Since you don't have any proofs or even evidences listed here for the existence of God, your stuff is propaganda. Take a look at the universe full of evidences for God as explained at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. Check out OP's evidence for God found in the first post of the thread. Then see if you can even say your evidences that prove God exists. The joke is wearing thin now, your comedy sketch is getting dull. You need to come up with some fresh material to keep us entertained. You don't think I'm giving you all this attention free do you? It has a cost, my time isn't free. You will pay me in entertainment in return for my attention. No it isn't, about the joke, I mean. You don't show up enough to be a boring joke. By the way, are you EVER going to present SOME even hint of scientific evidence for or against the existence of God, so that we can start to prove out to ourselves from your standpoint, whether or not God exists. After all, I did my best at this link. And I did it in such a way that even you could understand if only you went there and read it >>> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395.  Are you retarded? Do you have Alzheimers where you forget everything you read? Are you trolling? So then how can you not see that there has been a mountain of information against your beliefs, yet you continue to ignore them and trout your nonsensical, illogical beliefs as correct? Sorry if it sounds harsh, but you are dumbest person I've ever met to on the internet. Are you trolling? Are you simply ignorant. Can't you see that simply saying that there is a mountain of evidence without showing the evidence doesn't mean that there is necessarily any evidence at all? Perhaps you have evidence that refutes the universe full of evidence shown at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. As Mr. Universe said in Serenity, "No problem; Bring it on; Bring it on; Bring it on. From here to the eyes and ears of the 'verse. That's my motto, or would be if I had a motto." You like posting that link don't you. Here, I'll refute all of the nonsensical claims you make there. First off, I'll disprove the bible and since I'm lazy and you're too stupid, I'll repost quotes of paragraphs I previously typed to you in response to your nonsensical bullcrap. 1) The earth is much older than 6,000 years ago. The very Genesis portion of the bible is incorrect, as the Gregorian Calendar came around in the 1500s(500 years ago), and the bible was supposedly written close to 2,000 years ago. This means that the text saying God created the world in 6 days, is wrong, because there were no 24 hour days back then when the bible was written. The entire Genesis portion of the bible is believed to be symbolic by even fellow christian scholars. Either symbolic or edited(It's obviously fake). So your arguement of the earth being 6,000 years old BADecker is wrong. Go do your research. 2) In this link, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, you talk about Cause and Effect, of which you are again, wrong. On a subatomic level, particles are known to react differently. For example, cause can follow effect instead of effect following cause. Also, as I told you before, a new quantum theory supports the idea that the universe is Eternal, meaning it never had a beginning and will never have an end. The Big Bang theory is inherently flawed, so again, there goes your chance of saying the universe was even created by God in the first place, for if this theory is even marginally "correct", then you might as well throw your bible out the window cause everything there is inherently wrong. 3) Homosexuality has been found and recorded in over 500 species, with our closest relatives(such as Bonobos, etc) displaying a large array of homosexual behavior. Studies since the 1960s during Kinsey's time have shown that males are indeed born homosexual, as even straight males when subjected to erotic homosexual porn, were not "turned on" and vice versa, indicating that homosexuality in males in determined prior to birth and cannot be changed. Studies done on female sexuality show that women have a "flexible sexuality", as shown by Dr Meredith Chivers, women have been equally attracted to males and other women, even those who self identified as straight or lesbian, were still aroused at both sexes in erotic positions i.e erect penis, naked women's body, etc. Homosexuality is 100% natural as Heterosexuality, and btw, if you went to school, you'd know that sex is not for 1 thing only(The making of babies), it's not. If that was so, then women who have went through menopause would also be a crime in your book, since they can't make children naturally anymore. That would mean that your mother, grandma, practically every woman above age 50 is going to hell for having lived to age 50 and not being able to make children through sex anymore. Nice logic BADecker. 4) The bible has been edited, have passages taken in, taken out, since the early christian era right after Christ's supposed assention into Heaven. The romans have edited the bible, the monarchs of England have edited the bible, and the Church has edited the bible, numerous times. 5) The bible displays some of the most hideous and appaling things in all "holy books". The god of the bible promotes the killing of innocent people and animals, the raping of female children and women, and the general destruction of humankind. Feel free to throgoughly scan through your own bible and witness the atrocities in it, commanded by your "God". You know what, I'll post you a little of the pure evil promoted by the christian God: 1) "Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the LORD in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the LORD. Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves." (Numbers 31:16-18)
- In that quote from the Bible, God promotes the killing of innocents, while also promoting Pedophilia by keeping the women Children(notice children) alive. So now we know that the God of the bible promotes not just violence, but pedophilia(or hebephilia, depends on the age of the children, though I presume children are below the age of 12).
