilmente al centenar. Lo bueno de esta campaña es que no tiene un número de posts mínimos por semana, lo cual da mucha flexibilidad, y ayuda a adecuarse mejor a la disponibilidad de cada cual. |
|
|
|
Just for the sake of discussion, and going for the interpretation that many have made on this thread (1M$ in BTC, not 1M BTC), according to the article referenced down below, there are around 100K BTC addresses with a BTC equivalent greater or equal to 1M$. Of course this is all an n:m:[p] game (n addresses belong to m people - and are grouped behind p wallets), so there’s no way of telling how many people really have an equivalent of 1M$ in BTC, but it gives us a playing field play with. See: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/bitcoin-wallets-with-more-than-1-millionThe article references the source of the image, which leads to a site where, at first sight, I can’t seem to find it. I’ve seen the same site referenced on another article with similar information, but still pointing to a chart which differs from that of the image. |
|
|
|
If anyone wants to take a look at their (or others) average sMerit sending habits, they can get a glimpse here: Overall: https://public.tableau.com/profile/ddmrddmr#!/vizhome/BitcointalkMeritDashboard/PotentialMeritSources Restricted to 2021: https://public.tableau.com/shared/848DMMFCG?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_linkSpecifically, the column “Avg. Merit TX” is the interesting one, although the complementary stdDevSentTx may be interesting to take a look at too (the higher this value is, the more variable the amount send in relation to the average). The list is not delimited to Merit Sources, but the top members on the list are bound to be. There are a bunch of people with an average in the 1s range, going all the way up to 5s (and beyond). For example, my average for the running 2021 is of 1,04, with a standard deviation of 0,2. So basically, I’m a regular (mean) 1 sMerit per Tx type of person. Additionally, the Sent TX summary (top right of the following screen) shows that I (Username is changeable) award 1 sMerit 89,92% of my sMerit TXs, 2sMerits 9,3%, and my max is that of 10 sMerits (0,04%): https://public.tableau.com/shared/QTY32FDHP?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link |
|
|
|
<...> No puedo recomendar ninguna personalmente, y hay que estudiar muy bien las apps o widgets que uno instala en su teléfono (y más aún en Android). La necesidad de tener muchas precauciones se agudiza si tienes wallets de cripto en tu móvil, siendo recomendable tener cuanto menos elementos instalados adicionales mejor. Dicho eso, si buscas en Google con búsquedas del estilo de "android crypto widget", aparecen entradas de la Google Play store, por ejemplo la siguiente: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.crypter.cryptocyrrency
Tiene más de 1M de descargas, y una buena valoración media, con opción de Widgets. Luego está el rollo de los ads, que uno ha de valorar. No obstante, reitero, que si tienes alguna wallet con cripto en el mismo dispositivo, valora bien si merece la pena tener cierto riesgo adicional por instalar este tipo de software. |
|
|
|
Y no son sólo los bancos los que quieren sacar tajada al bitcoin. El Corte Inglés (con una situación delicada) ha registrado la marca Bitcor en la oficina de la Propiedad Intelectual de la UE, bajo el paraguas de "servicios financieros; transacciones financieras relacionadas con el intercambio de moneda, y compraventa de divisas". No está claro qué creará, ni cuando, pero el movimiento denota intención, y aunque lo amparen bajo un pretexto de reservar el nombre de la marca, aquí el que no corre vuela. Ver: https://cincodias.elpais.com/cincodias/2021/05/07/companias/1620412960_697182.html |
|
|
|
<…>
De hecho, con las tres condiciones que indicas (Actividad 1666, Legendario y Registro 2016+) hay tres candidatos. A tener presente, para quien lo mire, que la Actividad no es estática, y cambiará en su debida ventana de tiempo. Con actividad 1700 no hay nadie. Los valores más cercanos son 1696 y 1708. Por razones obvias, no participo en los retos (me cuesta un periquete a mí ver lo anterior), pero dicho eso, si yo lo puedo ver, y como suelo compartir datos, no es dificil dar con ello. |
|
|
|
|
El otro día le daba vueltas a los cajeros de bitcoin, y no tengo del todo claro su futuro. Su origen parecía interesante, en tanto en cuanto evitabas el KYC. Todo esto según el país estará en un estado u otro realmente, pero bueno, con tendencia al KYC. Luego está la vertiente de accesibilidad para los tenedores, y de experimentación para los novatos.
