|
I really wonder if getting your kids to mine Bitcoin would be considered child labor, since you know, gold mining by children in Africa is considered child labor too. I wonder if similar laws will be put in place for digital jobs in the future.
|
|
|
|
If bitcoin can not be traded into cash you will not use it or spend it but you can be still holding it for a long time and wait again that bitcoin will be accept to trade again in fiat or cash..
Bitcoin will last longer than fiat. The USD for instance, only has a couple years left, I would say about thirty. The federal reserve is a Ponzi scheme and like all Ponzi schemes, it will inevitably collapse. |
|
|
|
I can't say that I lost a lot, but yeah, once I lost something big, and it was a 2 BTC bet on a player with odds of 1.1.
He was doing great, until the opponent started playing well against him, don't know what happened to that player who was winning, he felt down and lost his confidence and lost the game. That was the worst experience I ever had in gambling.
Wow, that sounds really unlucky. Sorry to hear about that mate. Sometimes sportsmen accept money to lose a particular game that they are favored to win, to cause upsets and make people who bet on higher odds rake in big winnings. |
|
|
|
Poor you Americans. I'd never get caught if I was a miner, because I doub't my government even know what is Bitcoin  ... Which government is this? I doubt they don't know, most of them are all aware. Saying it would leak where I live, but as an information, that's a poor country somewhere in Asia. Thanks, that really narrows it down  Also, keep in mind that if it is a really poor country, you will have difficulty using Bitcoin because it relies on the network, and Bitcoin doesn't fare well with bad connection speed (The blockchain size is currently over 80 Gigs). Also, depending on how bad the country is, you will not have any legal rights to prevent law enforcement from confiscating your devices, including the ones with your Bitcoin in them. |
|
|
|
I really doubt whether the race had anything to do with this. The article never mentions about the race of the perpetrator. What if he is just another African American? Also, there is a strong possibility that the perpetrator is either Hispanic or Asian American (there are not too many non-Hispanic whites in Las Vegas). So unless someone can post an image of the perpetrator here, we can't be sure.
Yeah, typical. If guy is White, they say that it is racism. If he isn't, then they say "a man". That's a one-side racism that is unfortunately going to much these days. Said by the guy who has a fascist cult avatar responsible for billions of innocent deaths. It's not racist to mention it was a black guy that was shot. It's racist to stick your fingers in your ears and go "lalalalalalala" when somebody mentions a defining physical characteristic of a man shot and killed in a city where hate crimes against his particular demographic are common. |
|
|
|
Website now has https and will force all users to use https. http will automatically be redirected to https.
Is the sole criteria for judging "post quality" an analysis of the volume of characters per post? Because in that case, it will only reward people who are fans of pasting data from websites. |
|
|
|
Not really a meme or related to the 2016 election. Also, not relevant because we weren't really having a debate/discussion here. Still a good share nonetheless. Here's my meme, relevant today:  |
|
|
|
http://www.ontheissues.org/Hillary_Clinton.htm This organization has put a lot more thought into the issues and implemented a scoring system for the candidates. They place her as a hard-core liberal which is further left than I consider her. @Masha Sha By left-wing I mean overtly liberal You are quoting a website which is literally from the establishment. Her voting record would not place her as a liberal, only her speeches made in 2016 would. This does not even include paid speeches made to Wall St. executives. The organization is stated to be non-partisan, non-profit and run by volunteers from various political stripes. Since you don't like that source, I've e-mailed Alex Jones to see if he can give you a more unbiased opinion on Hillary's political leanings. I haven't been to any paid speeches by any of the candidates. Again, that source is relying only on her quotes from the 2016 election, which are not consistent with her voting record. In the end, it's the voting record that matters. You can claim to be all peace and freedom loving, but it won't matter if you don't follow through with your beliefs while in elected office. You didn't even look at the site you shithead! The very first page has her voting revir on the abortion issue back to 2003. I'm done with this discussion! I thought you were serious... my bad. I've already seen all the major candidates' pages on Ontheissues. As for you calling me a shithead:  |
|
|
|
Proving once again that Donald Trump is merely a scapegoat in the Liberal Democratic agenda. Let's look at a list of Trump's most controversial:....