2) "And to the others he said in mine hearing, Go ye after him through the city, and smite: let not your eye spare, neither have ye pity: Slay utterly old and young, both maids, and little children, and woman: but come not near any man upon whom is the mark; and begin at my sanctuary. Then they began at the ancient men which were before the house." (Ezekiel 9:5-6)
- Here, god gives the command to kill innocents yet again, simply because they do not believe him. Mass genocide anyone? You can even compare the God of the bible to Adolf Hitler by this point.
Heres a website that shows you the many horrors commanded by God in the bible, feel free to double check in your own bible: http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/cruelty/long.htmlThe christian god simply does not exist. Every, single, one of your bullshit claims has been refuted many, many times over throughout the course of this thread. Also, it'd do you well to not cherrypick and "interpret"/basically lie about what's said in the bible. You can't say things like, "these laws were intended for the Israelites only"...I thought the bible was created by god? So then why is he including the promotion of murder and etc that were intended for the Israelites at the time, in a book that's supposedly meant to be for "all times"? Oh yea, cause he doesn't exist. |
|
|
|
Since you don't have any proofs or even evidences listed here for the existence of God, your stuff is propaganda. Take a look at the universe full of evidences for God as explained at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. Check out OP's evidence for God found in the first post of the thread. Then see if you can even say your evidences that prove God exists. The joke is wearing thin now, your comedy sketch is getting dull. You need to come up with some fresh material to keep us entertained. You don't think I'm giving you all this attention free do you? It has a cost, my time isn't free. You will pay me in entertainment in return for my attention. No it isn't, about the joke, I mean. You don't show up enough to be a boring joke. By the way, are you EVER going to present SOME even hint of scientific evidence for or against the existence of God, so that we can start to prove out to ourselves from your standpoint, whether or not God exists. After all, I did my best at this link. And I did it in such a way that even you could understand if only you went there and read it >>> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. Are you retarded? Do you have Alzheimers where you forget everything you read? Are you trolling? So then how can you not see that there has been a mountain of information/evidence against your beliefs, yet you continue to ignore them and trout your nonsensical, illogical beliefs as correct? Sorry if it sounds harsh, but you are the absolute dumbest person I've ever met on the internet. |
|
|
|
Just so we’re clear, I’m establishing that that the Bible is inaccurate. Not just inaccurate, but massively inaccurate. There are more examples of course, some which make it clear that the author of the Bible thinks the world is flat, some which make it clear that the author thought the world did not move and then there are more considered examples, such as the value of pi being unknown at the time (surely God would have known it!?!).
So this is my statement, logically derived from the above.
“The Bible is inaccurate – therefore God is fallible – therefore the definition of God is incorrect – therefore God does not exist.”
To add a touch of justification to this, let’s break it down. We know the Bible is inaccurate, in fact the Bible is contradictory within its own pages. The Bible is the only place that defines God, and God is defined as being infallible. The Bible is also stated as being of God’s word (albeit written by man, see below). Seeing as we know the only source that defines the Christian God is inaccurate, and at least part of the definition is inaccurate (infallible), we can not trust the remainder of the definition. Therefore the definition of God in invalid and God does not exist.
