Good news. It's kind of a good exchange. The more exchanges, the better. never heard of that but well yeah the more the better What are other exchanges it will be listed on? Quite early they announced it, the token sale is still going, usually we have to wait till the end to know about exchanges. They announced HitBTC as well. But big exhanges (like Binance) dont allow to divulge about listing on them. So I hope Marc will be on some good Chinese exhanges as well Not very happy about the HitBTC choice but at least there is Coss for the moment as well HitBTC is a good exhange. But they have too high fee for withdraw some tokens. But for ETH for example fee not so big. But my favourite - Binance and Kukoin at this moment. Will they announce some more? Haven't heard about this. Probably official announcements will follow after the token sale is finished. One more week left, not that long, stay tuned. Yes, I guess so. The token will be listed on exchange as soon as the token sale end. VR is relatively new for some people and it needs time to make this technology becomes popular. The technology itself VR is not new. But there are practically no such projects. Therefore, for the first time after launching the platform, there may be problems with the user. Users simply will not.
|
|
|
Is there going to be a public demo before the ICO of that AI filter so we can throw real and fake ratings against it and check the results for ourself? 95% is a bold claim and I'm not just going to take someone's word for it. Especially not if that someone is the one who's trying to sell some kind of magical algorithm without any proof.
Public beta version will be available (in Quarter 2-3) after the closed beta testing among ICO participants. So you need to be an ICO participant to test the system. Isn't that that putting the cart before the horse? What is the minimum amount to become an ICO participant in that time period when the testing is available? Or do you mean the closed beta test is after the ICO has finished? I'm not sure if that would be a good plan. Then you'd be investing kinda blind. Agreed to this at least an alpha before ico would be a good sign . But beta after ico, is not really a good plan like stated above it's true that it's unusual, but if the product is not ready yet, then it doesn't make sense to reveal it to the public. I think that you do not need to hurry with the release of the alpha or beta version. First you need to think it through.
|
|
|
Hey, guys! We still need your help in voting for us in Kickico! All you have to do is to sign up with facebook and scroll down to our project in the link and vote https://www.kickico.com/ratingJust like this - http://take.ms/kgHiqWe are currently in TOP 30 in just 1 day. I have supported) Your project is worthy. And I'm not surprised that you enter in the TOP 30!
|
|
|
Mark.Space is going to be best project in VR space. Unique concept will attract many developers to launch their app on platform.
I'm a bit stuck.... People see in these projects is only the bait to get rich quick((( that's really upsetting Me.... I believe that this project is not just a way of dressing! It is a future that is just around the corner!
|
|
|
What different between your project and Peculium for example? Which advantages you have?
Peculium is more of Portfolio Management with AI help. And we do that too. Their scope will just be one of the branches that Kepler Tech is into. We are an Asset-backed project and they're not. We are into Robotics and they're not. Kepler Tech has dozens of patents applied for and with product prototypes already. These and among others that we do clearly favors us than the rest of the competition. Thank you for the clarification on this aspect. I invested good money in the Peculium. I hope your project will be better!
|
|
|
I read a onepager in one of the upcoming ICOs, now i know we have a 300 paged whitepaper, brochures and presentations in ehealth, maybe a summerized whitepaper should be good for everyone:) 300 page is a lot for some of us.
Btw. I am ok with 5 eth. minimum cap on the private sale phase. Devs want to attract bigger investors so 5 eth is quite normal i think.
Actually, it is more than normal. I saw 80-100 eth minimum for even pre-sale. So for private sale 5 eth minimum is not a high number even it is a very low number. By the way, i think brochure can be used as a summary of the whitepaper. but a project with a aim of 2025, i think big investors won't invest 80 or 100 eth for a idea. I was thinking about a 30 paged whitepaper, brochure seemed shallow to me. You are right maybe it would have been better for them to built an alpha of the platform in advance. This would create a lot more confidence. You must understand that for the platform of such a plan, haste is a direct path into the abyss of failure. The platform should be configured to the smallest parts, otherwise it will result in the collapse. what do you mean by haste, I assume when you say smallest parts, tech details in whitepaper ? Under the rush I mean the statement of many from the alpha version of the project! In such a project may not be the fastest platform gathered for a quick hand!
|
|
|
I read a onepager in one of the upcoming ICOs, now i know we have a 300 paged whitepaper, brochures and presentations in ehealth, maybe a summerized whitepaper should be good for everyone:) 300 page is a lot for some of us.