So we can see clearly, it does not matter who is elected, left wing or right wing, they are both part of the same head.
This kind of statement has been made in EVERY presidential election. In this particular case it is dead wrong. Did you just ignore everything I had written in my original post? The same bad foreign policies will continue to be expanded under the new President, as they have been expanding consistently. Also: * Both parties authorize prohibition and scheduling of substances * Both parties have signed bills authorizing the surveillance, indefinite detention, and suspension of the due process of American citizens on US Soil. The Patriot Act and the NDAA received support from both parties * Both parties have authorized drone bombs in the Middle East, which only seek to further radicalize the area. Both parties support interventionism. * Both parties have signed bills authorizing use of drones as patrolling devices in the American airspace (See The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012) * Both parties support the federal reserve scam. Both parties have played a role in its foundation. * Both parties believe the government should regulate marriage between two consenting adults. * Both parties had spent over a billion dollars in their 2012 Presidential campaigns. * Both parties support US intervention in Israel's illegal occupations of Palestine. * Both parties are backed by the same corporations and special interest groups. I'm going to stop here, because I know that if I add more, you guys will stop reading the post. I hope my point has been clear now though. Sure, you can point out commonalities. Or you can point out differences. One does not negate the other. It's a comparison of policies. A wide majority of their policies are identical. You can't really point out major differences in their policy. So you are the one who is wrong, dead wrong. |
|
|
|
I am just saying that if the perpetrator is another African-American, the incident can't be treated as a hate crime.
This is false, it's still possible to commit a hate crime against somebody who is the same race/religion/sexual orientation/etc as you. All I am saying is that, it is very likely that it was a hate crime, but we are not 100% sure about it.
Yes, I agree with that. |
|
|
|
how much price
Be prepared to pay a lot, in the range of a couple hundred per hour. Sex ain't cheap, kids. |
|
|
|
Yes, it matter.
Hillary Clinton is much more qualified for this position, she will not lead aggressive and dangerous foreign policy, accept dictators, create walls between Mexico and USA etc.
Trump is much more actor than politician.
He acting all the time and manipulate media and voters a lot.
He don't have quality of good leader and will divide country and the world, in the case he win election.
The fact that you even say that means you did not read my entire post. Hillary Clinton has already done all that and will do much worse once she is President. Trump only talks about it, Clinton has walked his talk. Hillary has a greater influence on the media and manipulates the crap out of her voters, she is more corrupt and richer than Trump. |
|
|
|
This is what I don't get. When white people stand up for their rights, it is compared to Nazism and fascism. But black supremacist movements (such as Black Panthers and Black Lives Matter) and Mexican supremacist movements (such as La Raza) are tolerated and given governmental protection. There should be equal treatment for everyone.
That's ridiculous. White supremacy gave us the Jim Crow era, lynchings, slavery, mass murder, distribution of HIV positive needles to the black community, and lots of other crazy shit. This is beyond ridiculous. Do you have any evidence for this? If you remember, the overwhelming majority of the HIV positive patients during the 1980s were homosexual and bisexual white men (especially in California and New York). A large majority of the deaths from AIDS during the 1980s and early 1990s were also among the white men. Black men started to get affected only during the late 1990s, as the epidemic started spreading to cities such as Atlanta, New Orleans and Detroit. I wouldn't say ridiculous. Terrible? Sure. A tragedy? Certainly. White supremacy is founded upon the idea that the straight white male is superior to any other demographic in the world. Centuries of forging the global empire in the name of God (Manifest Destiny) and a sense of messianism (White man's burden) has caused the eugenicists to end up on top, through fear mongering. Bayer has openly admitted to selling HIV-positive "medication" to Latin American and Asian countries. There is a reason why HIV is most common among demographics despised by the straight white male. In fact, during WWII (During which the straight white male supported the Nazis 100% btw), the German chemist who was going to be sentenced for war crimes in Nuremburg fled to the United States, where he was made the Chairman of Bayer. By withholding essential services such as harm reduction, contraception, and safer sex education from certain demographics, white supremacists allowed HIV to be prevalent, in hopes that it would exterminate the people they didn't like. Hitler was influenced heavily by California-style eugenics. |
|
|
|
I really doubt whether the race had anything to do with this. The article never mentions about the race of the perpetrator. What if he is just another African American? Also, there is a strong possibility that the perpetrator is either Hispanic or Asian American (there are not too many non-Hispanic whites in Las Vegas). So unless someone can post an image of the perpetrator here, we can't be sure.