There will come arguments from Christians that while God is infallible, and the Bible is the true word of God, the Bible was in fact written by man, who is fallible. This does not hold up when you examine the scale and volume of inaccuracies held within the Bible. I can understand man rounding down the value of pi, for example, but to get the entire creation story wrong is a bit of a stretch. Likewise, given that God is all powerful, he surely would not have left an obviously inaccurate account of his greatest work go to press, or was that just another sign of his fallibility?
I think I’ve made a stronger argument, based on Christian beliefs, for the non existence of God than there ever has been for the existence of such a deity.
Besides the very obvious inconsistencies found in the bible(Which is supposedly the "word of god", the very theory behind god doesn't make sense either. There is a very simple "Omnipotence Paradox" that is currently "unsolvable"(No matter how many false answers you may find people give), it asks that, " Can god create an object so heavy he can't lift it?". The answer for that is either of these 2: If yes: then that mean God's power is not absolute and is limited because he can't lift the stone If no: then that mean God's power is not absolute and is limited because he can't make the stone in the first place That paradox shows that Omnipotence itself is a logical fallacy aka it is not real. There are also many more paradoxes that exist regarding this. This supposed paradox is human, limited thinking. God did it by creating His Son, Jesus, Who was entirely God just as His Father is entirely God and the Holy Spirit is entirely God. Yet they are 3 distinct individuals who are not 3 Gods, but one God. God can do it because He is God. The Rock that God couldn't lift was Jesus, because the Father couldn't lift Him. Yet the Rock lifted because He lifted Himself. Thus, God couldn't lift, but at the same time He did. Now, the Holy Spirit exists so that, with Him, those of us who are willing, can lift ourselves to the state of "Godness" through Him, the Holy Spirit God. But, we can't do it if we reject God. Why not? No strength without Godness. So, your response shows that you can't argue against logic, and you resort to the usual nonsense, "Because Jesus is God's son etc etc". Thanks for clearing that up. I honestly think you're just trolling...If you're actually serious, then Wow. |
|
|
|
Most people who think about it know that the speed of light is a constant. Light travels at the rate of 186,000 miles per second. This, however, has been shown by recent experiment to be wrong. In fact, the speed of light travels at varying rates at different times. The evidence that this is commonly accepted by scientists lies in the redshift of certain stars and galaxies. The point is, what was the speed of light 2,000 years ago? What was it 10,000 years ago if the universe is indeed that old? We don't know. We can guess. We can estimate to some extent. But we don't know for a fact. In the past, there might have been tremendously great differences between the "constants" that we see now, and what they were in the distant past. How do we know? Because we are finding tiny differences in many so-called constants year by year right now. The same is true for much of physics. The simple well-known physics of the operation of stars is being entirely overturned by the electric cosmos findings. The point is, we can barely measure things that are right under our noses with reasonable accuracy. The whole idea of a 13 or 14 billion years old universe is pure speculation. It is based on the idea that the constants that we see now were constants over all time. But they are not. The Bible on the other hand, was taken from writings that came down from almost the beginning, 6,000 years ago. These writings were sifted through by Moses, a prince of Egypt between 1,500 and 1,600 BC. He wrote the basics of what he found down in the first 5 books of what would become the Bible. The strength of the Bible is way stronger that scientific observations of today. The age of the current creation is right around 6,000 years. See http://www.albatrus.org/english/theology/creation/biblical_age_earth.htm. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10706854#msg10706854 to show how the Bible itself can be interpreted showing both, 6,000 for this creation, but time-like additions for the whole timeline of the earth https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10706854#msg10706854. Can you face reality at all? The bible is not accurate, it has been rewritten, edited, have things taken out and put in by; The monarchs of england, early christians, the church, and the romans. The bible is not "god's work" simply put. Humans rewrote and edited every portion of the bible. Also, it should do you well to read up on the Eternal Universe theory, which states that the Universe is eternal and has no beginning(Which automatically means the bible's Genesis chapter which talks about creation is 110% false. Not to mention(I'll tell you again), The Genesis Portion of the bible is believed to be False and/or edited. It says that the universe was created in 6 days. However, back when the bible was supposedly written, there were no 24 hour days. The 24 hour day 365 year calendar is the gregorian calendar and it was made in the 1500s. That by itself means that Genesis is False/Edited. |
|
|
|
Just so we’re clear, I’m establishing that that the Bible is inaccurate. Not just inaccurate, but massively inaccurate. There are more examples of course, some which make it clear that the author of the Bible thinks the world is flat, some which make it clear that the author thought the world did not move and then there are more considered examples, such as the value of pi being unknown at the time (surely God would have known it!?!).