Btw. I am ok with 5 eth. minimum cap on the private sale phase. Devs want to attract bigger investors so 5 eth is quite normal i think.
Actually, it is more than normal. I saw 80-100 eth minimum for even pre-sale. So for private sale 5 eth minimum is not a high number even it is a very low number. By the way, i think brochure can be used as a summary of the whitepaper. but a project with a aim of 2025, i think big investors won't invest 80 or 100 eth for a idea. I was thinking about a 30 paged whitepaper, brochure seemed shallow to me. You are right maybe it would have been better for them to built an alpha of the platform in advance. This would create a lot more confidence. You must understand that for the platform of such a plan, haste is a direct path into the abyss of failure. The platform should be configured to the smallest parts, otherwise it will result in the collapse.
|
|
|
if I correctly understand, Hard Cap: 250$ million ? Quite large money About unsold tokens, no concretics yet - as for me this is very important aspect. It would be good that the team as soon as possible decided it's. In light of recent events in the market, I think a Hard Cap would be difficult to achieve! But this project inspires confidence. May be he can do! I don't think in any market conditions they can raise 250 mil. but we'll see, this does have potential and hopefully people will see it. When I read about building a huge factory I've looked asap at the hardcap, it's all well exaplained at the end of the whitepaper. Well, I think that to achieve their goal we can't speak about soft/hardcap, they just need to raise $250,000,000! They need $50,000,000 for facilities only, you would build facilities without putting equipment in them? It will be very hard to achieve that sum of money but I'm curius to see if they're gonna make it Im wondering about their marketing strategies and planning, are they sure enough to get that much? Because its very rare that an ICO can raise that much. They should try to get some partners that can that can help them economically and in terms of facilities. It seems complicated to raise so much money. I am sure that they would reach this amount, you need a good investor giants in the world of robotics, and the development of artificial intelligence.
|
|
|
The Team Gain more and more. Now 20 Team Members from 8 countries. Thats great to see that in the news today.
Good to know that! It significantly increases the likelihood of the project being implemented earlier that expected. This is good news for companies and investors! If the company will implement its plans faster than indicated in the roadmap it will only be a big plus!
|
|
|
if I correctly understand, Hard Cap: 250$ million ? Quite large money About unsold tokens, no concretics yet - as for me this is very important aspect. It would be good that the team as soon as possible decided it's. In light of recent events in the market, I think a Hard Cap would be difficult to achieve! But this project inspires confidence. May be he can do!
|
|
|
Even if this platform has the right people to accomplish this, is still needed 2 years to pass from alpha version to beta version and in the first phase only focus on NPL in order to identify different patters.I understand that is a lot of work but why so much time between them ?
Well I assume it takes some time because clinical trials take a lot of time? You can't do such stuff in just a month. this is the type of project that doesn't just happen overnight. personally I appreciate the time they're taking with this. if they were scamming they certainly wouldn't have mentioned this amount of time. This is the rare case of long-term projects! About ANY quick profit speech can not go. And all investors should understand. This project is very promising. And this is why such large deadlines!
|
|
|
So much discussion about the whitepaper, especially about the length and if it is appropriate. but we shouldn't forget that this is not a small project which is done after 3 months of work.
You are right. This document fully corresponds to their road map), I'll spend one day exploring it. That's the thing I always have in my mind. If you care about the project - find some time to learn about it. If you don't - please do not complain I'm totally in agreement with you, We must not forget it's a long-term project. As you said, we will have to learn and understand it step by step, and besides, we will have to be more torerant, because it is a lot of work on it.The Whitepaper issue has been resolved. I hope the people read it. Aha, I think that long-term project may have that long WP. If someone is not ok with that - please look for some other short-terms I'm sure that very soon we will hear a lot of questions from people who did not read the document and did not know the answers to your questions!
|
|
|
|