Does the race of the perpetrator really matter, if the victim was black in a region where hate crimes against blacks are common? You realize that it doesn't have to be done by a white person to be considered a hate crime. |
|
|
|
We can't have another 4-8 years of Obama/clinton no fucking way we need new blood.
Hillary has a slim lead of 3% currently, there's only a couple of months left and anything can happen. If Trump wants to win he should stop being self-destructive few weeks before the election. That's the point. He wouldn't be Trump if he stopped being self-destructive. Same with Clinton being Clinton. Same with the American people, to vote for either of them.  In the United States, there is a two-party system in place. It is nearly impossible for a third party candidate to get more than 20% of the vote in the POTUS elections. Even Ross Perot could gather just 18.9% of the vote in 1992. And whenever there is a strong third party candidate, things get easier for the Democratic candidate. That happened in 1992, and the same will happen in 2016 as well. I have already made my prediction for 2016, Hillary Clinton is going to be the next President. It's unfortunate, but it is going to happen, because the mainstream media has a very pro-Clinton agenda. |
|
|
|
No surprise at all. Portugal legalized all drugs (both soft-drugs like marijuana and peyote, and hard drugs such as heroin and LSD) in 2001. In 2015, the number of deaths due to drug overdose had declined by a startling 75% (i.e number of deaths are just 1/4th of that in 2001). Not just that. Rate of continuation of drug usage went down from 45% to 28%. HIV infection rates among injecting drug users declined from 42 per million to just 6 per million! I'd like to know what has led you to classify LSD as a "hard drug". It is non-toxic, creates no physiological dependencies, does not remain in your system for long, and has no deaths associated with a result of direct use. |
|
|
|
http://www.ontheissues.org/Hillary_Clinton.htm This organization has put a lot more thought into the issues and implemented a scoring system for the candidates. They place her as a hard-core liberal which is further left than I consider her. @Masha Sha By left-wing I mean overtly liberal You are quoting a website which is literally from the establishment. Her voting record would not place her as a liberal, only her speeches made in 2016 would. This does not even include paid speeches made to Wall St. executives. The organization is stated to be non-partisan, non-profit and run by volunteers from various political stripes. Since you don't like that source, I've e-mailed Alex Jones to see if he can give you a more unbiased opinion on Hillary's political leanings. I haven't been to any paid speeches by any of the candidates. Again, that source is relying only on her quotes from the 2016 election, which are not consistent with her voting record. In the end, it's the voting record that matters. You can claim to be all peace and freedom loving, but it won't matter if you don't follow through with your beliefs while in elected office. |
|
|
|
Wow he got screwed over! I wonder if the same outcome would have happened if he were white?
The receiving $1 in punitive damages? Probably. The warrantless raid and the choking, handcuffing? Probably not. Also, if the victim were a white college student, he would be making front page news on every media source out there. If the victim was white then no one would knew about it. Because it would not happen if he were white. |
|
|
|
Well we can say that corruption is present in the very gene of Human being no matter how much you say that you never did corruption but at the end of the day every last one of us who is alive today is corrupt whether that corruption could lead unrest in socity or in human body
That is a very good reason to abolish government and become sovereign, independent beings. It is the very structure of government that is flawed. The ones who stand up against corruption are either fired or resign out of frustration, leaving only the corrupt ones inside. This is what I call "Corruption by design". |
|
|
|
http://www.ontheissues.org/Hillary_Clinton.htm This organization has put a lot more thought into the issues and implemented a scoring system for the candidates. They place her as a hard-core liberal which is further left than I consider her. @Masha Sha By left-wing I mean overtly liberal You are quoting a website which is literally from the establishment. Her voting record would not place her as a liberal, only her speeches made in 2016 would. This does not even include paid speeches made to Wall St. executives. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