So this is my statement, logically derived from the above.
“The Bible is inaccurate – therefore God is fallible – therefore the definition of God is incorrect – therefore God does not exist.”
To add a touch of justification to this, let’s break it down. We know the Bible is inaccurate, in fact the Bible is contradictory within its own pages. The Bible is the only place that defines God, and God is defined as being infallible. The Bible is also stated as being of God’s word (albeit written by man, see below). Seeing as we know the only source that defines the Christian God is inaccurate, and at least part of the definition is inaccurate (infallible), we can not trust the remainder of the definition. Therefore the definition of God in invalid and God does not exist.
There will come arguments from Christians that while God is infallible, and the Bible is the true word of God, the Bible was in fact written by man, who is fallible. This does not hold up when you examine the scale and volume of inaccuracies held within the Bible. I can understand man rounding down the value of pi, for example, but to get the entire creation story wrong is a bit of a stretch. Likewise, given that God is all powerful, he surely would not have left an obviously inaccurate account of his greatest work go to press, or was that just another sign of his fallibility?
I think I’ve made a stronger argument, based on Christian beliefs, for the non existence of God than there ever has been for the existence of such a deity.
Besides the very obvious inconsistencies found in the bible(Which is supposedly the "word of god", the very theory behind god doesn't make sense either. There is a very simple "Omnipotence Paradox" that is currently "unsolvable"(No matter how many false answers you may find people give), it asks that, " Can god create an object so heavy he can't lift it?". The answer for that is either of these 2: If yes: then that mean God's power is not absolute and is limited because he can't lift the stone If no: then that mean God's power is not absolute and is limited because he can't make the stone in the first place That paradox shows that Omnipotence itself is a logical fallacy aka it is not real. There are also many more paradoxes that exist regarding this. |
|
|
|
|
People like BADecker remind me of the Jehovah Witness's going around from door to door, trying to explain fervently and in vain their false beliefs, sad fate.
|
|
|
|
I think Litecoin is close dead cause miners dump and people is not interested in buying anymore, atleast lets be serious the only coin that is actually usefull for doing something else than pump/dump/hopehold is BTC , the world is not even used to one cryptocurrency and we are already creating hundreds more, and the few of them that actually are inovative and have something to offer is ignored. Ltc will have now or in yhe future the value people gives to it, there is plenty of them and not too many willing to buy.
True True. |
|
|
|
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
God, in the offer of freedom, has allowed people to do evil as well as good. - That means god is not good God doesn't like the evil because it harms the people who do it. - He obviously does like evil(And he tolerates it, if he didn't there would be no evil), because he continues to let evil room. Did he save any of those 6 million+ jews from getting slaughtered like barn animals by Hitler? No. + many more examples.
God is doing away with the evil, and He is doing away with the ability to do evil any longer. - No he is not, hundreds of thousands of people are murdered yearly.Because of the tremendous greatness with which He set this universe up, the way He is doing away with evil is to destroy this universe. - So he's going to "destroy" this universe to do away with evil, really, that's your answer?God is offering the people who want to get out of the evil, the chance to join Him in the new universe He is setting up. - Makes no sense, see XinXan's post, and the very chapter of Revealations itself is regarded as Symolic, not to be taken literally, just like Genesis. I advise you to take theology...God, in the offer of freedom, is allowing people the opportunity to remain in the evil, by not believing in and accepting Him, so they essentially are destroyed right along with the rest of the evil when He completely dissolves this universe. - Again, see XinXan's post, by God allowing evil, that means he himself is not good.Where do you want to be? destroyed with the evil? or saved with the good? If you want to be saved with the good, you better start believing in God the right way. Otherwise you are being evil, and will be destroyed with the rest of the evil, as you have asked, by remaining in unbelief regarding God. - Again, see XinXan's post.The purpose of XinXan's questions and the answers are there to illustrate that: God either doesn't exist, isn't "god"(Can't do all things), or he's not a good "god". There's 3 answers and XinXan described it perfectly. P.S. None of BADecker's statements made sense, at all. And with that, so long. There's no further point in discussing this. |
|
|
|
think that last train for LTC will be next year BTC halving if price goes up on BTC if not LTC will go on 1 cent price for coin.