No obstante, a medida que se implanta el KYC, y se extienda el acceso a productos derivados en las propias entidades bancarias, diría que irán perdiendo gran parte de su atractivo. Por un lado, con KYC + comisiones altas, tienen poco sentido para el usuario experimentado, que puede usar combinación de Exchange + cuenta bancaria (si no hay problema con uno y otro claro está) a un menor coste. Queda la accesibilidad, pero si los bancos se meten en el negocio de compra/venta/custodia, es fácil que extienda su red para la compra/venta de bitcoins.
Veremos cómo devenga la situación de aquí a unos años …
|
|
|
|
<...>
If you take a look at the dnstwister site, you’ll se a whole range of similarly named domains, some of which lead to Binance+ref, but others take you other sites without and explicit referral code (I’ve just tried a few, and one led to Kraken, while another to Localbitcoins), building up traffic perhaps. These are the results for Bitcointalk on dnstwister: https://dnstwister.report/search?ed=7777772e626974636f696e74616c6b2e6f7267 |
|
|
|
Como curiosidad, en EEUU, el FBI está poniendo avisos en los cajeros Bitcoin ATM de algunas localidades, para intentar mitigar el número de timos que se están dando, donde los timadores dirigen a la gente para hacer uso de los mismos a fin de pagar falsas facturas, multas y tasas. Tiene su lado positivo, claro está, pero también una lectura negativa visible a primera vista para los que se inician o ponderan su iniciación. Es un difícil equilibrio … Ver: https://www.news5cleveland.com/news/local-news/fbi-issues-warning-after-man-almost-loses-9-999-to-bitcoin-scam |
|
|
|
<…>
The thread’s heading is misleading here. The base article (on Coinbase’s blog by the way, which has its viewpoint implications) has "fact check" as a prefix to the rest of the title, and what the article goes on to do is to use that as a hypothesis and debunk it through data. Leaving the heading as is, will lead people to think that that is the core statement here, whilst it’s really the opposite. Coinbases’s complete heading ("FACT CHECK: Crypto is increasingly being used for criminal activity and is a haven for illicit finance") could be clearer, and is semi-clickbait really, waiting for the reader to read the result of the fact check exercise. |
|
|
|
Data as of 07/05/2021Updated the lists in the OP (and subsequent post) to reflect the forum members that still qualify in each of those lists. Currently, on those lists there are, lacking <= 20% merits to rank-up (activity may not be met though): - 44 Heroes (on their way to Legendries) - 71 Sr. Members (on their way to Heroes) - 52 Full Members (on their way to Sr. Members) - 45 Members (on their way to Full Members) - 203 Jr. Members (on their way to Members) Added this week (11): user_id name Status posts activity activity_Met merit rank ProbableInitialRank trust url
1634314 shahzadafzal Active 1104 448 N 412 Sr. Member Old Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1634314
970256 btc_angela Active 5550 1526 Y 400 Sr. Member Sr. Member =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=970256
1265260 ovcijisir Active 1385 1218 Y 204 Full Member Member =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1265260
1078798 Silber Active 876 876 Y 80 Member Member =+0 / =1 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1078798
2962880 TheNineClub Active 254 140 Y 80 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2962880
3241646 Caross Active 54 54 N 9 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3241646
1303943 TangentC Active 218 112 Y 8 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1303943
2814604 Refrumatrix Active 95 95 Y 8 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2814604
2722124 SOCAR Active 54 54 N 8 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2722124
2395536 Bordijo Active 45 45 N 8 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2395536
950840 T3Rm1Nus Active 54 54 N 8 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=950840
(*) this week (15): user_id name Status posts activity activity_Met merit rank ProbableInitialRank trust url
900408 spirits Active 824 824 Y* 526 Hero Member Member =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=900408
198552 MishaMuc Active 1499 1120 Y* 505 Hero Member Sr. Member =+2 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=198552
811213 polymerbit Active 519 519 N 500 Hero Member Full Member =+11 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=811213
866954 niko83 Active 333 333 N 255 Sr. Member Full Member =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=866954
2862749 Zilon Active 272 182 N 104 Full Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2862749
1978664 tread93 Active 77 77 N 44 Member New Era Newbie =+1 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1978664
2842708 Badmanthought Active 138 136 Y 21 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2842708
2835857 cryptoboss2020 Active 1058 294 Y 14 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -2 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2835857
2868443 BevNation Active 65 65 N 13 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2868443
2752168 villain_Mr.Burns Active 87 84 N 10 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =1 / -2 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2752168
1051085 CryptoOnanist Active 63 63 N 10 Member Old Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1051085
2250773 anderson697 Inactive 114 98 N 10 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2250773
1950645 FabiAdr76 Inactive 72 72 N 10 Member Old Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1950645
2853789 TheBitcoinWardrobe Active 34 34 N 11 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2853789
3271296 gms_btc Active 55 42 N 11 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3271296
(*) Due to enough merits for the next rank, or being banned.