That's utter nonsense. What has the price of an inactive and mostly abandonned project (like LTC) to do with a Bitcoin reward halving? The answer is nothing. It's not even sure, if LTC will still be a Top 30 coin until then. Like darkota said, they arent connected anymore and rightly so. Very true |
|
|
|
The 3 basic reasons to wipe Religion off the face of the Earth(There are countless more):
1) Religion only causes intolerance, mistrust, hate, divide, and cruelty
2) No one religion is right, they all have followers that fervently believe theirs and theirs only is true(Which confesses to the logical assumption that none is true)
3) God(s) does not exist
Hey peoples in this thread! We have an atheist here C'mon theres so many proof God exist Quite the opposite. The data against God's existence far outweighs the "data"(If you classify people's opinions and bind faith as data) for God's existence. |
|
|
|
|
The 3 basic reasons to wipe Religion off the face of the Earth(There are countless more):
1) Religion only causes intolerance, mistrust, hate, divide, and cruelty
2) No one religion is right, they all have followers that fervently believe theirs and theirs only is true(Which confesses to the logical assumption that none is true)
3) God(s) does not exist
|
|
|
|
BADecker: I challenge you to a duel, my knowledge of the emerald tablet's against your bible in a friendly fitbaw match, our turn, being the ball? Hopfully the admins will send us a percentage of the bets as a donation lol, just for the increased trafic  Edit: You start the thread, so as not to hijack, let's see what we know? Not interested. It's enough to know: "In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth." There was a great universal war between the "angels" of God, and "fallen angels" of Satan. This war brought the whole universe to disorder. The dregs of "material" coalesced in what the Genesis calls "the Earth." From that point, God Himself rebuilt the universe in a period of 6 days. He also made mankind in the form of our first two original ancestors. Moses figured out the basic truths about our beginning. He wrote it down in the first 5 books of the Bible. Obviously, the info in these books doesn't cover even a fraction of the knowledge that is out there. But it covers the things that people need to know to live a reasonable life on earth, and to be saved from death to eternal life. Whatever God is, He developed in less than one day the complicated life that we know as mankind. He actually "breathed" a portion of Himself into the first man, so that mankind actually has a touch of God in himself. Fill up on the themes of the Bible. Anything other than that will not produce beneficial results. Nobody can create mankind except God, Himself. Nobody can breathe the Spirit of God into man's nostrils so that man becomes a living soul. Neither you, nor I, nor anyone else needs anything more than the themes of the Bible for eternal life. In Genesis, it never says that God created the universe after the "universal war" between the angels and satan/followers. Also, it's clear you've never taken theology(Which all priests are required to do). To be honest, you should just stop talking BADecker. Even the priest at my local church would frown/laugh at what you've written. The Genesis portion of the bible is considered by most biblical historians to be Symbolic, and not literal, especially since back when these chapters were supposedly written, there Were No 24 hour Day Calendars aka The gregorian calendar did not exist yet, which is why "God creating the universe is 6 days" is regarded as Symbolic. You and whoever else believes that God created the world in 6 days is an idiot, and truly needs to go back to school. From that you can also see just how much the bible has been edited over the centuries(Genesis was edited), and why most of the things in there are symbolic or simply false. Literally every sentence you write makes me feel like you dropped out of school in 3rd grade BADecker. At least research before you come up with bullshit that not even fellow christians would accept. Blah, blah, blah, blah. Any time you decide to take a look at the way things are written the Bible, you will see that the Bible distinguishes between literal and figurative, right in the language it uses. So, when jokers like you yakety yak like this, it can absolutely be expected. You don't have a clue about what you are yacking. First off, the bible does not clearly distinguish(Excluding many of Jesus's parables) between what may be metaphorical, symbolic, or literal. Second off, as I said before, The 24 hour/day 365 year Calendar, was not made until the 1500s. This means that the Genesis Portion of the bible where it says god created everything in 6 days is incorrect(edited?) or symbolic. Either one, because they did not have 24 hour "days" back then as we do now. If you're gonna argue, at least try and dont look like a fool. |
|
|
|
it is taking a big beating. but did you see the pump on it when people thought bitcoin was going to rise? it still had a lot of life.
to know for sure the situation of whether litecoin is really capable or not of rising back up, we will just have to see how it does with Bitcoin's next pump.
I don't own any and don't plan on it, but there could still be life left in it. Regardless of what CMC says, to me it is still the real #2.
Litecoin detached from Bitcoin more than a year ago once the community finally released ltc was nothing but a bitcoin clone(especially when ASIC's were made for it, defeating the whole purpose of litecoin existing in the first place). During Bitcoin's rise last may/june of 2014, Litecoin did not rise with it(It continued going down in price). try hate to see it but its try think that last train for LTC will be next year BTC halving if price goes up on BTC if not LTC will go on 1 cent price for coin. LTC price isnt connected to BTC at all anymore. Its only downhill forevermore. |
|
|
|
BADecker: I challenge you to a duel, my knowledge of the emerald tablet's against your bible in a friendly fitbaw match, our turn, being the ball? Hopfully the admins will send us a percentage of the bets as a donation lol, just for the increased trafic Edit: You start the thread, so as not to hijack, let's see what we know? Not interested. It's enough to know: "In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth." There was a great universal war between the "angels" of God, and "fallen angels" of Satan. This war brought the whole universe to disorder. The dregs of "material" coalesced in what the Genesis calls "the Earth." From that point, God Himself rebuilt the universe in a period of 6 days. He also made mankind in the form of our first two original ancestors. Moses figured out the basic truths about our beginning. He wrote it down in the first 5 books of the Bible. Obviously, the info in these books doesn't cover even a fraction of the knowledge that is out there. But it covers the things that people need to know to live a reasonable life on earth, and to be saved from death to eternal life. Whatever God is, He developed in less than one day the complicated life that we know as mankind. He actually "breathed" a portion of Himself into the first man, so that mankind actually has a touch of God in himself. Fill up on the themes of the Bible. Anything other than that will not produce beneficial results. Nobody can create mankind except God, Himself. Nobody can breathe the Spirit of God into man's nostrils so that man becomes a living soul. Neither you, nor I, nor anyone else needs anything more than the themes of the Bible for eternal life. In Genesis, it never says that God created the universe after the "universal war" between the angels and satan/followers. Also, it's clear you've never taken theology(Which all priests are required to do). To be honest, you should just stop talking BADecker. Even the priest at my local church would frown/laugh at what you've written. The Genesis portion of the bible is considered by most biblical historians to be Symbolic, and not literal, especially since back when these chapters were supposedly written, there Were No 24 hour Day Calendars aka The gregorian calendar did not exist yet, which is why "God creating the universe is 6 days" is regarded as Symbolic. You and whoever else believes that God created the world in 6 days is an idiot, and truly needs to go back to school. From that you can also see just how much the bible has been edited over the centuries(Genesis was edited), and why most of the things in there are symbolic or simply false. Literally every sentence you write makes me feel like you dropped out of school in 3rd grade BADecker. At least research before you come up with bullshit that not even fellow christians would accept. |
|
|
|
|
People like Vlad2Vlad are admirable. They're the type of people that help change the world. However, Vlad's loyalty are for the wrong coins. As other users have said, Maxcoin has been given up on. .