|
|
|
|
Update 07/05/2021:The dashboard gives you access to anyone’s complete merit history in the TX tab, surpassing the 120 day limit. Link: BitcoinTalk Merit Dashboard. Updated the Merit Dashboard to reflect the most recent sMerit available data: Total sMerit: 892.321 Total TXs: 483.393 From Users: 23.409 To Users: 38.844 minDate: 2018-01-24 22:12:21 maxDate: 2021-05-07 02:40:28 Aggregate awarded sMerit for the last complete week (26/04/2021 .. 02/05/2021) is 3.783, which is up 11,26% from the previous week. In addition, there are no new Legendary and 4 new Hero Members this week: Lachrymose -> Hero Member from New Era Newbie during Merit System kick-off. MishaMuc -> Hero Member from Sr. Member during Merit System kick-off. polymerbit -> Hero Member from Full Member during Merit System kick-off. spirits -> Hero Member from Member during Merit System kick-off. Note:
-Copper Members and non-native ranks (staff, etc) are displayed as real (regular) ranks.
|
|
|
|
Bitbase se ha adentrado en el terreno de los préstamos, usando el cliente como colateral tus bitcoins u otra criptomoneda (de entre el conjunto que acepten). El usuario puede solicitar un préstamos en fiat, entre 500€ y 100k€, seleccionar el plazo de devolución (entre una semana y dos años), y parece que el pago de la devolución del préstamos se hace en cripto (no en fiat). Hay lógicamente un interés (1%/mes) y una comisión de apertura (3%). Luego hay todo un conjunto de reglas sobre como los colaterales van variando según su valor en relación al valor prestado, e incluso hay un ratio de liquidación del préstamo, lo cual liquida la garantía a partir del colateral. No sé qué tal acogida tendrá, y se trata de hacer números para el que le interese, pero los números son complicados de predecir en un entorno de volatilidad. Ver: https://es.cointelegraph.com/news/bitbase-launches-cryptocurrency-lending-service-in-spain |
|
|
|
<…>
I’ve had that happen a couple of times whislt writting a small sql query. If it’s small, and you really want to publish it as a post here, you can go by trial and error to see if you can detect the keyword/s or line/s that are making it display the Blocked message, and alter them slightly, adding a comment to what needs to be changed to make it work. For example, in the code that you showed in the image file, the keyword to change was onreadystatechange, which I’ve change to onready Ystatechange here (extra Y included): Var sochain = new XMLHttpRequest();
Var url2= "https://chain.so/api/v2/get_info/BTC";
Sochain.open("GET",url2);
Sochain.responsetype('json');
Sochain.onreadyYstatechange= function() {
If (this.readyState ==4 && this.status ==200) {
Alert(sochain.response.data.network)}
}, sochain.send();
|
|
|
|
A veces, una manera de mirar la información es en base a ejemplos concretos. El siguiente listado refleja los top 50 usuarios del foro (en su globalidad) con el número más alto de Trust en su perfil, siendo el valor más alto actualmente de 129 bajo el punto de vista de DT . trust positive user_id name url
+129 / =0 / -0 129 346731 minerjones https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=346731
+98 / =3 / -0 98 881377 Hhampuz https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=881377
+81 / =1 / -0 81 1000199 krogothmanhattan https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1000199
+73 / =3 / -5 73 18321 OgNasty https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18321
+59 / =1 / -0 59 134378 Blazed https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=134378
+55 / =1 / -1 55 206143 Lesbian Cow https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=206143
+54 / =2 / -0 54 507936 DarkStar_ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=507936
+48 / =0 / -0 48 313016 owlcatz https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=313016
+47 / =1 / -0 47 113670 Mitchell https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=113670
+47 / =0 / -0 47 160943 greenplastic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=160943
+46 / =1 / -0 46 353680 chronicsky https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=353680
+45 / =0 / -0 45 1285450 Agrawas https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1285450
+45 / =0 / -0 45 352429 BitcoinPenny https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=352429
+42 / =0 / -0 42 120837 vizique https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=120837
+41 / =0 / -0 41 1668017 anonymousminer https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1668017
+40 / =0 / -0 40 949248 Kryptowerk https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=949248
+37 / =1 / -0 37 402550 digicoinuser https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=402550
+37 / =0 / -0 37 279158 wheelz1200 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=279158
+36 / =0 / -0 36 1137750 bavicrypto https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1137750
+35 / =0 / -0 35 917493 comit https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=917493
+35 / =0 / -0 35 140827 yogg https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=140827