It is absolutely foolish to buy any more maxcoin at this point. More than a year later and Maxcoin still has not have had any development on it, no marketing, nothing. It's dead. Move on to other coins with actual, potential, futures and spread your enthusiasm there. Stop wasting your time on coins like these.
And no, I'm not trying to "secretly" buy any maxcoin, I just see you constantly posting on threads of dead coins like these(ix for ex) and it's a huge waste of your time, and money if you're actually buying these coins.
|
|
|
|
What if this is the afterlife? Reincarnation is a popular belief.
As history has shown us with religious beliefs, they almost always tend to be false(As they were used to expain things people couldn't understand, such as the concept of souls being used in europe to give meaning to the human mind) |
|
|
|
|
There is likely no afterlife, which is why we must cherish the life we have for as long as possible.
|
|
|
|
it is taking a big beating. but did you see the pump on it when people thought bitcoin was going to rise? it still had a lot of life.
to know for sure the situation of whether litecoin is really capable or not of rising back up, we will just have to see how it does with Bitcoin's next pump.
I don't own any and don't plan on it, but there could still be life left in it. Regardless of what CMC says, to me it is still the real #2.
Litecoin detached from Bitcoin more than a year ago once the community finally released ltc was nothing but a bitcoin clone(especially when ASIC's were made for it, defeating the whole purpose of litecoin existing in the first place). During Bitcoin's rise last may/june of 2014, Litecoin did not rise with it(It continued going down in price). |
|
|
|
|
So, every now and then I see a post about the beauty of a decentralized exchange. Well here's the thing. You can't get USD on a Decentralized Exchange, adding new coins to trade will always be a headache, and since there won't be any censorship, scamming with new, random, 2 day old altcoins will be abundant, among other things
Decentralized Exchanges sound good in theory, but in practice it just isn't plausible.
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, people who have steeped themselves in a particular religion, mostly find it difficult to set it aside when they find out it is a false religion.
Can you compile a list for us all of all these false religions? How do you recognise a false religion? No, I probably couldn't. I would probably miss at least a few. Besides, I don't have the time that it would take to investigate and compile. You could probably search Wikipedia for a list of main ones. Well, with Christianity all around you, and with all the talk about the Bible I have been doing in this thread, start there, the Bible, and ask God to direct you on your journey into this kind of religious seeking. But you have to be sincere in your testing for God. Ask Him to prove Himself to you if He really exists. But do it from the standpoint of really asking sincerely. He doesn't cater to people who are simply playing around or attempting to mock Him. I would be particularly interested to hear you respond *directly* to his question about how you are able to recognize a false religion. The direct instructions for such would probably be similar to the instructions Moses gave the people of Israel for determining if a prophet was a prophet of the Lord, or a false prophet. This would be to match the things that he said with what happened. You could say similar about matching a religion with the way things work. In fact, in this and other threads, I have been pointing out that the things we call science don't always match all the scientific ideas that should be applied to them. A lot of what we call science (I'm not talking about pure science, or the scientific method, here) simply doesn't have enough information behind it to say that it is absolute truth, or often very near the truth. The Bible is full of prophecies that were fulfilled. There are others that have not been fulfilled yet. Other religions have few prophecy listings, and few that are fulfilled. One of the greatest prophesies of the Bible that has been fulfilled is that of the fall of Israel as a nation because they disobeyed God. The fall lasted around 1,900 years. They have only come back according to other prophesy, and not with the glory that they held in the past. Are you joking? Those "prophecies" are general and anyone with an IQ over 83 can make them. The roman empire fell, the byzantine empire fell, etc and etc, all of which were far, far more powerful than Israel could ever dreamed of being back then. All empires eventually fall, so that prophecy about Israel falling is laughable(I actually made a smirk when I was reading what you typed). Now everyone reading this can fully conclude that everything you've said has been bullshit with this statement: "One of the greatest prophesies of the Bible that has been fulfilled is that of the fall of Israel as a nation because they disobeyed God. The fall lasted around 1,900 years" Thank you for typing that. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