+34 / =4 / -0 34 369879 Zepher https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=369879
+34 / =2 / -1 34 520313 Lutpin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=520313
+34 / =15 / -5 34 101872 Lauda https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101872
+33 / =1 / -0 33 65034 dozerz https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=65034
+33 / =1 / -0 33 81962 monkeynuts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=81962
+33 / =8 / -1 33 15728 TECSHARE https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=15728
+33 / =0 / -0 33 3 satoshi https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3
+32 / =0 / -0 32 327499 dazedfool https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=327499
+31 / =1 / -0 31 300014 DaveF https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=300014
+31 / =0 / -0 31 129764 Ticked https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=129764
+30 / =0 / -0 30 170557 AT101ET https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=170557
+30 / =0 / -0 30 216582 willi9974 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=216582
+30 / =1 / -3 30 316604 CryptoImperator https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=316604
+30 / =0 / -0 30 98986 TMAN https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=98986
+29 / =2 / -0 29 30747 Vod https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=30747
+29 / =0 / -0 29 109430 TookDk https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=109430
+29 / =0 / -0 29 224612 bithalo https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=224612
+29 / =1 / -0 29 904524 ChiBitCTy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=904524
+28 / =0 / -0 28 2514450 rxalts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2514450
+28 / =3 / -1 28 337097 iluvbitcoins https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=337097
+27 / =0 / -0 27 35 theymos https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=35
+26 / =0 / -1 26 1478835 MoparMiningLLC https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1478835
+26 / =0 / -0 26 18614 CanaryInTheMine https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18614
+26 / =0 / -0 26 189967 buckrogers https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=189967
+25 / =1 / -1 25 289011 Rmcdermott927 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=289011
+25 / =0 / -0 25 133846 monbux https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=133846
+25 / =1 / -0 25 25960 smoothie https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=25960
+25 / =0 / -0 25 459836 LoyceV https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=459836
+25 / =3 / -0 25 487418 The Pharmacist https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=487418
El ejercicio sería, para el interesado, mirar los casos, entrar en las valoraciones, y comprender por qué fueron recibidas las de carácter positivo, y si se ajustan al espíritu del sistema de confianza (esencialmente con carácter comercial). Tengamos presente que los datos anteriores son con visión DT (normalmente DT1 + DT2), y que las listas de confianza personales arrojan valores de confianza distintos (yo veo números algo distintos a los anteriores por ejemplo, al tener mi lista propia). |
|
|
|
|
Reconozco que siempre me ha dado de pereza mirar los modelos de previsión (y mira que me interesan las bases en general), y creo que los fundamentales fuertes en bitcoin son propensos a romperlos dada su imprevisibilidad en tiempo y fuerza.
No sé si alguien por aquí se ha mirado a fondo el modelo S2F de Plan B y tiene una visión más profunda del subyacente del mismo, y los aspectos que le sustentan como uno de los modelos de previsión serios. Una opinión al respecto con fundamento es bienvenida.
|
|
|
|
En todos estos casos donde el ente hace de custodio, o bien lo delega sobre un tercero (prácticamente todos los casos realmente), me pregunto acerca de las garantías, y de cómo éstas se reflejan en la documentación. Si uno lee las TOS (que con estos reducimos la población sustancialmente), puede encontrar redactados tal y como el que figura en el caso de Paypal, donde se indica que: Crypto Assets are not insured by FDIC, the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) or any other public or private insurer, including against cyber theft or theft by other means. Cryptocurrency activity is not a regulated activity in many states, including California. The value of Crypto Assets can be extremely volatile and unpredictable, which can result in significant losses in a short time. Buying and selling Crypto Assets is inherently risky, and you should consider the risks before deciding to buy or sell Crypto Assets, including those provided in our STATE DISCLOSURES section below.
De la lectura del párrafo anterior, se desprende que no hay garantía alguna, al no estar aseguradas por nadie en su totalidad ni en parte. Normalmente, se recalcan los riesgos asociados a la volatilidad, pero no a los del respaldo, que son un verdadero acto de confianza (probablemente por desconocimiento) … |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
